Sunnyside Unified School District Federal and State Accountability Results.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AZ Learns Legacy Profiles vs. A-F Profiles Assessment-Dr. Heather Cruz.
Advertisements

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Annual Report of Progress The Public Schools of Jersey City Dr. Charles T. Epps, Jr. State District Superintendent of Schools January 4, 2006.
AZ Learns and A-F Letter Grades Arizona Department of Education Presentation to the NCAASE Committee ASU Washington Center, Washington D.C. March 7, 2012.
Nine Key Factors to Student Achievement (2010) 1.Intervention classes that use technology in every class period. 2.Principal leading change.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
1. The Process Rubrics (40 or 90) should be open soon. 2. The Data Profile and SI Plan are expected to open in December. 3. The complete CNA will.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
Arizona LEARNS: Overview of the Achievement Profiles.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT.
What is the SQRP?  The School Quality Rating Policy (SQRP) is the Board of Education’s policy for evaluating school performance.  It establishes the.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
OAKLEY ELEMENTARY ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING SEPTEMBER 16, :00 P.M. – 6:00 P.M. MEDIA CENTER “Building a Legacy of Excellence: Aim High and Achieve More”
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
ESEA Waiver and Accountability Status School Committee Presentation September 24, 2013.
Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals Mechanisms for Determining Progress and Grant Renewals National Network of State School Improvement.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.
School Improvement Support School Year.
1 Up-date on Assessment in Connecticut Dr. Barbara Q. Beaudin, Associate Commissioner Division of Assessment and Accountability Chief, Bureau of Student.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
MI-SAAS: Michigan School Accreditation and Accountability System Overview of Key Features School Year.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
By Brian Patrick Federal Programs Director Whiteriver Unified School District #20 WHITERIVER UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 I.ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Lansing Central School District District Assessment Results Presentation May 14, 2012 Dr. Stephen L. Grimm, Superintendent District Leadership Team 1.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Michigan School Report Card Update Michigan Department of Education.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Annual Public Meeting Data Presentation October 19, 2009 Cabe Student Center 6:00 p.m.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
Springs 2006 and 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress Results Potential Challenges with 2008 Annual Measurable Objectives & District Corrective Action.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
Department of Accountability: “Anyone can measure the rain; we build arks.” Assessment Update: Preliminary Results Department of Accountability.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
Measuring Turnaround Success October 29 th, 2015 Jeanette P. Cornier, Ph.D.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Accountability Goals September 2014 Bristol Public Schools.
California’s New LCFF Accountability Rubrics and School DAshboard
2012 Accountability Determinations
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Anderson Elementary School
FUSD AIMS/SAT10 Results Spring 2012.
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Lodi USD LCAP Data Review
Presentation transcript:

Sunnyside Unified School District Federal and State Accountability Results

Federal AccountabilityArizona State Accountability Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) AZLEARNS “Legacy” ModelNew AZLEARNS “A-F” Model  Annual objectives to measure academic progress of all students Math & Reading  All, Ethnicity, SPED, ELL, Low SES  Test 95% of all students on AIMS-DPA  90% attendance for Elementary and Middle Schools  80% Four-Year Graduation Rate or 2% increase over previous year  Either a school makes AYP or not (Y/N)  Each Year not making AYP results in levels of School Improvement: o School Improvement Year 1 or 2 o Corrective Action o Restructure Planning o Restructure Implementation (by years)  Percent Passing AND Percent Improvement on AIMS (Reading/Writing/Math)  Individual Student Growth  ELL Reclassification Rate  Graduation/Dropout Rates  Percent Exceeding on AIMS Profiles o Excelling o Highly Performing o Performing Plus o Performing o Underperforming  All students including ELL and SPED with AIMS scores Composite Score (50%)  % students passing AIMS + ELL reclassification/Grad/Dropout rates Growth Scores (50%)  Relative Academic Growth of All students in the school AND  Growth of bottom 25% of students Profiles o A = Excellent performance o B = Above average performance o C = Average performance o D = Below average performance o F = Failing Performance Note: All Accountability Systems only count students enrolled within first 10 days of school AND enrolled when it is time to take AIMS

