Supplementing Census Data SANDAG Case Study. DEMOGRAPHIC DATA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. LEHD OnTheMap Data Planning Applications Conference, Session 2 Bruce Spear, Cambridge.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB Planning Applications Conference presented by Elizabeth Sall Maren Outwater Cambridge Systematics,
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2014 Lecture 07
The Current State and Future of the Regional Multi-Modal Travel Demand Forecasting Model.
Status of the SEMCOG E6 Travel Model SEMCOG TMIP Peer Review Panel Meeting December 12, 2011 presented by Liyang Feng, SEMCOG Thomas Rossi, Cambridge Systematics.
MPO Modeling Efforts in the Development of an Activity-Based Model (ABM): The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
Transportation Planning CE 573 Course Introduction and Four-Step Travel Demand Moding (FSTDM)
Presented to: Presented by: Transportation leadership you can trust. LEHD OnTheMap Data 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Tampa, FL Bruce Spear September.
© John M. Abowd 2005, all rights reserved Sampling Frame Maintenance John M. Abowd February 2005.
11 American Community Survey Summary Data Products.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Source: Minnesota IMPLAN Group. IMPLAN Products. ES and 1999 Source : California. Reports and Research.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
11 San Diego Work Related Travel Survey Brian Lane, SANDAG Kevin Stefan, HBA Specto ABJ40 Travel Survey Methods Committee January 16, 2013.
GIS Techniques and Algorithms to Automate the Processing of GPS- Derived Travel Survey Data Praprut Songchitruksa, Ph.D., P.E. Mark Ojah Texas A&M Transportation.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Evaluating and Communicating Model Results: Guidebook for.
Census Transportation Planning Products Program Penelope Weinberger CTPP Program Manager - AASHTO GIS in Public Transportation Conference (September 14,
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Base Data Preparation and Updating Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and.
1 Commuting and Migration Data Products from the American Community Survey Journey-to-Work and Migration Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau 2010 State.
A Spatial Analysis of Orange Line Rider Demographics November 1, 2012By Tamar Sarkisian.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
1 Public Transportation Data in the American Community Survey (ACS) and Census Transportation Planning Products (CTPP) Dec 3, 2009 AASHTO Standing Committee.
Chicago Traffic Analysis Zones 9-Counties 1990 Population: 7,429,181 Area (sq. miles): 137 Number of zones: 14,127 People per zone: 526 Resident workers:
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
Utilizing Advanced Practice Methods to Improve Travel Model Resolution and Address Sustainability Bhupendra Patel, Ph.D., Senior Transportation Modeler.
: Research Question: Would ridership needs in the area of the Mid-Coast Corridor Transit Project be better Served by the implementation of a Bus Rapid.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Overview of Southern Ocean County Presented by David J. McKeon, Assistant Planning Director Ocean County Department of Planning Tuesday, January 11, 2005.
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
RTC DVRPC Household Travel Survey TMIP Peer-Review October 29, 2014 Ben Gruswitz, AICP Office of Modeling & Analysis Sarah Moran Office of Modeling.
San Diego Regional Economic Prosperity Strategy Transportation: Helping Address the Three E’s.
American Community Survey (ACS) 1 Oregon State Data Center Meeting Portland State University April 14,
Leta Huntsinger | PB | | Stacey Bricka | NuStats | |
Comparisons of Synthetic Populations Generated From Census 2000 and American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS) 13 th TRB Application.
Location, Relocation and the Journey to Work by David Levinson University of California at Berkeley Department of Civil Engineering/ Institute of Transportation.
Mobility MATTERS! Connecting People to Life Who Rides the Bus? How Understanding Transit Demographic Can Improve Service May 7, 2015.
Transportation Planning Data Needs and Sources CE 451/551 Iowa State University Reg Souleyrette Source: Transportation Planning Handbook unless otherwise.
Scenario S: Preferred Alternative. Scenario S: Creating Mixed-use Centers Around Major Transportation Areas Is The Primary Driver Of Improved Transportation.
Morgan County Transit Discussion UTA Corporate Staff Presentation November 19, 2013.
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection Chris Tatham Sr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute 725 W. Frontier Circle Olathe, KS
Journey to Work from 1990 Census and ACS National test (C2SS) Elaine Murakami, USDOT, FHWA Nanda Srinivasan, Cambridge Systematics Inc.
Leveraging Web-Based GIS for Managing Transportation Model Network Information TRB Planning Applications Conference May 10 th, 2011 Reno, Nevada Steve.
Comparison of an ABTM and a 4-Step Model as a Tool for Transportation Planning TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference May 8, 2007.
SACO, formerly known as Pepperellborough named in In 1805 dropped the old name in favor of the ancient Native American name of SACO. QUICK FACTS:
Introduction to Sugar Access
Food for Life: Addressing the Issues of Food Security in Oakland, CA Adriana Valencia and Dustin White City Planning 255 – Urban Applications of Geographic.
Point-Base Household and Job Geographic Datasets Jill Locantore, Land Use Planner Jeremy Papuga, Demographic Analyst Erik Sabina, Regional Modeling Manager.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide 2007/2008 Household Travel Survey Presentation of Findings on Weekday Travel Robert E. Griffiths Technical Services.
Public Health, Transportation, and the Built Environment: Benefits and Costs Marlon G. Boarnet Professor and Chair, Department of Planning, Policy, and.
Learning the CTPP Data Access Software Basics Penelope Weinberger CTPP Program Manager – AASHTO Liang Long CTPP Technical Guru – Cambridge Systematics.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
Analysis of Travel Behavior Using the ACS J.G. Berman, Siim S öö t and Susumu Kudo Urban Transportation Center, UIC.
Impact of Aging Population on Regional Travel Patterns: The San Diego Experience 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference, Columbus.
Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.
Travel Model Validation - Key Considerations - Presented to Iowa DOT Peer Review 31 March 2004.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern: Vehicle Occupancy Midterm Report Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Timothy Arde-Acquah,
By Alain L. Kornhauser, PhD Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering Director, Program in Transportation Faculty Chair, PAVE (Princeton Autonomous.
Transportation Modeling – Opening the Black Box. Agenda 6:00 - 6:05Welcome by Brant Liebmann 6:05 - 6:10 Introductory Context by Mayor Will Toor and Tracy.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern: Vehicle Occupancy Midterm Report Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Timothy Arde-Acquah,
John M. Abowd and Lars Vilhuber February 16, 2011
Validating Trip Distribution using GPS Data
EVALUATING THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS OF MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
Castle Hills Market– For Lease
Norman Washington Garrick CE 2710 Spring 2016 Lecture 07
Cindy Miller Cindy Frey
Presentation transcript:

Supplementing Census Data SANDAG Case Study

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

Dwelling Unit Counts Census (SF1) Resolution:Blocks (25,700) Property Record Files Resolution:Parcels (800,000) Aerial Photographs Resolution:Individual building Limitations:Small areas only Buildings, not units Census (SF1) Resolution:Blocks (25,700) Property Record Files Resolution:Parcels (800,000) Aerial Photographs Resolution:Individual building Limitations:Small areas only Buildings, not units

Structure Type Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) Limitations:Self-reported Property Record Files Resolution:Parcels (800,000) Aerial Photographs Resolution:Individual building Limitations:Small areas only Selected structure types Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) Limitations:Self-reported Property Record Files Resolution:Parcels (800,000) Aerial Photographs Resolution:Individual building Limitations:Small areas only Selected structure types

Employment Estimates Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) ES202 Files Resolution:Individual employers Limitations:Confidentiality issues Missing employers Multiple Sites Derived from Building Floor Area Resolution:Parcels (800,000) Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) ES202 Files Resolution:Individual employers Limitations:Confidentiality issues Missing employers Multiple Sites Derived from Building Floor Area Resolution:Parcels (800,000)

Household Income Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) State Income Tax Returns Resolution:Tracts (600) Limitations:Confidentiality issues Definitional differences Complex process Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) State Income Tax Returns Resolution:Tracts (600) Limitations:Confidentiality issues Definitional differences Complex process

Case Study Parcel Level Dwelling Units

MGRA Geography

Irregular Geography

Transit Access

Parcel and MGRA Geography

Block Group Check

Block Counts and Land Use

Residential Buildings

Problem Areas Census Structure types Geo-coding quality Block definitions Senior housing Property Record Files Units on public/non-taxable land Both Units under construction Census Structure types Geo-coding quality Block definitions Senior housing Property Record Files Units on public/non-taxable land Both Units under construction

TRANSPORTATION DATA

Number of Vehicles Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) Department of Motor Vehicles Resolution:Countywide Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias Census (SF3) Resolution:Block groups (2,200) Department of Motor Vehicles Resolution:Countywide Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias

Average Trip Length (Minutes) Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Limitations:Self-reported Speed Surveys/Transportation Models Resolution:TAZs (4,600) Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Limitations:Self-reported Speed Surveys/Transportation Models Resolution:TAZs (4,600) Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias

Transit Mode Shares Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Transit On-Board Surveys Resolution:Small summary areas Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Very large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Transit On-Board Surveys Resolution:Small summary areas Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Very large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias

Trip Tables Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Very large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias Census (CTPP) Resolution:CTPP zones (500) Home Interview Surveys Resolution:Very large summary areas Limitations:Sample bias

Case Study Auto Travel Times

Travel Time Surveys Route AMPM ObservedModeledDifference ObservedModeledDifference Calsbad-Escondido % % Chula Vista-Sorrento Mesa54 0 0% % Downtown-Sorrento Mesa % % El Cajon-Downtown % % Escondido-Calsbad % % Escondido-Downtown % % Escondido-Kearny Mesa % % MidCity-Kearny Mesa % % Mid City-Sorrento Mesa % % Oceanside-Downtown % % Rancho Bernado-Sorrento Mesa % % Sorrento Mesa-Downtown % % SanYsidro-Downtown % % Total % %

California Statewide Travel Survey 1,200 San Diego County Households 180 Households with GPS-Equipped Vehicles 1,000 GPS trips out of 4,700 total survey trips February-October 2001 GeoStats

GPS Coverage

GPS Points

Freeway Speed Comparison

Arterial Speed Comparison

CTPP – Model Comparison -4% -11% -7%

Modeled Travel Times Minutes to CBD by Auto

CTPP Travel Times Minutes to CBD by Auto

Modeled Travel Times Minutes to Suburb by Auto

CTPP Travel Times Minutes to Suburb by Auto

Supplementing Census Data SANDAG Case Study