CIVITAS Open Academy Ljubljana 15 April 2010 Eric N. SchrefflerProf Tom Rye, Transport ConsultantEdinburgh Napier San Diego, California, USAUniversity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

Smarter Choices – changing travel behaviour through soft policies Dr Sally Cairns Senior Research Fellow TRL and UCL ECOMM 2005:
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Prof. R. Shanthini 09 Feb 2013 Source: Winner: Ahmedabad, India In only a few months of.
Tom Fairchild The R&D initiative of Arlington County Commuter Services.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
The Swedish delegation presents: LundaMaTs - an integrated effort of creating a sustainable environmentally friendly car traffic in the city of Lund.
CONGESTION PRICING Traffic Solution or Tax Scheme?
Alternative Transportation: Carpooling at Niagara College
Transportation’s share of our carbon footprint Transportation is growing faster than other sectors, accounted for half the growth in emissions from
Sustainable Transport Management at Local Level: The ARCHIMEDES Project Mette Skamris Holm, City of Aalborg Coordinator ARCHIMEDES The Single Market Act.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Umeå:s positive experiences with CIVITAS and how we would like to continue the work!
© Trivector MORE THAN JUST PARKING – MM IN EARLY STAGES ECOMM Utrecht, May 2015 Caroline Mattsson, Trivector
A Very Big Experiment Congestion Charging in London Peter Jones Transport Studies Group University of Westminster.
Promoting Sustainability through Mobility Management Concepts, Belgian Experience Bart Desmedt General manager Traject.
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
1 Providing Commute Choices to Employees Krute Singa.
CIVITAS ELAN Open Academy Ljubljana 16 April 2010 Eric N. SchrefflerTom Rye, PhD Transport ConsultantNapier Edinburgh San Diego, California, USAUniversity.
Auckland’s Travel Demand Initiatives Sustainable Mobility & Healthy Communities Summit 2014.
Sustainable Mobility in Central Asia A call for vision, integrated planning and resources Guido Bruggeman Chief Technical Advisor of UNDP/GEF Project “City.
The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Law.  The CTR Law requires major employers - in Urban Growth Areas throughout Washington - to implement an employee.
Connie Ruth, EPA Best Workplaces for Commuters The Advantages of Excellent Commuter Benefits Why your University or College Should Achieve the Best Workplaces.
Enter Presentation Name Public Works Transportation Division ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Hamilton, Ontario Transit Plenary November, 7, 2012.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
GoBerkeley 1 goBerkeley: Integrating TDM and Parking Management into Downtown Berkeley Monday, October 28 th, 2013 Steer Davies Gleave 970 – 355 Burrard.
Transportation 101 June 12, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  GG & C Bus Company, Inc.  Mid Mon Valley Transit.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
ECOMM 2007 Conference highlights and what's next? Christer Ljungberg, Trivector Traffic.
GeniUS! Challenge #4 - Utilising footfall & transport 15/3/12 Andy D’Agorne.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Transportation 101 August 7, Presenting Agencies  Southwestern PA Commission’s CommuteInfo program  IndiGO: Indiana County Transit Authority 
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
Managing Travel Demand – Making the Health Connection Results from European Scanning Trip Presented at: Healthy Regions, Healthy People Lake Arrowhead,
Draft Transportation 2035 Plan for the San Francisco Bay Area ACT February 24, 2009.
Write down one word that comes into your thought when you read the following word: 15 Feb 2008 R. Shanthini Transport.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
2004 State of the Commute Survey: Assessing the Impacts of Regional Transportation Demand Management National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board.
Alameda County Transportation Services – CCBA Panel Reducing Our Carbon Footprint from Transportation Phillip Kobernick, Alameda County General Services.
GCAA Feb 17, Results 1.2 million miles of travel 600 tons of air pollution Each day these efforts reduce: Currently partnering with more than 1650.
Transportation 101 February 18, CommuteInfo Introducing… a better way to work.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
NBTN – Mainstreaming sustainable business travel in the UK The National Business Travel Network Mainstreaming sustainable business travel in the UK Context,
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
The London Congestion Charge Past, present and future… Lauren Sager Weinstein Chief of Staff, Finance and Planning Transport for London.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
Nottingham Workplace Parking Levy Sue Flack Director for Planning and Transport.
WELCOME! Employer Transportation Coordinator (ETC) Training Part 1: Orientation to the Commute Trip Reduction Law.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
WELCOME! Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Survey Briefing.
Part One PRICING AND INSTITUTIONAL STRATEGIES TO MANAGE DEMAND MANAGING TRAVEL DEMAND TO MITIGATE CONGESTION donpeat.com.
Sustainability Programs
SOME PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR TRANSPORT EMISSIONS
“To inspire and influence the evolution of integrated mobility”
Lorain County Transit Needs Assessment
Presentation transcript:

CIVITAS Open Academy Ljubljana 15 April 2010 Eric N. SchrefflerProf Tom Rye, Transport ConsultantEdinburgh Napier San Diego, California, USAUniversity Edinburgh, UK Travel Demand Management: International Experience

