Final Reports, No-Cost Extensions and Close Outs FY06 ERCM Final Grantee Meeting August 4, 2007, Washington, DC U.S. Department of Education, Office of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Office of University Partnerships Office of Policy Development and Research U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships.
Advertisements

Page 1 Discretionary Grant Administration. Page 2  Overview of ED financial policies  Managing budget  Avoiding audit problems  Identifying key resources.
Office of University Partnerships Madlyn Wohlman-Rodriguez Hispanic-Serving Institutions Assisting Communities (HSIAC) 2006 Grant Terms and Conditions.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Sam Lopez, NPD Program Manager, OELA
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program Application Webinar 12/22/201110:00 AM 1/4/20122:00 PM.
Grants Management Overview 2013 Minority Fellowship Program Grantee Meeting April 23-24, 2013 Salvador Ortiz; Maria Martinez;
© 2014 Public Health Institute PROPOSAL WRITING.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Developing Earmark Grant Performance Measures: Grant Proposal Section 3 Deanna Khemani.
Performance Monitoring and Evaluation: Site Visits, Reporting, and the Government Performances and Results Act FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December.
Enhanced Assessment Grant1 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Enhanced Assessment Grants (Updated June 2012)
1 Susan Weigert, Project Officer GSEGs Overview of GSEG Management.
Centers for International Business Education—Technical Assistance.
A Fiscal Overview of Grants Illinois Association of School Business Officials Educational Support Professionals’ Conference Presented by: Tim Imler.
325K: Combined Priority for Personnel Preparation Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
325D Preparation of Leadership Personnel Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Presenter: Patricia Gonzalez, Ph.D. Office.
Health Center Planning Grants: An Overview of Final Reporting Requirements & Grants Close Out Avni Shridharani, MHS Senior Advisor Bureau of Primary Health.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION ARRA GREEN JOB AND HEALTH CARE / EMERGING INDUSTRIES NEW GRANTEE POST AWARD FORUM JUNE.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Webinar April 19, 2011 HazMat Grant Program: HMEP Application Guidance Overview and Explanation of the Sample Application for the HMEP Grant Program for.
First 5 LA Invoicing & Budget Modification Workshop OHCD Contractors FY
Social and Behavioral Context for Academic Learning Program Meeting Emily Doolittle Program Officer Sunday, June 7, 2009.
Reporting on the Federal Financial Report “SF-425” Presented by HOMELESS GRANT AND PER DIEM PROGRAM and The Financial Service Center 1.
Basic Financial Reporting Carol A. Langguth Division Director Duane Alphs Team Leader Awards Management Division Office of Grants & Financial Management.
Monitor and Closeout Awards Lamar Revis NMFS Team Leader Paulette S. Moss OAR, NWS, NESDIS Team Leader.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Page 1 Discretionary Grants Administration David J. Downey Office of the Deputy Secretary Risk Management Service.
Evaluation, Government Performance and Results Act and Performance Reports FY06 ERCM Initial Grantee Meeting December 7, 2006, San Antonio, TX U.S. Department.
MDCH/DELEG Michigan Nursing Corps Request for Proposals Webinar March 15, 2011 Collaboration of Michigan Department of Community Health and Michigan.
Specialty Crop Block Grant Program –Farm Bill CFDA –
Program Overview Joint grantee meeting for Cognition & Student Learning (CASL) and Education Technology (EdTech) Carol O’DonnellJonathan Levy Program Officer,
DIVISION OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT UPDATES.
1 Expanded Authorities & Financial Monitoring. 2 Greater flexibility for managing ED Discretionary Grants The “Expanded Authorities” Amendments Amendments.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Non-Competing Continuation HRSA 5-U NCA TA Website:
Accountability and Grants Management: Connecting the Dots U.S. Department of Labor, ETA, Region 4 Discretionary Grantee Training Conference March 1-2,
Charter School 2015 Annual Finance Seminar Grant Management Office of Grants Fiscal September 11, 2015.
1 SPDG Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office.
IES Statistical and Research Methodology in Education Grant Program (84.305D) 2010 Program Meeting.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2011.
Social Innovation Fund Creating an Application in eGrants Technical Assistance Call 1 – 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 19, ;
How to Submit An Amendment Tips from the 21 st CCLC Unit Updated September 17, 2009.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Outreach Program Closeout Process & Performance Improvement Measurement System (PIMS) Kathryn Umali, MPH, CHES U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
SIG Day 2009 Jennifer Doolittle OSEP July 20, 2009.
Completing the PIRC 2010 Annual Performance Report Parental Information and Resource Center Technical Assistance Webinar April 13, 2010 United States Department.
Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) 2004 Renewal Competition.
NOTES FROM INFORMATIONAL BRIEFINGS FOR POTENTIAL REGIONAL CENTER AND CONTENT CENTER APPLICANTS JUNE 19,20 & 22, 2012 Comprehensive Centers Program.
1 Access to the World and Its Languages LRC Technical Assistance Workshop (Part 1) Access to the World and Its Languages I N T E R.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
Center for Faith-Based and Community Initiatives Carol M. White Physical Education Program CFDA # F.
FTA Research Program Requirements Bruce Robinson Office of Research, Demonstration and Innovation April 17, 2007.
OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Managing Your Grants 101 Terry Jackson – OSEP Shedeh Hajghassemali – OSEP July 22, 2008.
ANNUAL AND FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS 524B FORM REPORTING PERIOD BUDGET EXPENDITURES INDIRECT COST RATE PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
1 SPDG Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants SPDG Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2015.
1 Jennifer Coffey 323A State Personnel Development Grants Webinar on Grant Performance Report for Continuation Funding Jennifer Coffey Office of Special.
Modifications eta EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR YouthBuild Grants Management & Region 3 Peer to Peer Forum May.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING FY 2013 Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education.
PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Webinar for 325D and 325K Grantees Completing the ED Grant Performance Report (ED 524B) for the Annual Performance.
Grant Modifications and When Are They Needed? Region 3 Discretionary Training Forum April 26-29, 2011 Atlanta, GA Presented by: Connie Taylor, FPO eta.
Educational Technology, Media, and Materials
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Tara Hill and Sara Strizzi
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORTS
How to Complete a Matching Grant Report
Presentation transcript:

Final Reports, No-Cost Extensions and Close Outs FY06 ERCM Final Grantee Meeting August 4, 2007, Washington, DC U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools 400 Maryland Avenue, SW / Washington, DC Michelle Sinkgraven Sara Strizzi Program Analysts, U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools

2 Session Objectives Provide an overview of final report requirements Project Specific Measures GPRA Budget Information Discuss no-cost extensions Purpose Process Closing out FY06 ERCM grant projects Report due dates Liquidation Period Available Resources

3 Final Reports

4 Measures to Report on in the Final Report 1.Project-specific objectives and performance measures As reflected in grant applications As reported on in interim report Based on individual school and district issues 2.Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) measures

5 Project-Specific Objectives Project Objective: A specific, measurable statement about what the project will achieve. Hint: Start the objective with the word “To” followed by a verb. For example, “To increase the number of bus drivers trained in CPR from 5 bus drivers to 25 bus drivers.”

6 Project-Specific Performance Measures Performance Measure: A value or characteristic that can be used to determine the extent to which the objective has been achieved. For example, the # of bus drivers trained in CPR between September 1, 2006-March 31, 2008.

7 Government Performance and Results Act Measures What is GPRA? Purpose of the GPRA GPRA measures for the ERCM Program Measure 1 Measure 2 Measure 3

8 What is GPRA? The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 requires all federal agencies to manage activities with attention to outcomes. Agencies must: State intended accomplishments Identify the resources required Periodically report to Congress

9 Purpose of the GPRA Continuous monitoring of program outcomes results in: Improved accountability for expenditures using public funds Informed Congressional decision making through use of objective information Government focus on results

10 What are the ERCM GPRA Measures? Measure 1: Demonstration of increased number of hazards addressed by the improved school emergency response plan as compared to the baseline plan. Measure 2: Demonstration of improved response time and quality of response to practice drills and simulated crises. Measure 3: A plan for, and commitment to, the sustainability and continuous improvement of school emergency response plans by the district and community partners beyond the period of Federal financial assistance.

