9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Ecce Homo: Why It’s Great to be Labeled a “Person” Clifford Nass Stanford University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Social Animal Man is by nature a social animal; an animal who is unsocial naturally and not accidentally is either beneath our notice or more than.
Advertisements

Cognitive Systems, ICANN panel, Q1 What is machine intelligence, as beyond pattern matching, classification and prediction. What is machine intelligence,
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Why Do We Study Psychology? Psychology is the study of behavior and mental processes. Behavior is any action that can be observed or measured. Behavior.
Working Models Self in relation to others.. Working Models  Primary assumption of attachment theory is that humans form close bonds in the interest of.
Example of Stimuli Used in Asch's Study Participants agreed with the majority approximately 37% of the time.
Research Methods & Approaches
Reflection on Adolescent Playfulness Marianne B. Staempfli Ph.D. Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies.
Learning new uses of technology: Situational goal orientation matters Presenter: Che-Yu Lin Advisor: Min-Puu Chen Date: 03/09/2009 Loraas, T., & Diaz,
At What Cost Pervasive? A social computing view of mobile computing systems By: D.C.Dryer, C. Eisbach, and W.S. Ark IBM Systems Journal, online Presentation.
September 14,  Induction Swan 1 is white Swan 2 is white Swan 3 is white… All swans are white.  Sir Karl Popper ( ) Induction can’t prove.
Introduction to Cognitive Science Philosophy Nov 2005 :: Lecture #1 :: Joe Lau :: Philosophy HKU.
Using the Web to Enhance Critical Thinking About Psychology Connie Varnhagen.
Empirical Methods in Human- Computer Interaction.
Effect of Shared-attention for Human- Robot Interaction Junji Yamato NTT Communication Science Labs., NTT Corp. Japan Kazuhiko Shinozawa, Futoshi.
May 3, 2005Time Warner/AOL CHIMe Lab Communication between Humans and Interactive Media: Clifford Nass Stanford University.
Liberal democracy liberal – individual rights, social equality democracy – participation of people in decisions that govern their lives.
Biointelligence Laboratory School of Computer Science and Engineering Seoul National University Cognitive Robots © 2014, SNU CSE Biointelligence Lab.,
Week 1: Introduction to Social Psychology
Attribution and media representations. Outline of attribution theory Human beings want to understand the world – Evolutionary advantages Events and human.
Social Psychology: Seeks to explain how our thoughts, feelings, perceptions, and behaviors are influenced by interactions with others Social Cognition:
Nov 10, 2008 Relationship between effective reading and human-computer interaction Barbora Drobíková and Richard Papík.
Design dilemma (Clark & Mayer, e-Learning, chapter 3, pp ) VP thinks a short course should just consist of text and tells course designer: “Everything.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Chemistry. I. Chemistry A. Definition: study of composition of matter and changes to it B. Matter: material making up everything.
This is a quiet activity. Read the question. THINK of the answer. Never yell out your answer.
Contents Cognitive Psychology What is Cognitive Psychology? Assumptions Methods of Investigation Core Studies from Cognitive Psychology - Loftus and Palmer.
Experimental Psychology PSY 433 Chapter 13 Social Psychology.
1 Science as a Process Chapter 1 Section 2. 2 Objectives  Explain how science is different from other forms of human endeavor.  Identify the steps that.
Chapter 2 Doing Social Psychology Research. Why Should You Learn About Research Methods?  It can improve your reasoning about real-life events  This.
1/59 Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship Clifford Nass Stanford University.
Manipulation. EVERYTHING we see, hear, or read in the media is manipulated. Cameras, microphones and computers (typewriters for the old folk) do not occur.
Social Psychology. The branch of psychology that studies how people think, feel, and behave in social situations.
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH SCIENCE??.  Think about this activity and how it relates to science and the way we go about making sense of the world.
Communicating in Small Groups. What is a Group? A small group is: At least 3, but not more than 15 people, Who interact and communicate with one another;
IT 와 인간의 만남 KAIST 지식서비스공학과 Experimental Research KSE966/986 Seminar Uichin Lee Sept. 21, 2012.
Agents and User Interfaces Marti Hearst SIMS 213, UI Design & Development April 29, 1999.
Section 6: The Experiment: Hunting for Causes
RESEARCH METHODS Module 2.  What is the one easy way to improve a relationship?  What makes people do the same stupid things repeatedly?  Does emotional.
HIGHLIGHTS OF CHI 2000 Thomas G. Holzman, Ph.D. (404)
Research Methods in Psychology. Characteristic of scientific findings Data and Theories A. verifiable and accurately reported B. Made public C. built.
©2010 John Wiley and Sons Chapter 2 Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction Chapter 2- Experimental Research.
The Language of Science.  Hypothesis: a prediction that can be tested; an educated guess base on observations and prior knowledge  Theory: a well tested.
Science Terms TAKS Objective 1.
A2 Psychology of Sport Self confidence Booklet 4 Skills Working as a team Complete green group tasks Working as an individual Complete yellow individual.
Introduction to Psychology Critical Thinking, Research & Ethics.
RESEARCH METHODS Reminder: Topics Due Wednesday. THEORY Explanations –Connect & organize data –Framework for future research –Coherent story.
All or Nothing: Levels of Sociability of a Pedagogical Software Agent and its Impact on Student Perceptions and Learning. 報 告 人:張純瑋 Dirkin, K., Mishra,
RESEARCH METHODS IN INDUSTRIAL PSYCHOLOGY & ORGANIZATION Pertemuan Matakuliah: D Sosiologi dan Psikologi Industri Tahun: Sep-2009.
PSYCHOLOGY UNITS 1 & 2 ORIENTATION DAY 2015/2016.
1.3: Scientific Thinking & Processes Key concept: Science is a way of thinking, questioning, and gathering evidence.
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH SCIENCE??.  Think about this activity and how it relates to science and the way we go about making sense of the world.
HRI A3 - Bekey.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Research in Psychology.
Why study Psychology?  Perhaps by studying psychology we can get a better understanding of why people act the way they do, or maybe you want to learn.
Clifford Nass, B.J. Fogg, Youngme Moon ation_conformity.html.
Unraveling the Mystery of Chronic Pain
Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots (Cynthia Breazeal) Yumeng Liao.
Scientific Method.
Learning Objectives I can construct and organize data into tables.
Leadership and Mentoring
Make as many observations as you can.
The scientific study of mind and behavior
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Observation – gathering information using the senses Inference – making statements using observation as well as prior knowledge Hypothesis.
Cognitive Processes and Personality
Unit 1 Scientific Inquiry
Scientific Method.
Theoretical Perspectives of Personality
Science ACT Prep Class Research Summary.
Agents and User Interfaces
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
Presentation transcript:

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Ecce Homo: Why It’s Great to be Labeled a “Person” Clifford Nass Stanford University

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Three Stories Robot best friend Shylock –Bleed –Tickle –Poison –Eyes, hands, organs, dimensions, senses, affections, passions Dred Scott case

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Lessons to be Learned “Human” is nothing more than a label “Human”: not ontological “Human”: psychological and social

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Does the Label Matter? Not philosophical question Is experimental question

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Findings –Funny people are: Smarter More likable More friendly Does not harm performance –Even applies in task situations

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Variables –Independent variables Successful humor vs. no humor HCI vs. CMC –Dependent variables Perception of interactant Behavior Smiling responses

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Likable

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Cooperation

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Actual Task Time

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Joking

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Smiling

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Humor — Implications Profoundly human behaviors are acceptable on computers People will be verbally friendly to computers CMC is basically the same, but –More jokes –More smiles! Cognitive construction of person

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Adaptation: Findings Humans: Adaptation is universal Computers: Adaptation is uncommon –Hard problem –Focus on Technology Precision of measurement

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Possible processes Social facilitation –Confident people do better when observed –Non-confident people do worse Stress –Opposite of social facilitation Which explanation applies to: –human-computer interaction? –Human-human interaction?

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Method Computer-based GRE (same for everyone) IVs –Confidence in prior GRE performance High Low –Adaptation No adaptation Ostensibly adapts based on previous questions

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE CMC

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE HCI

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Performance on the GRE

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Human label influences response to adaptation –Social facilitation in CMC –Choking in HCI Rarity effects?

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Animated Representations Conformity pressure is powerful –Informative –Normative Appearance is powerful

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Method Choice-dilemma questionnaire Representation –Text box –Stick figure –Rich animated figure (Ostensible) Interactant –HCI –CMC

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Traditional CMC

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Animated “People”

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Intelligence of Agent

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Public Conformity

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Representation matters in HCI Representation matters in CMC! –Was that the mental construction? TTS evidence –Can’t draw general conclusions about faces, characters, etc. CMC exerts great social influence

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Visible Agents What happens when agents are indistinguishable from humans? –Distinction disappears or –Label makes a difference Expectancy Theory: Everything should match its label

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Labeling: Findings Expectation of consistency with label –Better than expected: Great! –Worse than expected: Awful!

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Demo Human Slide51.human.movSlide51.human.mov or Synthetic Slide51.synthetic.movSlide51.synthetic.mov

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Context Auction Site Human-looking or agent-looking “Human” or “Agent”

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Bidding Behavior

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Implications Labels matter Appearance matters Humans are held to higher standard

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Summary – Part I Turning Turing Test on its head –“Human” is not ontological –Not “Is it human” but “if it’s human, now what?” HCI does NOT equal social interaction But what about “Media Equation”? –Cognitive construction may be at the critical determinant

9/29/01Human-Robot Interaction Final Question Will robots ever be labeled “human”?