Archived Information This information has been archived National Partnership for Reinventing Government 1999 Employee Survey U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ways to Improve the Hazard Management Process
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
External Quality Assessments Frequently Occurring Findings Observed by The IIA QA Teams.
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Campus-wide Presentation May 14, PACE Results.
Transit Security: An Overview of Activities Since 9/11 Eva Lerner-Lam President Palisades Consulting Group, Inc. ITE 2003 Annual Meeting August 24-27,
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
NORTHERN TERRITORY TREASURY Performance Development Framework (PDF) Review 2003 Original Treasury PDF Implemented 2009 November reviewed.
Performance Assessment Process: The Employee’s Perspective May 2014.
The National Declassification Center Releasing All We Can, Protecting What We Must Public Interest Declassification Board NDC Project Update April 22,
Texas City Municipal Police Association 2012 Satisfaction Survey.
1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of The Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management Human Resources Center The Department of Labor’s Performance.
Performance Appraisal System Update
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
UC San Diego Financial Perspective How do we look to resource providers? Customer Perspective How do customers see us? Internal Process Perspective Are.
Performance Measurement and Strategic Information Management
Michael Warren Senior Emergency Services Coordinator HMEP GRANT ADMINISTRATOR (916) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Executive Sponsor Session October 31, 2006 ATI Technical Assistance Workshop.
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
1 VA-Affiliated Nonprofit Research and Education Corporations (NPCs) Barbara F. West Executive Director National Association of Veterans’ Research and.
Core Performance Measures FY 2005
2010 Annual Employee Survey Results
Developing Quality Grant Proposals U.S. Department of Education Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives
THE STERLING MANAGEMENT MODEL… Is it right for you?
March 2010Developed by Agency Human Resource Services, DHRM1 Organization Assessment Example of an Organizational Design Review and Recommendations.
Maureen B. Higgins Assistant Director, Agency Support & Technical Assistance Office of Personnel Management December 8, 2010.
Robert M. Worley II Director, Education Service VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION Department of Veterans Affairs 2013 CCME Annual Symposium February 26,
DAS: State Controller's Division1January 2010 Department of Administrative Services State Controller’s Division Updated January, 2010.
“Changing Culture by Changing the Conversation” May 2000 Drive Change -- Don’t Just Measure It.
Orientation to 2008 Regional Training: Building and Sustaining Quality in NRS Data National Webinar June 24, 2008 Larry Condelli Steve Coleman.
NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems
THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF QUALITY, 5e, © 2002 South-Western/Thomson Learning TM 1 Chapter 8 Performance Measurement and Strategic Information Management.
Performance Management # 1.1. Employee Performance What is expected of an employee in terms of -Quantity of output -Quality of output -With specification.
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Breakout Session # 807 Dolly Fernandez, Chief, Contracting Services Div Rodger Evans, Chief, Design & Construction Western Div National Park Service,
TRANSIT BENEFIT CONFERENCE ON BEST PRACTICES AND STANDARDIZATION Presented By: December 6, 2007.
BPR PHASE IV IMPLEMENTATION NOAA Business Process Re-Engineering Current Status: June 21, 2006 NESDIS Cooperative Institute Directors and Administrators.
Leadership Council Retreat August 21, 2014 New Mentor Orientation Anchoring Our Work with DATA.
For over 70 years, the Texas Commission for the Blind has assisted blind and visually impaired Texans in achieving independent and successful lives through.
Commitment to Excellence in Nursing Regulation Presented at the 2004 CLEAR Annual Conference September 30 – October 2 Kansas City, Missouri Kathy Apple,
Federal Human Capital Survey: A Closer Look - FY 2008 The Department of the Treasury Building our Workforce for the Future April 2009.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
1 You are a New Member of the JAC; NOW WHAT? As a new Journey-Level Advisory Council (JAC) member, you probably have many questions, including those about.
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
Organizational Self-Assessment to Achieve Health Equity Gail Brandt Health Equity Consultant National Association of Chronic Disease Directors November.
2005 Customer Satisfaction Study September 2005 NASA Earth Observing System Data and Information Systems.
A Capacity Building Program of the Virginia Department of Education Division Support for Substantial School Improvement 1.
Pre-Decisional Involvement
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
Needs Assessment: Conducting, Completing and Aligning with the Budget November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker, ESE Worcester Public Schools: Gregg Barres, Manager.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
Budget Formulation 2017/2018 A review of the 2017 process and the 2018 process. Office of Budget and Performance Management November 2015.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
Quality Texas Foundation Site Visit Team Closing Meeting January 15, 2014.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
United States Department of Agriculture Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration Office of Human Resources Management Presented by Dr. Zina.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
The Federal Telework Program U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
1 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PRESENTATION TO BOTSWANA DRUG ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS 13 th – 17 th AUGUST 2007.
How Good are you at Managing your Processes? Operational Excellence.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 23, 2016 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) From Results to Action Presented by: Kim Haney-Brown.
1 Developing Your Internal Processes to Ensure Consistency Across Service Channels Integrating Government Service Channels Conference February 11, 2003.
Managing Talent – Maximizing Your Employee’s Potential 3 rd SACCO LEADERS’ FORUM Monique DunbarLorri Lochrie Communicating Arts Credit UnionCentral 1 Credit.
PowerPoint to accompany:
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Presentation transcript:

Archived Information This information has been archived National Partnership for Reinventing Government 1999 Employee Survey U.S. Department of Education Improvement Strategy March 31, 2000

NPR 1999 Employee Survey Background and Purpose Second government-wide employee survey. Large federal government agencies will assess organizational changes, especially in relation to reinvention efforts. Results to help agencies focus resources to improve operations and customer service. A 32-item survey was administered in September 1999 to a random sample of 32,265 employees in 46 government agencies. 12,755 surveys were returned--a 40 percent response rate.

Executive Summary Education’s (ED) results on the 32-item survey from 1998 to 1999: –Three items improved by 10 percentage points or more. –Six items improved by 6-10 percentage points. –Twenty-one items were within the margin of error (+/- 6%). –One item was worse by 7 percentage points. –One item was removed from the survey. Education compares favorably with Government-wide results: –Ten items were better than government-wide results by 10 percentage points or more. –One item was worse than government-wide results by 10 percentage points or more. Education has targeted four issues for special action. Education will use its own employee survey results to identify other areas for improvement strategies (ED survey results were received in March 2000).

Nationwide Comparison Differences of Ten Percentage Points or More In the past 2 years, the productivity of my work unit has improved.** My organization has made reinvention a priority.** Recognition and rewards are based on merit. Creativity and innovation are rewarded.** Corrective actions are taken when employees do not meet performance standards.*** Do you have electronic access to information to do your job? Teams are used to accomplish organizational goals, when appropriate. Employees in different work units participate in cross- functional teams to accomplish work objectives. In the past 2 years, I have been given more flexibility in how I accomplish my work.* Employees are rewarded for working together in teams. % Favorable *Best predictors of job satisfaction. **Best predictors of reinvention as a priority. ***Only survey item that Education was 10 percentage points lower than national average. How satisfied are you with the recognition you receive for doing a good job?*

Department of Education Areas of Greatest Improvement: Favorable Increases of 10 Percentage Points or More Recognition and rewards are based on merit. % Favorable Employees are rewarded for working together in teams. Management and the union(s) work cooperatively on mutual problems.

Department of Education 1999 Least Favorable Items % Favorable Has your organization streamlined the process for hiring employees? Are you clear about how “good performance” is defined in your organization? Employees are required to report the hours they work on a daily basis. Corrective actions are taken when employees do not meet performance standards. Has your organization simplified travel regulations?* Is the use of Plain Language writing being emphasized in your workplace? *Declined seven percentage points from 1998.

Recommendations and Performance Eleven 1998 survey items were targeted for improvement Three have improved by 10 percentage points or more: –Recognition and rewards are based on merit. (+14%) –Management and the union(s) work cooperatively on mutual problems. (+10%) –Employees are rewarded for working together in teams (for example, performance ratings, cash awards, certificates, public recognition). (+10%) Three have improved by percentage points: –Employees receive the training they need to perform their jobs (for example, on-the-job training, conferences, workshops). (+9%) –Are you clear about how “good performance” is defined in your organization? (+7%) –Creativity and innovation are rewarded. (+6%) Three have improved by less than 6 percentage points: –There are well-defined systems for linking customers’ feedback and complaints to employees who can act on the information. (+4%) –Employees receive training and guidance in providing high quality customer service. (+2%) –Corrective actions are taken when employees do not meet performance standards. (+1%) Two have declined: –Has your organization implemented simplified travel regulations? (-7%) –Has your organization streamlined the process for hiring employees? (-1%)

