R System. Lymphadenectomy pelvic para-aortic no Lymphadenectomy epithelial invasive ovarian cancer FIGO IIB - IV ECOG 0/1 and no CI against LNE no visible.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGO-Austria Phase-III Studie: HECTOR
Advertisements

“Taking Care of Tomorrows Patient Better than Today”… the Future is Now Set A1 – Title Slide David O’Malley, M.D.
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group Uterine Corpus Trials: GCIG David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation.
Intraperitoneal therapy in ovarian cancer Edward L. Trimble, MD, MPH National Cancer Institute, USA.
O VARIAN C ANCER C LINICAL T RIALS P LANNING M EETING Unanswered Questions in Upfront Therapy IP Therapy Issue Keiichi Fujiwara, MD, PhD Saitama Medical.
Senior Lecturer in Medical Oncology
Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients closed / 550 Leading EORTC Participating NCIC CTG Presentated at IGCS 2008 EORTC
Phillip Harter / Christian Marth
‍‍‍‍Chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer. Dr.Azarm.
Anal Cancer Rob Glynne-Jones Mount Vernon Cancer Centre on behalf of NCRI anal cancer subgroup.
Unanswered Questions in Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: Controversial Areas Deborah K. Armstrong, M.D. May 29, 2009.
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer Key issues in trial design.
Mary McCormack & Jonathan Ledermann NCRI Gynae Clinical Studies Group.
Evidence Based Decision Making In Gynecologic Cancer Paolo Zola Turin, ITALY Adriana Bermudez Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA.
GCIG Meeting 29th May 2009 The Implications of Primary Chemotherapy for Clinical Trials Iain McNeish Professor of Gynaecological Oncology Barts and the.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
1 March 2003 ODAC: DOXIL ®, Ovarian Cancer ODAC Discussion on Accelerated Approval March 12-13, 2003 DOXIL ® (doxorubicin HCl liposome injection) Treatment.
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Are there benefits from chemotherapy to early endometrial cancer
Partnering with Industry Katherine Y. Look M.D. Medical Fellow I Eli Lilly NCI/GCIG Panel Discussion May 29, 2009.
Investigating the Role of Anti- Angiogenic Agents in Ovarian Cancer Carol Aghajanian, M.D. Chief, Gynecologic Medical Oncology Memorial Sloan-Kettering.
Ovarian Committee. Closed Trials Upfront Surgery vs Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Patients closed / 550 Leading EORTC Participating NCIC CTG Presentation.
Be it resolved that… IP therapy should be the standard of care for women with optimally debulked Stage III ovarian cancer Not so fast… Michael A Bookman.
Result of Interim Analysis of Overall Survival in the GCIG ICON7 Phase III Randomized Trial of Bevacizumab in Women with Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer.
UPDATE ON GCIG TRIALS FOR EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
Proc ASCO 25: Abstract 5002 GOG0182-ICON5: Phase III Randomized Trial of Paclitaxel and Carboplatin vs Combinations with Gemcitabine, PEG-Lipososomal Doxorubicin,
Clique para editar o título mestre. Incorporation of bevacizumab in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: results and indications Ursula Matulonis,
GOG0172: The Dings The recommended regimen is not feasible –Substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin –Reduce cisplatin from 100 mg/m 2 to 75 mg/m 2 –Change.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer Angiolo Gadducci Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pisa Rome.
