Presented by Jan Hasbrouck, Ph.D. Using Findings from Effective Schools to Improve Student Achievement SAILS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
Changing Roles of Teams Putting all the pieces together to develop a strategic problem solving team.
Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
Instructional Decision Making
What is a Structured Learning Environment?. The Typical Cedar Lane Classroom Personal care opportunities limited due to schedule Limited Mobility opportunities.
Parents as Partners in Education
BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
A LASKA BLUEPRINT FOR LITERACY : B IRTH TO GRADUATION Lexie Domaradzki REACH Education Consulting.
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
RTI … What do the regs say?. What is “it?” Response To Intervention is a systematic process for providing preventive, supplementary, and interventional.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Eugene, OR Brown Bag Presentation: November 19, 2007
An Introduction to Response to Intervention MN Response to Intervention Center Ann Casey, Ph.D. Director St. Croix River Ed. District
Response to Intervention (RTI) Lindenhurst Schools
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
Why/Purpose Instructional Support Services Program Review The purpose of the review is to create a well-articulated, high quality, financially sustainable.
Materials and Resources This Portion of the SAS website includes sample materials, and units which align with state standards. Materials are created.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES The “Tween” Years — Increasing Academic Rigor Administrators’ Management Meeting for Exceptional Education and Student Services.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Parent Academy Topic: Support for All Learners 1.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
RTI Response to Intervention A View of the Ascension Experience.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
RtI.  Learn: ◦ What is RtI ◦ Why schools need RtI ◦ What are the components that comprise an RtI system - must haves ◦ Underlying assumptions for the.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Response to Intervention (RtI) How can we make it work in Wisconsin?
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Ontario Ministry of Education Caring and Safe Schools on Ontario: Supporting Students with Special Education Needs Through Progressive Discipline K-12.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
Office of Service Quality
Using DIBELS to Improve Reading Outcomes in Grades 3-5.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Local Control Accountability Plan
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Jan Hasbrouck, Ph.D. Using Findings from Effective Schools to Improve Student Achievement SAILS

Word of the Decade? accountability!

“Our school is ready to make some serious improvements in our instructional program…” “ So… how do we get there?

EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS RESEARCH Highly Effective School Few Challenges 90%+ Academic Success

EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS RESEARCH Highly Effective School Many Challenges

LOTS We have LOTS of effective schools research!! GOOD NEWS!

EFFECTIVE SCHOOLS RESEARCH Kathleen Cotton Making Schools Work Douglas Reeves 90/90/90 Schools

LOTS We have LOTS of effective schools research!! BAD NEWS

Set yourSAILS for success! S S TANDARDS A A SSESSMENTS I I NSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION L L EADERSHIP S S YSTEM-WIDE COMMITMENT Hasbrouck & Denton (2005)

STANDARDS Apply grade level expectations for what students should know and be able to do at key benchmarks ALL Use standards to set high performance goals for ALL students

ASSESSMENTS Assess to screen diagnose continuously evaluate measure the outcomes of students’ skills and performance

ASSESSMENTS  Benchmark/Screening Which students MAY need extra assistance?  Diagnostic What are a student’s skills strengths & needs?  Progress Monitoring Is learning happening?  Outcome Did the student make progress toward standards?

ASSESSMENTS Assess to screen diagnose continuously evaluate measure the outcomes USE results to make all key instructional decisions! Share data in frequent, public, nonjudgmental, collaborative meetings

INSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION ALL Plan and deliver lessons and interventions designed to meet the identified needs of ALL students, at all ability and skill levels Use validated, effective instructional materials & strategies Effectively organize & manage the classroom environment

LEADERSHIP Provide VISION, GUIDANCE & SUPPORT to insure that: ALL (a) effective instruction and interventions designed to meet standards are implemented for ALL students (b) instructional decisions are based on continuous assessment data (c) focused & sustained professional development provided to support S-A-I

