Cost-of-Care and Quality of Life of Patients with Parkinson´s Disease in Europe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Resolution studies
Advertisements

Chiari Surgical Outcomes Trial PI: Bermans J. Iskandar and Timothy George with collaboration from John Kestle ASAP-funded pilot study ASAP-funded pilot.
Artrelle Fragher & Robert walker. 1 you look for the median 1 you look for the median 2 then you look for the min and max 2 then you look for the min.
1 US Investigator Meeting DIAS-4, Chicago, July 2011 Good Clinical Practice (GCP) for Investigators and the Research Team.
Ozone Level ppb (parts per billion)
European Cooperative Network for Research, Diagnosis and Therapy of Parkinson´s Disease EuroPa Plenary Meeting WORK PACKAGE 3 WORK PACKAGE 3 - Patient.
Care of PD Patients in Europe - Healthcare Utilization and Health-Related Quality of Life EuroPa WP 5 Richard Dodel Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn.
Introduction Parkinsons disease is not just a burden for the patients it also has a substantial social and economic impact. The European countries differ.
16/06/2004 EuroPa Plenary Meeting -Paris EuroPa Plenary Meeting Paris Agenda EuroPa Plenary Meeting, Paris 9:00 - 9:15Meeting objectives /
29/08/2003 Midterm Review Meeting Helsinki Midterm Review Meeting, Helsinki2 Overall Objective Research Infrastructure The establishment of.
MICS4 Survey Design Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS4 Technical Assistance.
1 Introduction to the medicine prices and availability survey and training workshop Presentation template for adaptation and use in medicine prices and.
Utilizing the Electronic Medical Record to Reduce Inappropriate Medication Use Alan White, PhD – Abt Associates Valerie Weber, MD – Geisinger Health System.
Development-Knowledge Transfer Survey results over time: Recognition of CCGC name was 49-50% in 2002 moving up to 74% by 2003 Ranking of most useful.
Graphing Linear Inequalities in Two Variables
Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Turning Information Into Health.
Half Life. The half-life of a quantity whose value decreases with time is the interval required for the quantity to decay to half of its initial value.
1  1 =.
Emma Frew Introduction to health economics, MSc HEHP, October 2012 Outcomes: part II.
DiseaseNo disease 60 people with disease 40 people without disease Total population = 100.
Yudatiningsih I.1,Sunartono H.1,SuryawatiS.2
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
Marks out of 100 Mrs Smith’s Class Median Lower Quartile Upper Quartile Minimum Maximum.
Nurse Led Clinics Opportunity for nurses to make a difference Wilma Scholte op Reimer, RN, PhD Amsterdam School of Health Professions Academic Medical.
Canadian Health Outcomes for Better Information and Care
Regulatory Clinical Trials Clinical Trials. Clinical Trials Definition: research studies to find ways to improve health Definition: research studies to.
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Copyright © Healthcare Quality Quest, Proposed standards for a national clinical audit — How we got involved and what we have learned.
MathOnMonday® Presents: Building Math Courage® A program designed for Adults or Kids who have struggled to learn their Math in the traditional classroom!
Number bonds to 10,
Beat the Computer Drill Divide 10s Becky Afghani, LBUSD Math Curriculum Office, 2004 Vertical Format.
Using MyJob for Annual Benefits Enrollment Sign into MyJob doej PasswordUser NamePress Login button.
THE CHALLENGE: CHRONIC DISEASE CARE AND THE PROMISE OF HIT Health Care Information Technology 2004: Improving Chronic Care in California San Francisco.
A Corporate Perspective: the Significance of the Kyoto Mechanisms Tom Jacob DuPont October 29, 2002 UN Framework Convention on.
Meaningful Use Basics.  Demographics  Active Medication List  Active Allergy List  Vitals  Smoking Status  Problem List  Computerized Physician/Provider.
Let’s Add! Click the cloud below for a secret question! Get Started!
Enterprise Use Cases. Levels LevelDescriptionExamples 0 0aVerbal CommunicationNon-permanent, e.g. verbal communication 1Non-electronic dataMail, phone.
David Cloutier Director, Research Center Management and Development Budgeting for Industry Sponsored Clinical Trials.
IHTAS Phase II Project status report- Kilifi 27 th May, 2014.
Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3. SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program: Year 2 Meeting 3 SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM.
Patient Centered Medical Home What it means for Duffy Health Center Board Presentation September 10 th 2012.
1st NRC Meeting, October 2006, Amsterdam 1 ICCS 2009 Field Operations.
Data Management Seminar, 8-11th July 2008, Hamburg ICCS 2009 Main Survey Field Operations.
CDRM Project Diabetes Management Stefan Stadler – November 2009.
... for our health Wisconsin Research and Education Network and the University of Wisconsin Department of Family Medicine Collaboration Among Pharmacists.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
3rd NRC Meeting, 9-12 June 2008, Windsor ICCS 2009 Main Survey Field Operations.
Global IE Network Support Sebastian Martinez Jennifer Sturdy Survey Coordinator July 2008.
Measurement and Reporting Aubrie Entwood Chapter Project Manager Executive Director American Academy of Pediatrics, Maine Chapter.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg 11 ICCS 2009 – Field Trial Survey Operations Overview.
Data dissemination meeting February 28, 2007 ICAP New York.
Data Management Seminar, 9-12th July 2007, Hamburg Within-School Sampling – A General Introduction.
Questionnaire on Water and Climate adaptation Jos G. Timmerman Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Water Management.
Personal Health Budgets Evaluation Evaluation of the Personal Health Budgets Pilots Wider Cohort Pilot Sites.
UNIT-II CLINICAL DATA. UNIT-II CLINICAL DATA: Clinical Data, Application, Challenges, Solutions, Clinical Data Management System.
PRIMA Investigator Meeting Friday, June 16, 2006 Grand Sofitel Demeure, Amsterdam Stéphanie Baulu, Delphine Germain & Gilles Salles.
SB 580 Update: Automatic Enrollment California Public Utilities Commission.
1 MARCH 2012 Regulatory Documents & the CTSU.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
Requirements to run clinical trials: Research fee calculation, patient consent Kyoung Hwa Ha.
Responsibilities of Sponsor, Investigator and Monitor
The PRIME Study Dr. Komalkirti Apte
New NIH Human Subjects & Clinical Trials Information
MAINTAINING THE INVESTIGATOR’S STUDY FILE
PreManage Pilot One way to address ED utilization:
Recruitment Process.
Overview of the iLIVE Volunteer Project
Research Overview PowerTrials and Related Research Processes
TrueNTH A big thank you to everyone who is involved in the TrueNTH Global Registry study. We are on target to reach our current recruitment target of.
Presentation transcript:

Cost-of-Care and Quality of Life of Patients with Parkinson´s Disease in Europe

Study Outline Handling of study documents Monitoring process Study status and timelines Study on the cost-of-care and health-related quality of life

Determination of -health care utilization -health-related quality of life Objectives

Analysis of cost parameters

Quality of life Mobility Self-Care Usual Activities Pain/Discomfort Anxiety/Depression Best imaginable health state Worst imaginable health state Your own health state today EQ-5D

Data on resource utilization and quality of life -3 months retrospectively -3 months prospectively Design

Study population 100 per country Total of 1000 patients stratified by different H&Y stages Patients of EuroPa Registry of Parkinson´s Disease New patients

Economic data - CRF A and CRF B Clinical Data - Minimal data set of the EuroPa registry - CRF P Quality of life - EQ-5D Data collection

Monitoring of - data entered into the Minimal Data Set Each center has to decide whether the monitor receives access to the data of the respective country (reading rights only) Monitoring of Minimal Data Set

2. Handling of study documents

Study documents and CRFs EuroPa Patient´s Registry Patient Questionnaire Part A Patient Questionnaire Part B Investigator Questionnaire Part P Baseline Month 3

Please add the patient´s address Documents per patient provided to study center Contains: Questionnaire A Contains: Questionnaire B

Study center (Bonn) One big envelope: including - envelope "day 1" (CRF A) - envelope "month 3" (CRF B) Neurologische Klinik Bonn B a s e l i n e Neurologische Klinik Bonn Your center -send "CRF A" and "CRF B" to patient - forward CRF "A" to study center Bonn -forward "CRF B" to study center Bonn Patient is asked to complete "CRF A" Patient is asked to: -complete CRF B Patient Month3Month3 Study Flow I

Additionally provided documents to center Box of CRF P For patients not in the registry Center File Including: Study protocol Study outline Patient Information Informed Consent Form Further documents

Study center (Bonn) One big envelope: including - envelope "day 1" (CRF A) - envelope "month 3" (CRF B) Neurologische Klinik Bonn B a s e l i n e Neurologische Klinik Bonn Your center Patient is asked to: -complete CRF B Patient Month3Month3 Study Flow I - CRF P is to be completed by the investigator - CRF P - CRF A is to be completed by the patient - CRF A / CRF P are to be sent to the study center Bonn - CRF B is to be sent to the study center, Bonn - CRF B is to be provided to the patient

3. Monitoring process

Study Flow II Data of the Patient´s Registry will be monitored at Study coordination center, Bonn Process of Double Data Entry at Study coordination center, Bonn Data evaluation and analysis at Study coordination center, Bonn Reporting

Monitoring process Centers are asked to provide Monitoring access (reading-only rights) Monitoring of center-specific data Generating of Data query forms (DQF) Sending Data query forms to study center

Data Query Form

4. Study status and Timelines

CRFs adapted to national system by HE Printing process Documents at study center Patient Recruitment started MonitoringData entry Axfinalized CZFirst draft Dxfinalizedx75 ptsxx E Fx I NLxstarted Pxfinalized S UK Study status

Timelines (preparation of documents - data entry) July-SeptemberOctober-December Translation of CRFs Supplying physicians with study material Patient enrolment Data entry January-March November

Centers: for each completely received documented patient (CRFs) compensation of Euro 50 Health Economists: for translation of CRFs, adaption to national health care system, support of analysis review of documents Compensation compensation of Euro 2000

Participants in the Economic study Health Economists Country