Description of Grades A Demonstrate an excellent level of performance B Demonstrate an above average level of performance C Demonstrate an average level of performance D Demonstrate a below average level of performance F Demonstrate a failing level of performance (Assigned to schools that rank as a “D” school for three consecutive years)

How A-F School Accountability Points are Calculated Academic Growth 1 Points + Academic Outcomes Points = School’s A-F Letter Grade Score (100 possible)(100 possible)(200 total possible points) All Students’ Academic Growth Bottom 25% Students’ Academic Growth Academic Outcomes % of students passing AIMS 3 Possible Bonus Points in each of the following areas: 1. Dropout rate* 2. Graduation rate* 3. ELL Student Reclassification Rate 1 Academic growth is determined by comparing the change in AIMS test scores from one year to the next for similarly achieving students across the state. This is done to evaluate how well a school is growing its students, academically, as well as they advance from one grade to the next.

A-F Accountability Letter Grade Scores A-F Formula: Academic Growth 1 Points + Academic Outcomes Points = School’s A-F Letter Grade Score (100 possible)(100 possible)(200 total possible points) GradeTotal Score A B C D0-99

Different Ways Schools Can Achieve an A

AYP and AZ LEARNS 2010 Results and 2011 Results School NameAYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS AYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS Legacy LegacyA-F Desert ViewNO Restructure Implementation 1 PerformingDNORestructure PlanningPerforming S.T.A.R.NOSchool Improvement Y1Performing--NOSchool Improvement Y1Performing SunnysideNORestructuring PlannedPerformingCNOCorrective ActionPerforming ApolloNO Restructure Implementation Y1 PerformingDNORestructure PlanningPerforming Plus Billy Lane LaufferYES Performing PlusBYES Performing Plus ChallengerNOSchool Improvement Y2PerformingCNOSchool Improvement Y1Performing Plus ChaparralNO Restructure Implementation 1 Performing PlusCNO Restructure Implementation Performing Plus SierraNO Restructure Implementation 1 Performing PlusDNORestructure PlanningPerforming Plus CraycroftYES Performing PlusBYES Performing Plus DrexelNOWarning YearPerforming PlusDYES Performing ElviraYES Performing PlusBYES Performing Plus EsperanzaYES Performing PlusCYES Performing Plus Gallego BasicYES Highly Performing BYES Highly Performing LibertyNOWarning Year Highly Performing CYES Highly Performing Los AmigosYES Performing PlusCNOSchool Improvement Y2Performing Plus Los NinosNOWarning YearPerformingCYES Performing Los RanchitosNOSchool Improvement Y2PerformingDNOSchool Improvement Y1Underperforming Mission ManorNOWarning YearPerforming PlusCYES Performing Plus RiveraNOSchool Improvement Y1Performing PlusCNOWarningPerforming Santa ClaraYES Performing PlusCYESWarningPerforming Summit ViewYES Performing PlusBYES Performing Plus

School NameAYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS AYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS Legacy LegacyA-F Desert ViewNO Restructure Implementation 1 PerformingDNO Restructure Planning Performing S.T.A.R.NO School Improvement Y1 Performing--NO School Improvement Y1 Performing SunnysideNO Restructuring Planned PerformingCNOCorrective ActionPerforming SUSD High Schools

School NameAYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS AYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS Legacy LegacyA-F ApolloNO Restructure Implementation Y1 PerformingDNO Restructure Planning Performing Plus Billy Lane Lauffer YES Performing Plus BYES Performing Plus ChallengerNO School Improvement Y2 PerformingCNO School Improvement Y1 Performing Plus ChaparralNO Restructure Implementation 1 Performing Plus CNO Restructure Implementation Performing Plus SierraNO Restructure Implementation 1 Performing Plus DNO Restructure Planning Performing Plus SUSD Middle Schools

SUSD Elementary Schools School Name AYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS AYP AYP School Improvement Status AZ LEARNS Legacy LegacyA-F CraycroftYES Performing Plus BYES Performing Plus DrexelNOWarning Year Performing Plus DYES Performing ElviraYES Performing Plus BYES Performing Plus EsperanzaYES Performing Plus CYES Performing Plus Gallego Basic YES Highly Performing BYES Highly Performing LibertyNOWarning Year Highly Performing CYES Highly Performing Los AmigosYES Performing Plus CNO School Improvement Y2 Performing Plus Los NinosNOWarning YearPerformingCYES Performing Los Ranchitos NO School Improvement Y2 PerformingDNO School Improvement Y1 Underperformi ng Mission Manor NOWarning Year Performing Plus CYES Performing Plus RiveraNO School Improvement Y1 Performing Plus CNOWarningPerforming Santa ClaraYES Performing Plus CYESWarningPerforming Summit ViewYES Performing Plus BYES Performing Plus

