The Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) Recognition & Accreditation Amos Bien GSTC Technical Director GSTC 2 nd Annual Meeting Barcelona, 30 June.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Transparency and Domestic Regulation Mina Mashayekhi Division on International Trade UNCTAD.
EXAMPLES OF DRAFT CSC CORE REQUIREMENTS. ConsultationCSC certification Siting Requirements Contact usOperational & Planning Requirements Slide 2 Reading.
1 Assessment: Norms and Accreditation. Assessment: Norms and Accreditation-Module 11 2 Learning Objectives At the end of this module, participants will.
Ensuring Better Services and Fair Value “Introduction and roadmap to implementation of ISO in Zambia’s water utilities” Kasenga Hara March 2015.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
EPSON STAMPING ISO REV 1 2/10/2000.
Sustainable Energy Systems Overview of contractual obligations, procedures and practical matters KICK-OFF MEETING.
Conformity Assessment Practical Implications InterAgency Committee on Standards Policy June 2007 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland.
John J Downes International Travel and Tourism Law Consultant
Herbert Hamelewww.ecotrans.org Making tourism more sustainable: International initiatives, tools, examples Herbert Hamele ECOTRANS e.V. European Network.
Contractor Management and ISO 14001:2004
A brief history of sustainable tourism certification Earth Summit (1992) – Agenda 21 Environmental awards & certifications in agriculture and business.
ISO 9001 Interpretation : Exclusions
MAURITIUS STANDARDS BUREAU
Purpose of the Standards
The Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) Recognition and Accreditation Cathy Parsons and Amos Bien GSTC membership meeting Barcelona 2011.
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
International Organization for Standardization AIMS MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS Vijay Garg ,
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
Welcome ISO9001:2000 Foundation Workshop.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
ECO-MANAGEMENT AND AUDIT SCHEME Performance, credibility, transparency Accreditation & Registration Systems in EMAS.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Definition of Ecotourism  Ecotourism Kenya defines Ecotourism as, “the involvement of travelers in environmental conservation practices that address.
Defining Responsible Forest Management FSC Forest Certification Standards Defining Responsible Forest Management Version:
QUALITY INDUSTRY NATIONAL CONFERENCE “EMPOWERING FUTURE QUALITY PROFESSIONALS” What is Conformity Assessment? D. Iain Muir Senior Manager: Compliance Management.
ISO Richard Welford CSR Asia © CSR Asia 2011.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
Ship Recycling Facility Management System IMO Guideline A.962
Certification Schemes & Sustainable Tourism
Photo © Rainforest Alliance Strengthening Verification in Sustainability Standards: the Development of the ISEAL Assurance Code Patrick Mallet ISEAL Credibility.
WHO COURSE FOR THE CARs MONITORING AND AUDITING OF FOOD LAW COMPLIANCE AND ENFORCEMENT.
Introduction to ISO 9001:2000.
Conformity Assessment and Accreditation Mike Peet Chief Executive Officer South African National Accreditation System.
2008 New York - Member Forum Council for Responsible Jewellery Practices, Ltd. Overview of CRJP.
Environmental auditing
CERTIFICATION In the Electronics Recycling Industry © 2007 IAER Web Site - -
ISO / IEC : 2012 Conformity assessment – Requirements for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection.
ISO 9001:2008 to ISO 9001:2015 Summary of Changes
Evolving Practices in Sustainability Assurance Karin Kreider Sustainability in the Food Supply Chain, September 2011 Photo © Rainforest Alliance.
FOURTH EUROPEAN QUALITY ASSURANCE FORUM "CREATIVITY AND DIVERSITY: CHALLENGES FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE BEYOND 2010", COPENHAGEN, NOVEMBER IV FORUM-
Environmental Management System Definitions
EMAS V ERIFICATION AND V ALIDATION Impressions from an Accreditation Body M ARC WOUTERS BELAC EMAS S TAKEHOLDERS D IALOGUE B RUSSELS The views.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi- Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for Sustainable Fisheries Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi (MSC)
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
The common structure and ISO 9001:2015 additions
RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 Registration Management Committee Company Confidential RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC
TC176/IAF ISO 9001:2000 Auditing Practices Group.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Workshop on Accreditation of Bodies Certifying Medical Devices Kiev, November 2014.
Quality Management Systems Advice from ISO/TC 176 for Sector-specific applications.
1 The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade Basic Concepts and Member Obligations.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
1Johannesburg South Africa SMA May International Organization for Standardization.
Herbert Hamele LAF Study Tour on Tourism, European Commission & Committee of the Regions, Brussels, 20 th June 2011 Using Ecolabels for Mainstreaming European.
ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation ISO Certification For Laboratory Accreditation.
Responsible Jewellery Council ASSURANCE, GROWTH, CONFIDENCE
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
The Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC)
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Operationalizing Export Certification and Regionalization Programmes
How to conduct Effective Stage-1 Audit
Raising the Standards in European Homeopathy
The Value of Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

The Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) Recognition & Accreditation Amos Bien GSTC Technical Director GSTC 2 nd Annual Meeting Barcelona, 30 June 2011 Richard Bradley GSTC Accreditation Expert

The basics

Certification defined A voluntary procedure by which a facility, product, process, or service is assessed, subject to an audit, and issued a written guarantee stating it meets specific standards. It grants a “marketable” logo to those meeting or exceeding basic standards. Robert Toth 3

Associated activities Standardization consists of developing a written norm or standard. Auditing determines whether or not a business or activity meets the standard. Certification is the process of assessing conformity to a standard and granting recognition. Accreditation consists of certifying the qualifications of the certifier. Consultancies prepare companies for their certification. 4

Some characteristics of certification 1.Established Standard  All procedures should be clear and in writing.  The standard and its component criteria should be well- defined and in writing.  The standard should be made available to the general public (although the document may be sold for an accessible price). 2.Voluntary  Business participation is voluntary. 3.Credibility  Conformity with the standard should be verified by a recognized unbiased entity. 5

Some characteristics of certification 4.Transparency  Mechanisms to define standards should be participatory.  The certification must be open to all qualified businesses or activities within the scope of the standard-  Consultancy, auditing, and certifying are independent processes without real or perceived conflicts of interest. 5.It grants a marketing seal or logo  Logo use should be controlled by the certifier.  Both the certifier and the certified business should use the seal in their promotion. 6.Continuous improvement  In order to maintain the certification, a continuous improvement process is desirable, by specification or through different levels (e.g. 1-5 leaves; bronze, silver, gold, etc.).  A monitoring and evaluation system should be in place.  Businesses should be audited periodically to keep their certification. 6

Limitations on the use of logos When certifying a service (i.e. a hotel, a tour, or a travel agency), its performance should be assessed. In promoting the product the certification logo can and should be used. When certifying a process (a management system), such as ISO 9000 or 14001, promoting the service with the certification logo or saying the service is certified is not allowed. Stay in our rooms certified with ISO 14001… 7

Accreditation Accreditation: third-party attestation related to a conformity assessment body conveying formal demonstration of its competence to carry out specific conformity assessment tasks (ISO/IEC Guide 17011) Accreditation body: authoritative body that performs accreditation (ISO/IEC Guide 17011)

The problems and solutions

Confusion in the marketplace 130+ certification labels Little brand recognition or assurance of credibility

Most programs are small and have little consumer recognition Program size

Brand recognition requires years and a critical mass Blue Flag has certified 3,608 beaches and marinas, and consumers recognize the brand. Energy Star (USA) has certified millions of products, and consumers recognize the brand. End-consumer recognition required more than 10 years for these seals. There were more than13,638 certified tourist businesses in 2007 and 20,963 in 2011, but most labels have few certified businesses. Intermediaries –wholesalers, internet portals, large tour operators– already recognize sustainable tourism certification, but want assurance of credibility and a single language.

Certification message and credibility Message : Certification ensures quality, safety, environmental protection, and corporate social responsibility. Credibility : The certification standard and processes comply with international and local standards. Verification of credibility : The standard will be recognized by the GSTC & the processes accredited. Market penetration : There is a critical mass of certified businesses and message promotion.

ProblemsSolutions Lack of common understanding of sustainable tourism Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria provide a common operational definition Lack of recognition of standardsGSTC recognition of standards aligned with the GSTC Criteria Lack of credibility of certificationGSTC accreditation of certification bodies with objectively credible procedures Lack of critical mass for consumer recognition GSTC market access program Problems and solutions

The details

How do we ensure sustainability & credibility?

