CBM Constitution (By-law) Mihai Petrovici, CBM-Meeting, GSI-Darmstadt, October 5-7, 2004 - Short history - Why do we need a Constitution ? - Present draft.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Terms of Reference for the GEO Executive Committee Note: These Terms of References were approved at GEO-6 Helen Wood, GEO Secretariat Director.
Advertisements

Alan Edwards European Commission 5 th GEO Project Workshop London, UK 8-9 February 2011 * The views expressed in these slides may not in any circumstances.
European COoperation in the Field of Scientific and Technical Research Role and rules of procedure for Management Committee Carine Petit Science Officer.
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
Mandate of Parameter and Lay out Committee (PLC) of the HL-LHC project L. Rossi HL-LHC PC.
Lexington TMMA Proposed Bylaw Amendment Election of Officers March 9,
Division Leaders Meeting Reno, 2011 May, 22 nd 12:30 – 1:45 PM.
1 Future of NamGIS Johan van Rensburg Polytech 14 October 2005.
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
ATLAS Authorship Policy R. Voss Physics Department, CERN IUPAP C11 ICHEP’04, Beijing, China, August 18, 2004.
COUNCILLORS, MAYOR & ADMINISTRATOR ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES.
Chapter Rules Checklist. Article I.Name (Chapter name assigned by State Organization) Article II.Object/Purpose Chapter objectives include promotion of.
The role and responsibilities of the EITI Board Members Sydney, 24 May 2013 Christian Fr. Michelet.
CTC Board of Directors Roles & Responsibilities January 2014.
Welcome Elizabeth Schanbacher Assistant Superintendent of Educational Technology.
INDIANA UNIVERSITY Graduate and Professional Student Organization Elected Officers.
 Like the constitution of the country.  Filed with state to create a business.  States the purpose of the organization.  States the primary activities.
By: 1. Kenneth A. Kim John R. Nofsinger And 2. A. C. Fernando.
Saginaw Valley State University School/University Partnerships Presents.
 Management Structure  Roles & Responsibilities  Rules  AGM  Elections/Appointments I.A.W.P Governance.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Governance Document.
ASME C&S Training Module B2 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
Roles and Responsibilities in Municipal Land Use.
Report to the collaboration Yifang Wang IHEP Progress of the construction –SSM: Valve box successful, magnet cool down in mid June –Mechanical structure.
Discussion on HTASC Future Tobias Haas XV HTASC 3 October, 2003 CERN.
Proposed Bylaws Revisions Faculty Senate – June 12, 2014.
2 February Bylaws and Operations Manual Coordinator 2008 Region 10 Meeting Akinori Nishihara.
FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION TWO UNDERSTANDING THE ORGANIZATION OF CODEX Module 2.5 How do Codex Committees function?
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
1 1 LCC Physics and Detector Hitoshi Yamamoto ECFA LC2013, DESY May 27, 2013.
Proposed Recommendations of the West Virginia Formulation Council Subcommittee Sean Litteral, Chairman West Virginia Department of Transportation GIS Manager.
International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons at Darmstadt CBM Collaboration meeting Status Interim MoU J. Eschke, GSI.
Proposed Changes to the Executive Committee Gary Poleskey, President January 22, 2010.
Memorandum of Understanding RD-51 Collaboration 1MPGD-WS, NIKHEF April 2008H.Taureg.
Recommendations on the scientific programme The PAC endorsed the main lines of the proposed long-term programme. The draft document is expected.
1 Spokesman Selection Task Force SSTF - Report IB meeting, BNL, July 13, 2006 (Itzhak Tserruya on behalf of the SSTF)
International Accelerator Facility for Beams of Ions and Antiprotons at Darmstadt Introduction and Status EU CNI contract Kick-off meeting, December 1-2,
15/2/2006 LHCC Status Report J. Schukraft General News LHC progress & Schedule  continuing well, approx 2-4 month delay in some areas  NEW schedule:
Ian Bird GDB CERN, 9 th September Sept 2015
Cultural Heritage and Global Change: a new challenge for Europe Working for strengthening the European Research Area Towards Joint Programming in Research.
Few ideas for the future of the collaboration I.laktineh.
1Tuesday, April 21, 2009Presentation on the Latest Research kfairf aifiar 1 Speaker and Deputy are elected from within the Senate. What the Faculty Senate.
1 May 30, 2007 U.S. – China Symposium on Active Industry Participation in Standardization Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
Welcome and the ATF2 international collaboration in future 1.Introduction 2.Mission of ATF/ATF2 3.Organization of ATF/ATF2 4.International Collaboration.
LHC Computing, SPC-FC-CC-C; H F Hoffmann1 CERN/2379/Rev: Proposal for building the LHC computing environment at CERN (Phase 1) Goals of Phase.
AFSA Chapter Officer Training Module 1 Officer Roles and Responsibilities.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 A New Governance for IHE-Europe David Monteau, INRIA IHE-International Meeting, Nov
The role and responsibilities of the EITI Board Members Lima, 23 February 2016 Christian Fr. Michelet.
Discussion 5: Selecting Spokespeople Stefan Söldner-Rembold and Chang Kee Jung September 24, 2014 Fermilab, iiEB meeting.
ORIENTATION SESSION FOR COMMITTEE MEMBERS
Student Representative Council
Updating the Regulation for the JINR Programme Advisory Committees
MADMAX draft MoU preamble:
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Overview of U.S. Participation in ISO and IEC
Seventh RD51 CB – 14/4/2011 AGENDA Approval of the agenda
Soror Jacqueline Roundtree
AFSA Chapter Officer Training
Position Descriptions
The LCWR Governance Model
PRESENTATION BY NCOP ON STRUCTURE, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NCOP, DISTRICT AND SUB COUNTY COUNCILS FOR OLDER PERSONS COUNCILS.
Suggestions for changes in the Terms of Reference for JPIAMR
CEOS Membership Issues
PRESENTATION BY THE NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
Working with library trustees
INTERNATIONAL FUEL TAX AGREEMENT (IFTA)
Position descriptions
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

