1 navigat OR – Oregon’s GIS Utility n An enterprise approach to information management based on partnerships with all Oregon governments navigatOR is accelerated.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 Joe Auriemma Siemens Medical Solutions, Health Services Senior Director, Integration Engineering Siemens Medical Solutions.
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
HB1438 Update & Statewide Capital Planning Initiative Office of State Finance Department of Central Services November 8, 2011.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level The Economy and Conservation Agendas:
National Ocean Service Budget Update for the NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel Glenn Boledovich, Chief NOS Policy, Planning and Analysis Division.
Proposal for an Oregon GIS Utility Executive Summary of Preliminary Business Case and Next Steps.
Think Resiliently Act Regionally Sustainable Communities Leadership Academy.
PMO Services RFP Overview Patty Fontneau ED and CEO.
Statewide GIS Coordination. Review of GIS stakeholders strategic plan State CIO office’s strategic plan sets goals for GIS office and council effective.
Florida GIS Coordination
Regents Update New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc March 17, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture An Update for the.
UC San Diego EH&S Staff Meeting Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc May 5, 2004 Update on the New Business Architecture EH&S Staff Meeting.
University of California New Business Architecture Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc April 15, 2004 Accelerating the New Business Architecture UC Employment.
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Vermelding onderdeel organisatie 1 Economic models for the development of Spatial Data Infrastructures Forum June 2004 Bastiaan van Loenen
What’s next in California's flood future? Finding answers: California Water Management Investment Strategy FEMA Region IX - CHARG Stakeholder Meeting July.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Local/State Data Sharing Partnership Action Plan.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
NavigatOR Oregon’s One Government Approach Geospatial Enterprise Office March 20, 2013 Oregon Department of Administrative Services Oregon Department of.
The West Virginia GIS Program: A Decade of Progress, A Future of Promise Craig A. Neidig WV State GIS Coordinator WV Geological & Economic Survey Chairman,
Visual 2.1 ICS Overview Unit 2 : ICS Overview. Visual 2.2 ICS Overview Unit Objectives Identify:  Three purposes of ICS.  Requirements to use ICS.
Integrating Natural Resource Information Systems Governor’s Natural Resource Cabinet July 23, 2008.
January THE ISSUE Launch Event. Leicester. THE ISSUE Traffic- Health- Environment. Intelligent Solutions Sustaining Urban Economies. Professor.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Finance and Administration OIR GIS Services State of Tennessee Enterprise GIS Regional Epi Meeting (Overview) Chris Meeks Office for.
The State of Kansas Data Access and Support Center (DASC)
GIS Day UWM Making the Case for GIS Coordination in Wisconsin David Mockert November 14, 2007.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Commonwealth IT Consolidation Background and Basic Talking Points (Update Title as Needed) Committee or Person Presenting Date MM/DD/YYYY.
Enterprise GIS Planning and Framework Jennifer Reek GIS Coordinator City of Brookfield, WI.
DRAFT – For Discussion Only HHSC IT Governance Executive Briefing Materials DRAFT April 2013.
1 Energy Efficiency & Utilities Sector March 2014 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE.
One map for Indiana. It’s statewide, it’s regional, it’s local, it’s yours!
Presenter’s Name June 17, 2003 Nationwide Perspective: Building a Nationwide Network for Public Safety Dusty Rhoads Office of Emergency Communications.
Historic Challenges with the State Budgeting Process Existing processes are inconsistent, highly manual and labor-intensive, and require duplicative data.
Impact Conference The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania August 21, 2002 Alan Stevens Alan Stevens International Program Manager US Federal Geographic.
Dr. Fran Berman, RPI Feedback from BRDI Sponsor Forum 11/11 January 29, 2012 Fran Berman.
CASE STUDIES OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER PROJECTS AND PARTNERSHIPS A SMALL ISLAND PERSPECTIVE Kishan Kumarsingh TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO.
Steve Gay - GIS Manager Mid America Regional Council Kansas City, MO.
Community-Driven Development: An Overview of Practice Community Development Strategies – how to prioritize, sequence and implement programs CommDev Workshop.
Local/State Data Partnerships Providing Services to Citizens.
Federal Geographic Data Committee, Coordination Group Meeting Washington, DC 7 June 2005 Study Results Geospatial Interoperability Standards: A Return-on-Investment.
A Summary of State DOT GIS Activities Presented at the 2005 AASHTO GIS-T Symposium Lincoln, NE.
Sierra Water Workgroup Water Summit Kings Beach, California June 11, 2013 Barry Hill, Hydrologist Pacific Southwest Region USDA Forest Service.
Barriers Sources: various surveys and constituent feedback Coastal data Data integration and accessibility Improved intergovernmental coordination.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
Environmental Justice: Context Sensitive Planning Grant Program California Department of Transportation Division of Transportation Planning Office of Community.
Background: digital elevation model of Mt. Hood, Oregon Why GIS? A brief overview GIS for Communities and Natural Resources D’Anne Hammond
Regional Planning for Sea-Level Rise in Hampton Roads Benjamin McFarlane, AICP Regional Planner NOAA Hydrographic Services Review Panel October 26, 2011.
0 National Geospatial Platform Jerry Johnston Department of the Interior January 6, 2016.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
NSDI Future Directions Governance Report Presentation to the FGDC Steering Committee June 23, 2005.
Building Blocks for Implementing the National Spatial Data Infrastructure Hank Garie Executive Director (703)
California’s Flood Future Recommendations for Managing the State’s Flood Risk Flood Risk Management & Silver Jackets Workshop August 21, 2012.
The Earth Information Exchange. Portal Structure Portal Functions/Capabilities Portal Content ESIP Portal and Geospatial One-Stop ESIP Portal and NOAA.
Local/State Data Sharing Partnership Proposed Action Plan (Winter 2007/2008)
Blazent / ServiceNow Messaging Guide. Transforming data into actionable intelligence Improve business outcomes by contextualizing data to make informed.
Sharing Data: Issues and Opportunities Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting January 22, 2006 Leni Oman Director of Transportation Research Washington.
© RH Environmental Limited Future Solutions for Delivering Regulatory Services.
FDEM Updates Richard Butgereit, GISP
Regional Stewardship Rock Pfotenhauer, Chair Kit O’Doherty, Director
Statewide / Framework Datasets: Approaches and Outcomes
Agriculture and Land Stewardship Planning
Strong Workforce Program Getting Ready for the Regional Share
Commonwealth Transportation Board
Introduction to the Academic Health Science Network (AHSN NENC)
Presentation transcript:

1 navigat OR – Oregon’s GIS Utility n An enterprise approach to information management based on partnerships with all Oregon governments navigatOR is accelerated Framework (base) data development, data maintenance, and consistent data access to meet the needs of all Oregon governments Enables better decisions, greater efficiency, more accountability Enables collaborative action to deliver consistent services statewide

2 navigat OR – Oregon’s GIS Utility partnership between state, local, regional, tribal and federal agencies in Oregon develops a wide range of shared geographic data builds the enterprise architecture to make that shared data a resource enables new capabilities & coordinated actions across levels of government Examples include: Meth mitigation (public safety response, foster care program mgmt, environmental cleanup) Wildfire response (many agencies bring data together quickly to save lives and property) Economic development projects (information and regulatory decisions must be coordinated between multiple agencies to create jobs throughout the state) Nearly all government decisions and activities affect someone or something at a particular place. Information about those places is needed so that the decisions and activities are appropriate and effective. It doesn’t make sense for government agencies at many levels to develop the same data over and over.

3 navigat OR – Oregon’s GIS Utility Policy Option Package Salaries and OPE for 3 positions $ 666,226 Development of Very High Priority datasets** 2,375,000 navigatOR portal & at least two sub-portals for data access 1,715,000 Hardware & software purchase & maintenance 500,000 Web and enterprise services development & hosting 500,000 Establish one regional service hub (at Blue Mountain CC) 400,000 Total Budget $6,156,226 ** Very High Priority data includes critical infrastructure, taxing districts, roads & bridges, surface water, tax lots, addresses, elevation, vegetation, and flood inundation zones

4 navigatOR Business Case n Benefit/Cost study in 2006 n Oregon State & Local governments spend $5B annually on collection, use and maintenance of geospatial information n $200M/year in benefits - $10M from cost savings/avoidance and revenue enhancement n King County ROI – 10:1 measured over an 18 year program lifecycle

5 navigatOR Goals n Accelerate development & completion of shared Framework data, driving government applications n Encourage data sharing and access for all levels of government, private sector, and public n Install effective organizational structure & policies to encourage long-term collaboration n Provide tools and environment to support ongoing update of shared data n Provide effective web-based services for access

6 Regional Service Centers n Many rural governments (city/county/districts) don’t have the resources to develop GIS n If they aren’t creating base data, we have holes n Non-profit regional service centers affiliated with universities or colleges n Modeled after existing service centers in two largest urban areas n Contract management for economies of scale n Data integration and simple data development n Student laborers gain valuable experience