Overview TDM in the U.S. TDM in Latin America TDM in Japan TDM in Italy TDM in the Netherlands TDM in Sweden Final thoughts Ljubljana Workshop

Conversions used in this presentation 1 pound (lb) = 0.45kg 1 US gallon = 3.6 litres 1 mile = 1.6km VMT – vehicle mile travelled 1 pound (lb) = 0.45kg 1 US gallon = 3.6 litres 1 mile = 1.6km VMT – vehicle mile travelled

TDM IN THE U.S. Employer Participation in Reducing Car Travel Ljubljana Workshop

History of TDM in U.S. TDM has evolved in response to crises: World War II Individual Employer Efforts The Arab Oil Embargo Suburban Traffic Problems Air Pollution Traffic Congestion Gas Prices Global Climate Change Ljubljana Workshop

Seattle TDM Initiatives Commute Trip Reduction Law Extensive vanpool program Universal public transport pass Bicycle network Carsharing - Zipcar Corporate bus systems - Microsoft Ridesharing incentives – R-TRIP Telecommuting assistance Community-based TDM - Ljubljana Workshop

Commute Trip Reduction Law Washington State law enacted in 1991 Partnership of state, cities and employers Goal to reduce congestion, pollution and energy consumption Targets set to reduce VMT Requirements on worksites with 100+ workers Applies to 1,100 worksites in Washington State Companies survey employees annually Ljubljana Workshop

CTR Impacts Commuters making 26,000 fewer car trips Drive alone rate at CTR worksites down % in 1993 to 65.% in 2007 Washington State saw drive alone rate go down, only one of two among 50 states CTR commuters reduced 4000 tons of air pollution Reduced petrol consumption by about 7.9M gallons, saving over $23 million in fuel costs Ljubljana Workshop

CTR Impacts on Traffic Linking TDM and System Performance Without TDM I-5 in Seattle With TDM I-5 in Seattle Ljubljana Workshop

City of Redmond R-TRIP Redmond Trip Resource and Incentive Program Operated by City of Redmond for commuters Aim to reduce traffic congestion and improve AQ Offered to any Redmond resident or commuter Encourage bus use, ridesharing, bike, and walk Incentive is one-time $50, then chance at drawings One month free bus pass for new users Extra incentives for vanpoolers Ljubljana Workshop

Each day equals a chance to be entered in a prize draw. Logged on gortrip.com R-TRIP Incentive Calendar Ljubljana Workshop

Cumulative Impacts CO 2 REDUCED: 34,950,280 lbs FUEL SAVED: 1,593,428 gallons TRAVEL SAVED: 37,126,880 miles VEHICLE TRIPS SAVED: 1,244,159 trips (since May 2008) Ljubljana Workshop

Carsharing Widespread in Europe (Germany, Switzerland) 60,000 members and 900 vehicles in U.S. (2004) Some members get rid of 2 nd car Daily Impacts: (San Francisco Evaluation) Average reduction of 7 parking spaces demanded per carshare vehicle Average net reduction of 5 VMT per carshare member per day 0.75 lb of CO2 emissions reduced per carshare member per day

TDM IN LATIN AMERICA DOING MORE WITH LESS Ljubljana Workshop

TDM Initiatives in Latin America Vision plan in Guatemala City Bus Rapid Transit Ciclovia – closing streets for active transport Car Free Days – Bogotá No Drive Days – Mexico City Ljubljana Workshop

Guatemala City Part of Mayor’s 2020 Plan: “A City for Living” with three goals: 1.Social solidarity 2.Environmental responsibility 3.Economic competitiveness Transmetro and Pasos y Pedales part of Mayor Alvaro Arzu’s plan Ljubljana Workshop

Transmetro – Guatemala City BRT - dedicated busway on arterial median Ljubljana Workshop

Transmetro – Guatemala City Benefits Reduces travel time by 20% Few buses needed overall Safer Fares did not substantially increase Runner up to London and Paris for 2008 Sustainable Transport Award Ljubljana Workshop

Active Transport: Pasos y Pedales Part of Plan in Guatemala City Part of international Ciclovia movement Close five streets to traffic every Sunday from 10:00 to 14:00 Ljubljana Workshop

TDM IN JAPAN PERSONALIZED TRAVEL PLANNING Ljubljana Workshop

TDM Initiatives in Japan TDM is rather new in Japan Not well known by policy-makers Innovations in Park-and-Ride Bicycling parking technology Educating students and licensed drivers on mobility management Compressed work weeks and staggered hours Personalized travel planning Ljubljana Workshop

Travel Feedback Programs One-on-one advice on sustainable travel behavior via survey, follow-up and tailored information and incentives Also called: Individualized marketing (Germany/US) Travel blending/travel smart (Australia) Personalized travel planning (UK) Japanese Travel Feedback Programs (TFPs) for: Residents (at home) Students (at school) Employees (at work place) Ljubljana Workshop

