NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Advertisements

1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
1 School Designation Detailed Methodology Reward Identify the “highest-performing schools” and “high-progress schools” based in all-students group over.
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
LOUISIANA 1 Goals for Education Challenge to Lead 2003 Louisiana.
LONSDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OPEN HOUSE 2013 WELCOME!!!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
SIP Training Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 29, 2012.
NECAP DATA ANALYSIS 2012 Presented by Greg Bartlett March, 2013.
Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
MCAS REPORT Spring 2013 Presented to the Hingham School Committee November 18, 2013 by Ellen Keane, Assistant Superintendent.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Composite Index Scores (CIS) Understanding Accountability for Strategic Goal Setting August 24, 2015 Andrew Milligan | RIDE Office of Transformation.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
NECAP Results and Accountability A Presentation to Superintendents March 22, 2006.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME DATE 1.
NECAP Presentation Dunn’s Corners School Westerly, RI February 24, 2010.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
District Name FOCUS AND PRIORITY SCHOOLS SIP – CYCLE # REVIEW SCHOOL NAME February 30, 2013.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
Accountability & Assistance Advisory Council Meeting
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Augusta School Department School Board Presentation
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
2012 Accountability Determinations
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
NECAP PRESENTATION.
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Wade Hayashida Local District 8
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
Madison Elementary / Middle School and the New Accountability System
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Neptune Township School District ESEA/Title I Presentation
Denville Township Parent Academy for Student Success (PASS) NJ Student Learning Assessment (NJSLA) Informational Webinar March 18, 2019 Presented by.
Presentation transcript:

NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved 8/9 Improved by 1 level 1/9 Went down 1 level (PP-SBP) Central Elementary School

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Math Grade 4  5/6 Students Improved 1/6 Improved 2 levels 4/6 Improved 1 level 1/6 No Change Reading Grade 4  9/11 Improved 1/11 Improved 2 Levels 8/11 Improved 1 Level 1/11 No Change Math Grade 5  3/3 Students Improved 3/3 Improved 1 Level Reading Grade 5  3 / 4 Students Improved 1/4 Improved 2 level 1 /4 Improved 1 Level 1 /4 No Change Lonsdale Elementary School

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Grade 4 Math  3/4Students Improved 1/4 Improved 2 Levels 2/4 Improved 1 level 1/4 No Change Grade 4 Reading  4/5 Students Improved 4/5 Improved 1 Level 2/5 No Change Grade 5 Math  2/6 Students Improved 2/6 Improved 1 Level 4/6 No Change Grade 5 Reading  5/5 Students Improved 1/6 Improved 2 Levels 4/6 Improved 1 Level 1/6 N/C Northern Elementary School

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Math Grade 4  5/13 improved 5/13 Improved 1 level 8/13 No Change Reading Grade 4  10/13 Improved 9/13 Improved 1 level 1/13 Improved 2 levels 3/13 No Change Math Grade 5  9/11 Improved 9/11 Improved 1 level 2/11 No Change Reading Grade 5  3/11 Improved 3/11 Improved 1 level 7/11 No Change 1/11 Went down 1 level (P-PP) Saylesville Elementary School

NECAP Ramp-Up Program Math  18 Seniors 10/18 Scored 2 3/18 Made enough improvement w/in 1 to meet graduation requirements 5/18 Did not meet the NECAP progress requirements ELA  4/12 Sophomores & will test in October 2014  6/12 Juniors 5/6 Scored 3 1/6 Scored 1  2/12 Seniors 2/2 Scored 3 Lincoln High School 13/18 Students attending the program passed NECAP on the second try

Lincoln Public Schools School Classifications

How Our Schools Are Classified HOW SCHOOLS ARE CLASSIFIED K-8HIGH SCHOOL PROFICIENCY30 POINTS DISTINCTION5 POINTS GAP-CLOSING30 POINTS PROGRESS10 POINTS GROWTH25 POINTSNA IMPROVEMENT 5 POINTS GRADUATION 20 POINTS TOTAL100 POINTS

How our Schools Are Ranked RIDE ranks schools by Total Point Value, or Composite Index Score, to determine classifications: Commended Schools have the highest index scores in the state and no achievement gaps; they are recognized because of either high performance or significant progress. Leading Schools have an index score between 70 and 76. Typical Schools have an index score between 50 and 70. Warning Schools can be identified by any of seven criteria: index score <50; Proficiency of <10 or fewer points; School wide participation <95%; Sub group gap points < 15 points; student growth of <7.5 ( Applicable to high schools only…Improvement plus Graduation of 10 points or fewer; low graduation rate over time). Failure to attain any AMO (Annual Measurable Objective) for three consecutive years. Focus Schools have the lowest point totals in the state (excluding Priority Schools) for Proficiency or Gap-closing, regardless of their index score. Priority Schools have the lowest Composite Index Scores in the state. Schools previously identified as Persistently Lowest Achieving are also Priority Schools.

2013 School Classification Summary 2013 SCHOOL CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY SCHOOL Title I Targets Passed Classification Total Points /100 Points From % PROF /30 SUBGROUP GAPS /30 PROG TO 2017 TARGET /5 % IN DISTINCTION /10 STUDENT GROWTH /25 HS GRADUATION /20 HS SCALED SCORE CHANGE /5 Central Elementary 8/12Typical Lincoln Middle School 10/12Typical Lincoln High School 13/15Leading NA Lonsdale Elementary 12/12Typical Northern Elementary Y 12/12Typical Saylesville Elementary 14/14Typical

Comments Saylesville went from an index score of to an index score of just 4 points away from a leading school and met all of their targets. Lincoln High School is a Leading School. Northern Elementary is 2points away from becoming a leading school Saylesville Elementary, Northern Elementary, and Lonsdale Elementary met all targets. Participation rates district wide are excellent at 99.70%. Lincoln Middle School earned more total points and showed improvement in almost every area scored as compared to last year. Lincoln Middle School Plan

Looking at the Year Ahead Data Use District Wide. PARCC Lincoln Middle School Plan

Lincoln Middle School School Classification 2013 and Lincoln Middle School 10/12Typical Lincoln Middle School 9/14Typical

Lincoln Middle School-NECAP Mathematics

Lincoln Middle School Action Plan-Intensive Support – Additional 135 minutes of mathematics instruction per week for students with low NECAP scores. We will include all students who scored substantially below proficient and many who scored partial proficient. Action Plan-Targeted Support – Additional 75 minutes per week of remediation to improve basic mathematics skills with these same students.

Lincoln Middle School Action Plan-Teacher Support – Professional Development for mathematics teachers on the 8 Standards for Mathematical Practices built into the Common Core State Standards. Emphasis will be placed on standards: Perseverance in Problem Solving and Attend to Precision. – Community of Practice (COP)- Combined with department meetings will provide mathematics teacher with three hours of common planning time per month. – Data Team- Submitted plan to train the teachers on how to identify, view and interpret data. Mathematics teachers will be the first group trained.

Lincoln Middle School