Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough Guowei YU 8 th March 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Advertisements

Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ Beauty 2005 in Assisi, June 2005 Sascha Caron for the DØ collaboration Tag beauty fast …
Standalone VeloPix Simulation Jianchun Wang 4/30/10.
Surplus Hits Ratio Leon R. C&A Meeting Oct. 31, 2001.
Status of  b Scan Jianchun Wang Syracuse University Representing L b scanners CLEO Meeting 05/11/02.
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
Potpourri Vishnu V. Zutshi Northern Illinois University.
Status of MC Simulation Huaimin Liu BESIII Collaboration meeting IHEP, Beijing, Jan. 12, 2006.
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
4/22/2017 Utilization of a Combinatorial Hough Transform for Tracking in 3 Dimensions with a Drift Chamber Stephen C. Johnson, Federica Ceretto, Axel.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Faster tracking in hadron collider experiments  The problem  The solution  Conclusions Hans Drevermann (CERN) Nikos Konstantinidis ( Santa Cruz)
Introduction Miha Zgubič, summer student Scintillating fibre tracker software Analysis of performance of momentum reconstruction 1.
MdcPatRec Tracking Status Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao Shandong University.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Status report on the Asian Solid State Tracking R&D March 31, 2003 M. Iwasaki University of Tokyo.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
BesMUC Reconstruction Current Status You zhengyun, Mao yajun School of Physics, PKU
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
1 Pion production in np collisions at 1.25AGeV A.Kurilkin, P.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, A.Ierusalimov, T.Vasiliev, LHEP-JINR, Dubna, Russia For the HADES collaboration.
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
1 Open charm simulations ( D +, D 0,  + c ) Sts geometry: 2MAPS +6strip (Strasbourg geo) or 2M2H4S (D+ and D - at 25AGeV); TOOLS: signal (D +  K - 
Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System Zepu Mao IHEP BESIII Annual Meeting 2005/05/29.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
Differential cross section in deuteron-proton elastic scattering at 1.25 GeV/u P.Kurilkin, A.Kurilkin, V.Ladygin, T.Vasiliev LHEP-JINR For the HADES collaboration.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
Current Status of MDC Track Reconstruction MdcPatRec Zhang Yao, Zhang Xueyao
1 PP Minimum Bias Triggering Simulations Alan Dion Stony Brook University.
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 MDC Track Finding at BESIII Zang Shilei BES Annual Meeting (Jun 1, 2005) ______________________________________ -Outline- 
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
FCAL Krakow meeting, 6. May LumiCal concept including the tracker R. Ingbir, P.Růžička, V. Vrba.
Track finding with g-2 silicon tracker 2 nd Workshop on Muon g-2 and EDM in the LHC Era May 5, 2012 Kazuki Ueno (RIKEN)
Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang , Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting
E+/e- Backgrounds at BEPCII/BESIII JIN Dapeng Aug. 22, 2011.
Retrieve stereo hits in Hough tracking. Tracking efficiency status When |cos|>0.8, efficiency drop fast (1) (2) Figure(1) efficiency : events found at.
Gianluigi, 10 Sep 2012 Paris, September 10 th 2012 Status of the Pattern Recognition Code Gianluigi Boca GSI & Pavia University 1.
Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010
Hough-4-14.
First step to Reconstruction of PANDA Barrel DIRC in PandaRoot
Progress on the online tracking algorithm
B. Hariharan Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Hough Based Tracking For Low Pt In MDC
Stereo hit in Hough Tracking
EFA/DHCal development at NIU
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
Fast Track Fitting in the SiD01 Detector
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Detector Optimization using Particle Flow Algorithm
LEPS Collaboration Meeting in Taiwan Update of TPC Analysis (II)
road – Hough transform- c2
Tracking efficiency and multi turn tracks
100MeV learning.
Hough 工作进展.
Retrieve stereo hits in Hough tracking
Study of MDC tuning.
Hough Tracking Status.
Presentation transcript:

Status of Fast Tracking Algorithm MdcHough Guowei YU 8 th March 2006

Outline Introduction MdcHough Algorithm Results and Discussions Summary

Introduction  Algorithm Developments in MDC Reconstruction  Presented by W.D.Li,Migrated from ATLAS DeveloperOffline AlgorithmEvents filter Algorithm S.L.ZangMdc Tracking Y.ZhangMdcPatRec X.M.ZhangMdcFastTrk G.W.YUMdcHough

 Purpose  Efficient track finding  Nice transverse momentum resolution  High efficiency of track finding at high noise level

MdcHough Algorithm 43 layers,19 axial type |cos  |<0.93 Cell is near square ~8.1mm Interaction point Cosθ=0.83 Cosθ=0.93

Flow of MdcHough HitsPTPT Initial track finding Local maximum finding Track selection and Merging Track fitting MdcHough

 Initial track finding ( use a LUT-base Hough Transform)  (R,  )  ( ,1/p T ) [  (0~2  ) p T (400MeV~  )] qC T R=sin (  –  0 ) C T = 0.3/p T  Build a wire-ordered look-up table (   1/p T = 300  100). wire n+1 wire n active wire n-1 wire.. Bin 1Bin 2…Bin 100 Bin 1Bin 2…Bin 100 Bin 1Bin 2…Bin 100. wire-ordered LUT Flow of MdcHough

 Local maximum finding (select good track candidates by wired- oreded LUT)  Track selection and Merging  N hit > 15  Merge some tracks sharing more than 9 hits Flow of MdcHough

 Track fitting  Obtain hits from Bin-ordered LUT  Fitting track to get P T by using lpav tool. bin n+1 bin n bin bin n-1 number.. wire 1wire 2…wire 19 wire 1wire 2…wire 19 wire 1wire 2…wire 19. bin-ordered LUT Flow of MdcHough

Results and Discussion  Track Reconstruction CPU Time ~ 1ms/1 track  Resolution of P T (1.0GeV  )  Generate  (P T :1GeV) by Fixpt  Efficiency of Reconstruction (  ) VS cos  (polar angular)  p=8.0 MeV

 Efficiency of Reconstruction VS P T (  e  p)  Momentum resolution VS P T (μ,e,π,p) Double Gauss Fit

Noise level type 0: = C type 1:  1/r type 2:  1/r 2 (P T :1.0GeV  )  Efficiency vs noise  Resolution VS noise

Summary It costs about 1ms to reconstruct 1 track Efficiency of reconstruction(  ) :   >99% (P T >300MeV) for single track   >99% when noise level are 5%,10%,15% and 20%   decrease quickly when polar angular more than 0.8 Resolution of momentum(  p):  P T < 1.0GeV  p of proton is more than others  P T > 1.0GeV  p keeps about same value for all particles   p turns bad at noise level is more than 10% in type “0” Same results by adding wires shift;  Further work is to enhance  near polar angular and test the Algorithm in adjusted magnetic field

Thank!