JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
15A NCAC 07H.0308(a)(2) Temporary Erosion Control Structures Sandbags.
Advertisements

Dwane Powell (News & Observer; April 1, 2007) Jeffrey Warren, PhD NC Division of Coastal Management Setbacks and Static Vegetation Line.
1 Task Force Activities 28 June 2004 STESEG Task Force on Services (Benoît ARNAUD / OECD)
New reinjection technologies in hydrocarbon fields Ravenna, 28 March 2008.
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
State Implementation Plan (SIP) Development Process Presentation to: Triangle Area Mayors and County Commission Board Chairs Donnie Redmond April 7, 2005.
1 Child Care Resource and Referral (CCR&R): FY 13 Contract Renewal Proposal Summary Presentation January 2012.
Compensatory Mitigation Rule: Corps/EPA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Regulatory Branch U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds.
Applicants Rob & Judi McCarthy, SLO County Permit #DRC
Southern California Eelgrass Mitigation Policy NMFS, USFWS, and CDFG (1991) Effective compensation for impacts (90% success) Basis for consistent recommendations.
Human Impact on Beaches
Coastal Zone Management Act (16.USCA Sec (1)) Session Name: State Policy II Coastal Hazards Management Course “preserve, protect, develop, and where.
These sessions will introduce the basic natural processes, historical geographic ranges, and potential impacts of the natural hazards that are unique to.
Collaborative Science and Technology Network for Sustainability Progress Review Workshop October 18-19, 2005 Washington DC Ecological Sustainability in.
New Directions in Beach Policy? Leadership changes DEP Sand Memo Legislature (Beach Bill) Rule review and possible changes – –Sand – –Armoring – –Lighting.
What’s Mud Got to Do With It? Stephen J. Klaine, Ph.D. Department of Biological Sciences Clemson University
Gordon G. Thomson, P.E., D.CE. Director, Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. – A Shaw Group Company Monitoring and Performance Evaluation of Emergency.
April 14, Indicate every resource type proposed for impact on the Application: Tidal Wetland (short form for some projects) Nontidal Wetland Waterway.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Dr. Mary Foley National Park Service Chief Scientist, Northeast Region.
Spatial Abundance of Permeable Sediment on the Eastern US Continental Shelf Patricia L. Wiberg 1 and Chris Jenkins 2 1 Environmental Sciences, University.
Land Reclamation Eric Angat Teacher. 1. The Appalachian Region extend from _____________to ___________ MississippiNew York This Land is from Africa. Mississippi.
Planning Commission meeting 5/22/2012.  Project Schedule  Planning Commission’s Role  Review Chapters 1 – 3 of Draft SMP  Focus is on understanding.
Matthew Wight Pennsylvania State University - Master of Geographic Information Systems - GEOG 596A – Fall 2014 Enhancing Coastal Conservation Planning.
A Beach is a Beach… Or is it?
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
Beach Nourishment Effects on Nesting Marine Turtles Whitney Pyatt NC Coastal Reserve & NERR May 9, 2011.
North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Program Update November 2007.
San Francisco District San Francisco District Coastal Activities Frank Wu CERB Meeting June 4, 2009.
ECLAC Disaster Assessment ECLAC Disaster Assessment Training Manual Section V (ii) Coastal Engineering: Reconstruction – Management and Mitigation.
A PRESENTATION ON SEA-LEVEL RISE AND COASTAL SUBMERGENCE ALONG THE SOUTH –EAST COAST OF NIGERIA BY SAVIOUR P. UDO-AKUAIBIT INSTITUTE OF NATURAL RESOURCES,
Los Angeles District and South Pacific Division CERB June 4, 2009 Technical Tools for Regional Sediment Management Susan Ming – USACE, Los Angeles District.
NOAA Restoration Center Implementing the Gulf Regional Sediment Management Master Plan …responding to an ongoing emergency, improving responses to new.
GEOL Crises of a Planet Lab 7 - Coastal Studies Oct , 2012 Department of Earth Sciences.
DWA: WATER QUALITY MONITORING TASKS. TENDER DOCUMENT Aim: develop a systematic monitoring protocol that will determine possible impacts of natural and.
Timeline Impaired for turbidity on Minnesota’s list of impaired waters (2004) MPCA must complete a study to determine the total maximum daily load (TMDL)
Time Series for Ocean, La of the Louisiana Chenier Plain Aerial Video Survey Program Pontchartrain Institute of Environmental Sciences University.
A World of Solutions North Topsail Beach Shoreline Protection Project Phase 1 – New River Inlet Channel Realignment & Beach Restoration NC Water Resources.
Los Angeles District Los Angeles District 86 th CERB 3-4 June 2009 Los Angeles District Activities and Data Utilization Arthur T. Shak, SPL Navigation.
Seafloor Mapping in Massachusetts CZM – USGS Seafloor Mapping Cooperative & Gulf of Maine Mapping Initiative Anthony R. Wilbur Massachusetts Office of.
Explanation of Changes to Draft “Firming” Schedule, Service Schedule E Contact: Arnie Podgorsky Mike Thompson Wright & Talisman PC
Seabeach Amaranth and Renourished Beaches in North Carolina.
TOPSAIL BEACH 30 Yr Beach Management Plan June 8, 2011.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.
Bureau of Economic Geology John A. and Katherine G. Jackson School of Geosciences The University of Texas at Austin.
A Continuing Strategy for Accelerating Cooperative Riparian Restoration and Management Creeks and Communities.
Profiling Working Group 1 PWG Update Report By Brad Boles of Cirro Energy ERCOT PWG Vice-Chair for COPS Meeting March 11, 2008.
Day 19 Objective You will learn about soil texture and composition in order to determine soil’s value as a resource and conservation measures. Warm-Up.
Coastal Engineering Waterfront & Marinas Civil Engineering Regulatory Permitting Site Investigations Marine Environmental Construction Destination Development.
Jefferson County Planning Commission Hearing April 10, 2013
USGS Science in Support of Coastal Issues
Commercial Operations Sub-Committee Update to TAC
COSA Committee Meeting
Editor of Journal of Coastal Zone Management
Erosion Hazard Near Sensitive Waterbodies
Monitoring Shoreline Change at Port Hueneme Beach
Session 6 - 7: Major Coastal Hazards (Session 7: Part II)
Undercurrent Stabalizer Technology:
Coastal Components GLY 2030C.
COSA Committee Meeting
Economic Impact Potential of Recycling in Ohio
Section 2: Types of Sedimentary Rocks
Sedimentary Rocks A sedimentary rock is formed by the accumulation and compaction of sediments (rock pieces, minerals, animal parts, or chemical precipitates)
Sedimentary Rocks A sedimentary rock is formed by the accumulation and compaction of sediments (rock pieces, minerals, animal parts, or chemical precipitates)
Section 2: Types of Sedimentary Rocks
Dawlish Warren Explain how coastal management strategies used in your chosen area have taken conflicting views into account.
Request for a Major Variance from the Neuse River Riparian Area Protection Rules    LBJ/Cary Associates, LLC Daycare facility Cary, NC Karen Higgins.
Shoreline Processes and Features Outline
What is the impact of students being required to develop different learning strategies part way through their studies, due to meeting modules which rely.
Committed to our coast Preliminary Assessment of Restoration Impacts in the Isles Dernieres, Terrebonne Parish, LA CPRA Board Meeting Baton Rouge,
Essential Freshwater.
Presentation transcript:

JEFF WARREN Coastal Hazards Analyst June 2004 Science Panel Draft Recommendations for Beach Nourishment Sediment Criteria Photo by Rudi Rudolph

OUTLINE Why worry about nourishment sediment? Timeline of sediment criteria discussions Organization of current recommendations Review of current recommendations Where do we go from here?

(3) Beach Nourishment. Sand used for beach nourishment shall be compatible with existing grain size and type. Sand to be used for beach nourishment shall be taken only from those areas where the resulting environmental impacts will be minimal. 15A NCAC 07H.0308 Specific Use Standards for Ocean Hazard Areas (a) Ocean Shoreline Erosion Control Activities: EXISTING LANGUAGE

Emerald Isle at 19 th Street Public Access Site during 2003 nourishment project where a fine was imposed for carbonate content Photo by Rudi Rudolph Why worry about nourishment?

TIMELINE MARCH 2002 Science Panel subcommittee created to discuss sediment criteria in response to shell abundance in Bogue Banks nourishment project SEPT 2002 Early suggestions included sampling protocol of beach to be nourished, the inclusion of borrow areas, and the avoidance of a simple statewide standard

OCT 2003 Based on subcommittee efforts and discussions to date, entire Science Panel felt recommendations were close to completion and would devote the next meeting entirely to sediment criteria NOV 2003, MARCH and MAY 2004 Three Science Panel meetings devoted solely to sediment criteria JUNE 2004 Language and organization of recommendations streamlined and reviewed by entire Panel

ORGANIZATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS 1.General Definitions 2.Characterization of Beach to be Nourished 3.Characterization of Borrow Site Material 4.Compatibility of Borrow Site Material to Beach to be Nourished

Fifth Section to be Considered: 5. Post-nourishment Monitoring and Mitigation

1. DEFINITIONS Beach Nourishment Borrow Area Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve

Source: USGS

1. DEFINITIONS Beach Nourishment Borrow Area Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Compatible Sediment Grain Size

Wentworth Grain-Size Scale

2. CHARACETRIZATION OF BEACH TO BE NOURISHED Compatible sediment Sediment sampling Sediment analysis

GOAL: Sediments similar to existing beach

Longitudinal Sampling Profile

3. CHARACETRIZATION OF BORROW SITE MATERIAL Site characterization techniques Defined as a mineral reserve Average grain size for entire site in addition to coarse (>4.76 mm) and fine (<0.0625) fractions Navigation channel maintenance

4. COMPATIBILITY OF BORROW SITE MATERIAL TO BEACH TO BE NOURISHED Coarse sediment (>4.76 mm) cannot exceed 4% plus native Fine sediment (< mm) cannot exceed 5% plus native

Photo by Rudi Rudolph SUMMARY Science Panel has made excellent progress applying complex technical issues to NC beaches

Photo by Rudi Rudolph SUMMARY Science Panel devoted to finishing sediment compatibility recommendations in a timely manner

Photo by Rudi Rudolph SUMMARY Science Panel cautious of rushing the final nourishment sediment criteria recommendations to the CRC

Photo by Rudi Rudolph SUMMARY October Science Panel meeting will again focus solely on sediment compatibility issues

Photo by Rudi Rudolph SUMMARY Final recommendations possible by October CRC meeting