GSTC recognizes credible standards The Global Sustainable Tourism Council (GSTC) recognizes standards that are aligned with the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria (GSTC Criteria). As an interim measure through 2013, the GSTC will award “ Working towards Accreditation ” (WTA) status to credible certification bodies. The GSTC will approve accreditation of credible certification bodies. 17

If the they meet GSTC requirements, the standard and the conformity assessment scheme are “Recognised” by the GSTC Sustainable tourism standard and conformity assessment scheme Structure, resources and processes A standard for sustainable tourism enterprises Processes for updating the standard Rules for operation (e.g. audit frequency, treatment of non- conformities GSTC requirements The standard must contain equivalent clauses to GSTC’s standard Rules to update the standard when GSTC’s standard is updated Rules for conformity assessment structure, resources and processes Audit body rules must meet minimum GSTC criteria, and any extra rules should not contradict the GSTC’s rules If the CB meets GSTC requirements it is “Accredited” by the accreditation body following GSTC advice. Certification [conformity assessment] body (CB) Following certification scheme rules for audit bodies, a CB issues certificates to tourism enterprises who conform to certification scheme standards Accreditation requirements A GSTC approved accreditation body audits each CAB to ensure they meet, at a minimum, GSTC’s CB requirements. An interim approval as Working Towards Accreditation (WTA) may be granted to “grandfather” existing CBs. An accredited CAB following a GSTC recognised certification scheme will be licensed to use the GSTC logo Recognition and accreditation

Certification meets its own standards The certification standard chosen by a business should meet the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria (GSTC). The standard can cover more, but not less. It should be adapted to local conditions and industry sector. The development of the standard should comply with the ISEAL Code of Good Practice, ISO 59, and TBT Annex 3. The certification process should follow the international procedures of ISO/IEC Guide 65 (ISO DIS 17065) and the GSTC accreditation procedures. Credibility is thus ensured and market recognition is facilitated.

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PART 1 The GSTC Standard for sustainable tourism PART 2 The GSTC Accreditation Criteria for Certification Bodies PART 3 The GSTC Recognition and Accreditation Procedures GSTC Manual for Recognition and Accreditation

Aligned with internationally recognized processes (ISO, ISEAL, IAF, WTO) Wide consultation (5 workshops – over 100 programs) Open consultation of manual – 2010 Manual finalized (version 1) – January 2011 Recognition of standards initiated – February 2011 Manual redesigned to address Working towards Accreditation – June-July 2011 Developing the accreditation procedures

Three stage process: 1.GSTC evaluates a standard (certification, verification, 3 rd, 2 nd, or 1 st party) to determine its equivalence with the GSTC Criteria = RECOGNIZED STANDARDRECOGNIZED STANDARD 2.Working Towards Accreditation (WTA) 3.GSTC, through an ISO compliant accreditation body, accredits Conformity Assessment Bodies (CABs) that use a Recognized Standard = GSTC ACCREDITEDGSTC ACCREDITED The GSTC Recognition & Accreditation Processes

What Is A Standard? A technical standard is a “document, established by consensus and approved by a recognized body, that provides, for common and repeated use, rules, guidelines or characteristics for activities or their results, aimed at the achievement of the optimum degree of order in a given context”. - ISO 2323/ 1 8

GSTC recognition process return

Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria 37 criteria, 4 pillars. Social & Economic CulturalEnvironmental Sustainability Management

ISO-IEC Guide 65 (DIS 17065): General requirements for bodies operating product* certification systems Demonstrated competence of organization and auditors Legally established independent entity Impartiality committee Financial stability Cannot offer consultancies to certification clients without a major impartiality firewall. * According to the guide, services are “products”.

ISO-IEC Guide 67 (17067): Conformity assessment -- Fundamentals of product certification September 13, 2015 Describes some of the activities of product certification, identifies the basic elements and types of product certification, and demonstrates ways to combine these elements to design a system of product certification.

According to IAF-GD5, Annex 1, to accredit certifiers of services: The standard should Direct observation of the service offered, including “secret shoppers” Evaluation of internal controls, including processes or management systems Certification of services – comply with ISO Guide 7 – or equivalent (e.g. developed with the participation of all interested parties and in consultation with them) – include requirements for performance indicators – include requirements for processes to ensure consistency in the services offered.

