PEIMS and Accountability. Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Advertisements

Bureau of Indian Education
Site-Based Decision Making and Planning. (TEC , ) Committee Members: Provide assistance to the superintendent or campus principal in the development,
Why Data Integrity? The Importance of Processes and Procedures TASSP Conference, June 2014 Texas Education Agency, Program Monitoring and Interventions.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Bilingual and ESL Programs: End of the Year Activities May 14, 2012 Closing out and Beginning
PUBLIC EDUCATION INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PEIMS) PEIMS General Session – September 2012 Olga Garcia, Coordinator of PEIMS/Application Support Mike.
Graduation, Completion, & Dropout. Re-Alignment Accountability Graduation Completion Dropout District Practice PEIMS Reporting.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Lessons Learned from AYP Decision Appeals Prepared for the American Educational Research Association Indiana Department of Education April 15, 2004.
An Introduction to the Individual Student Enrollment System ISES Segment 2 Department of Public Instruction Spring 2008.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Let’s Become Familiar With….. Graduation Rate Attendance Rate.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Monitoring Accommodations in South Dakota Linda Turner Special Education Programs.
Improving Data Quality Best practices for entering and maintaining data.
TELPAS, STAAR-ALT & Other Online Testing Presented by: Nancy Webster, Galena Park ISD & Tracy McDaniel, Spring ISD.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
Proposed Three Point Data Check System for Adequate Yearly Progress Dr. Charity Fleming Smith, Assistant Commissioner Arkansas Department of Education.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Go for the Touchdown with ESC-2
Student Answer Documents: Accuracy & Accountability.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
TSDS PEIMS Submission I Training Joe Perez PEIMS Director Javier Guevara PEIMS Supervisor September 15 & 16, 2015.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Bilingual Coordinators’ Network Meeting September 25, 2008.
New EMIS Coordinator Training 12/13/13 Presenters: Brenda Hartley – OMERESA EMIS Support Tammy Hrosch – MDECA EMIS Services Manager.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
AYP Accountability Participation Proficiency Attendance Rate Graduation Rate AAI Subgroups Safe Harbor Uniform Averaging Confidence Interval School Improvement.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
10+ Ways to Analyze Data Presenter: Lupe Lloyd Lupe Lloyd & Associates, Inc.
Precodes for the Pennsylvania System of School Assessment (PSSA)
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
The Importance of MSIS Data for Assessment Reporting and Accountability Office of Research & Statistics Mississippi Department of Education July 2004.
Staging Training Region 4 ESC January 16, Data Validation Acronyms  DVM – Data Validation Monitoring  DA – Data Analysis (Intervention document)
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
Georgia Alternate Assessment The Importance of Portfolio Review Prior to Submission February 2011Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent.
WSLS/ISES Overview Data Ambassadors Session September 28, 2006.
2016 TELPAS Online Testing. TELPAS Assessment Management System Accessed at
2012 TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection. Disclaimer  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.
TEA Student Assessment Division 2  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.  If any slide is.
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Getting Started with the INDIVIDUAL STUDENT ENROLLMENT SYSTEM Segment 1 (revised July 1, 2006)
2016 TELPAS Online Testing & Data Collection. Disclaimer  These slides have been prepared by the Student Assessment Division of the Texas Education Agency.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT DIVISION TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY Assessment Provisions for Qualifying ELL Asylees and Refugees Spring 2011 Administrations © 2010, Texas.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
Assessing LEP Students for English Language Proficiency
CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Consultant for CTE
Secondary Attendance Clerk Appendix D Training
TSDS PEIMS Data Quality: Program Intent Codes
High School Verification Reports
Annual Report Georgetown ISD 2016 Accountability Rating:
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
EMIS Overview Student.
CTE PEIMS Coding Steve Neal Educational Specialist for CTE
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Accountability/DVM Update
Strategies for Reducing Habitual Truants
Annual Report Public Hearing
Public Education Information Management System (PEIMS)
Presentation transcript:

PEIMS and Accountability

Clear System of Data Quality Documentation (Enrollment, Special Program, etc.) PEIMS Data Entry Pearson Data File Answer Documents Accountability Reporting