4 Year History SUSD AYP and AZ LEARNS Results SchoolYearMade AYP AZ LEARNS (Legacy) AZ LEARNS A-F Desert View 2008NoPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010NoPerforming 2011NoPerformingD STAR 2008NoPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010NoPerforming 2011NoPerforming- Sunnyside 2008NoPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010NoPerforming 2011NoPerformingC

4 Year History SchoolYearMade AYP AZ LEARNS (Legacy) AZ LEARNS A-F Apollo 2008NoPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010NoPerforming Plus 2011NoPerformingD Billy Lane Lauffer 2008NoPerforming 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming Plus 2011YesPerforming PlusB Challenger 2008YesPerforming 2009YesPerforming 2010NoPerforming Plus 2011NoPerformingC Chaparral 2008NoUnderperforming 2009YesPerforming 2010NoPerforming Plus 2011NoPerforming PlusC Sierra 2008NoPerforming 2009NoUnderperforming 2010NoPerforming Plus 2011NoPerforming PlusD

4 Year History SchoolYearMade AYP AZ LEARNS (Legacy) AZ LEARNS A-F Craycroft 2008YesPerforming Plus 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming Plus 2011YesPerforming PlusB Drexel 2008YesPerforming Plus 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming 2011NoPerforming PlusD Elvira 2008NoPerforming 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming Plus 2011YesPerforming PlusB Esperanza 2008YesHighly Performing 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming Plus 2011NoPerforming PlusC Gallego Basic 2008YesHighly Performing 2009YesHighly Performing 2010YesHighly Performing 2011YesHighly PerformingB Liberty 2008YesHighly Performing 2009YesHighly Performing 2010YesHighly Performing 2011NoHighly PerformingC Los Amigos 2008NoPerforming 2009NoPerforming Plus 2010NoPerforming Plus 2011YesPerforming PlusC

4 Year History SchoolYearMade AYP AZ LEARNS (Legacy) AZ LEARNS A-F Los Niños 2008YesPerforming Plus 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming 2011NoPerformingC Los Ranchitos 2008YesPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010NoUnderperforming 2011NoPerformingD Mission Manor 2008YesPerforming Plus 2009NoPerforming 2010YesPerforming Plus 2011NoPerforming PlusC Rivera 2008NoUnderperforming 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010NoPerforming 2011NoPerforming PlusC Santa Clara 2008NoUnderperforming 2009YesPerforming Plus 2010YesPerforming 2011YesPerforming PlusC Summit View 2008YesPerforming 2009NoPerforming 2010YesPerforming 2011YesPerforming PlusB

Challenges Funding High Mobility Rates Sub Group Populations ELL SPED Low SES State Policy Changes

Academic Interventions Reading Plus / READ 180 / System 44 Project Graduation Coaching Model TAP / BEST One-to-One DTC, TTF, ITC Beyond Textbooks (K-8) Essential Elements of Instruction (E.E.I) Ocotillo Early Childhood Center Full Day Kindergarten College Readiness Parent Engagement

Building Institutional Capacity Data analysis, interpretation, and understanding AIMS Galileo (Benchmarks) Tyler Pulse Data Warehouse Assessment and testing procedures standardized One-to-One Strategic Instructional Design Leadership New Site Leadership Transformation of Curriculum Department Change Management 9-Step School Improvement Process

Emerging Work K-1 Common Core/PARCC Literacy Initiative (K-9) Walk to Read/ Success for All (SFA) Expansion CORE Consultants Freshman Academy (ICLE) Mathematics Special Education (ICLE) SSES Provider Teacher/Principal Evaluation Model TAP / BEST Tyler Pulse Data Warehouse Online Learning Technology Based Intervention Strategic School Improvement Targeted Assistance (SIG at Los Ranchitos)