1 Multiphase code development for simulation of PHELIX experiments M.E. Povarnitsyn, N.E. Andreev, O.F. Kostenko, K.V. Khischenko and P.R. Levashov Joint.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Plasma Medicine in Vorpal Tech-X Workshop / ICOPS 2012, Edinburgh, UK 8-12 July, 2012 Alexandre Likhanskii Tech-X Corporation.
Advertisements

Design and Experimental Considerations for Multi-stage Laser Driven Particle Accelerator at 1μm Driving Wavelength Y.Y. Lin( 林元堯), A.C. Chiang (蔣安忠), Y.C.
SENIGALLIA-COULOMB09 1 Protons Acceleration with Laser: influence of pulse duration M. Carrié and E. Lefebvre CEA, DAM, DIF, Arpajon, France A. Flacco.
Progress Report on SPARTAN Chamber Dynamics Simulation Code Farrokh Najmabadi and Zoran Dragojlovic HAPL Meeting February 5-6, 2004 Georgia Institute of.
Collaborative Comparison of High-Energy-Density Physics Codes LA-UR Bruce Fryxell Center for Radiative Shock Hydrodynamics Dept. of Atmospheric,
Imaginary time method and nonlinear ionization by powerful free electron lasers S.V. Popruzhenko Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow EMMI workshop.
SCT-2012, Novosibirsk, June 8, 2012 SHOCK WAVE PARTICLE ACCELERATION in LASER- PLASMA INTERACTION G.I.Dudnikova, T.V.Leseykina ICT SBRAS.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of Plasma Turbulence for Radiation Belt Remediation Center for Space Science & Engineering Research Virginia.
Hybrid Simulation of Ion-Cyclotron Turbulence Induced by Artificial Plasma Cloud in the Magnetosphere W. Scales, J. Wang, C. Chang Center for Space Science.
GEOMETRIC EFFECTS ON EUV EMISSIONS IN M. S. Tillack, K. L. University of California San Diego.
1 Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo simulations of a radiation driven plasma Marc van der Velden, Wouter Brok, Vadim Banine, Joost van der Mullen, Gerrit Kroesen.
Simulations of the Experiments Ken Powell CRASH Review October, 2010.
Prediction of Fluid Dynamics in The Inertial Confinement Fusion Chamber by Godunov Solver With Adaptive Grid Refinement Zoran Dragojlovic, Farrokh Najmabadi,
Short pulse modelling in PPD N. J. Sircombe, M. G. Ramsay, D. A. Chapman, S. J. Hughes, D. J. Swatton.
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling Zoran Dragojlovic.
M. S. Tillack, Y. Tao, F. Najmabadi Proposed contributions to Jupiter-III by the laser-matter interactions group Briefing to Prof. Yoshio Ueda 20 November.
Acceleration of a mass limited target by ultra-high intensity laser pulse A.A.Andreev 1, J.Limpouch 2, K.Yu.Platonov 1 J.Psikal 2, Yu.Stolyarov 1 1. ILPh.
Finite Temperature Effects on VLF-Induced Precipitation Praj Kulkarni, U.S. Inan and T. F. Bell MURI Review February 18, 2009.
Modeling Emerging Magnetic Flux W.P. Abbett, G.H. Fisher & Y. Fan.
PARS Workshop on Novel Methods of Excitation of ULF/ELF/VLF to Improve Efficiency and Availability" November 3 - 6, 2002 Sponsored by Air Force Research.
SECTION 3 CHANGES IN TEMPERATURE AND PHASE Chapter 10.
Measurement of Magnetic field in intense laser-matter interaction via Relativistic electron deflectometry Osaka University *N. Nakanii, H. Habara, K. A.
Great feeling Walking Ifen without machines Sunday Jan 26, 2007.
COST Meeting Krakow May 2010 Temperature and K  -Yield radial distributions of laser-produced solid-density plasmas Ulf Zastrau X-ray Optics Group - IOQ.
Massively Parallel Magnetohydrodynamics on the Cray XT3 Joshua Breslau and Jin Chen Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Cray XT3 Technical Workshop Nashville,
Attenuation by absorption and scattering
Tzveta Apostolova Institute for Nuclear Research and Nuclear Energy,
M. Povarnitsyn*, K. Khishchenko, P. Levashov
Experimental, technological and computational capabilities of RFNC-VNIITF for potential collaboration in the frame of ISTC Targeted Initiative G.N.Rykovanov,
Center for Laser Micro-Fabrication School of Mechanical Engineering Purdue University Large Scale Numerical Modeling of Laser Ablation.
1 Phase transitions in femtosecond laser ablation M. Povarnitsyn, K. Khishchenko, P. Levashov Joint Institute for High Temperatures RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Laser Energy Transport and Deposition Package for CRASH Fall 2011 Review Ben Torralva.
Multi-fluid MHD Study on Ion Loss from Titan’s Atmosphere Y. J. Ma, C. T. Russell, A. F. Nagy, G. Toth, M. K. Dougherty, A. Wellbrock, A. J. Coates, P.
