2013-2014 School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report Preliminary Dakota State Test of Educational Progress (D-STEP) Information August 6,2013.
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
Academic Excellence Indicator System (AEIS) Report Presented to ACISD Board of Trustees 12/15/2011 ARANSAS COUNTY ISD – A TEA RECOGNIZED SCHOOL.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT ANNUAL REPORT “CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES - MORE THAN PSSA AND AYP”
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
PROGRESS MONITORING OF ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Baldwin-Whitehall School District 2nd Quarter Data.
Standardized Testing Report PSAT (10-11)  SAT (11-12) PLAN (10)  ACT (11-12) AP (11-12) EXPLORE (8) Science Assessment (7) ACT Aspire (7-8)
College and Career Preparation 1 College and Career Preparation Lodi Unified School District September 2, 2008 Prepared by the Assessment,
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
OLMOS ELEMENTARY. WHOOOO WE ARE SCHOOL FACTS: ENROLLMENT: 657 RATING: IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED GRADES: PK-5 SPECIAL PROGRAMS: PK, BILINGUAL/DUAL, ALE CAMPUS.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in this applies to all teaching professionals (non-teaching.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
OCTORARA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 2014 Standardized Testing Data Review 11/17/2014 MAXIMIZING OPPORTUNITIES FOR SUCCESS.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
GRADE 10 CAPT ACT ADVANCED PLACEMENT SAT “HARTFORD MAGAZINE RECOGNIZED GMHS AS THE SIXTH RANKING HIGH SCHOOL IN HARTFORD COUNTY.” 2011 High School Testing.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System Jennifer Stegman, Assistant Superintendent Karen Robertson, API Director Office of Accountability and Assessments.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
Future ready PA Index Update 5/23/17.
PA School Performance Profile
A Brief History Data-Based School & District Improvement
Indiana Area School District
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability Update
WTHS Student Achievement Data and Analysis
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
2013 RCAS Summative Assessment Report
A 50 Year Tradition of Excellence
PA’s ESSA Approved Plan
PVSD PDE School Performance Profile
Texas State Accountability
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services
Presented to the Octorara Area School Board on December 3, 2018
Starting Community Conversations
An Introduction to the Future Ready PA Index
Presentation transcript:

School Performance Profile and PVAAS

 Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple things – SPP assigns schools a score based on multiple factors  SPP allows us to: ◦ Set goals ◦ Plan ◦ Allocate resources ◦ Compare with other schools  These numbers go into teacher and principal evaluations

BHSHMSMESPESWES  A score of 70 or higher is considered ‘strong’ by the state  Scores close to the max score of 100 would be earned by ‘highly effective’ schools (can earn up to 7pts extra credit)

50% of the School Academic Performance Score is comprised of three areas:  40 % Indicators of Academic Achievement  5 % Indicators of ALL Students Closing the Achievement Gap  5 % Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap - Historically Underperforming Students

 40% of the School Academic Performance Score ◦ Indicators of Academic Growth/PVAAS - Measures the school’s impact on the academic progress of groups of students from year-to-year.  10% of the School Academic Performance Score ◦ Other Academic Indicators - Assesses factors that contribute to student achievement (e.g., graduation rate, promotion rate, attendance rate).

 Measures a student's performance at one single point in time  Highly correlated with a student's demographics  Compares student performance to a standard  Critical to a student's post-secondary opportunities

EthnicityBHSHMSMESPESWES American Indian Asian Black or African American Hispanic Multi-Racial White Native Hawaiian Historically Underperforming Subgroups BHSHMSMESPESWES Econ. Disadvantaged ELL Special Education

ACHIEVEMENT SCORES – How many of our kids are proficient in…  PSSAs, Keystones, NOCTI/NIMS (career schools)?  Grade 3 Reading?  SAT Scores?

ACHIEVEMENT SCORES ProficiencyBHSHMSMESPESWES Math (Algebra I) Reading (Literature) Science (Biology) NA Writing NA Industry (NOCTI)76 NA Grade 3 Reading NA SAT/ACT 100 NA

SAT/ACT College Ready Benchmark Number of 12 th grade students with Record of Scoring 1550 or higher on the SAT 110 Number of 12 th grade students with Record of Scoring 22 or higher on the CT 61 Grade 12 Enrollment387 Number of 12 th grade students with 1550 (SAT) or 22 (ACT) or higher divided by 12 th grade enrollment College Ready Benchmark Performance 100 Percentage of 12 th grade students with 1550 (SAT) or 22 (ACT) or higher Performance Measure Greater than – – – – 10.00

