Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results 2010-2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
OCTOBER Accountability Updates. Annual Measurable Objectives Achievement AMOs Achievement Gap Closure AMOs Subgroup Improvement All AMOs are.
1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)
4 Principles of ESEA Flexibility 1 January College-and-Career-Ready Expectations for All Students ( ) 2.State-Developed Differentiated Recognition,
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Coalition of Concerned Citizens for African American Children David Holdzkom Assistant Superintendent - Evaluation & Research Ken Branch Senior Director.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
KCS Achievement Data. District-wide Achievement District Achievement  Achievement plots will be included for the following subjects  Algebra I  Algebra.
Welcome and Introductions H.O.B. – Helping Our students “BE” successful!
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Accountability Scorecards Okemos Board of Education September 2013.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Mississippi Statewide Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress Model Improving Mississippi Schools Conference June 11-13, 2003 Mississippi Department.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Thank you for being willing to change the date of this meeting! Annabelle Low 7lbs 13oz.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Welcome to the BT Super Conference
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Bixby Public Schools OCCT Data and AYP/API December 12, 2011.
2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS
PBMA 2016 Learning Gains.
Texas State Accountability
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
AYP and Report Card.
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
Education Briefings for Candidates for Office In 2008
2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director
T = Texas A = Academic P = Performance R = Report
Presentation transcript:

Loudon County Schools Student Achievement Data Results

SCORE PRIZE 2011 Loudon Makes 1 st Finalist List “The SCORE Prize annually awards $10,000 to the elementary, middle, and high school and $25,000 to one district in Tennessee that have most dramatically improved student achievement. In awarding the SCORE Prize, we aim to recognize those schools and districts that are doing the hard work of education reform, highlight and share their best practices, and show other schools and districts throughout Tennessee that improvement is possible.” -TNSCORE.ORG

SCORE AWARD VIDEO

Reading/Language Arts: % Proficient & Advanced Achievement GRADE LEVELCOUNTYSTATE 3 rd 43.5% (0.3% growth) 43.9% (1.6% growth) 4 th 51.9% (4.9% growth) 44.7% (2.4% growth) 5 th 62.6% (12.0% growth) 53.5% (5.5% growth) 6 th 66.9% (9.8% growth) 55.5% (4.3% growth) 7 th 57.5% (8.0% growth) 45.3% (2.9% growth) 8 th 63.7% (11.4% growth) 48.1% (5.8% growth)

Math: % Proficient & Advanced Achievement GRADE LEVEL COUNTYSTATE 3 rd 46.4% (0.1% growth) 51.4% (3.5% growth) 4 th 40.8% (-1.7% loss) 38.7% (4.2% growth) 5 th 51.4% (24.5% growth) 46.5% (10.9% growth) 6 th 44.5% (15.0% growth) 38.8% (7.7% growth) 7 th 43.3% (18.2% growth) 35.9% (7.4% growth) 8 th 40.8% (13.5% growth) 34.6% (8.6% growth)

Science: % Proficient & Advanced Achievement GRADE LEVEL COUNTYSTATE 3 rd 65.3% (-0.4% loss) 61.5% (0.2% growth) 4 th 52.4% (-0.6% loss) 46.6% (1.6% growth) 5 th 68.2% (11.8% growth) 54.3% (2.8% growth) 6 th 59.4% (3.1% growth) 53.4% (4.4% growth) 7 th 60.7% (2.6% growth) 55.8% (6.3% growth) 8 th 72.4% (2.8% growth) 60.4% (5.8% growth)

Graduation Rate SCHOOL Status Loudon County 89%90.8% Above State Expectations Greenback89.5%100% Above State Expectations Loudon85.4%88.7% Above State Expectations

AYP LOUDON COUNTY MATH ED (K-8)

AYP Loudon County Math (K-8) Hispanic AYP LOUDON COUNTY MATH HISPANIC (K-8)

AYP LOUDON COUNTY MATH ALL (9-12)

AYP LOUDON COUNTY MATH ED (9-12)

AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA ALL (K-8)

NDD AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA SWD (K-8)

AYP Loudon County R/LA (K-8) ED AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA ED (K-8)

AYP Loudon County R/LA (K-8) Hispanic AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA HISPANIC (K-8)

AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA ALL (9-12)

AYP LOUDON COUNTY R/LA ED (9-12)

High School ACT Results YEARPREDICTED MEAN OBSERVED MEAN SYSTEM EFFECT STATE GROWTH ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH GROWTH ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH

District Report Card SUBJECT STATE GROWTH Std MATHDB0 R/LACB0 SOCIAL STUDIESAA0 SCIENCECC0 ALG I PREDICTED: OBSERVED: (NDD) PREDICTED: OBSERVED: 711 ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH BIOLOGY I PREDICTED: 699 OBSERVED: (NDD) PREDICTED: OBSERVED: NDD ENGLISH I PREDICTED: OBSERVED: PREDICTED: OBSERVED: ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH ENGLISH II PREDICTED: OBSERVED: (NDD) PREDICTED: OBSERVED: ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH US HISTORY PREDICTED: OBSERVED: PREDICTED: OBSERVED: ABOVE EXPECTED STATE GROWTH

Current Tennessee Accountability Plan % tested AND 66% proficient in language arts (combination of reading, language, and writing) K-8 SchoolsHigh Schools 95% tested AND 74% proficient in language arts (combination of English and writing) 95% tested AND 60% proficient in mathematics 95% tested AND 63% proficient in Algebra Subgroups White Hispanic Black Native American Asian/Pacific Islander Economically Disadvantaged Special Education Limited English Proficient Minimum of 45 students for accountability purposes Only students who are enrolled for the full academic year are included 93% attendance rate or show improvement 90% graduation rate or show improvement A 95% confidence interval is applied to determine if targets are met

Proposed Tennessee Accountability Plan: WAIVER 95% tested TCAP Math, Science, & R/LA data (weighted 33.3% each) K-8 SchoolsHigh Schools 95% tested EOC Algebra I, Eng I Eng II, Biology I, & Grad Rate (weighted 20% each) Increase overall by 4% Decrease Subgroup Achievement gaps by 6% Subgroups White vs. Non-White Economically Disadvantaged (ED) vs. Non-ED Students with disabilities (SWD) vs. Non-SWD English Learners (EL) vs. Non-EL Minimum of 30 students for accountability purposes Includes ETT (Every Test Taker), regardless of attendance, transfer, etc. Reward: Top 5% in %P/A & Progress Focus: 10% with largest ACH gap; subgroup below threshold Priority: Bottom 5% in Proficiency Reward: Top 5% in %P/A & Progress Focus: 10% with largest ACH gap; subgroup below threshold; <60% Grad Rate Priority: Bottom 5% in Proficiency *Based on a 3-year “success rate” for each subgroup, by school, for the total number of students taking any corresponding exam

Current Status of Schools

Questions? More Information? LOUDON COUNTY SCHOOLS 100 RIVER ROAD LOUDON, TN CONTACTS: Director of Schools- Jason Vance Assistant Director- Mike Garren Data/Inst. Coach- Stephanie W. Smallen