CBM Constitution (By-law) Mihai Petrovici, CBM-Meeting, GSI-Darmstadt, October 5-7, Short history - Why do we need a Constitution ? - Present draft - main aspects - Next steps

Feb. 2004: CB chairperson elected Spokesperson election by in an anonymous way Constitution (by-law) elaboration ~250 participants - 39 Institutions - 12 countries  Working group: Herbert Ströbele Zbigniew Majka Walter F.J. Müller Peter Senger Mihai Petrovici Peter Senger  Ref: ALICE ATLAS CMS PHENIX STAR COMPASS Conceptual Design Report LOI

(RRB)    Project Leaders      Management Structure Management Functions

CBM Organization I. General 1. Science Mission 2. Membership of the Collaboration 3. New Members of the Collaboration 4. Suspension of Membership 5. Associate Membership 6. Non-Fulfilment of Obligations 7. Plenary Meetings 8. Milestones II. Collaboration Board 1. Role 2. Membership 3. Chairperson and Deputy 4. Meetings 5. Decision Procedures 6. Agenda and Minutes III. Management Structures 1. Management Board 2. Technical Board 3. Resources Board 4. Physics Board IV. Management Functions 1. General Rules 2. Spokesperson and Deputy 3. Coordinators 4. Project Leaders

I. General 1. The Science Mission of CBM The goal of the CBM Collaboration is to built a dedicated heavy-ion detector to investigate the properties of highly compressed baryonic matter as it is produced in nucleus-nucleus collisions at the future accelerator facility in Darmstadt. The present design of the detector is described in the Letter of Intent. The primary mission of CBM is to study key questions of QCD in the region of moderate temperature and very high baryonic densities: confinement chiral symmetry restoration nuclear equation of state 2. Membership of the Collaboration Institutions Members 7. Plenary Meetings The full collaboration has 3-4 days meetings (CBM meetings) at least 2 times a year. The general forum, the CBM Plenary Meetings, assembles at these occasions. Plenary Meetings are open to all Members of the Collaboration. All major issues concerning the physics aims of CBM, the design of CBM detectors and other important matters are presented to the Plenary Meetings prior any decision in the Collaboration Board.

I. General 8. Milestones On the way to a full functioning Colaboration, te following steps are foreseen: Letter of Intent Memorndum of Unerstanding Technical Design Report Physics Performance Report Memorandum of Understanding for Maintenance and Operation

II. Collaboration Board 1. Role The Colaboration Board (CB), is the policy and decision making body of the CBM Collaboration 2. Membership One representative of each Member Institution Each Institution has one vote 3. Chairperson and Deputy 4. Meetings 5. Decision Procedures Decisions require 2/3 majority of the Institutions represented during the vote.

III. Management Structures 1. Management Board Role The CBM Management Board (MB) supervises the progress of the experiment, along the lines defined by the CB and prepares decisions for and makes recomandations to the CB Membership The CB Chairperson in consultation with the Collaboration and Spokesperson nominates members of the MB which are then elected by the CB Ex officio Members of the MB are the Spokesperson and Deputy, the Coordinators, the CB Chairperson and Deputy 2. Technical Board 3. Resources Board 4. Physics Board

IV. Management Functions 1. General Rules All mandates and appointments are valid for a limited period of time as defined by the CB 2. Spokesperson and Deputy The Spokesperson is responsible to the CB for the execution of the CBM project He/She takes all necessary decisions in close consultation with MB and CB He/She represents the CBM Collaboration to the Darmstadt Future Facility Committee, to its management and to the outside world 3. Coordinators Technical Coordinator Engineering & Integration Coordinator Physics Coordinator Resources Coordinator Other Coordinators May be nominated by the Spokesperson such as Test Beam Coordinator 4. Project Leaders

(RRB) Walter F.J. Müller Volker Friese October 8, 2004, 16:00 CBM-CB Meeting · · Approval of the CBM Constitution · · Election of : - Technical Coordinator - Physics Coordinator