Overview and Guidelines for... SOA/NPAC, Internal and Inter- carrier testing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) March 15, 2005 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Nextel Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint.
Advertisements

1 Number Portability Administration Center Change Orders NANC 399 & NANC 400 NANC Meeting March 15, 2005 Tom McGarry NeuStar, Inc.
North American Numbering Council Billing & Collection Working Group DRAFT November 30, 2006 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Sprint Nextel Jim Castagna, Verizon.
NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) November 30, 2006 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Sprint Nextel Natalie McNamer, T-Mobile Karen Riepenkroger,
Number Resource Optimization Working Group Report to NANC July 18-19, 2000 Brian Baldwin, SBC Beth ODonnell, Cox Communications Eleanor Willis-Camara,
FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Rosemarie Day Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Thursday, May 8, 2008 Operations Report Current Priorities and Future Plans.
North American Portability Management LLC 1 NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION.
This information is current as of 11/17/2004 and is subject to change- Verizon Wireless 1 Local Number Portability.
UNC Modification Proposal Revised Timescales for LDZ Shrinkage Arrangements Simon Trivella – 25 th September 2008 Distribution Workstream.
3 Dec 2003Market Operations Standing Committee1 Market Rule and Change Management Consultation Process John MacKenzie / Darren Finkbeiner / Ella Kokotsis,
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) January 19, 2005 Co-Chairs: Rosemary Emmer, Nextel Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint.
Version 4.0 NOTE: For a more detailed description of each process step within these flows, please refer to the accompanying Inter-Service Provider LNP.
Making the difference to your business Employee Consultation Forum Meeting 24 th July 2012.
Monthly Updates to Presort Data. Agenda What is Presort Data? History of Update Schedule Important Terms to Understand The New Schedule Transition to.
Direct Access to Numbers Trial Limits, Results & Conclusions Of the Six-Month Technical Trial John Visclosky June 17, 2014 NANC Meeting FCC Headquarters.
TUG Chair Report Report for the Fiscal Year of 1999.
OBF Report to the NANC July Report of Local Number Portability Efforts Presented to the NANC by the Alliance for Telecommunications Industry Solutions’
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #53 meeting June 28, 2006 Cathie CapitaRobert Schafer NIIF Co Chair.
6/5/011 NPAC SMS BUSINESS DAYS/HOURS & TIMERS. 6/5/012 CONCEPTS Porting and Concurrence Business days Business hours Timers Service Provider profile.
2011 Theme: Power Up Your Potential Detroit Chapter General Body Meeting September 15, 2012.

Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Resolutions San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Stanley Faust.
Line Graph- a graph that uses a line to show the relationship between two sets of data. Line graphs show how data changes over time.
Version 3.0 North American Numbering Council (NANC) Inter-Service Provider LNP Operations Flows NOTE: For a more detailed description of each process step.
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #61 meeting February 8, 2008 Todd Rodgers Robert Schafer NIIF Co Chair.
Mismatch Is end-user porting all telephone numbers? New Service Provider notifies Old Service Provider of change using Local Service Request (LSR) Old.
Mismatch NNSP sends porting LSR to ONSP to port number. End-user Contact End-user agrees to change to New Service Provider (NLSP) NLSP obtains end-user.
Community Capability: Adoption of dementia friendly practices through all community sectors, resulting in: Increased community awareness Increased services.
1 NIIF Summary Report Activities since the NIIF #35 meeting October 18, 2002 Stu Goldman – NIIF Moderator
Grants and Contracts Jim Butterfield and Kathy Blackwood October 5, 2004.
Outage Scheduler Transition Plan Kenneth Ragsdale NATF.
Wireless Number Portability Subcommittee Wireless Pooling Alternative Evaluation June 22, 1999.
Strategic Planning Deanna Herwald Vice President-Quality Management Systems.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG) March 24, 2016 Co-Chairs: Laura Dalton, Verizon Karen Riepenkroger, Sprint 03/24/20161.
ICC Industry Advisory Committee Purpose and Scope The purpose of the Industry Advisory Committee (IAC) is to promote, in cooperation with the International.
Power of Choice (PoC) Program Overview
Introducing ASPR’s Coalition Surge Tool
Report to RMS July 14, 2004.
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
NANC Report Numbering Oversight Working Group (NOWG)
SPS Project Benefits Advocates Web Series #1: Intro to SPS Benefits Project June 4, 2015.
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
NAPM LLC MEMBERSHIP INTRODUCTION
HITSP Project 2007 Work Plan and Schedule Contract HHSP EC
New Orleans Hospitality Outlook
Revised engagement approach for draft GTAC
FY 2019 Close Schedule Bi-Weekly Payroll governs close schedule
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Coordinate Operations Standard
2016 T&D Conference Technical Co-chairs: Shay Bahramirad, ComEd
NPA 450/579 (Area Code) Relief in Quebec
NPA 403/587/780/825 (Area Code) Relief in Alberta
IEEE 802 EC Privacy Recommendation SG November, 2014, Report to 802 EC
12 May 2008 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: IGTHz reduced meeting schedule proposal.
JUNE 2010 CALENDAR PROJECT PLANNING 1 Month MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY
Coexistence CG Chair’s Report to the Singapore Meeting
Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Industry Numbering Committee (INC) Report to the NANC
Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2
Task Group N Schedule March 15, 2004
Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.
Presentation transcript:

Overview and Guidelines for... SOA/NPAC, Internal and Inter- carrier testing

SOA Testing n May 1, 2001 to September 30, 2001 n Must be coordinated through Neustar n Not a topic for discussion in this forum

Internal (intra-company) testing n Timeframe – Now to September 30, 2001 – Guidelines on Section of industry test plan – Once the intra-company testing of affected nodes and network, and the certification testing with the Number Portability Administration Center (NPAC) is successfully completed, the Test Coordinator will schedule inter-company testing. Prior to initiating the inter-company testing, all intra-company testing must be completed by the individual Service Providers.