11 Measure 1 Demonstration of increased number of hazards addressed by the improved school emergency response plan as compared to the baseline plan.

12 Measure 1: Definitions Hazards: Broadly defined as potential threats to the school / school district whose date or time of occurrence cannot be predicted. Examples include: Terrorist attack Tornado Earthquake Chemical spill Unlawful entry by unlawful person Criminal activity Addressed: Written plan is in place that responds to hazards Baseline plan: Emergency plan in place prior to grant award date

13 Measure 1: Data Needed Number of hazards addressed by the improved school emergency plan Number of hazards addressed by the baseline plan Measure can include information on number of hazards at the district level and at the school level

14 Completing Measure 1 on the 524B Project Status Chart Box 1.a. Performance Measure: Number of hazards addressed by the improved school emergency response plan as compared to the baseline plan. Measure Type: GPRA Quantitative Data: Step 1: Enter 999 in all data fields Step 2: Provide numerical answers to each of the following in the “Explanation of Progress” section:  Number of hazards addressed in original (baseline) plan  Number of hazards addressed in final plan  Number of additional hazards addressed by final plan  Formula: # of hazards in final plan - # of hazards in baseline plan

15 Completing Measure 1 on the 524B Project Status Chart Additional information to include in the “Explanation of Progress” section: Provide a narrative that explains what the numbers mean and how they were calculated. Be specific and list additional hazards that have been addressed. Describe any barriers that prevented you from meeting your goal, if applicable.

16 Measure 2 Demonstration of improved response time and quality of response to practice drills and simulated crises.

17 Measure 2: Definitions Response Time: The number of minutes and seconds it takes to respond to a practice drill or simulated crisis. The type of response depends on the type of drill staged. Drills include, but are not limited to: Fire drill Lockdown Community-wide emergency response drill Hazardous weather drill Active shooter drill Shelter-in-place drill Evacuation

18 Measure 2: Definitions (continued) Demonstration of improved response time: A quantifiable decrease in the amount of time it took to respond to a practice drill or simulated crisis that was staged at the beginning of the performance period and the end of the performance period. Quality of response: To respond to this portion of the measure, attach a copy of the after-action report for each drill and clearly state what has been done to make improvements in quality.

19 Measure 2: Data Needed Response time: Baseline (Drill #1): Response time to drill conducted at the beginning of the performance period or before the grant was awarded. Drill #2: Response time (to same type of drill) at the end of the performance period. Quality of response: A thorough narrative description of the drills documenting lessons learned and a plan for addressing any shortcomings. Attach an after-action report for each drill.

20 Completing Measure 2 on the 524B Project Status Chart Box 1.a. Performance Measure: Demonstration of improved response time and quality of response to practice drills and simulated crises. Measure Type: GPRA Quantitative Data: Step 1: Enter 999 in all data fields Step 2: Provide numerical answers to each of the following in the “Explanation of Progress” section:  Actual time for drill #1 (baseline drill)  Goal (target) time for drill #2  Actual time for drill #2  Difference between drill time #1 and drill time #2

21 Completing Measure 2 on the 524B Project Status Chart Additional information to include in the “Explanation of Progress” section: Provide a narrative for the data provided, explaining what the numbers mean and how they were calculated Be specific, include information about what went right and wrong and how times were calculated Provide the rationale for the drill #2 goal/target and when it was established (I.e. upon completion of drill #1) Describe any barriers that prevented you from meeting the goal for drill #2, if applicable Include a qualitative analysis of each drill, such as an after- action report

22 Measure 3 A plan for, and commitment to, the sustainability and continuous improvement of school emergency response plans by the district and community partners beyond the period of Federal financial assistance.

23 Measure 3: Definitions Plans: The emergency management plan developed under the ERCM grant.

24 Measure 3: Data Needed Provide the answer to the following question: “Do we have a plan for, and commitment to, the sustainability and continuous improvement of school emergency response plans by our district and community partners beyond the period of Federal financial assistance?” A simple “yes” or “no” is not sufficient. A copy of the plan should be provided with your final report. In addition, an objective analysis of whether or not the plan meets this measure should be provided.