Sample logo use

GSTC is evaluating standards for recognition. GSTC is developing a program for CBs that are working towards accreditation. GSTC is developing contracts for Accreditation Bodies to accredit the certifiers. Accredited CBs and their certified businesses will be able to use the GSTC logo and participate in the market access program. Evaluate the real-world impact of certification. Where the GSTC is now

Timeframes TaskEstimated startEstimated completion Accreditation manual, version 1 July 2010January 2011 Accreditation manual, version 2 May 2011July 2011 Guidelines for recognizing standards November 2010January 2011 Standards recognitionFebruary 2011ongoing WTA proceduresJune 2011July 2011 Contracting & training accreditation bodies Last quarter of 2011ongoing Awarding WTA statusThird quarter of 2011December 2013 Awarding accreditationFirst quarter 2012 (earlier for CABs with national accreditation) ongoing

One vision we can all embrace. For more information: Global Sustainable Tourism Council Amos Bien

A. Demonstrate effective sustainable management B. Maximize social and economic benefits to the local community and minimize negative impacts C. Maximize benefits to cultural heritage and minimize negative impacts D. Maximize benefits to the environment and minimize negative impacts. because: they require doing something, they are easy to understand, they correspond to the well-known triple bottom-line, but are less ambiguous, the UNWTO 12 Aims can be easily mapped onto them, structure successfully used by a number of modern programs. We organized the criteria into four actions 33

A.1. The company has implemented a long-term sustainability management system that is suitable to its reality and scale, and that considers environmental, sociocultural, quality, health, and safety issues. A.2. The company is in compliance with all relevant international or local legislation and regulations (including, among others, health, safety, labor, and environmental aspects). A.3. All personnel receive periodic training regarding their role in the management of environmental, sociocultural, health, and safety practices. A.4. Customer satisfaction is measured and corrective action taken where appropriate. A.5. Promotional materials are accurate and complete and do not promise more than can be delivered by the business. A.6. Design and construction of buildings and infrastructure A.6.1. comply with local zoning and protected or heritage area requirements A.6.2. respect the natural or cultural heritage surroundings in siting, design, impact, and land rights and acquisition A.6.3. use locally appropriate principles of sustainable construction, A.6.4. provide access for persons with special needs. A.7. Information and interpretation of the natural surroundings, local culture, and cultural heritage is provided to customers, as well as explaining appropriate behavior while visiting natural areas, living cultures, and cultural heritage sites. A. Demonstrate effective sustainable management 34 return

B.1. The company actively supports initiatives for social and infrastructure community development, including, among others, education, health, and access to sanitation. B.2. Local residents are employed, including in management positions. Training is offered as necessary. B.3. Local and fair-trade services and goods are purchased by the business, where available. B.4. The company offers the means for local small entrepreneurs to develop and sell products that are based on the area’s nature, history, and culture (including food and drink, crafts, performance arts, agricultural products, etc.) B.5. A code of conduct for activities in indigenous and local communities has been developed, with the consent of and in collaboration with the community. B.6. Policies are implemented against commercial exploitation, particularly of children and adolescents, including sexual exploitation. B.7. The company is equitable in hiring women and local minorities, including in management positions, while restraining child labor. B.8. The international or national legal protection of employees is respected, and employees are paid a living wage. B.9. The activities of the company do not jeopardize the provision of basic services, such as water, energy, or sanitation, to neighboring communities. B. Maximize social and economic benefit to the community and minimize negative impacts 35 return

C.1. The company follows established guidelines or a code of behavior for visits to culturally or historically sensitive sites, in order to minimize visitor impact and maximize enjoyment. C.2. Historical and archeological artifacts are not sold, traded, or displayed, except as permitted by law. C.3. The business contributes to the protection of local historical, archeological, culturally, and spiritually important properties and sites, and does not impede access to them by local residents. C.4. The business uses elements of local art, architecture, or cultural heritage in its operations, design, decoration, food, or shops; while respecting the intellectual property rights of local communities. C. Maximize benefits to cultural heritage and minimize negative impacts 36 return

D.1. Conserving resources D.1.1. Purchasing policy favors environmentally friendly products for building materials, capital goods, food, and consumables. D.1.2. The purchase of disposable and consumable goods is measured, and the business actively seeks ways to reduce their use. D.1.3. Energy consumption should be measured, sources indicated, and measures to decrease overall consumption should be adopted, while encouraging the use of renewable energy. D.1.4. Water consumption should be measured, sources indicated, and measures to decrease overall consumption should be adopted. D. Maximize benefits to the environment and minimize negative impacts(1) 37 return

D.2. Reducing pollution D.2.1. Greenhouse gas emissions from all sources controlled by the business are measured, and procedures are implemented to reduce and offset them as a way to achieve climate neutrality. D.2.2. Wastewater, including gray water, is treated effectively and reused where possible. D.2.3. A solid waste management plan is implemented, with quantitative goals to minimize waste that is not reused or recycled. D.2.4. The use of harmful substances, including pesticides, paints, swimming pool disinfectants, and cleaning materials, is minimized; substituted, when available, by innocuous products; and all chemical use is properly managed. D.2.5. The business implements practices to reduce pollution from noise, light, runoff, erosion, ozone-depleting compounds, and air and soil contaminants. D. Maximize benefits to the environment and minimize negative impacts (2) 38 return