The Process… Test Administration & Submission of Answer Documents Pearson ScoringTEA Reporting Answer Documents Pre-Code LabelsCorrected Pre-Code Labels PEIMS & Data Files Option 1Option 2

Accountability Systems and Indicators AEIS – State Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Performance Based Monitoring (PBM) Data Validation Monitoring (DVM) School Safety Choice Option (SSCO) And more…

PEIMS & Accountability … Where? — Subgroup Data — Special Program Data — Enrollment — Attendance — Completion Rate (grades 9-12) — Annual and Cohort Dropout Rates — Student and Class Information — Staff Information — Data Quality — Financial Data — More…

State Accountability — Ratings based on: TAKS %’s Completion Rate I and II (9-12) Annual Dropout Rate (7-8) Value Added: Gold Performance Acknowledgments — Data disaggregated based on All Students, Ethnicity & Economically Disadvantaged

AYP — Ratings based on Met performance standard on State Assessments Met participation rate for State Assessments Graduation Rate (schools offering grade 12) Attendance Rate (for elementary schools) — Data disaggregated based on All Students, Ethnicity, Economically Disadvantaged, Special Education & Limited English Proficient students.

PBM Connection PBM - 4 Program Areas — Bilingual Education: 9 Indicators — Career & Technical (CTE): 10 Indicators — NCLB Title Programs: 8 Indicators — Special Education: 18 Indicators

DVM Connection DATA INTEGRITY INDICATORS — Leavers Are leavers coded in accordance with Appendix D of Data Standards? — Discipline Are discipline infractions coded based on PEIMS Data Standards and Chapter 37 requirements? — Student Assessment Inconsistencies How does your attendance accounting and PEIMS coding match up to the absences and # of test takers – “A”? How does your PEIMS coding of CTE and LEP students match up to the test answer documents?

DVM Connection Leaver

DVM Connection Discipline DVM

DVM Connections Student Assessment

SSCO Connection

The Connections Data Elements collected through the PEIMS are used throughout Accountability systems to monitor and evaluate districts Timelines – Accountability reporting is “after the fact.” PEIMS reporting errors cannot be changed. – Some indicators are based on prior year(s). May be impacted for 2 Accountability cycles before errors are identified and corrected. Know the PEIMS Due Dates

The Connections Consequences of PID errors: – Longitudinal Studies are difficult to analyze with the existence of PID errors. – Impact on Graduation Rates, Completion Rates – Underreported/Over reported Leavers – Duplicate Students

Data accuracy is CRITICAL: – Many financial, accountability, and other decisions are made based on data, so data must be ACCURATE – Since the various evaluation systems are shifting to reliance on data rather than on-site visits, the data that feeds into the system must be RELIABLE

PEIMS Data Quality Key Factors to Improving Data Quality: – Knowledge and Training Know the PEIMS requirements, guidelines, resources (PEIMS Website, Data Standards, SAAH, FAR guide, etc) Know the PBM Indicators (PBM Website, PBMAS Manual, Data Validation Manuals, AYP Manual, Accountability Manual, etc) – Planning Written Procedures, Timelines, Policies, Job Descriptions, Responsibilities – Data Verification School Management System Reports, EDIT+ Reports

PEIMS Data Quality Key Factors to Improving Data Quality: Training – Qualified Personnel – Who is responsible for training – Who attends training and how often Train the trainer – Making commitment to training Written Procedures – Information Flows Identify Source Documents – Timelines – Checklists – Levels of Verification Designated Personnel Job Descriptions – Define final approval process – Document Retention

PEIMS Data Quality Responsibilities: – Who owns the data? – Who enters the data? – Who verifies the data and at what point? Establish periodic reviews of data Data entry – responsible for entering data only Special program directors responsible for content Principals responsible for reasonableness and accuracy PEIMS coordinators responsible for submitting data – check for reasonableness Superintendent final responsibility

Tools and Resources Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) – State Accountability System – dex.html dex.html Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) – Performance Based Monitoring –

Tools and Resources Data Validation Monitoring (DVM) – School Safety Choice Option (SSCO) – PEIMS Resources – Data Standards – EDIT+ Reports and Tables Reference – Login to EDIT+ to view Data – /index.html /index.html