Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How to Work with Government Building & Maintaining Relationships.
Advertisements

Frank J. Coale Mark P. Dubin Chesapeake Bay Program Partnerships Agriculture Workgroup BMP Verification Review Panel Meeting Annapolis, Maryland December.
Checking & Corrective Action
Future of the Construction and Post Construction Water Quality Program
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Historic Record of Practice Implementation Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
Who does the monitoring?. State agency staff University/Extension Consultant Volunteer/citizens’ groups Soil & Water Conservation District, Irrigation.
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
Certification of Market Values STEB PROGRAM Briefing Points 2011 Pennsylvania Department of the Auditor General Thomas E. Marks, CPA Deputy Auditor General.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
BMP Verification Process Progress to Date Frank Coale, AgWG Chair Mark Dubin, AgWG Coordinator 06/19/12.
Module 7: Construction Phase
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
CBP Partnership’s BMP Verification Review Panel’s Findings and Recommendations to Date CBP Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee December 3, 2013.
Municipal Regional Permit Provision C.6 Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.
METRICS WORKGROUP January 8, 2013 Washington, DC.
1 Homologues Group Meeting Slovenia, October 2009 Republika SlovenijaEuropean Union Ljubljana, October 2009 System evaluation and sampling – first.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
CBP Partnership Approach for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented Jim Edward, CBPO Deputy Director CBP Citizen Advisory.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
The Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) and Provision 2.
1 Field Maintenance of Structural and Vegetative Measures Level 1A: Fundamentals Seminar Education and Certification for Persons Involved in Land Disturbing.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Scenario Builder Gary Shenk CCMP workshop 5/11/2010.
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Delaware.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
1 ASPECTS REGARDING PLANNING AND REPORTING RELATED TO RECOMMENDATION 331/2001/EC ON MINIMUM CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Using ISMS Principles and Functions in Developing an ARRA Readiness Review Process Presented by Linda K. Rogers Assessments & Readiness Programs Manager.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
Lake Jesup BMAP Adoption Environmental Protection Division February 23, 2010.
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
Private Sector Forester Training Fall 2003 Avon Schenectady Cortland Fayetteville 3.5 SAF CFE Credits.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
2009 NPS 319 Project Review Arkansas Forestry Commission U of A Cooperative Extension Service September 16-17, 2009.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
Arkansas Forestry Commission U of A Cooperative Extension Service September 21-23, NPS 319(h) Project Review.
Watershed Analysis Presented to the Washington State Forest Practices Board By Mary McDonald and Marc Engel Department of Natural Resources, Forest Practices.
Evaluation Measures for Municipal Storm Water Management Programs Daniel Rourke Fresno Metropolitan Flood Control District October 15, 2003 Counting Raindrops.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Ensuring Full Access to Federal Cost Shared Conservation Practices W. Dean Hively, Ph.D. U.S. Geological.
Verification Requests Citizen Advisory Committee –Repeated requests for BMP verification Chesapeake Executive Order Strategy –USDA and EPA commitment to.
Animal Raising Claims in the Labeling of Meat and Poultry Products October 14, 2008 United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection.
Pertemuan 14 Matakuliah: A0214/Audit Sistem Informasi Tahun: 2007.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Lower Rio Grande Valley Low Impact Development (LID) Implementation and Education by Brianna Saenz,MS, EIT AUGUSTO SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ, M.S, CFM. Institute.
Nutrient Management Planning for CAFO & AFO Fundamentals Nutrient Management Training Dec. 16 &17, 2009 Tom Basden WVU Extension Service.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Program
Haz Mat Incident Considerations
National Association of State Conservation Agencies
“How To Ace an Inspection” Russell McLaren – Entergy ARES Water Lead
James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Draft BMP Verification Protocols for Non-significant WWTPs Combined Sewer Overflows On-site Wastewater Treatment Systems CBPO Wastewater Workgroup.
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Forest harvesting practices are a suite of BMPs that minimize the environmental impacts of road building, log removal, site preparation and forest management.

Forest Harvesting BMPs get credit for reducing 50 percent of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and total suspended sediment loading from disturbed forest lands.

State2012 Forest Harvest BMPs (acres) % of FH acres w/ BMPs (in model) DE2,631100% MD23,95782% NY00% PA13,28914% VA123,25893% WV14,63098%

Track total acres of forest harvest BMP implementation, or rate of implementation on private land, and conduct site visits after harvest to ensure proper installation. There are several options for tracking BMP implementation: State forestry agency documents that the project sites were visited and evaluated for forest harvest BMP establishment within 6 months of harvest and submits actual acres to NEIEN annually OR State forestry agency will determine average rate of BMP implementation by on-site sampling (spot- checking) private land harvest sites within 6 months of harvest activity OR…

…State forestry agency will determine an average rate of implementation by conducting a review of forest harvest records every 5 years. If using a sampling regime to determine rate of BMP implementation, use a confidence level of 80% (+/-5%). Forestry staff or Cooperative Extension Offices can assess the overall rate of BMP implementation by using data collected from local forest district offices or county environmental protection offices. Harvest plan reviews provide one such record. BMP implementation rates will only be credited after the first such review has been completed. The rate of BMP implementation can be determined by spot-checking a portion of total projects every 5 years. Derived, assumed, or anecdotal information on implementation is insufficient. The number of private acres reported as using Forest Harvest BMPs is calculated by multiplying the annual acres being harvested by the average BMP implementation rate for that 5-year period. A good source of information …SGSF

States should describe their existing and planned inspection programs for Forest Harvest BMPs in Verification Protocols. Monitor use of forest harvest BMPs for Adaptive Management Assessing forest harvesting BMP implementation and function, and looking at specific categories of BMP practices, can address issues such as training needs for forestry personnel and forestry practitioners. It can also provide insights about whether BMPs themselves are adequate or need improvement. States should describe how they plan to use adaptive management in verifying the implementation and function of forest harvesting BMPs.

EPA will fund VATech to pull together a Panel of Experts Definition will be reconsidered Panel will also make recommendations regarding loading of disturbed forests FWG will be part of approval process Must be complete by October 2015