WHAT WILL THE KEY ISSUES IN END- POINT ASSESSMENT BE, IN FUTURE OVARIAN CANCER TRIALS INVOLVING NOVEL TARGETED AGENTS? first line treatment maintenance/consolidation.
Endometrial Committee David Scott Miller, M.D., F.A.C.O.G., F.A.C.S. Director and Dallas Foundation Chair in Gynecologic Oncology Professor of Obstetrics.
GCIG Rare Tumor Working Group Chicago, IL, June 3, 2010 Chair: Isabelle Ray-Coquard Co-Chair: David M. Gershenson.
OCEANS: A Randomized, Double- Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy with or without Bevacizumab (BEV) in Patients with Platinum-
Endometrial Cancer Commitee Minutes Prague, 21 October 2010 David Miller, Ketta Lorusso.
CALYPSO Trial: Carboplatin & Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) versus Carboplatin & Paclitaxel in Relapsed, Platinum- Sensitive Ovarian Cancer Pujade-Lauraine.
Endometrial Cancer Commitee Minutes Chicago June 3, 2010 David Miller, Ketta Lorusso.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
GCIG trials for rare ovarian histologies Edward L. Trimble, MD, MPH National Cancer Institute, USA.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel- Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab- Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
Pazopanib in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A new galloping horse. Dr. Raafat Ragaie, MD,FRCR.
Relapsed/Refractory Ovarian Cancer: Decision Points in Diagnosis and New Treatment Strategies Friday, March 24, 2006 Palm Springs Convention Center Primrose.
MITO 25 A randomized phase II trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Bevacizumab-Rucaparib vs Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Rucaparib.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Results Increased median PFS 2.8 months No apparent increased survival. HR=0.985 CR+PR=46% Gemzar vs 36% control Independently Assessed Increased toxicity,
Saturday, May 30, :00 PM - 9:00 PM The Peabody Orlando Orlando, Florida Ovarian Cancer: Recent Developments in the Standard of Care and Emerging.
GCIG Rare Tumor Working Group Prague, CZ, October, 2010 Chair: Isabelle Ray-Coquard Co-Chair: David M. Gershenson.
Elderly Women Ovarian Cancer Multicenter, randomized trial of carboplatin +/- paclitaxel in vulnerable elderly patients with stage III-IV advanced ovarian.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 GOG0213: Bevacizumab Retreatment of Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian.
Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences U.O.C Medical Oncology Director: Prof A. Russo Ovarian cancer Case Report 1 Dr. Lorena Incorvaia,
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
IMagyn050 YO39523 / GOG-3015 / ENGOT-ov39
Randomized Phase III Study Of Gemcitabine
Dose dense chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of ovarian cancer
Claudia Marchetti Pierluigi Benedetti Panici
Ovarian cancer update Kentucky cancer Registry 9/8/2016
PHASE I/II STUDY OF PEGYLATED LIPOSOMAL DOXORUCIN (PLD) AND GEMCITABINE (GEM) IN RECURRENT PLATIN RESISTANT OVARIAN CANCER (OC). A Study of the VWOG.
Farletuzumab in platinum sensitive ovarian cancer with low CA125
Tertiary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer:
Ovarian Cancer: A new look at an old veteran
ARRAY The MILO Study Study Design Schema
ACT II: The Second UK Phase III Anal Cancer Trial
IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update
Randomized phase III trial on Trabectedin (ET 743) vs clinician’s choice chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancers.
Joan L. Walker, M.D. Stephenson Cancer Center University of Oklahoma
IMagyn050 YO39523/GOG-3015/ENGOT-ov39 Recruitment Update
Presentation transcript:

R System. Lymphadenectomy pelvic para-aortic no Lymphadenectomy epithelial invasive ovarian cancer FIGO IIB - IV ECOG 0/1 and no CI against LNE no visible extra- and intra-abdominal tumor residuals no bulky lymph nodes Endpoints: OS, PFS, QoL Strata: centre, PS,age Lymphadenectomy In Ovarian Neoplasms AGO – OVAR OP.3 (LION) 80/ 640 Supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Carbo Paclitaxel +/- BIBF 1120 (Vargatef) Patients 0 / 1300 (2:1 random) Leading AGO-OVAR Participating AGO Austria, BGOG, GINECO, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US Oncology AGO-OVAR-12

Multicenter, randomised, double-blind, Phase III trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of Vargatef (BIBF 1120) in combination with standard treatment of carboplatin and paclitaxel compared to placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel patients with advanced ovarian cancer AGO-OVAR12 R C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T C T = Vargatef 2 x 200 mg po qd = Placebo  120 weeks C = Carboplatin AUC 5-6 d1 T = Paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 (3h) d1 q21d / 6 courses Vargatef / Placebo : - no intake on days of chemotherapy - dose: 200 mg po bid (combi + mono) - dose adaptation in case of undue toxicity - max. duration of 120 weeks in non-progressing pts SURGERYSURGERY n=1300

Pazopanib consolidation 1 yr First Line Chemotherapy Control Patients 80 / 900 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating AGO Austria, ANZGOG, BGOG, GEICO, GINECO, ICORG, JGOG, KGOG, MANGO, MITO, NSGO, US-Sites: California Consortium, NY GOG, SWOG AGO-OVAR 16

A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pazopanib Monotherapy Versus Placebo in Women Who Have not Progressed after First Line Chemotherapy for Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer Survival Follow-up (post-PD) First-line Chemotherapy (allow ip, neoadj) Placebo (12 months) Pazopanib (12 months) If not PD Treatment Period RANDOMIZERANDOMIZE Observation (to PD) Screening Baseline Post-Treatment Period Follow-up Period

Carbo Topo vs Chemo (CT or CG) in recurrent Platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer Patients 508 / 550 Leading NOGGO/AGO-OVAR Participating AGO-AUSTRIA, GEICO HECTOR

CT vs CDDP + Irinotecan Patients 416 / 652 Leading JGOG ParticipatingGINECO, GOG, KGOG, MITO, SGCTG JGOG-3017 Clear Cell Carcinoma

JGOG3017/GCIG Ovarian Trial Protocols Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel plus Carboplatin (TC) Therapy versus Irinotecan plus Cisplatin (CPT-P) Therapy as a First Line Chemotherapy for Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary Study Chair Toru Sugiyama, MD (Iwate Medical University) Study Co-Chair Seiji Isonishi, MD (Jikei University School of Medicine) Fumitoshi Terauchi, MD (Toho University)

RANDOMIZATION TC Paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 (d1) Carboplatin AUC 6 (d1) Every 3 wk x 6 CPT-11/CDDP CPT mg/m 2 (d1, 8, 15) Cisplatin 60 mg/m 2 (d1) Every 4 wk x 6 International Cooperative Phase III Study for Clear Cell Carcinoma -Clear Cell Ca -Stage I~IV 225 patients in each arm, 450 total for 3 years 326 patients in each arm, 652 total for 4.25 years

JGOG3017/GCIG T RIAL

Weekly CT vs 3-weekly CT (QoL) Patients 72 / 500 Leading MITO Participating MaNGO, AGO-OVAR MITO-7

Trial design Aim of the trial is to compare the quality of life of weekly somministration of carboplatin plus carboplatin (experimental arm) versus every 3 weeks administration of the same drugs (standard arm) in 1 ° - line advanced ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancer RANDOM Carboplatin AUC 2 Paclitaxel 60 mg/mq day 1, every 21days Carboplatin AUC 6 Paclitaxel 175 mg/mq day 1 - every 21days

PLD vs CT cross-over in 6-12 m platinum-free interval Patients 18 / 253 Leading MITO ParticipatingMaNGO, AGO-OVAR, Belgium MITO-8

RANDOM LIPOSOMAL DOXORUBICIN 40 mg/mq day1 every 28 days CARBOPLATIN AUC 5 + PACLITAXEL 175 mg/mq day1 every 21 days Cross-over at Progression CARBOPLATIN AUC 5 + PACLITAXEL 175 mg/mq day1 every21gg LIPOSOMAL DOXORUBICIN 40 mg/mq day1 every 28 days Trial design The objective of this trial is the efficacy determined through analysis of overall survival (OS) of the different sequence (CP→PLD vs PLD→CP) in recurrent ovarian cancer patients with platinum-free interval 6-12 months

ICON6: A randomised trial of concurrent (with platinum based chemotherapy) and maintenance cediranib (AZD2171, Recentin) in women with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup Trial Stage 1 MRC/NCRI, NCIC Stage 2 ANZ-GOG, IMN, EORTC, GINECO, GEICO, MANGO, NSGO, ICMB and others