D.3.Conserving biodiversity, ecosystems, and landscapes D.3.1. Wildlife species are only harvested from the wild, consumed, displayed, sold, or internationally traded, as part of a regulated activity that ensures that their utilization is sustainable. D.3.2. No captive wildlife is held, except for properly regulated activities, and living specimens of protected wildlife species are only kept by those authorized and suitably equipped to house and care for them. D.3.3. The business uses native species for landscaping and restoration, and takes measures to avoid the introduction of invasive alien species. D.3.4. The business contributes to the support of biodiversity conservation, including supporting natural protected areas and areas of high biodiversity value. D.3.5. Interactions with wildlife must not produce adverse effects on the viability of populations in the wild; and any disturbance of natural ecosystems is minimized, rehabilitated, and there is a compensatory contribution to conservation management. D. Maximize benefits to the environment and minimize negative impacts(3) 39 return

Setting Social and Environmental Standards v5.0 June 2010 ISEAL Code of Good Practice

ISEAL Code of Good Practice for Setting Social and Environmental Standards Based on, in part: ISO/IEC Guide 59:1994. Code of good practice for standardization. ISO/IEC Guide 14024:1999. Environmental labels and declarations - Type 1 environmental labelling - Principles and procedures. WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Annex 3: Code of good practice for the preparation, adoption and application of standards Differences from ISO The social, environmental and/or economic objectives of a standard shall be clearly and explicitly specified in the standard. Interested parties shall be provided with meaningful opportunities to contribute to the elaboration of a standard. Standard-setting organizations shall identify parties that will be directly affected by the standard and proactively seek their contributions. Constraints on disadvantaged groups to participate effectively in standard development shall be addressed in the standard development process. Final international standards shall be placed in the public domain and, with the exception of reasonable administrative costs, shall be made available for free in electronic format. Particular attention should be paid to the needs of developing countries and small and medium-sized enterprises.

ISEAL Code of Good Practice: General Themes  Transparency: all activities must be documented, a rationale for decisions provided, and all documentation visible and easily accessible.  Inclusion: a diverse group of stakeholders must be actively sought and consulted, especially those parties affected by the standard and including disadvantaged groups with hurdles to participation.  Consensus: decisions should be made by consensus.  Confidence: Stakeholder engagement and agreement with the process and the outcome must be trusted.

Consensus  General agreement, characterized by the absence of sustained opposition to substantial issues by any important part of the concerned interests.  NOTE – Consensus should be the result of a process seeking to take into account the views of interested parties, particularly those directly affected, and to reconcile any conflicting arguments. It need not imply unanimity. ISEAL Code of Good Practice v5.0, 2010.

Advance Documentation Terms of Reference Development  Includes a justification of the need for the standard and how it will meet the need  Documentation of other similar standards  Objectives the standard seeks to achieve  Assessment of risks associated with the standard Public Summary & Work Program  Brief document explaining the consultation process, the standard being revised, and how to participate  Membership requirements/selection criteria for relevant working groups, the Council, and consultation participants are outlines

Stakeholder mapping  Identify major interest sectors and key interested parties, based on the standard’s objectives. Define:  which interest sectors are relevant and why,  what are likely to be the key issues for each sector,  who are the key stakeholders,  what means of communication will best reach them.  Include stakeholders with:  relevant expertise to the subject matter of the standard,  those that are materially affected by the standard  and those that could influence the implementation of the standard.

Stakeholder outreach  Key stakeholders shall be proactively approached to contribute to the consultation.  Materially affected parties must make up a meaningful segment of the participants.  Constraints on disadvantaged groups to participate effectively in standards development and revision shall be addressed in the standards development process.

Public consultation  Two rounds lasting no less than 60 days  Second round required if there are significant objections and/or inadequate outreach to stakeholders  Language requirements should be taken into consideration where possible  Interested parties should have “meaningful opportunities to participate” in each part of the process  Input should be allowed in a variety of formats and languages  The decision making process must be defined and must strive for consensus  Each comment must be considered and decision for inclusion or exclusion justified  All comments and how they are addressed must be compiled, made public and delivered to all commenters

Structure and Content  The standard will contain clear objectives that underpin a logical framework  A hierarchy of knowledge should be implemented: objective, criteria, indicator, verifier  The standard shall allow for monitoring and evaluation towards achievement  Language should be unambiguous  Expression shall focus on performance rather than design  The standard must include and add value to current standards and practices where possible, including attribution or citations where necessary  Guidance should be developed for the adaptation of the standard to national, regional, or local levels  Organizations with related standards must be informed and included where possible

