Self-Assessment Project Year 1 Report Disability Housing Network March 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Training/Technical Assistance RFP information. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Administration.
Managing Risk: A Framework and Reporting Cycle 2014.
Auditing, Assurance and Governance in Local Government
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
Preparing for Lease Up: Staff Training for Successful MHSA Supportive Housing Operations MHSA Operations TA Call January 5, 2011 Anne Cory, CSH
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
Chapter 43 An Act Relative to Improving Accountability and Oversight of Education Collaboratives Presentation to Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
1 INTERNAL CONTROLS A PRACTICAL GUIDE TO HELP ENSURE FINANCIAL INTEGRITY.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Informational Overview of The Stow Community Improvement Corporation May 10, 2010.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Chapter 11: Follow-up Reviews and Audit Evaluation ACCT620 Internal Auditing Otto Chang Professor of Accounting.
1 | Weatherization Assistance Programeere.energy.gov Eric Bell 1 Federal/State Monitoring 2010 Orientation for State WAP Directors and Staff.
Collaboration Nation: Piloting EPA’s Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy Ken Harmon, Attorney Office of Compliance U.S. Environmental.
School Councils 101 Fall School Council Orientation Forum YRDSB 2009.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
MODULE II 1 How are UCEDDs Connected?. Topics of Presentation 1. Administration on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AIDD) 2. Association of.
Welcome Elizabeth Schanbacher Assistant Superintendent of Educational Technology.
New Clerk Academy Key West, Florida. OVERVIEW ROLE OF THE CLERK IN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Budgets: Annual, Acquisition, and Capital Reserve May 2, 2012.
Training on Financial Management for Fiscal and Asset Managers Technical Assistance for Community Services and Housing Development Center April 2, 2008.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
May 20, Purpose of the Self- Assessment Required by the Head Start Performance Standards (i)(1) Head Start Ac 2007 Head Start Act Section.
Understanding County Budgets & Fiscal Report s County Extension Council Training Module Council Leadership Development Committee — a partnership of the.
UNM and Health System Internal Audit Departments Internal Audit Department Orientation Manu Patel, Internal Audit Director Purvi Mody, Executive Director,
Retha Britz Copyright 2013 All rights reserved for this presentation 1 Establishment and functioning of a REC Retha Britz.
Do it pro bono. Strategic Scorecard Service Grant The Strategy Management Practice is presented by Wells Fargo. The design of the Strategic Scorecard Service.
Understanding the Master Contract April 4, How Webinar Technology Works Only Cathy and the presenters can be heard; all others are in listen-only.
1 Collaborative Provision and External Examining Nicola Clarke Centre for Academic Standards and Quality Enhancement (CASQE)
Implementation Issues of Sarbanes-Oxley CASE Presentation September 23, 2004 By Denise Farnan.
Agency Risk Management & Internal Control Standards (ARMICS)
1 Internal Audit of the Estonian Financial Supervisory Authority (EFSA) Raivo Linnas Internal Auditor Tallinn, Estonia – June 29, 2004.
2005 Continuity Planning where the rubber meets the road.
The Life of a Policy Council Member
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
QRIS Quality Improvement Grants Board of Early Education and Care March 9, 2010.
The views expressed in this presentation do not necessarily reflect those of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System Association.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
FRYSC Advisory Councils Partners in Progress
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Charter Schools in Florida Friday, February 13, 2015 Mid-Year Transportation.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Cross-Cutting Issues 5310-JARC-New Freedom U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration SAFETEAU-LU Curriculum August 7, 2007.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
ORGANIZATION CAPACITY ASSESSMENT (2013) Produced in April 2013.
Pertemuan 14 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
Regional Accreditation Workshop For Asia and Eastern Europe Manila, Philippines th March, 2012.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency 3rd Health Programme The Electronic Submission System (JA 2015) Georgios MARGETIDIS.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
Roles & Responsibilities of an Impressive Program Governance Plan
North Carolina Council on Developmental Disabilities
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
Session objectives After completing this session you will:
Presented by Jean Fecteau OEO Fiscal Analyst
The Role Of The Citizens’ Oversight Committee
Module 3: Local Partnership Systems & Accountability Overview
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Division of ACF / Assisted Living Surveillance
INGONYAMA TRUST BOARD’S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Managing Housing for Sustainability and Viability
HR AUDIT (An Early Evaluation System) (An Early Evaluation System) S.Jayaprakash., M.Sc (IT), PGD.HRM, DLL & AL.
Presentation transcript:

Self-Assessment Project Year 1 Report Disability Housing Network March 2012

Goals for Today Provide overview of Self-Assessment Project and Data Collection Process Give overview of respondents Share analysis of data collected as of the end of the first year Discuss next steps

Self-Assessment Project Master checklist of 102 legal requirements and recommended best practices for nonprofit housing corporations. Developed and approved by DHN Board of Directors in Implemented via grant from Ohio Developmental Disabilities Council 10/1/10 through 9/30/12.

Goals of the Project To provide housing corporations across the state of Ohio a comprehensive checklist of the field’s best practices. To link housing corporations to the corresponding policy templates through the DHN website. To share information with housing corporations about others’ successes with these items. To provide in-depth, one-on-one assistance to housing corporations as they implement these policies and procedures within their own organizations

Self Assessment Tool Format Section 1 – Board Governance – 62 questions Section 2 – Financial Management – 12 questions Section 3 – Property Management – 26 questions Section 4 – Inspections – 1 question Section 5 – Future Planning – 1 question

Potential Respondents 65 Housing Corporations – 30 staffed by the nonprofit (privatized) – 35 staffed by the county board (not privatized) 7 Metropolitan Housing Authorities – Athens, Fayette, Meigs, Perry, Pike, Sandusky, Wayne (Unknown) Others: ICFDDs or residential services programs who have developed community-based housing as well.

