Objective-Oriented Project Planning (ZOPP)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Il Project Cycle Management :A Technical Guide The Logical Framework Approach 1 1.
Advertisements

The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.
PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Training on Project Development and Management
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS POLÍTICOS PARA ÁMERICA LATINA Y ÁFRICA LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH HUMANA.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
ACTION PLANNING FOR POST- QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEWS*
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Corporate Social Responsibility- do we need a Statutory Instrument? Presented to the Zambia Alternative Mining Indaba conference- July 17, 2013 Sombo Chunda,
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
Monitoring Evaluation Impact Assessment Objectives Be able to n explain basic monitoring and evaluation theory in relation to accountability n Identify.
Objective- and Strategic Analysis
1 CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT Lecture 3 Project management methodologies.
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT. Process Centre receives Scenario Group Work Scenario on website in October Assessment Window Individual Work.
CR Toolkit Workshop CR Stakeholder Identification Tool ICMM Toolkit# 1 & 2 Trainers: Joe Samara and Merikas Timori Date: 07 th August 2013 Venue: CR Conference.
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
1 Framework Programme 7 Guide for Applicants
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
Building Strong Library Associations | Regional Convenings DAY 1 Session 5 Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities (using SWOT) and determining Outcomes.
Demystifying the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge Central Iowa IIBA Chapter December 7, 2005.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Developing Indicators
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT PLANNING AND APPRAISAL LOGICAL FRAME WORK PREPARED BY GEORGE BOTCHIE.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
IPA Funds Programme Management sept Bölgesel Rekabet Edebilirlik Operasyonel Programı’nın Uygulanması için Kurumsal Kapasitenin Oluşturulmasına.
Mothers unwilling to go to clinics Low staff skills Inadequate number of clinics Shortage of drugs High infant mortality rates Commercial pressure for.
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK by Lorelyn T. Dumaug.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
1 PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT Gilles Ceralli TR Methodology – HI Luxembourg 06/2008.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
SUB-MODULE 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK RESULTS BASED LOG-FRAME TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2 )
Project Management Learning Program 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Writing Project Report Multi-Purpose Reporting.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
Project Management Learning Program July 2008, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Project Design and Planning Sequence of Systematic Project Design.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
THE PROJECT CYCLE By Dr. Peter Quartey (ISSER, Univ. of Ghana)
Monitoring and Evaluation
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
Preparing proposals for funding RIMC Research Capacity Enhancement Workshops Series : “Achieving Research Impact”
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Evaluation and Review of Experience from UNEP Projects.
July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
ACTED AME Appraisal, Monitoring and Evaluation. Summary 1/ ACTED AME department 2/ AME Responsibilities 3/ AME throughout project cycle 4/ Involvement.
Logical Framework Approach 1. Approaches to Activity Design Logical Framework Approach (LFA) – Originally developed in the 1970s, this planning process.
EH/GE 3131 PROJECT PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT 3/10/20161 Mr. Idrissa Y. H. Geography & Environment Department of Social Science School of Natural and Social.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Building an ENI CBC project
The Logical Framework Approach
Draft OECD Best Practices for Performance Budgeting
Dileep K Adhikary, PhD /PRAM Associates
UNDP-UNEP POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT INITIATIVE (PEI): MID-TERM REVIEW
AICT5 – eProject Project Planning for ICT
Civil Society Facility and Media Programme Call for proposals: EuropeAid/162473/DH/ACT/Multi Webinar no. 3: Preparing effective Concept Note.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

Objective-Oriented Project Planning (ZOPP) Dr Anthony Wemakor Dept of Community Nutrition SMHS UDS

Project and Programme A project can be described as the process of using inputs to carry out activities in order to achieve previously defined objectives. A programme is a series of projects in a sector, sub-sector or region that are linked together by a clearly defined concept.

Project Cycle Management Evaluation (See) Plan (Idea) Implementation (Do) PDM

Why Project Planning Objective-oriented – not activity-driven Consistency Logical - Logically sets objectives and actions Participatory Transparency and accountability Monitoring and evaluation Framework for assessing relevance, feasibility and sustainability Describes external factors that influence the project’s success: assumptions and risks

Project planning instruments Methods to facilitate the planning and implementation of projects and programmes Late 1960s Logical Framework Approach (LFA) (USAID) Early 1980s Objective-Oriented Project Planning (ZOPP) (GTZ) European countries adapted the ZOPP

Objective-oriented project planning (ZOPP) Goal-oriented project planning “Zeroing on People and Processes”

ZOPP ZOPP is a systematic structure for identification, planning, and management of projects Applied through iterative workshops with project authorities, beneficiaries and stakeholders Utilizes problem analysis and stakeholder analysis to create a project planning matrix similar to logical project framework

Zopp Workshops Lasts from 1 day to 2 weeks (avg. 1 week) Methods and Tools Lasts from 1 day to 2 weeks (avg. 1 week) Participants selected to represent all interest groups Basic premise: main interest groups must be represented from all levels Exercise requires a facilitator with a high degree of experience and skill

ZOPP ZOPP has 2 phases: A. Analysis Analysis phase comprises 5 sub-types Stakeholder analysis Problem analysis Objective analysis Alternative analysis Assumptions B. Project planning

A. Analysis Participant analysis: (interests, motives, attitudes and implications for project) Problem analysis: major problems grouped into a problem-tree with cause and effect and identification of the core problem Objectives analysis: a restatement of the problems into realistically achievable goals; Alternatives analysis: assessment of alternative objectives according to resources, feasibility, cost-benefit ratio, social risks, sustainability and other factors as decided by group. Prepared on charts. Assumptions: These conditions are necessary for successful transformation of problems into secured objectives.

