October 6. 2005 TCRP Report 21: Mobility Management Institutional Factors for Success.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION (TMA) GREATER IRVING-LAS COLINAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING AUGUST 25, 2009.
Advertisements

West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
ANYBODY CAN RIDE! Examples of successful rural transit programs and practices elsewhere in the United States.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
The Rural Routes to Employment Project: Customizing Employment, Expanding Communities Beth Keeton, Southeastern Regional Director The Center for Social.
Community Transit Solutions for the Suburbs APTA Annual Meeting September 30, 2013.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
MCLARY MANAGEMENT Mobility Management 18 th Rural Conference Mobility Management in Rural Environments OMAHA, NE October 21, 2008 James J McLary McLary.
Short Range Transit Improvement Plan CITY OF HIGHPOINT Sounding Board Meeting Service Recommendations September 9, 2014.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Vanpool 101 Vanpool Works for Transit Caryn Souza, Director, RideshareNation and Associate Director Community Transportation Association of America, Washington,
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
Linda K. McCarthy, Executive Director Missoula Downtown Association Missoula, Montana
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
CalACT 2005 Autumn Conference CTSAs As Mobility Mangers CalACT 2005 Autumn Conference CTSAs As Mobility Mangers October 6, 2005.
Feasibility Study Jonathan CalderwoodJune 14, 2013 West Shore Communities Feasibility of Sustainable Transportation with Passenger Ferry Service.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Keeping Harris County Moving.. Background Transit needs study in Commissioned by H-GAC and Harris County Transportation Coordinated Council.
Reacting to Trends Rising gas prices! Decreasing public funding for transportation. TDM becoming more needed in new development. Modified tax benefit.
TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
One Call Transportation Services One Call Transportation Services Building on a Network.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Access Services Inc. Access Paratransit Operations.
Sullivan County Coordinated Transportation Plan Proposed Coordinated Transportation Plan.
GO Airport Shuttle Don Eames The GO Group, LLC Board Member President/CEO GO The Airport Shuttle AGTA Meeting Ft. Myers, FL.
CalACT Conference California Mobility Management Project JARC/New Freedom Grants San Diego, California March 19, 2009 California Alliance of Information.
1 TRANSIT PERFORMANCE REVIEW Balancing Transit Service with Travel Demand and Available Resources.
Innovations in Transit Planning and Financing Presentation to the 2003 MPO Conference, Muncie IN October 16, 2003.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Blueprint for Tomorrow Fairhope City Council February 9, 2008.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
Florida Department Of Transportation District IV Office of Modal Development Commuter Choices 2004 Summit 2004 Summit.
Results Management: Principles and Strategies based on the work of Gary L. Bowen, Ph.D. and Dennis Orthner, Ph.D School of Social Work University of North.
DC Circulator Transit Development Plan TPB Access for All Advisory Committee October 28, 2010.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
WHAT IS A MOBILITY MANAGEMENT CENTER? HOW WOULD IT FUNCTION?
Steve Heminger Executive Director, MTC AMPO Annual Conference Washington, D.C. – October 23, 2003 Playing in Traffic: A New Look at Management and Operations.
Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M University Joe Richmond, University of North Texas Operating Your Own System Versus Contracting.
Analyzing the Mobility Impacts of TOD Level of Service in Transit Oriented Districts Service for Who?
Community Partnership Program Don Okazaki, Planner Accessible Services King County Metro.
Transport.tamu.edu TAMING WILD BRONCOS Transit Management Changes, Financing, Training, Staffing Rod Weis, Texas A&M University Lana Wolken, Texas A&M.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT INITIATIVE SEMINAR Common Denominators of Successful Center City Revitalization Donovan Rypkema Heritage Strategies International.
Gastonia Transit Expansion Study City Council/Planning Commission Joint Transportation Workshop September 13, 2007.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
From Here to There: Transportation Demand Strategies to Support the Grounds Plan at the University of Virginia Presented by Chris Conklin, P.E.
The Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transportation For Livable Communities Program.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
WAYPOINTE Norwalk, CT Walker Parking Consultants Andy Hill Jody Todd June 26, 2008.
E XPANDING M OBILITY O PTIONS IN M ARIN Marin Transit’s Paratransit and Mobility Management Programs 1.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
Move New Haven Transit Mobility Study:
Strategic direction Chapter 4.
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
NCARPO Quarterly Meeting July 27, 2018
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Orange County Transportation Authority Micro-Transit Pilot Program
Transportation Task Force Mission and Vision
Health care for the Homeless Strategic Planning 2018
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
April 23, 2018.
Re-Thinking Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities
Shenandoah County Public Transit Feasibility Study
Presentation transcript:

October TCRP Report 21: Mobility Management Institutional Factors for Success

October Presentation Overview Mobility Management 101 Four Primary Institutional Factors for Success Case Study Illustrations Seven key themes of successful mobility management endeavors

October TCRP Report 21 Definition: “A mobility manager is a transportation organization serving the general public that responds to and influences the demands of the market by undertaking actions and supportive strategies, directly or in collaboration with others, to provide a full-range of options to the single occupant vehicle.”

October Four Mobility Management Functions Operational: service routes, community shuttles, vanpool subsidies, DAR, etc. Technological: real-time dispatching, multiprovider reservations, telecommuting centers, etc. Informational/Programmatic: collaborative arrangements with ridesharing agencies, 511, etc. Land Use: transit villages

October What are the Institutional Factors that Lead to Successful Implementation?

October Mobility management is an agency ethos. It is an institutional state of mind than emphasizes moving people instead of the mode of transportation

October Key Institutional Factors

October Highest Control Factors Leadership: mobility management is successful where a leader champions the cause, convinces elected officials, takes risks, shares power and recognition. Organization Culture: open to change, market driven, cohesive internal vision and mission. Creativity rewarded. No bias towards a single mode.

October Highest Control Factors Management Capabilities: understanding of service alternatives, fostering roles of other organizations, and seeking innovative funding possibilities Personal Addition: Performance measure and cost Cost per trip and subsidy per trip are key indicators. Openness to competitive contracting.

October Case Studies Emery Go Round: operated by a transportation management association OmniLink: operated by Potomac Rappahannock Transportation Commission Midday Shuttle operated by the City of Menlo Park Caltrain and BART shuttles operated by SamTrans Community Transit Network operated by the City of Boulder

October Emery Go Round Connects MacArthur BART with major residential, employment, school and retail complexes. Two weekday and two weekend routes 10 minute frequencies peak; minute off-peak Thrives because of strong leadership from 2-person management team.

October Motto: “taking customers where they want to go, when they want to go.” Property Based Business Improvement District has provided stable funding source. TMA contracts with City of Emeryville. Free to passengers 36.7 passengers per hour. $1.65 cost per passenger

October PRTC OmniLink State-of-the-art technology utilized to accommodate passenger route deviations Relieves some of the trips made my pure demand responsive service. Serves areas where there is occasional demand, but fixed-route not cost-effective. 10% of passengers request route deviations

October passengers per hour Farebox recovery ratio of 23% Part of family of services provided by PRTC in Virginia

October Menlo Park Community Service Route Two-bus one route service primarily designed to serve needs of seniors. Operates 9:30 am to 3:30 pm, clock hourly headways. Picks up and drops off passengers at front door of local Safeway, Stanford medical clinics, library, senior centers, etc. Free to passengers

October City of Menlo Park logo painted on side of contracted bus. Funding mix of redevelopment, Measure A, and BAAQMD monies Operating cost per hour of $45 including cutaway bus. Passengers per hour: 9.7 Cost per passenger trip: $4.62

October Caltrain and SamTrans Shuttles Innovative funding partnerships with 8 cities and over 150 employers. Employers/cities contribute 25% of shuttle cost in lieu of passenger fares. 75% subsidy mix of JPB, TA, BAAQMD, C/CAG funds. Significant flexibility in how shuttles are operated and managed.

October Rail Shuttle coordinator provides entrepreneurial spirit to matching services to markets. 39 shuttles provide 1.3 million annual trips. Average cost of $3.14 per trip

October Community Transit Network Boulder, CO Part of larger effort to shift 19% auto trips to alternative transportation. Six community fixed routes with minute headways peak; off-peak Branding provides upgraded image.

October Group pass model for both employers and residential areas. Service and marketing improvements: 1990: 5,000 passengers/day to 2004: 26,000/day. $1.32 to $3.34 per passenger trip.

October Seven Key Themes Matching services to market needs Customer service and community orientation Maintaining a cost-effective cost per passenger Collaborative partnerships to leverage resources and engender local ownership Flexibility to meet needs Entrepreneurial management with leadership of key person Successful mobility management programs can be housed in a variety of institutional structures, including CTSAs