Inter-carrier testing n Excerpt from Industy test document Section n “Each Service Provider will conduct a set of test scripts between itself and another service provider. Specific combinations of participants will be determined by the participants themselves, using the recommended list defined in Section 3…. Participants may choose to run additional tests developed by individual Service Provider combinations that address any specific needs, architectures or business arrangements of the testing partners. n Service Providers participating in a particular location will negotiate for test partners and test selections. Their Test Coordinators will manage this process by developing a master test schedule and track the testing done in each location by each Service Provider”

Wireless/Wireline porting n Any porting between wireless and wireline will default to wireline “long” timers

Wireless/wireline porting n SHORT n WPR form n Hours of operation - will be discussed later n ICC time – 30 minutes n NPAC T1/T2 timer- – 1 hr each n LONG n LSR form n Hours of operation- n will be discussed later n ICC time – 24 hour n NPAC T1/T2 Timer – 9 hours each

Reseller porting n Facility based provider is responsible for NPAC communication for its reseller n FB provider’s SPID will be on the NPAC record n Responsibility for ICC process is determined by each carrier

Reseller/Facility based provider porting Wireless to Wireless Assumption: For a complex port it is assumed that coordination is complete before step 1. step 1 WPR step 2 WPRC step 3 Notification step 3 Notification step 4a SV Create NLSP OLSP NLSP NNSP ONSP NNSP NPAC

Reseller/Facility based provider porting Wireless to Wireless Assumption: For a complex port it is assumed that coordination is complete before step 1. step 4b SV Match step 5 activate download step 6a completion step 6b completion ONSP NPAC NNSP NPAC NNSP NLSP ONSP OLSP

WNP Industry Test Plan n CTIA Number Advisory Working Group Intercarrier test plan (Version 1.0) – Section 1 - Scope/Purpose, Assumptions n vertical services not included, only tested as agreed between providers n “black box” testing approach n only concerned with LNP compliance n after porting business as usual, no degradation to system n no vendors mentioned in test plan

WNP Industry Test Plan n Impacts to system by LNP  Porting Order Exchange  Service Provisioning  Exception Processing – Order Cancellation  Disconnected TN Snapback  Call Flows  911 Record Changes  Operator Services  Inter-service provider billing

WNP Industry test plan n Section 2 - Network configuration requirements/consideration n STP, SCP, SSP, SOA/LSMS requirements n Section 3 - Test Planning – Test coordinator, manager roles/resp – Documenting results – Test matrix (Appx. A)

WNP Industry test plan n Section 4 - Test cases – 4.0 Provisioning cases (9 tests) – 4.1 Wireless/Wireless test cases (36 tests) – 4.2 Wireless/Wireline test cases (16 tests) – 4.3 Wireline/Wireless test cases (16 tests) – 4.4 Enhanced services (4 tests) – TOTAL = 81 possible tests – Description, procedure, results for each case

WNP Industry test plan n Appendices: – Appendix A Test matrix – Appendix B Support drawings – Appendix C Entry checklist – Appendix D Exit checklist – Appendix E Sample forms – Appendix F Test successful criteria – Appendix G Related documents – Appendix H Glossary of terms

Test coordination n MSA # n Test coordinators from each SP will schedule inter-carrier testing dates from this info – CompanyDate ready for testing – Company A (11/15/01) – Company B (12/12/01) – Company C (10/01/01)

Future Meetings n 1 year until testing should be complete – June 2001 to May 2002 – propose 12 monthly face to face meetings the week before WNPO (2 day meetings) – 12 monthly conference calls (1/2 day meetings) – other ad-hoc meetings can be scheduled as needed

Next Meeting Dates n Face to Face (2001) n Tues & Wed week before WNPO – June 5,6 Arlington, VA (Telecorp) – July 5 (no face-to-face, conf call) – Aug 7,8 Denver, CO (Qwest Wireless*) – Sep 4,5 Seattle, WA (Voicestream or Triton PCS*) – Oct 2,3 Dallas,TX (Cingular) – Nov 6,7 Atlanta, GA (Cingular) – Dec 4,5 Sprint PCS or – Telcordia* n WNPO – June Kansas City, MO – July 9-10 Ottawa – Aug Seattle, WA – Sept Baltimore, MD – Oct 8-9 San Antonio, TX – Nov New Orleans, LA – Dec Phoenix, AZ

Next Meeting Dates n Conf Calls (2 weeks after face-to-face) – TIME: 12 PM - 4 PM (Eastern) – May 24, 2001 – June 21, 2001 – July 5, 2001 (due to holiday) – July 19, 2001 – August 23, 2001 – September 20, 2001 – October 18, 2001 – November 29, 2001 – December - cancelled