25 Completing Measure 3 on the 524B Project Status Chart Box 1.a. Performance Measure: A plan for, and commitment to, the sustainability and continuous improvement of school emergency response plans by our district and community partners beyond the period of Federal financial assistance. Measure Type: GPRA Quantitative Data: Target, Raw Number: YES Actual, Raw Number: YES, if your district has met this standard. If not, NO.

26 Completing Measure 3 on the 524B Project Status Chart Explanation of Progress: Provide a detailed answer to the question, “Do we have a plan for, and commitment to, the sustainability and continuous improvement of school emergency response plans by our district and community partners beyond the period of Federal financial assistance?” Provide proof of your plan. This could include, but is not limited to, the following:  Copies of updated Partner Agreements  Timelines/agenda for upcoming community partner meetings/drills after the grant period is over  Your district’s completed emergency plan

27 Section B - Budget Information A business office person must complete Section 8, Budget Expenditures on the Cover Page. Grantees are requested to submit (under Section B of the Project Status charts - Budget Information) a budget indicating expenses incurred to date and how much funding remains available for unexpended funds in each of the following categories: Personnel, Fringe Benefits,Travel, Equipment, Supplies, Contractual, Other, Indirect Costs, and Training Stipends In-Kind Funds: If a grantee claimed “matching” or in-kind funds in the original application, they must report on these funds in the budget.

28 Section B - Budget Information The following should go in Section B of the Project Status charts - Budget Information section: For budget expenditures made with Federal grant funds, grantees must provide an explanation if funds have not been drawn down from GAPS to pay for the budget expenditure amounts reported on the Cover Page. An explanation if funds were not expended at the expected rate during the reporting period. A description of any significant changes to the budget resulting from modification of project activities. A description of any budget changes that affected your ability to achieve the approved project activities and/or project objectives.

29 Section C – Additional Information The following should go in Section C of the Project Status charts –Additional Information section: Utilizing your evaluation results, draw conclusions about the success of the project and its impact. Describe any unanticipated outcomes or benefits from your project and any barriers that you may have encountered. What would you recommend as advice to other educators that are interested in your project? How did your original ideas change as a result of conducting the project? If applicable, describe your plans for continuing the project (sustainability; capacity building) and/or disseminating the project results. Report on any statutory reporting requirements for this grant program.

30 No-Cost Extensions

31 What is the Purpose of a No-Cost Extension? No-cost extensions are only allowed for the completion of previously approved grant activities that require additional time for completion. No-cost extensions may NOT: Be exercised merely for the purpose of using unobligated funds; Include any change in the approved objectives and scope of the grant; or Propose any new activities.

32 Requesting a No-Cost Extension In accordance with EDGAR Part 74.25, grantees can request a on-time no-cost extension for up to one year. Process for requesting a no-cost extension Federal Project Officers (FPO) will send an with instructions approximately 30 days prior to March 1, 2008, the official end date for FY06 ERCM grants. Grantees must notify their FPO in writing ( is preferable) of the intent to request a no-cost extension. Requests can ONLY BE MADE between the time the instructional has been sent out from the FPOs and ten days before March 1, 2008.

33 Requesting a No-Cost Extension for Greater Than 6 Months Grantees requesting an extension of greater than 6 months will be required to complete and submit a complete set of Project Status Charts from the ED 524B in addition to the materials requested in the instructional .

34 Close-Outs

35 Relevant Information Final Report Due Dates Grantees have up to 90 days after the project end date to submit the final report. Liquidation Period Grantees have a 90-day liquidation period after the grant officially ends. The liquidation period is to be used to draw down funds for expenses incurred before the end of the grant period. Invoices for expenses incurred after the end date, including services provided by the evaluator, are not allowable. Resources The FY06 ERCM Grantee Listserv will remain active so please use each other as a resource in your continued efforts!

36 QUESTIONS