School Facilities Construction Commission Project Overview Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS) Student Achievement through High Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E X P E R I E N C E Y O U R A M E R I C A Buildings at Fort Hancock National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Gateway National Recreation Area.
Advertisements

Basic Spreadsheet Functions Objective Functions are predefined formulas that perform calculations by using specific values, called arguments, in.
Kentucky Department of Education Division of District Support - District Facilities Branch School Funding for Construction 2012.
Capital Improvement Program and Campus Renewal Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board 2004 Facilities Conference February 6, 2004.
B ALTIMORE C ITY P UBLIC S CHOOLS State of Our School Building 1 DRAFT.
GASB#34 Asset Management TEAM Transportation Fair Presentation by: Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. Charles J. Nemmers, P.E. October 8, 2004St. Louis, Missouri.
MSUSA Capital Bonding Request Proposal
See the Present… Know the Future…. RECAPP ® Markets Telecom Facilities Municipalities Government Transportation.
Capital Planning Module Gary R. Schaecher Founder, TMA Systems, LLC.
Counties General Services Association Spring 2014 Conference Always On Through Anticipating Facilities Issues.
University of Kentucky Campus Physical Development Plan Update.
Title Welcome to Our Webinar! Presentation Title: Application Process for the School Replacement and Renovation Program – What this means for your school.
Lecture(4) Measurement of System performance Infrastructure performance measurement Infrastructure performance measurement must be multidimensional,
Chapter 3 Asset Management. 2 Asset management Asset management = infrastructure management Infrastructure management = Capital management = Asset management.
Lecture(4) Instructor : Dr. Abed Al-Majed Nassar
Standard Deviation A measure of variability
1 Fundamentals of Reliability Engineering and Applications Dr. E. A. Elsayed Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering Rutgers University
Background Coating process uses fixtures (cans) to mask part leaving the area to be coated exposed to the coating material. Coating thickness is assessed.
Successful Facility Assessments: Savings through Facility Manager and A/E Partnerships May 27, 2014.
Advancing Construction and Program Management Worldwide 1 Expanding Facility Condition Assessment in the Information Age Michael D. Dell’Isola, PE, CVS,
Sustainment Management Systems
Chapter 1 Infrastructure Management System. Managers and engineers need clear guidelines for life- cycle management of infrastructure systems for water,
Facilities Summary of Sightlines’ Report Campus Profile and Customer Service Survey Results
Article 26 School Rooftop HVAC unit replacement at Loring or Noyes Schools Article 26 HVAC Unit Replacement.
Public Works Contracting Marsha Reilly Office of Program Research House of Representatives recommended.
Manage the Facility Condition Index (FCI)
Facility Condition Assessment –If You’re Not Doing it You Should Be!
SB 540 Task Force Briefing Establishing a Statewide Facility Database & Regional Comparative Analysis Software at the Dept of Education January 21, 2013.
Managing the Facilities Asset Portfolio Prepared for the Tuition Policy Advisory Committee by The University of Texas Physical Plant September 10, 2003.
FTA SGR Transit Agencies Feedback Session Results Presented by: PricewaterhouseCoopers Kristy Fridley, Mark Baumgardner, and Charles Baldwin.
Financial Planning For Major Capital Projects ECIS Annual Leadership Conference Seville, Spain April 25, 2014 Presenter: Larry Kraut.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Health Infrastructure Renewal Fund HIRF Program LHIN and Hospital Teleconference October 25, 2013.
Financial Skills. Objectives 1.Business strategy 2.Budget strategy 3.Calculations 4.Practice.
FY2013 ROPA Presentation University of Alaska System.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Lessons Learned from ARRA Projects Solution ShowcaseLessions Learned from ARRA Projects Walter Tersch, LEED.
University of Idaho Permanent Building Fund & the Annual Capital Budget Request Process Campus Planning Advisory Committee April 8, 2011 Raymond Pankopf,
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Proposed Changes to Attachment G FY 2011 – FY 2015 Five Year Plan.
Office of Acquisition and Property Management Policy for Estimating Current Replacement Value and Deferred Maintenance.
Capital Improvement Loan Program 2014 NCSHA Conference October 21, 2014 Anne Berman, Assistant Director Development.
1 Age of Smithsonian Facilities Age of Buildings From Museums And Facilities: Critical Assessment and Improvement Objectives.
Overview of Condition Assessment Process. Main Topics to Cover in the Overview  What is a Condition Assessment? 1. Why is it important? 2. Why is consistency.
1 Barcelona May 2003 INFORMATICAL SYSTEM INTEGRATING THE RELIABILITY CENTERED MAINTENANCE THE SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION.
+ Target price method and building element cost estimation Lauri Luoma-Halkola, Jukka Kujala, Jonna Haavisto & Pauli Autio
Annual FIMS Comprehensive Training Argonne National Laboratory May 6, 2015.
County of Santa Barbara General Services Department Facility Condition Assessment Lessons Learned Greg Chanis, Assistant Director August 13, 2015.
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
10/9/2003Tuition Policy Advisory Committee1 Appendix.
Campus Condition Index (CCI) Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Finance and Resource Planning Paul Turcotte, Program Director.
FCI Supplement What determines FCI scores?. Explore FCI Dataset Descriptive Statistics Histograms Correlations Factor Analysis?
© 2006, Educational Institute Chapter 1 The Role, Cost, and Management of Hospitality Facilities Hospitality Facilities Management and Design 3 rd Edition.
Kentucky Department of Education, Office of Assessment and Accountability, July 2012 Questions: or
Ontario School Boards 72 district school boards in Ontario Approximately 4,900 schools TDSB presently operates 551 active schools Approximately 11.3% of.
ACEC National Energy and Environment Challenges in Asset Management? Brian Long Transmission Line Performance Xcel Energy August 15, 2015.
Updated Facility Condition Assessment Prince George’s County Public Schools June 17, 2008.
Portfolio-Based Roof Management How to Get More Service Life and Energy from your Roof Portfolio.
South Tyneside Homes The Decent Homes Programme January 2007.
Overview WMU – Case Study Software Demonstration Best Practices
Blue Ocean Planning Final Report March, 2017.
Deferred Maintenance Deferred Maintenance
OVERVIEW History of commissioning at WMU What we wanted to accomplish
Duffin Creek WPCP Optimized Renewal Planning & Decision-Making
Campus Facilities Conditions Customer View
Space Utilization Advisory Committee November 14, 2017
Indiana “Blue Ocean” Project
Gaining Trust Through Data-Driven Decisions
Unbridled Learning: College/Career for All Accountability System
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION
SSUSD Richmond Elementary Status to Board of Education May 2, 2019
Presentation transcript:

School Facilities Construction Commission Project Overview Facilities Inventory and Classification System (KFICS) Student Achievement through High Performance Schools October 2011

KFICS Classification Tools – By Cost or Investment 2 Condition + Suitability + Technology Needs Budget ($) = Kentucky Facility Index (KFI) Kentucky Facility Index: Current Replacement Value ($) SUMMARY of Cost or Investment Budget Classification Tools  FCI (Condition Index)  KSI (Suitability Index)  KTI (Technology Index)  KFI (Kentucky Facility Index)

KFICS Benchmark Metrics – Condition FCI Industry “standards”: FCICondition <.05Good.05 thru.10Fair.10 >Poor Industry “standards”: FCICondition <.05Good.05 thru.10Fair.10 >Poor Needs Budget of 10K CRV of 100K 10, ,000 =.10 FCI EXAMPLE: Condition Needs Budget ($) = Facility Condition Index (FCI) Condition Index: Current Replacement Value ($) Average existing: ~.25 to.35 ~ is a flag to consider major renovation or demolition 3

KFICS School Condition Data and Criteria 4 Replacement Cost Model

KFICS Building / School Condition Score 5

Knowing What You Have: Condition Concepts Deferred Maintenance Example: 20 year rooftop HVAC unit 2011 Installed Unit “expired” in 1980 and was unfunded for replacement Unit is 50% used; predict renewal budget for 2020

KFICS: Managing Facility Failures  Three types of failures A. Early (warranty period) B. Intrinsic C. Wear-out (run to failure)  Actionable investments to extend life during the Intrinsic Period (A&B)  Investments to manage failure risk in the Wear- Out period (C) 7 Early Failure Period Intrinsic Failure Period “Useful Life” Wear -Out Period “Run to Failure” 0 Time Failure Rate h(t) Component Failure Curve A B C Source: Engineering Statistics Handbook

FCI vs. Facility Age 8 65% 60% (Total Renovation) 30% (roof, HVAC) KDE Renovation Points

SUMMARY of Criteria Classification Tools  Condition Score (1- FCI)  Suitability Score (Scored Points / Possible Points)  Technology Score (Scored Points / Possible Points)  Kentucky School Score (KSS) 9 KFICS Classification Tools – By Criteria (Condition Score *.75) + (Suitability Score *.20) + (Technology Score *.05) = Kentucky School Score (0 – 100) Kentucky School Score :

KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Scoring 10

11 KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Scoring

KFICS Criteria - Suitability / Technology Models 12

KFICS Scoring Weights  Condition = 75% of School Score  Suitability = 20% of School Score  Technology = 5% of School Score 13

Required Investment Benchmarks  The First Set of Benchmark Metrics is based on Cost or Required Investment: 14 Index Formula or Calculation Max/ Minimum Values Kentucky Facility Index (KFI) (Repair$ + Suitability$ + TechRead$) / Replace$ Worst % | Best 0% Kentucky Suitability Index (KSI) Ratio of Suitability cost / Replacement valueWorst 35% | Best 0% Kentucky Technology Index (KTI) Ratio of Technology cost / Replacement valueWorst 1.77% | Best 0% Facility Condition Index (FCI) Ratio of Repair cost / Replacement valueWorst % | Best 0%

Criteria Scoring Benchmarks  The Second Set of Benchmark Metrics is built on Criteria Scoring: 15 Index Formula or Calculation Max/ Minimum Values Condition Score(1-FCI %) times 100Worst 0 | Best 100 Suitability Score Criteria Based Scored Points / Possible Points Worst 0 | Best 100 Technology Score Sum of Points for Technology Criteria Scored Worst 0 | Best 100 School Score(Condition Score *.75) + Suitability Score *.20) + (Technology Score *.05) Worst 0 | Best 100

Scores for Recently Renovated Building Investment Requirements Condition Index Criteria Scoring Repair:$0KFI:2.24% Condition Score: Suitability:$269,574KSI:2.24% Suitability Score: Tech Readiness: $0KTI:0.00% Technology Score: Replace- ment Value: $12,034,410FCI:0.00%School Score:

Scores for Older Non-Renovated Building Investment Requirements Condition Index Criteria Scoring Repair:$7,329,689KFI:93.58% Condition Score: Suitability:$1,470,080KSI:15.50% Suitability Score: Tech Readiness: $76,220KTI:0.80% Technology Score: Replace- ment Value: $9,485,000FCI:77.28%School Score:

District FeedBack System 18 Archived report versions Web-based report review comments from district KDE response on actions taken PDF School Report