1. Participant/stakeholder Any group within or outside a project that has a stake in the project’s activities and/or outcomes. Examples        Government        Local Authorities        Vulnerable groups        Employers        Workers        NGOs

1. Participant/stakeholder Analysis Purpose: To identify those groups who, directly or indirectly, will affect or be affected by a project. To determine, through consultation, the issues, concerns and information needs of different stakeholders To estimate the probable impact which various stakeholders will have on the project To identify measures to enhance stakeholder support for the sustainable development objectives of the project.

Importance of Stakeholder Analysis Methods and Tools Stakeholder Analysis promotes the three necessary conditions for the effective implementation of a project. Awareness/Commitment: that stakeholders understand and believe in the objectives and implementation strategy of the project. Capability: that stakeholders believe they can cope with and benefit from the changes which the project is intended to bring Inclusion: that stakeholders feel they are valued, consulted and part of the change process which the project represents

Step 3 Identify the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of the Stakeholders to the Project (SWOT) What are the strengths and weaknesses of the stakeholders? As a consequence, what are the opportunities and threats of the external environment?

Step 4 Methods and Tools Identify the main individuals/groups of Stakeholders who need special attention and propose specific measures in a summary table:  

2. Problem Analysis Purpose: To identify major problems and their main causal relationships. Output: ‘Problem tree’: a graphical arrangement of problems differentiated according to ‘causes’ and ‘effects’

Core Problem Approach Identify a “core” or central problem Methods and Tools Identify a “core” or central problem List all the problems related to or stemming from the core problem Determine which related problems are causes and which are effects of the core problem Arrange the problems in a cause-effect heirarchy around the core problem

Example: Problem Tree of Infant Malnutrition, Iquitos, Peru, 2005

Problem Tree Analysis Relies on: Methods and Tools Relies on: Group-based interaction e.g. Workshop format Participation of key stakeholders Process facilitation Achieving consensus on problems, causes and effects

3. Objective analysis The Problem Tree provides the basis for the objective analysis: the identification of specific project objectives by converting problems or constraints into specific objectives b) the definition of project activities and outputs by substituting cause-effect relationships with means-end relationships

Methods and Tools B. Project Planning The output of the Analysis Phase of the ZOPP process feeds into the planning phase. The output of the project planning phase is the Project Planning Matrix (PPM). The PPM is a 4 x 4 matrix. The PPM is a one-page summary of: why the project is carried out, what the project is expected to achieve, how the project is going to achieve these results, factors crucial for the success of the project, how the success of the project can be measured, which data are needed to assess project success, what the project will cost.

The Project Planning Matrix Summary of objectives/ activities Objectively Verifiable Indicators Means/Sources of Verification Important Assumptions Overall Goal (OG) Indicators that the OG has been achieved Document/database available to prove that the OG has been achieved For sustaining objectives in the long term Project Purpose (PP) Indicators proving that the PP has been achieved Document/database available to prove that the PP has been achieved For achieving the overall goal Results/Outputs Indicators proving that the results/outputs have been achieved Document/database available to prove that the results/outputs have been achieved For achieving the project purpose Activities Specification of inputs/costs of each activity Records of cost involved e.g. voucher, personnel emolument For achieving the results/outputs

Summary of objectives/activities Overall Goal to which the contributes Project Purpose: which project purpose needs to be achieved for a significant contribution to be made to the project goal? Results/Outputs: which results/outputs will have to be obtained in order to achieve anticipated impact? Activities: which activities will the project have to carry out in order for the results/outputs to be obtained?

Important Assumptions For sustaining objectives in the long term: Which external factors will have to occur in order to assure sustained continuity of the achieved contribution to the OG in the longer term? For achieving the overall goal: Which external factors will have to occur for the anticipated contribution to the overall goal to actually take place? For achieving the project purpose? Which important assumptions in relation to the results/outputs 1-..., that cannot be influenced by the project or has been consciously defined as external factors, that must occur for the project purpose to be achieved? For achieving the results/outputs? Which important assumptions in relation to the activities 1-..., that cannot be influenced by the project or have been consciously defined as external factors, that must occur in order for the results/outputs to be obtained?

Stages in the ZOPP Process Methods and Tools Stages in the ZOPP Process Pre-ZOPP: in-house exercise by agencies in preparation for a project. Appraisal ZOPP: in-house appraisal for preparing Project TORs Partner ZOPP: in-country; presentation and discussion of previous phase conclusions and recommendations with staff of project country Take-off ZOPP: in-country; preparation of the plan of operations with personnel responsible for project execution and counterpart authorities. Re-planning ZOPP: prepared in-country; adjustments during project implementation.

ZOPP’s Iterative Workshops Methods and Tools ZOPP’s Iterative Process ZOPP’s Iterative Workshops ZOPP is not a oneshot exercise; Each plannng phase has a specific goal Each goal is the subject of a workshop Each workshop comprised of different stakeholders Participants analyse key issues throughout the project cycle. No set formula for successful workshop. All need to create common language and understand one another divergent views

Conclusion Conclusion Methods and Tools Conclusion Conclusion Collaboration is not "automatically" part of the ZOPP process. The project team, borrower/donor, and stakeholders must commit to adopting a participatory stance for the overall project; otherwise, the ZOPP process is merely an organizing tool.

Logical Framework Analysis

3. Logical Framework Analysis Methods and Tools Q: What is Logical Framework Analysis? A: An analytical tool to assist project specialists and stakeholders in conceptualising: the objectives of a project; the means whereby these objectives will be achieved how progress towards achieving objectives will be measured and, the underlying assumptions and risks which will be faced

Contents of the LogFrame Matrix