ICON 6 Start up slides Oct 2009 ICON 6 Design schema Arm A Reference arm 6 cycles of chemotherapy plus Placebo No Progressive disease Maintenance cediranib after chemotherapy Maximum 18 months from randomisation Arm B Chemotherapy Plus cediranib during Chemotherapy Arm C Chemotherapy plus cediranib during Chemotherapy No Progressive disease Placebo Maximum 18 months from randomisation No Progressive disease Placebo Maximum 18 months from randomisation 2:3:3 RANDOMISATION

ICON6 Cediranib Dose Reduction Cediranib dose initially selected at 30mg/d in ICON6. Reduced to 20 mg Stage I re-started Stage I now completed 103 patients entered (11 UK; 6 CDN) Stage II being prepared with expansion of chemotherapy options to be discussed by ITMG Sunday 11th Oct- Belgrade ICON 6 Start up slides Oct 2009

Planned Trials

Cytoreductive surgery vs NO surgery in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC Patients 0 / 385 Leading AGO-OVAR Participating? AGO-OVAR-OP.4 DESKTOP III

AGO-OVAR-OP.2 DESKTOP II Study collective: AGO score + 1st relapse 129 pts (87%) Study collective: AGO score + 1st relapse 129 pts (87%) 08/06 – 03/08: Screening of 516 pts with platinum-sensitive relapse in 46 centres 08/06 – 03/08: Screening of 516 pts with platinum-sensitive relapse in 46 centres Score positive + First relapse Frequency of complete resection by applying the AGO Score 76% Complete resection

AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4) A randomized trial evaluating cytoreductive surgery in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer Complete resection seems feasible and a positive AGO-score Strata: Platinum-free-interval 6-12 vs > 12 months - 1st line platinum based chx: yes vs no Complete resection seems feasible and a positive AGO-score Strata: Platinum-free-interval 6-12 vs > 12 months - 1st line platinum based chx: yes vs no RANDOMRANDOM RANDOMRANDOM Cytoreductive surgery Cytoreductive surgery platinu m- based chemo- therapy * recom mende d platinu m- based chemo- therapy * recom mende d no surgery

The next steps: Protocol finalized (-> review participating groups) Ethical approval for Germany:12/09 -> FPI 01/2010 Identifikation of interested GCIG-groups/single centres -> representatives contact: Again limited funding - participating groups have to pay local costs (DESKTOP II model – Presentation/Publication/Co-authorship) AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)

Collaborative Nursing Study MITO12 Pathway to diagnosis of ovarian cancer in Italian women: an exploratory study Primary Objectives Describe the frequency and duration of symptoms in the 12 months preceding the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (Goff symptoms survey) Describe time intervals of sentinel events –Onset of persistent symptoms –First physician visit –Diagnosis of ovarian cancer Describe the pathway to diagnosis according to Andersen’s model of “total patient delay”

Weekly Paclitaxel vs weekly Paclitaxel and Pazopanib in patients with resistant/refractoryovarian cancer: Phase II randomized multicenter trial MITO - 11

Trial design Aim of the trial is to compare the PFS of weekly paclitaxel vs weekly paclitaxel and pazopanib RANDOM Pazopanib 800 mg/day Paclitaxel 80 mg/mq day 1, every 28days Paclitaxel 80 mg/mq day 1, 8, 15 - every 28 days

IP vs IV carboplatin + weekly Paclitaxel Patients Leading JGOG Participating JGOG IP Trial

iPocc Trial Design Epithelial Ovarian, Peritoneal, Fallopian Tube Cancer Stages II-IV Optimal, Suboptimal Excluding Clear Cell Carcinoma Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Weekly Carboplatin AUC 6 IV Q21, 6-8 Cycles Paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 IV Weekly Carboplatin AUC 6 IP Q21, 6-8 Cycles Randomization Primary Endpoint: PFS Secondary Endpoint: OS, Toxicity, QOL, Cost

oxaliplatin + capecitabine ± bevacizumab vs carboplatin + paclitaxel ± bevacizumab Patients 0/332 Leading NCRI/SGCTG GOG Participating AGO OVAR, GINECO, MaNGO, NSGO, KGOG MucinousEOC

Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre Targets: Planned start date – November 2009; Planned end date – May 2014 European Sites: Interest from sites in UK, Denmark, Finland, Sweden, Norway, France, Italy & Germany. Approximately 40 UK sites interested. Trial is in set-up, no centres are open. Chief Investigator: Prof. Martin Gore Sponsor: University College London Contact

TC dose dense / 3weekly ± BEVACIZUMAB Patients 0 / 2000 Leading MRC/NCRI Participating ? ICON-8

Randomisation ARM1: C q 3/52 P q 3/52 (current std) ARM2: C q 3/52 P q 1/52 ARM3: C q 1/52 P q 1/52 Current Proposal (A) Immediate Primary Surgery (IPS) (B) Delayed Primary Surgery (DPS) Surgery (IPS) Surgery (DPS) Chemotherapy (ARM 1-3 x 6) Chemotherapy (Arm 1-3 x 3) Chemotherapy (Arm 1-3 x 3) One trial with pre-specified stratification for IPD v DPS Plan to use lower dose of paclitaxel than JOG for arm 2: Carboplatin AUC6 d1Paclitaxel 60mg/m 2 d 1,8,15 q3w JOG study 60% received 6 cycles, 48% required at least one dose reduction and 76% had at least one delay, doses used carboplatin AUC6 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2

IP/IV Platinum/T vs IV CT optimally debulked following NACT Patients 0 / 780 Leading NCIC CTG ParticipatingGEICO, NCRI, SWOG NCIC CTG OV.21

Basic Design Patients with EOC 3-4 cycles neoadjuvant chemo Initial surgery: < 1 cm residual 3 cycles IV Carbo/Taxol 3 cycles IP/IV platinum and taxol Endpoints: PFS and OS R Day 8th Optimal Surgery Shorter course

Phase II Patients will be randomized to one of the following three arms: ArmAgent(s)DoseRouteDuration Schedule DaysRepeat 1 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 IV 3 hours Day 1 Every 21 days 60 mg/m 2 1 hour Day 8 Carboplatin AUC 5 if measured GFR (use AUC 6 if calculated GFR) 30 minutes* Day 1 2 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 IV3 hours Day 1 60 mg/m 2 IP By gravity as rapidly as possible Day 8 Cisplatin75 mg/m 2 IP By gravity as rapidly as possible Day 1 3 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 IV3 hours Day 1 60 mg/m 2 IP By gravity as rapidly as possible Day 8 Carboplatin AUC 5 if measured GFR (use AUC 6 if calculated GFR) IP By gravity as rapidly as possible Day 1 * or according to local practice

Phase III Patients will be randomized to one of the following two arms: ArmAgent(s)DoseRouteDuration Schedule DaysRepeat 1 Paclitaxel 135 mg/m 2 IV 3 hoursDay 1 Every 21 days 60 mg/m 2 1 hourDay 8 Carboplat in AUC 5 if measured GFR (use AUC 6 if calculated GFR) 30 minutes*Day 1 2The selected IP arm from Phase II (regimen as in above table) Every 21 days * or according to local practice

A randomised phase III trial of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent, platinum resistant, epithelial ovarian cancer Patients 0 / 250 Leading SGCTG Participating? DDPC-PREOC

Trial Design Carboplatin (AUC 3) and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) for 3 weeks out of 4 for 6 cycles Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (40 mg/m2) every 4 weeks for 6 cycles RANDOMISERANDOMISE 250 patients with platinum resistant disease Primary Endpoint: PFS Secondary Endpoints:Overall Survival Quality of Life Health Economic Analysis Response Rate Toxicity/Hypersensitivity Dose Intensity Post progression therapy

Thank you for attention