Publication  All drafts of the standard should be published promptly and for free  Hard copies should be made available on request for as low a cost as possible  Translations should be provided where possible

Other ISO guides 13 de Septiembre de 2015 ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004 Standardization and related activities -- General vocabulary ISO/IEC Guide 2:2004 ISO/IEC Guide 7:1994 Guidelines for drafting of standards suitable for use for conformity assessment ISO/IEC Guide 7:1994 ISO/IEC Guide 14:2003 Purchase information on goods and services intended for consumers ISO/IEC Guide 14:2003 ISO/IEC Guide 15:1977 ISO/IEC code of principles on "reference to standards” ISO/IEC Guide 15:1977 ISO/IEC Guide 21-1:2005 Regional or national adoption of International Standards and other International Deliverables -- Part 1: Adoption of International Standards ISO/IEC Guide 21-1:2005 ISO/IEC Guide 21-2:2005 Regional or national adoption of International Standards and other International Deliverables -- Part 2: Adoption of International Deliverables other than International Standards ISO/IEC Guide 21-2:2005 ISO/IEC Guide 23:1982 Methods of indicating conformity with standards for third-party certification systems ISO/IEC Guide 23:1982 ISO/IEC Guide 28:2004 Conformity assessment -- Guidance on a third-party certification system for products ISO/IEC Guide 28:2004 ISO Guide 47:1986 Presentation of translations of ISO publications ISO Guide 47:1986 ISO/IEC Guide 50:2002 Safety aspects -- Guidelines for child safety ISO/IEC Guide 50:2002 ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999 Safety aspects -- Guidelines for their inclusion in standards ISO/IEC Guide 51:1999 ISO/IEC Guide 53:2005 Conformity assessment -- Guidance on the use of an organization's quality management system in product certification ISO/IEC Guide 53:2005 ISO/IEC Guide 59:1994 Code of good practice for standardization ISO/IEC Guide 59:1994 ISO/IEC Guide 60:2004 Conformity assessment -- Code of good practice ISO/IEC Guide 60:2004 ISO Guide 64:1997 Guide for the inclusion of environmental aspects in product standards ISO Guide 64:1997 ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002 Arrangements for the recognition and acceptance of conformity assessment results ISO/IEC Guide 68:2002 ISO/IEC Guide 71:2001 Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons with disabilities ISO/IEC Guide 71:2001 ISO Guide 72:2001 Guidelines for the justification and development of management system standards ISO Guide 72:2001

Other ISO standards 13 de Septiembre de 2015 ISO/IEC 17020:1998 General criteria for the operation of various types of bodies performing inspection ISO/IEC 17020:1998 ISO/IEC 17024:2003 Conformity assessment -- General requirements for bodies operating certification of persons ISO/IEC 17024:2003 ISO/IEC 17030:2003 Conformity assessment -- General requirements for third-party marks of conformity ISO/IEC 17030:2003 ISO/IEC 17040:2005 Conformity assessment -- General requirements for peer assessment of conformity assessment bodies and accreditation bodies ISO/IEC 17040:2005 ISO/IEC :2004 Conformity assessment -- Supplier's declaration of conformity -- Part 1: General requirements ISO/IEC :2004 ISO/IEC :2004 Conformity assessment -- Supplier's declaration of conformity -- Part 2: Supporting documentation ISO/IEC :2004 ISO 14024:1999 Environmental labels and declarations -- Type I environmental labelling -- Principles and procedures ISO 14024:1999 ISO/IEC 17000:2004 Conformity assessment -- Vocabulary and general principles ISO/IEC 17000:2004 ISO/PAS 17001:2005 Conformity assessment -- Impartiality -- Principles and requirements ISO/PAS 17001:2005 ISO/PAS 17002:2004 Conformity assessment -- Confidentiality -- Principles and requirements ISO/PAS 17002:2004 ISO/PAS 17003:2004 Conformity assessment -- Complaints and appeals -- Principles and requirements ISO/PAS 17003:2004 ISO/PAS 17004:2005 Conformity assessment -- Disclosure of information -- Principles and requirements ISO/PAS 17004:2005 ISO/IEC 17011:2004 (Replaces Guide 61) Conformity assessment -- General requirements for accreditation bodies accrediting conformity assessment bodies ISO/IEC 17011:2004