Simulation of femtosecond laser ablation of gold into water Povarnitsyn M.E. 1, Itina T.E. 2, Levashov P.R. 1, Khishchenko K.V. 1 1 JIHT RAS, Moscow, Russia.
Multi-material simulation of laser-produced plasmas by Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics A. Sunahara France /5-11. Institute.
Experimental part: Measurement the energy deposition profile for U ions with energies E=100 MeV/u - 1 GeV/u in iron and copper. Measurement the residual.
VARIOUS MECHANISMS OF ELECTRON HEATING AT THE IRRADIATION OF DENSE TARGETS BY A SUPER-INTENSE FEMTOSECOND LASER PULSE Krainov V.P. Moscow Institute of.
Self-consistent non-stationary theory of multipactor in DLA structures O. V. Sinitsyn, G. S. Nusinovich, T. M. Antonsen, Jr. and R. Kishek 13 th Advanced.
Warm Absorbers: Are They Disk Outflows? Daniel Proga UNLV.
Optimization of plasma uniformity in laser-irradiated underdense targets M. S. Tillack, K. L. Sequoia, B. O’Shay University of California, San Diego 9500.
Computational Nanophotonics Stephen K. Gray Chemistry Division Argonne National Laboratory Argonne, IL Tel:
1. Fast ignition by hydrodynamic flow
Abel Blazevic GSI Plasma Physics/TU Darmstadt June 8, 2004 Energy loss of heavy ions in dense plasma Goal: To understand the interaction of heavy ions.
First Attempt of Modelling of the COROT Main Target HD Workshop: "gamma Doradus stars in the COROT fields" /05/ Nice Mehdi – Pierre.
Global Tracking for CBM Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Ivan Kisel 1 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory.
Laboratory photo-ionized plasma David Yanuka. Introduction  Photo-ionized plasmas are common in astrophysical environments  Typically near strong sources.
01/20/2009Wei, Sawada, Macphee, Mackinnon1 Revised target lists – Focus on shock heating and e-transport in WDM targets – Add electron transport in shocked.
Non Double-Layer Regime: a new laser driven ion acceleration mechanism toward TeV 1.
1 ON THE MODELING OF DOUBLE PULSE LASER ABLATION OF METALS M. Povarnitsyn, K. Khishchenko, P. Levashov Joint Institute for High Temperatures, RAS, Moscow,
Intramolecular Energy Redistribution in C 60 M. Boyle, Max Born Institute.
Heat Exchange. HOW IS THERMAL ENERGY TRANSFERRED? 3 MECHANISMS: CONDUCTION CONDUCTION CONVECTION CONVECTION RADIATION RADIATION.
Mirela Cerchez, ILPP, HHU, Düsseldorf Meeting GRK1203, Bad Breisig, 11th October 2007 Absorption of sub-10 fs laser pulses in overdense solid targets Mirela.
International Conference on Science and Technology for FAIR in Europe 2014 APPA Cave Instrumentation for Plasma Physics Vincent Bagnoud, GSI and Helmholtz.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
Wide-range Multiphase Equations of State and Radiative Opacity of Substances at High Energy Densities Konstantin V. Khishchenko, Nikolay Yu. Orlov Joint.
______ APPLICATION TO WAKEFIELD ACCELERATORS EAAC Workshop – Elba – June juillet 2016 | PAGE 1 CEA | 10 AVRIL 2012 X. Davoine 1, R. Lehe 2, A.
January 30, 2007 CERN Resonant laser ion sources By V. Fedosseev.
23. September 2016 | TU Darmstadt | Fachbereich 18 | Institut Theorie Elektromagnetischer Felder | Prof. Dr.-Ing. Thomas Weiland | 1 Laser acceleration.
Polarization of final electrons/positrons during multiple Compton
Thermal effects in laser-metals interaction using a
Chamber Dynamic Response Modeling
Simulation of laser ion-acceleration and transport
V. Bagnoud PHELIX, Plasma Physics department GSI Darmstadt
Temperature Measurements of Limiter Surfaces at High Heat Flux in the HT-7 Tokamak H. Lin, X.Z. Gong, J. Huang, J.Liu, B. Shi, X.D. Zhang, B.N. Wan,
Preliminary study for Soft X-ray Spectroscopy in VEST
Studies of the energy transfer
Development of a novel measurement technique for the Amorphous Carbon EM Characterization in the Sub-THz frequency range. A.Passarelli, A. Andreone,
Temperature gradient method Heat flux through bottom wall
Diagnosis of a High Harmonic Beam Using
M. Povarnitsyn, K. Khishchenko, P. Levashov
Presentation transcript:

1 Multiphase code development for simulation of PHELIX experiments M.E. Povarnitsyn, N.E. Andreev, O.F. Kostenko, K.V. Khischenko and P.R. Levashov Joint Institute for High Temperatures RAS, Moscow, Russia EMMI Workshop GSI, Darmstadt, Germany 22 November, 2008