SYSTEM-WIDE COMMITMENT ALL Adopt a system-wide “no excuses” model that partners administrators, teachers, parents and staff to help ALL students achieve success: “Unless we…” Encourage and support collaboration across classrooms, special programs, and home

S-A-I-L-S ALL of S-A-I-L-S must be incorporated into a school’s instructional system to ensure that ALL students achieve success SAILS safepositive SAILS must be launched into a safe and positive school environment A LL 5 Elements

SAILS Needs Assessment Indicator Low Need Some Need High Need S  S tandards A  A ssessments I I  I nstruction & I ntervention L  L eadership S C  S ustained C ommitment

Self Evaluation forSTANDARDS aware  Are all teachers, administrators & specialists aware of state standards & benchmarks? aligned  Are instructional materials aligned with standards? using planning instruction & interventions, evaluations & setting IEP goals?  Are teachers using standards & benchmarks for planning instruction & interventions, evaluations & setting IEP goals?

ASSESSMENTS Self Evaluation for ASSESSMENTS aware  Are teachers, administrators, & specialists aware of different types and purposes of assessments? when & how to administer  Do teachers & specialists know when & how to administer different types of assessments? materials  Do teachers & specialists have sufficient assessment materials? use assessment results  Do teachers & specialists know how to use assessment results for making instructional decisions?

INSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION Self Evaluation for INSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION aware  Are teachers, administrators, and specialists aware of the multi-tiered instructional model & RTI? oral language, phonemic awareness, phonics/decoding, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, writing & spelling  Do teachers & specialists know how to teach oral language, phonemic awareness, phonics/decoding, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, writing & spelling skills appropriately for grade & instructional need?

INSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION Self Evaluation for INSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION use core & supplementary materials?  Do teachers & specialists know how to use core & supplementary materials? differentiate instruction  Do teachers know how to differentiate instruction to meet the differing needs of students (grouping; providing Tier II instruction in the classroom; increasing instructional intensity)? schedule  Does a reading schedule need to be developed? roadmap  Does the district have a program roadmap for using instructional materials?

LEADERSHIP Self Evaluation for LEADERSHIP AWARE  Are building & district leaders AWARE of the key elements of effective schools? VISION  Are leaders creating and communicating a clear VISION of the results to be obtained from improved instructional outcomes? GUIDANCE & SUPPORT  Are leaders providing the necessary GUIDANCE & SUPPORT including focused and sustained professional development to teachers and specialists?

SUSTAINED SYSTEM-WIDE COMMITMENT Self Evaluation for SUSTAINED SYSTEM-WIDE COMMITMENT NO EXCUSES  Do all participants embrace a NO EXCUSES attitude? SUSTAIN  Are plans in place or being developed to SUSTAIN the successes achieved through S-A-I? TIME & SUPPORT COLLABORATION ?  Are teachers, specialists, coaches, etc. being given the TIME & SUPPORT necessary for the increased COLLABORATION that improved instructional outcomes will require ?

“Our school is ready to make some serious improvements in our instructional program…” “ So… how do we get there?

SAILS Set your SAILS for success! S S TANDARDS A A SSESSMENTS I I NSTRUCTION & INTERVENTION L L EADERSHIP S S YSTEM-WIDE COMMITMENT Hasbrouck & Denton (2005)

TOGETHER Let’s all work TOGETHER to help every student achieve success!

REFERENCES Cotton, K. (1995). Schooling Practices that Matter Most. NWREL. Gibson, V., & Hasbrouck, J. & Denton, C. (2007). Differentiating Instruction: Grouping for Success New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education Hasbrouck, J. & Denton, C. (2005). The Reading Coach: A How-to Manual for Success Longmont, CO: Sopris West

Reeves, D. Making Standards Work: 3 rd Ed. Denver: Advanced Learning Press. Sprick, Randy & colleagues Safe & Civil Schools Interventions Teacher’s Encyclopedia of Behavior Management: 100 Problems/500 Plans

Contact Information Jan Hasbrouck, Ph.D. JH Consulting Seattle, WA