CLOSING THE GAP – The state wants us to have half as many non-proficient kids in six years than we have now. Are we on track? (ex: if we are 40% proficient now, we need to be 70% proficient six years from now, growing 5% a year to reach that goal)  SPP looks at all students  SPP looks at Historically Underperforming – group made of economically disadvantaged, special education, and ESL

CLOSING THE GAP (ALL Students) Closing Gap BHSHMSMESPESWES Math NA Reading NA Science 1000 NA 100 Writing NA Industry Standard NA

The objective is to close 50% of the gap between performance in the baseline year and 100% proficiency of students in this group over a six (6) year period. Percent Proficient or Advanced in Baseline Year48.64 Percent Proficient or Advanced in Reported Year59.06 Baseline Year2013 Reported Year2014 Year in the 6 Year Cycle1 Achievement Gap Between Baseline Year and 100 % Proficient or Advanced % of Achievement Gap (to be closed in 6 years)25.68 Average Gap Closure Required Each Year (over the 6 years) 4.28

CLOSING THE GAP(Historically Underperforming Students) Closing Gap BHSHMSMESPESWES MathNA ReadingNA Science 1000 NA 100 WritingNA Industry Standard NA

The objective is to close 50% of the gap between performance in the baseline year and 100% proficiency of students in this group over a six (6) year period. Percent Proficient or Advanced in Baseline Year22.73 Percent Proficient or Advanced in Reported Year35.71 Baseline Year2013 Reported Year2014 Year in the 6 Year Cycle1 Achievement Gap Between Baseline Year and 100 % Proficient or Advanced % of Achievement Gap (to be closed in 6 years)38.64 Average Gap Closure Required Each Year (over the 6 years) 6.44

 Measures a student's growth across time; i.e., across years  Not related to a student's demographics  Compares student performance to his/her own prior performance  Critical to ensuring a student's future academic success  By measuring students' academic achievement AND growth, schools and districts have a more comprehensive picture of their own effectiveness in raising student achievement.

GROWTH – Did our kids make growth as expected by the state statistical models? PVAASBHSHMSMESPESWES Math NA Reading NA Science NA 7892 Writing NA 50 NA 100

PVAAS Growth BHSHMSMESPESWES Algebra I NA Math NA Reading NA Science NA Writing NA NA

Inconsistent Growth This is what we want to see with all students

OTHER  What percentage of our kids graduated?  What was our attendance rate?  Does our school offer AP/IB/College courses?  How many of our kids took the PSAT/PLAN test?

OtherBHSHMSMESPESWES Graduation NA Attendance Promotion NA AP/IB Courses 100 NA PSAT Participation NA

Extra CreditBHSHMSMESPESWES Math NA Reading NA Science NA Writing NA 3.53 NA Industry 40 NA AP/IB Adv. 3 or higher NA

 Have many kids proficient  Continue to move non-proficient kids to proficient each year  ‘Grow’ kids beyond the expectations of the state data model  Have high graduation/promotion rate (kids aren’t failing)  Have high attendance rate  Offer advanced courses  Provide opportunity to take PSAT/PLAN test

 Focus on growth – we have to move our kids beyond what is expected of them – this growth will raise our growth score on the SPP and lead to higher achievement scores, which will raise our achievement scores  Close the gap – continue to focus on moving kids to proficient, taking small steps each year  Increase our graduation/promotion/attendance rates  Offer more advanced courses

and School Years

Building Level Academic Score PSSA Proficiency Algebra I Literature Biology Industry Standard SAT 100 PVAAS Algebra I 8279 Literature 100 Biology 73100

Other Indicators Industry StandardNA Graduation Rate Attendance AP Offerings 100 PSAT Extra Credit for Advanced Algebra I Literature Biology Industry Standard AP 3 or higher

Building Level Academic Score PSSA Proficiency Mathematics Reading Science Writing PVAAS Mathematics Reading Science Writing 7150

Other Indicators Attendance Promotion NA Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics Reading Science Writing

Building Level Academic Score PSSA Proficiency Mathematics Reading Other Indicators Promotion NA99.69 Attendance

Building Level Academic Score PSSA Proficiency Mathematics Reading Science Writing Grade 3Rdg PVAAS Mathematics 8072 Reading Science 6478 Writing 100

Other Indicators Promotion NA Attendance Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics Reading Science Writing

Building Level Academic Score PSSA Proficiency Mathematics Reading Science Writing Grade 3Rdg PVAAS Mathematics 100 Reading Science 6392 Writing 100

Other Indicators Promotion NA 100 Attendance Extra Credit for Advanced Mathematics Reading Science Writing

More information can be found on the BWSD website at under the tab School Performance Profile