2 Motivation PHELIX setup parameters and targets Model and problems of realization — Multiscale and multistage tasks — Adaptive mesh refinement — Summary of our model Preliminary results Conclusions and future plans Discussion Outline

3 Setup parameters & tasks = mkm,  ~ 500 fs  10 ns, E ~ 200  500 J, F ~  W/cm 2 PHELIX Hybrid: metals, dielectrics Foils & clusters Actual questions: warm dense matter increase absorption efficiency high temperature and ionization radiation loss

4 Time & space scales for PHELIX setup time, fs pulse duration el-ion exchange ionization rate laser frequency laser wavelength space, nm plasma cloud cluster size skin layer foil thickness

5 Limitations of modeling QMC ~ 100 particles MD ~ 1 mkm 3 (~10 5 processors, Blue Gene etc.) Hydrodynamics – real size systems, but… …kinetic models

6 Multiscale problem 1 mkm 1000 mkm Time steps ~ 10 5 Uniform mesh 2D ~ 10 6  10 8 cells 3D ~ 10 9  cells AMR 2D ~ 10 5  10 7 cells 3D ~ 10 7  cells Expecting AMR profit 2D ~ 10 times 3D ~ 100 times PHELIX

7 Adaptive mesh refinement Refinement is applied in zones of interest (interfaces, high gradients of parameters) while the rest of domain is resolved on a coarse mesh

8 Advance in time (3 levels of AMR) ΔtΔt Δt /2 Δt /4 lev0 lev 1 lev2 t

9 Multi-material Godunov’s framework with AMR Pb powder on Al at 5 km/s Grid: 4x10 6 cells, 10 4 Pb particles (0.1 mm) 12 proc, 10 hours

10 Multiscale problem Time steps ~ 10 5 Uniform mesh 2D ~ 10 6  10 8 cells 3D ~ 10 9  cells AMR 2D ~ 10 5  10 7 cells 3D ~ 10 7  cells Expected AMR profit 2D ~ 10 times 3D ~ 100 times

11 Two-temperature multi-material Eulerian hydrodynamics Basic equationsMixture model

12 Interface reconstruction algorithm (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) D. Youngs (1987) D. Littlefield (1999) Specific corner and specific orientation choice makes only five possible intersections of the cell Symmetric difference approximation or some norm minimization is used to determine unit normal vector j+1 j j-1 i-1 ii+1 U*tU*t U*U* 3D2D

13 Two-temperature semi-empirical EOS bn unstable sp

14 Ablation of metal targets by fs pulses M. E. Povarnitsyn et al. // PRB 75, (2007). M. E. Povarnitsyn et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 6343 (2007) M. E. Povarnitsyn et al. // Appl. Surf. Sci. (in press, 2008)

15 Extra effects in hot plasma

16 1.Multi-material hydrodynamics (several substances + phase transitions) 2.Two-temperature model (Te  Ti) 3.Two-temperature equations of state (Khishchenko) 4.Wide-range models of el-ion collisions, conductivity, heat conductivity (, ,  ) 5.Model of laser energy absorption (electromagnetic field) 6.Model of ionization & recombination (metals, dielectrics) 7.Model of radiation loss (bremsstrahlung + spectral radiation) 8.Parallel realization with AMR Model & code features

17 1.Multi-material hydrodynamics (several substances + phase transitions) 2.Two-temperature model (Te  Ti) 3.Two-temperature equations of state (Khishchenko) 4.Wide-range models of el-ion collisions, conductivity, heat conductivity (, ,  ) 5.Model of laser energy absorption (electromagnetic field) 6.Model of ionization & recombination (metals, dielectrics) 7.Model of radiation loss (bremsstrahlung + spectral radiation) 8.Parallel realization with AMR Model & code features

18 Interaction with Al foil t, ns I, a.u. 6 single-proc problem domain single-proc I 0 = 5x10 11 W/cm 2, =1.054 mkm, thickness = 2 mkm, Gauss r 0 = 6 mkm Single-processor mode, uniform mesh

19 Interaction with Al foil I 0 = 5x10 11 W/cm 2, =1.053 mkm, thickness = 2 mkm, Gauss r 0 = 6 mkm

20 Interaction with Cu clusters (n e /n cr ) #14  [g/cc] 2.8 T e [ev]620 T i [ev]75 = mkm I 0 = W/cm 2  = 500 fs

21 Interaction with Cu clusters (n e /n cr ) #14#6  [g/cc] 2.81 T e [ev] T i [ev]7560 = mkm I 0 = W/cm 2  = 500 fs

22 Conclusions and Outlook Simulation results are sensitive to the models used: absorption, thermal conductivity, electron-ion collisions, EOS, etc… Interaction with cluster targets can produce warm dense matter with exceptional parameters Adaptive mesh refinement can give an essential profit in runtime and work memory used For 2D and 3D simulation of PHELIX experiments we develop hydro-electro code with AMR and in parallel Multidimensional calculations with AMR and in parallel are in sight

23 Discussion