OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR VARIABLE RESIZING OF ROUND FLAT-TOP DISTRIBUTIONS George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA John A. Hoffnagle,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring film thickness using Opti-Probe
Advertisements

Soft X-ray Self-Seeding
Chapter 2 Propagation of Laser Beams
Cavity length alignement 1.Two alignement mirrors -> symmetric beam image 2.PZT sweeping with an amplitude = several FSR 3.Shift two plane mirrors (in.
Nonlinear Optics Lab. Hanyang Univ. Chapter 2. The Propagation of Rays and Beams 2.0 Introduction Propagation of Ray through optical element : Ray (transfer)
Ray matrices The Gaussian beam Complex q and its propagation Ray-pulse “Kosten- bauder” matrices The prism pulse compressor Gaussian beam in space and.
 Light can take the form of beams that comes as close
VARISPOT FS BEHAVIOR IN COLLIMATED AND DIVERGING BEAMS: THEORY AND EXPERIMENTS Liviu Neagu, Laser Department, NILPRP, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania.
Course outline Maxwell Eqs., EM waves, wave-packets
Decoupling laser beams with the minimal number of optical elements Julio Serna December 14, 2000.
Aberrations  Aberrations of Lenses  Analogue to Holographic Model  Aberrations in Holography  Implications in the aberration equations  Experimental.
Physics 52 - Heat and Optics Dr. Joseph F. Becker Physics Department San Jose State University © 2003 J. F. Becker San Jose State University Physics 52.
Group S3. Lab Session 5 Following on from our previous lab session decided to find the relationship between Disparity vs Camera Separation. Measured Disparity.
Announcements. Projection Today’s Readings Nalwa 2.1.
Physics 1402: Lecture 35 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … »solutions –Homework 09: Wednesday December 9 Optics –Diffraction »Introduction.
Nature of light Ray or geometrical optics Wave or physical optics Quantum theory: W p =hf.
Fig Spherical aberration for a lens
Camera model Relation between pixels and rays in space ?
Abstract A new ultrahigh-resolution photoemission electron microscope called PEEM3 is being developed at the Advanced Light Source. An electron mirror.
Lecture 8 ENGR-1100 Introduction to Engineering Analysis.
Physics 52 - Heat and Optics Dr. Joseph F. Becker Physics Department San Jose State University © 2005 J. F. Becker San Jose State University Physics 52.
The Pinhole Camera Model
Physics 1502: Lecture 34 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: graded soon … –Homework 09: Friday December 4 Optics –Interference –Diffraction »Introduction.
Kinematics - Plane motion Jacob Y. Kazakia © Types of Motion Translation ( a straight line keeps its direction) 1.rectilinear translation 2.curvilinear.
1 Chapter 10 Diffraction March 9, 11 Fraunhofer diffraction: The single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
The Ray Vector A light ray can be defined by two co-ordinates: x in,  in x out,  out its position, x its slope,  Optical axis optical ray x  These.
Image Formation. Input - Digital Images Intensity Images – encoding of light intensity Range Images – encoding of shape and distance They are both a 2-D.
LIGO-G Z Gaussian to Super- Gaussian Diffractive Optical Elements Patrick Lu Advisor: Prof. Robert Byer Stanford University March 23, 2005.
1 CS6825: Image Formation How are images created. How are images created.
Fiber-Optic Accelerometer Using Wavefront-Splitting Interferometry Hsien-Chi Yeh & Shulian Zhang July 14, 2006.
Pion test beam from KEK: momentum studies Data provided by Toho group: 2512 beam tracks D. Duchesneau April 27 th 2011 Track  x Track  y Base track positions.
Mirrors & prisms MIT 2.71/ /12/01 wk2-b-1 Last time: optical elements, – Pinhole camera – Lenses Basic properties of spherical surfaces Ray tracing.
Geometric Camera Models
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Assessing Single Crystal Diamond Quality
ABSTRACT The design of a complete system level modeling and simulation tool for optical micro-systems is the focus of our research . We use a rigorous.
MULTI-MODE GENERATOR FOR THE COLD TEST OF BROADBAND QUASI-OPTICAL GYROTRON MODE CONVERTERS D. Wagner 1, M. Thumm 2, G. Gantenbein 2, J. Flamm 2, J. Neilson.
Lecture 18 Optical Instruments
March Chuck DiMarzio, Northeastern University ECE-1466 Modern Optics Course Notes Part 2 Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University.
Lenses and imaging MIT 2.71/ /10/01 wk2-a-1 Huygens principle and why we need imaging instruments A simple imaging instrument: the pinhole camera.
Multi-colour sctintillator-based ion beam profiler James Green, Oliver Ettlinger, David Neely (CLF / STFC) 2 nd Ion diagnostic workshop June 7-8 th.
A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration Zhengyou Zhang Sung Huh CSPS 643 Individual Presentation 1 February 25,
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Circular aperture Wed. Nov. 27, 2002.
G. Ferioli, R. Jung - LHC-BI Review Workshop November 19&20 LHC Screen Profile Monitors G. Ferioli, R. Jung Introduction BTV LHC layout Monitor set-up.
Kerr-lens Mode Locking Without Nonlinear Astigmatism Shai Yefet, Valery Jouravsky and Avi Pe’er Physics Department and the Institute of Nanotechnology.
Prof. Charles A. DiMarzio Northeastern University Fall 2003 July 2003
Hartmann Sensor for advanced gravitational wave interferometers
New emittance monitor beamline
RICH MEETING - CERN - April 21 st 2004 Università degli Studi di Milano Bicocca Variation of Refractive Index inside an Aerogel Block Davide Perego.
For off-center points on screen, Fresnel zones on aperture are displaced …harder to “integrate” mentally. When white and black areas are equal, light at.
25/05/2007POSIPOL FOUR MIRRORS Fabry Perot resonator at LAL-Orsay Y. Fedala With help of F. Zomer, R.Cizeron.
Chapter 1. Ray Optics.
Systematic studies on pellet beam production M.Büscher, A.Gerasimov, V.Chernetsky, P.Fedorets, A.Dolgolenko,V.Balanutsa, A.Boukharov, L.Gusev, S. Mineev,
Announcements Exam 3 starts Thur noon, and continues through Mon close, in the Testing Center. It will include both conceptual questions and homework style.
G. Trad on the behalf of the BSRT team Emittance meeting 04/11/2015.
Optical Characterization and Performances of Aerogel Radiator L.Barion, G.Battaglia, M. Contalbrigo, P. Lenisa, A.Movsisyan, L. Pappalardo, M. Turisini.
3. Beam optics.
l 66TH MEETING OF THE ESRF l May 2014 l Author
HPR activities at INFN Milan
Single-shot visualization of EVOLVING, light-speed index structures by multi-object phase contrast imaging Zhengyan Li, Rafal Zgadzaj, Xiaoming Wang, Chih-Hao.
Geometric Camera Models
Chapter 10 Diffraction March 20 Fraunhofer diffraction: the single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Announcements Midterm out today Project 1 demos.
Review calculation of Fresnel zones
The M2 parameter in space ---beam quality factor
Scalar theory of diffraction
Chapter 10 Diffraction February 25 Fraunhofer diffraction: the single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Scalar theory of diffraction
Experience with photoinjector at ATF
Presentation transcript:

OPTICAL SYSTEM FOR VARIABLE RESIZING OF ROUND FLAT-TOP DISTRIBUTIONS George Nemeş, Astigmat, Santa Clara, CA, USA John A. Hoffnagle, IBM Almaden Research Center, San Jose, CA, USA

OUTLINE 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND BEAMS – MATRIX TREATMENT 3. VARIABLE SPOT RESIZING OPTICAL SYSTEM (VARISPOT) 4. EXPERIMENTS 5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 6. CONCLUSION

1. INTRODUCTION Importance of flat-top beams and spots Obtaining flat-top beams - Directly in some lasers, at least in one transverse direction (transverse multimode lasers; excimer) - From other beams with near-gaussian profiles – beam shapers (transverse single-mode lasers) Obtaining flat-top spots at a certain target plane - Superimposing beamlets on that target plane (homogenizing) - From flat-top beams by imaging and resizing  this work

2. OPTICAL SYSTEMS AND BEAMS: MATRIX TREATMENT Basic concepts: rays, optical systems, beams Ray: R R T = (x(z) y(z) u v)

Optical system: S A 11 A 12 B 11 B 12 A B A 21 A 22 B 21 B 22 S = = C D C 11 C 12 D 11 D 12 C 21 C 22 D 21 D 22 Properties: 0 I S J S T = J ; J = ; J 2 = - I; I = ; 0 = - I AD T – BC T = I AB T = BA T  det S = 1; S - max. 10 independent elements CD T = DC T A, D elements: numbers B elements: lengths (m) C elements: reciprocal lengths (m -1 ) Ray transfer property of S: R out = S R in

Beams in second - order moments: P = beam matrix W M W elements: lengths 2 (m 2 ) P = = = ; M elements: lengths (m) M T U U elements: angles 2 (rad 2 ) Properties: P > 0; P T = P  W T = W; U T = U; M T  M  P - max. 10 independent elements Beam transfer property (beam "propagation" property) of S: P out = S P in S T W = W I Example of a beam (rotationally symmetric, stigmatic) and its "propagation" M = M I U = U I W = W 0 W 2 = AA T W 0 + BB T U 0 In waist: M = 0 ; Output M 2 = AC T W 0 + BD T U 0 U = U 0 plane: U 2 = CC T W 0 + DD T U 0 Beam spatial parameters: D = 4W 1/2 ;  = 4U 1/2 ; M 2 = (  /4)D 0  / ; z R = D 0 /  Beam: P

Round spot D (α) Quasi – Image Plane + Cyl. (f, 0) – Cyl. (–f, α ) Incoming beam D 0 y x z Sph. f 0 Block diagram 3 - lens system: + cyl. lens, cyl. axis vertical ( f, 0) - cyl. lens, cyl. axis rotatable about z (-f,  ) + sph. lens (f 0 ) + free-space of length d = f 0 (back-focal plane ) 3. VARIABLE SPOT RESIZING OPTICAL SYSTEM (VariSpot)