Respondents (N=51) 46 Housing Corporations 2 Metropolitan Housing Authorities 3 others (One MHA and one housing corporation have submitted self-assessments since we did the analysis and report to ODDC.)

Respondent Map

What are we learning? Organizational Capacity of Nonprofit Housing Corporations in Ohio

Analysis – Two ways By size of organization (properties owned) By staffing of organization

Respondents Categorized by Size “Large” - owns and manages more than 75 properties. 6 responses “Medium” - owns and manages properties. 14 responses “Small” - owns and manages 15 or fewer properties. 31 responses

Respondents Categorized by Staffing “Nonprofit Staffed Housing Corporation” – nonprofit organization that employ staff to administer the organization. 22 responses. “County Board-Staffed Housing Corporation” – nonprofit organization, where county board staff perform administrative functions of the organization – 24 responses. “Other” – 2 MHAs, 2 ICFDDs and one CAC

Board Governance

Board Governance – By Size ItemLMS #12 – Board assures that the organization’s work is evaluated in relation to its goals. 83%86%45% #17 – New board members have adequate orientation to their roles/responsibilities 67%64%58% #19 – Board members have written and relevant job descriptions 33.3% 29%16% #31 – The board develops and adheres to clearly defined codes of ethical conduct… 100%64%81% #44 – The planning process includes consideration of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses. 67%79%45%

Board Governance – By Staffing ItemNPCB #12 – Board assures that the organization’s work is evaluated in relation to its goals. 86%42% #17 – New board members have adequate orientation to their roles and responsibilities. 77%50% #19 – Board members have written and relevant job descriptions 32%13% #31 – The board develops and adheres to clearly defined codes of ethical conduct… 73%79% #44 – The planning process includes consideration of the organization’s strengths and weaknesses. 73%38%

Financial Management

Financial Management by Size ItemLMS 54. An independent audit or review of the organization’s financial condition is conducted annually by a CPA. 100% 83% 57. HDC has adequate internal controls to include invoice approval procedures…dual check signing, etc. 100%43%48% 59. HDC board receives financial reports which provide a clear picture of the financial health of the organization. 100%93%87% 60. HDC has an operational budget covering at least the following categories: duties, utilities, reserve, etc. 100%79%71% 62. HDC has a capital replacement budget and reserve. 83%57%45%

Financial Management by Staffing ItemNPCB 54. An independent audit or review of the organization’s financial condition is conducted annually by a CPA. 95%83% 57. HDC has adequate internal controls to include invoice approval procedures…dual check signing, etc. 59%46% 59. HDC board receives financial reports which provide a clear picture of the financial health of the organization. 95%83% 60. HDC has an operational budget covering at least the following categories: duties, utilities, reserve, etc. 86%63% 62. HDC has a capital replacement budget and reserve. 77%25%

Property Management

Property Management by Size ItemLMS 65. HDC has leases in place noting monthly payment, payment date, and late penalties. 100% 87% 68. HDC has a system for logging in, prioritizing, and tracking work orders. 100% 86%65% 75. HDC has a safety policy in place. 83%29%32% 78. HDC has a policy/protocol for identification and treatment of bed bugs. 83%21%10% 84. HDC has a partnership with…county board to evaluate tenant ability to self-evacuate in a fire and provide special accommodations if they cannot. 67%79%61%

Property Management by Staffing ItemNPCB 65. HDC has leases in place noting monthly payment, payment date, and late penalties. 100% 88% 68. HDC has a system for logging in, prioritizing, and tracking work orders. 86%58% 75. HDC has a safety policy in place. 50%17% 78. HDC has a policy/protocol for identification and treatment of bed bugs. 36%8% 84. HDC has a partnership with…county board to evaluate tenant ability to self-evacuate in a fire and provide special accommodations if they cannot. 55%79%

Inspections

Inspections by Size Large 6/6 = 100% Medium 12/14 = 86% Small 23/31 = 74% Note: many who checked “no” or “partial” note they conduct inspections but not according to one of the standardized tools listed.

Inspections by Staffing Nonprofit-staffed housing corporations are 15% more likely to report they annually inspect each entire property using a standardized tool.

Future Planning

Future Planning By Size Of the 51 respondents, plans have been received from: Large 6/6 = 100% Medium 11/14 = 79% Small 19/31 = 61% Note this does not mean that a plan has been received for every county in a multi-county housing corporation’s jurisdiction.

Future Planning by Staffing County board-staffed housing corporations are only slightly more likely to have completed a county plan, 79% compared to 77%. Note than none of the metropolitan housing authorities or other entities had completed a county plan.

Conclusions Organizations vary widely by size, structure and scope of purpose. These variations are reflected in their organizational capacity as measured by the Self-Assessment Tool. Large organizations are more likely to have more highly-developed organizational capacity. “Privatized” Housing corporations are more likely to have highly-developed organizational capacity. Many organizations, especially smaller ones, regard many items on the tool as “not applicable.” This perception is probably a barrier to full participation.

Grant Reporting Even without a systematic review of actions taken by housing corporations since completing the tool, we were able to achieve the goals established for Year Two of the grant in the first quarter. – 41/30 Internal processes improved or policies created. – 45/40 people trained in system advocacy about quality assurance.

Next Steps Continue collecting self-assessments as possible; refresh report at end of the project year. Conduct systematic review of actions taken since participating in the self-assessment project. Increase emphasis on one-on-one technical assistance and collaborative peer review. Continue building the website resources page so that it is as comprehensive and as fresh as possible.