San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
1 Title III Access to Core Instructional Coach AMEEL NOOS Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
ON TARGET WITH AMAOS 1, 2, 3 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS September 29, 2009 Welcome.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Annual Title I Parent Meeting Martin Luther King Jr. Middle School.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
MARTINEZ UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CST DATA ANALYSIS STAR RESULTS Presented by Audrey Lee Director, Curriculum & Educational Technology 10 September.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Performance Indicators Presentation September 2011.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
California Standards Test (CST) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Results, Oakland Unified School District Division of Student Achievement.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Ross Valley School District STAR, API and AYP Summary Toni Beal, Director of Student Services September 27, 2011.
091 Equity Initiative Status Indicators_March Lodi Unified School District Equity Initiative Status Indicators Prepared by the Assessment, Research,
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
California Standards Tests (CSTs) and California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Grade 10 Census Report Data to inform the evaluation of the district’s.
ESEA Title III Accountability System. JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 22 Title III Requires States to: Define two annual measurable.
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Student Achievement and School Support Division
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Standardized Testing & Reporting
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
Academic Achievement Alameda County School Districts
Academic Achievement Report for Meadow Homes Elementary School
Presentation transcript:

San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel Chaja, Assistant Director of Research and Program Evaluation

California Standards Test (CST)

2006 CSTs Content AreaGrades ELA Grade-levels 2 through 11 Grade-level Writing 4 & 7 Math Grade-levels 2 through 7 End-of-year Courses 8 through 11 Social SciencesGrade-levels 8, 10, 11 Science Grade-levels 5, 8, 10, 11 End-of-year Courses 9 through 11

ELA & Math CSTs By Ethnicity

SUB- GROUP 2 nd ‘05 2 nd ‘06 3 rd ‘05 3 rd ‘06 4 th ‘05 4 th ‘06 5 th ‘05 5 th ‘06 6 th ‘05 6 th ‘06 OVERALL Asian Filipino Hispanic / Latino African American White Special Ed English Learners SED ELA CST PERCENT PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

SUB- GROUP 7 th ‘05 7 th ‘06 8 th ‘05 8 th ‘06 9 th ‘05 9 th ‘06 10 th ‘05 10 th ‘06 11 th ‘05 11 th ‘06 OVERALL Asian Filipino Hispanic / Latino African American White Special Ed English Learners SED ELA CST PERCENT PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

SUB- GROUP 2 nd ‘05 2 nd ‘06 3 rd ‘05 3 rd ‘06 4 th ‘05 4 th ‘06 5 th ‘05 5 th ‘06 6 th ‘05 6 th ‘06 7 th ‘05 7 th ‘06 OVERALL Asian Filipino Hispanic / Latino African American White Special Ed English Learners SED Math CST Percent PROFICIENT OR ABOVE

Academic Performance Index (API) Measures performance & progress based on results from statewide tests at grades 2-12 Statewide tests include: Numeric index from 200 to 1000 API cycle includes API Base & API Growth API Growth Target established as 5% of difference between API Base and 800

SLUSD API Results Reported by District, School and Subgroup ( API Cycle)

Comparative API Data Over a 4-Year Period Alameda County School Districts and High Schools

Student Subgroup API Growth Targets Since 1999 API Growth Targets for numerically significant subgroups was 80 percent of the schoolwide target Beginning with the API Cycle calculations for numerically significant subgroups will parallel schoolwide target calculations

API By Student Subgroups African American Hispanic/Latino EL Hispanic/Latino

Subgroup Percentage of Overall Student Population

API Subgroup Data: African American and Hispanic/Latino Students

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Must meet annual targets that increase over time Goal is 100% of students proficient in ELA and mathematics by Annual determination for schools and LEAs Requirements: Federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires states to reports results of each public school and school district

AYP Components

Participation rate –Up to 11 different student subgroups –Two content areas –22 ways Percent proficient –Up to 11 different student subgroups –Two content areas –22 ways API High school graduation rate AYP Components

ELAMath Elementary and Middle Schools 24.4%26.5% High Schools22.3%20.9% Percent Proficient Targets

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient ELA Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient ELA High Schools and High School Districts

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient Math Elementary Schools, Middle Schools, and Elementary School Districts

Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Percent Proficient Math High Schools and High School Districts

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs)

AMAOs for English Learners (ELs) Performance objectives or targets that all school districts receiving Title III funds must meet Must meet all three AMAOs Two English language proficiency AMAOs calculated from the California English Language Development Test (CELDT) One academic achievement AMAO based on AYP information

AMAO 1 Percent Making Annual Progress in Learning English (CELDT Assessment) SLUSD (57.5%)

AMAO 2 Percent Attaining English Proficiency (CELDT Assessment) SLUSD (37%)

AMAO 3 ELA Meeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level (CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD (35%)

AMAO 3 Math Meeting AYP Requirements for the EL Subgroup at the District Level (CST, CAPA, CAHSEE Assessments) SLUSD (45%)

Program Improvement (PI) Applies only to schools and school districts that receive federal Title I funds Status assigned only if AYP targets were not met for 2 consecutive years within specific areas Must implement additional federal requirements Exiting PI status requires meeting AYP for 2 consecutive years

San Leandro Unified School District AYP

California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE)

California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE) Aims to significantly improve pupil achievement in public high schools Ensures that pupils who graduate from public high schools can demonstrate grade level competency in reading, writing, and mathematics Helps identify students who are not developing skills that are essential for life after high school Encourages districts to give these students the attention and resources needed to help them achieve these skills during their high school years Is used in determining AYP (participation rate – grade 10 and graduation rate)

Student Suspensions & Expulsions

Percent of Students Suspended One or More Times vs. Percent of Student Population by Ethnicity for the District and for Each School During the School Year Note: Schools not depicted had no suspensions

The End