W 2 = W 2 I; W 2 = A 2 W 0 + B 2 U 0 W 2 (  ) = [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) sin 2 (  )] W 0 + (f 0 2 ) U 0 = W 0 [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) sin 2 (  ) + f 0 2 /z 2 R ] D(  ) = D 0 [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) sin 2 (  ) + f 0 2 /z 2 R ] 1/2 = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/sin 2 (  R )] 1/2 Compare to free-space propagation: D(z) = D m [1 + z 2 /z 2 R ] 1/2 D m = D 2 (  =  ) = D 0 f 0 / z R =   f 0 D M = D 2 (  =  2) = D 0 [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) + f 0 2 /z 2 R ] 1/2  D 0 f 0 / f (for f/z R <<1) sin(  R ) = f/z R ;  R = “angular Rayleigh range” Perfect imager  B = 0  W 2 = A 2 W 0  beam-independent “Image-mode” of optical system + incoming beam (beam-dependent - Rayleigh range z R ): A 2 W 0 >> B 2 U 0  A 2 >> B 2 /z 2 R f/z R = sin(  R ) << sin(  )  1 VariSpot “image-mode”  D(  )  D 0 (f 0 /f) sin(  ) VariSpot input-output relations

4. EXPERIMENTS Experimental setup

Data on experiment Incoming beam data ( = 514 nm) CCD camera data (type Dalsa D7) - Gaussian beam Pixel size: 12  m D 0 = mm Detector size: 1024 x 1024 pixels  = mrad Dynamic range: 12 bits (4096 levels) z R = 29.1 m Noise level: 2 levels M 2 = 1.05 Attenuator: Al film; OD  3 - Flat-top (Fermi-Dirac) beam D 0 = mm  = mrad z R = 45.8 m M 2 = 1.55 VariSpot data f Cyl = +/- 500 mm f 0 = 1000 mm  = (manually rotatable mount, +/ resolution)

Fermi-Dirac (F-D) beam profile I(r) = I 0 / {1 + exp [  (r/R 0 - 1)]} R 0 = 3.25 mm  = I 0 = mm 2 M 2 (ideal F-D) = 1.50 M 2 (experimental F-D) = 1.55

5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Exact  D(  ) = D 0 [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) sin 2 (  ) + f 0 2 /z 2 R ] 1/2 = = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/sin 2 (  R )] 1/2 Image-mode  D(  )  D 0 (f 0 /f)sin(  ) = D M sin(  ) Gaussian beam D(  ) vs.  D(  ) vs. sin(  E = d min /d max vs. 

Exact  D(  ) = D 0 [(f 0 2 /f 2 ) sin 2 (  ) + f 0 2 /z 2 R ] 1/2 = = D m [1 + sin 2 (  )/sin 2 (  R )] 1/2 Image-mode  D(  )  D 0 (f 0 /f)sin(  ) = D M sin(  ) Flat-top (Fermi-Dirac) beam D(  ) vs.  D(  ) vs. sin(  E = d min /d max vs. 

Estimating the zoom range in image-mode (“angular far-field”) D(  ) vs.  (small angles) Kurtosis vs.  Blue lines  Image-mode   4 0 D(  )  D 0 (f 0 /f)sin(  ) = D M sin(  )   Zoom range in image-mode (FD  FD)  13 x - 15 x

Examples of spots - Gaussian beam Incoming gaussian beam; D 0 = mm Gaussian beam in back-focal plane of f 0 = 1 m spherical lens D f = mm

Examples of spots - flat-top (Fermi-Dirac) beam Incoming Fermi-Dirac beam; D 0 = mm Fermi-Dirac beam in back-focal plane of f 0 = 1 m spherical lens D f = mm

Examples: VariSpot at working distance Gaussian beam  = 50 0  = 10 0  = 4 0  = 50 0 Fermi-Dirac beam

Discussion - Zoom (image-mode) range (D M /D min ) scales with z R /f - Variable spot size scales with f 0 - Cheap off the shelf lenses used, no AR coating - This arrangement already shows ( ) : 1 zoom range for flat-top profiles. D min  1.0 mm; D M  13.6 mm - Estimated ( ) x zoom range for flat-top profiles - Estimated 50  m minimum spot size with flat-top profile - Analysis  smaller spots in “focus-mode”, (“Fourier-transformer-mode”, “angular near-field”) regime (not discussed here)

Prototype Zoom = 7 : 1 D min  1 mm; D M  7 mm

6. CONCLUSION New zoom principle demonstrated to resize a flat-top beam at a fixed working distance Zoom factor (dynamic range of flat-top spot sizes): ( ) : 1 D min  1.0 mm; D M  13.6 mm Reasonable good round spots with flat-top profiles Estimated results using this approach (with good incoming flat-top beams and good optics): D min  50  m Zoom factor: ( ) : 1