1999 Survey Action Plan For these department-wide, long-standing problems improvement actions will begin now: –Dealing with poor performing employees. –Streamlining the hiring process. –Simplifying travel management. –Linking customer feedback to employees who can take action on the information. Education is using its recently completed ED 2000 Employee Survey data coupled with the 1999 NPR survey data to identify additional department-wide areas for improvement actions. Further, individual ED offices will formulate their own improvement plans and will use focus groups and “tiger teams” as necessary.

Action Plan for Dealing with Poor Performing Employees Benchmark best practices of Federal agencies and the private sector. May In partnership with the union, implement best practices to create an environment of excellence. October Provide appropriate training to employees. November Provide performance management information and resources to employees: brochures, pamphlets, web resources, training opportunities, and counseling services. July-August Require all managers to attend performance management training at least annually so that they can demonstrate confidence in dealing with poor performers. December Require managers to assess employees’ knowledge, skills, and abilities and provide feedback to employees regarding standards for good performance. Ongoing. When we identify a non-performing employee, we will coordinate personnel, training, dispute resolution, and Employee Assistance Program efforts to assist in improving performance. Ongoing.

Action Plan for Dealing with Poor Performing Employees (cont’d) Require an Individual Development Plan for poor performing employees. Ongoing. Conduct focus groups with managers to better understand why managers are not dealing with poor performing employees. Assess results and determine appropriate action. December Conduct focus groups with employees (after consultation/negotiation with union) to better understand why employees believe good performance is not clearly defined and why corrective actions are not taken against poor performing employees. Assess results and, in partnership with the union, determine appropriate action. December Require managers to assess poor performing employees’ performance and provide corrective feedback quarterly. November Support proposed legislative changes. Ongoing.

Action Plan for Streamlining the Hiring Process Benchmark best practices of Federal agencies and the private sector. June Require selecting officials to take action on “certificates of eligibles” within 30 days of receipt thereof. June Implement an automated, customer accessible, personnel action tracking system that can identify bottlenecks, assess accountability, and speed up the hiring process. August Revise hiring procedures to improve timeliness and customer service. Begin implementation in September Automate the application process. November Support proposed legislative changes to streamline the hiring process. Ongoing.

Action Plan for Simplifying Travel Management Benchmark best practices of Federal agencies and the private sector. April Select new travel management contractor. May Review old contractor’s traveler satisfaction survey and prioritize customer requests for improvements. June Publish revised internal travel procedures on the Chief Financial Officer’s Intranet web site. September Implement an Intranet web-based travel system for processing Department of Education travel vouchers. Next 18 months.

Action Plan for Linking Customer Feedback to Employees Who Can Take Action on the Information Benchmark best practices of Federal agencies and the private sector. Secure customer feedback on key business processes in selected critical service areas. September Distribute customer feedback data from the ED Pubs customer satisfaction surveys to managers who can improve existing products and develop new ones. ED Pubs is the department’s central resource for ordering Department of Education publications. Design a process for conducting quarterly employee focus groups and labor/management meetings to identify needed improvement actions across the department. Develop a real-time system to share customer comments with key managers. Establish a Front Line Forum, bringing together ED’s front-line customer service staff to establish new and improved ways to share customer knowledge and feedback with other ED staff.

Statement of Commitment Judith A. Winston General Counsel and Acting Under Secretary U.S. Department of Education Since 1993, the Department of Education has demonstrated its commitment to improving employee satisfaction and customer service by implementing many new programs, including: flexiplace, a 360-degree performance appraisal system, new work/life programs (e.g., transit benefits), improved workspace in headquarters and the regions, and electronic customer access to ED information. The quality of these initiatives is reflected in the generally-positive results of NPR’s employee survey and the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) customer satisfaction survey. In 2000, we will continue our improvement efforts by focusing work on areas identified by employees on the NPR survey as most in need of improvement: dealing with poor performing employees, streamlining the hiring process and improving travel management. With these efforts and others, I expect the satisfaction of ED employees and customers to continue to improve. For more information, contact Jim Bradshaw in the Office of Public Affairs at (202) or via