Travel Feedback Program Impacts Residential TFPs resulted in: – 7.3% % reduction in car use –increased public transport use 30% - 69% Work place TFPs resulted in: – 12% reduction in car use – 50% increase in public transport use –19% decrease in CO2 emissions Ljubljana Workshop

TDM IN ITALY URBAN MOBILITY POLICY Ljubljana Workshop

Integrating TDM into Urban Plan ROME MOBILITY POLICY Concentric Rings: Historic core: ZTL access control Rail ring: no non-catalyzed cars; parking pricing Green ring: parking management Ring road: higher polluters pay fee Outside ring: suburban park-and-ride Source: ATAC

TDM IN THE UK TRAVEL PLANS AND PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING TRAVEL PLANS AND PERSONALISED TRAVEL PLANNING

Workplace travel plans (MM) in UK Estimated that by 2007 in UK, travel plans in place for: 40% local authorities 50% colleges/universities 20% hospitals 10% businesses with more than 100 staff Travel plans required in all major new developments Impacts e.g. Wellcome Trust, 800 staff research institution near Cambridge – cut car use to 47% of trips Median cost – around €60/employee Estimated that by 2007 in UK, travel plans in place for: 40% local authorities 50% colleges/universities 20% hospitals 10% businesses with more than 100 staff Travel plans required in all major new developments Impacts e.g. Wellcome Trust, 800 staff research institution near Cambridge – cut car use to 47% of trips Median cost – around €60/employee

Personalised travel plans in UK Study of 16 schemes covering 80,000 households found average reduction in car driver trips of 11% and of car km of 12% Cost around 40€/household Study of 16 schemes covering 80,000 households found average reduction in car driver trips of 11% and of car km of 12% Cost around 40€/household

TDM IN THE NETHERLANDS FINANCIAL INCENTIVES Ljubljana Workshop

Financial Incentives Financial Incentives Amsterdam Ring Road Reconstruction of beltway around Amsterdam Comprehensive TDM program, including –Free transit pass “mobility card” for 30,000 area employees –Outreach campaign –Personal travel advice service –Camera images at major interchanges on website –Shuttle to rail station –Reduced parking cost at rail park-and-ride lots –Free use of bikes from rail station Increased transit share from 23% to 42% Decreased car share from 61% to 42% Rail share up even after reconstructed roads opened Ljubljana Workshop

TDM IN SWEDEN PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER – TDM AS PHILOSOPHY Ljubljana Workshop

Swedish TDM Initiatives National policy – 4-stage principle Broad implementation of TDM and MM Comprehensive and comparable evaluation of TDM measures (SUMO) Sustainable Urban Transport Planning – example: Lundamats Bicycle focus Travel plans BRT Mobility Center Land Use Ljubljana Workshop

Four-stage Principle Adopted by Swedish Road Administration in 2002 Requires consideration of TDM first Specific problems and road segments need to undergo step-wise evaluation to consider: Step 1-Measures that affect the demand for transport and the choice of mode Step 2-Measures that affect the more efficient use of the existing road network Step 3-Measures that make improvements to existing roads Step 4-Measures that make new investments in road capacity or major rebuilding Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden Sustainable Urban Transport Plan University town in SW Sweden 105,000 in urban area 25,000 commute into Lund 35,000 change at rail station 1969: decided against new arterial 1971: closed center to traffic Priority given to bike and walk Source: Trivector Traffic AB and City of Lund Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden Sustainable Urban Transport Plan (LundaMaTs) Lund Environmentally-friendly Transport 1. Introduction of sustainable planning 2. Recognition of bicycle city 3. Extended public transportation integrated with land use 4. Environmentally-friendly car traffic 5. Employer trip reduction Adopted in 1997 Source: Trivector Traffic AB Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden Implementation of LUNDAMATS Governmental co-funding of 4 projects Bicycle city Walk and bike to school The Lund Link – BRT system Mobility Centre More than $42 million over 6 years (35% from governmental funds) Goal to maintain 1995 traffic levels in 2005 Phase I ; Phase II initiated Source: Trivector Traffic AB Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden Acceptance of LUNDAMATS: How has it changed your behavior? Source: Trivector Traffic AB Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden Impact of LUNDAMATS: Comparing 1995 and 2005 per capita travel Ljubljana Workshop

LUND, Sweden LUNDAMATS: The Keys to Success Educate residents about sustainable travel Involve politicians early in the process Carefully and thoroughly evaluate both process and impacts Sources: Peter Jönsson and City of Lund Ljubljana Workshop

Final Thoughts TDM can be useful mitigation strategy at worksite, school or new development TDM is comprised of many measures, BUT… TDM is most effective when implemented as integrated packages (as with CIVITAS) TDM should be integrated into system operations TDM is a philosophy aimed at realizing a sustainable transport future Ljubljana Workshop

THANKS! Eric Schreffler Tom Rye Ljubljana Workshop