Iowa Collaborative Assessment Modules A Brief Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Explanation of What It Is and How We Use It. nment/learningcenter/icattutorial The above link will take you.
Advertisements

An Orientation for Parents Fall What is MAP? Measures of Academic Progress Measures of Academic Progress Tests in reading, language, and math Tests.
Preparing You and Your Child for E.O.G. Testing FAQ About E.O.G. Testing Q: Why do the children have to take the E.O.G test? A: The North Carolina End-of-Grade.
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
PARCC Assessment Administration Guidance 1. PARCC Assessment Design Summative Assessments 2 Performance- Based Assessment End-of-Year Assessment  After.
Iowa Core Leadership Session 1 for Welcome!!
American Diploma Project: Algebra II End-of-Course Exam ADP Leadership Meeting June 4-5, 2007.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
About Waterloo website Project report June Outline Overview of process Project deliverables Lessons learned.
Example of “nested” goals 8.1
Assessment Literacy Series
Common Core State Standards. What are Standards? They ensure that students are ready to be successful in school and in the workforce. They set the tone.
Common Core State Standards CCSS What Parents & Board Members Need to Know.
Georgia Milestones End of Grade (EOG) Assessment Grades 3, 4, and 5 Whitney Shook, Assistant Principal/Testing Coordinator Lori Dunagan, Curriculum Support.
Principal Network Series Lisa Andrew, Ed.D Martha Martinez District and School Support Services.
Information on New Regents Examinations for SCDN Presentation September 19, 2007 Steven Katz, Director Candace Shyer, Bureau Chief Office of Standards,
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa Collaborative Assessment Modules (ICAM) Heartland Area Education Agency.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Assessment Overview Dr. Gayle Potter Associate Director Curriculum, Assessment, and Research January 9, 2008.
Sample Middle School San Antonio Independent School District 2002–03 Name Principal.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
December, Welcome Introductions Overview of Agenda.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Measuring the Power of Learning.™ California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Using Formative Assessment and the Digital Library.
Direct Math Assessment State Department Training September, 2008 Cindy Johnstone Mathematics Coordinator.
Designing and implementing a developmentally appropriate state-wide Kindergarten Entry Assessment and K-3 Formative Assessment System: Necessary Considerations.
NEW STANDARDS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY Connecticut Common Core Standards.
CMC South Conference November 1, 2013 Sacramento City Unified School District Iris Taylor Mikila Fetzer Suzie Craig.
Curriculum Updates and Draft Instructional Framework I.Welcoming and Thank you… II.Implementation timeline and where we are… III.Review of the Curriculum,
1 LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION GEE GEE 21 2 GEE 21 Graduation Exit Examination 21st century.
Sample High School San Antonio Independent School District 2002–03 Name Principal.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Comprehensive Curriculum Now that I have it, what do I do with it? July 2005.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
KUD Know –Purpose of the Model Core Curriculum –Our Timeline and Action Plan –Expectations for aligning Model Core Curriculum Essential Concepts or Skill.
CEDAR RIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL JANUARY 15, 2015 acos2010.wikispaces.com.
New Developments in NYS Assessments. What is new? Required use of Standardized Scannable Answer Sheets for all Regents Exams starting in June 2012 Beginning.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Sol C. Johnson High School Wednesday September 23, 2015 (11:00am and 5:30pm) Auditorium.
Sample Elementary San Antonio Independent School District 2002–03 Name Principal.
Save the Sea Turtle L.S.E. 3 rd grade PBL presentation.
Session 1 Achievement Testing Pre-Test Training
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Ohio’s State Assessments: What do families need to know? November 2015.
+ SOUTH DAKOTA PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS MODEL PROCESS OVERVIEW PE WEBINAR I 10/29/2015.
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
Building an Interim Assessment System: A Workbook for School Districts CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 22, 2010.
3 rd, 4 th and 5 th Grade. Agenda Preparation looks like… General Information for Exams Overview of ELA Exam Overview of Math Exam Ways to Help At Home.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Spring 2015 Verona PARCC Results: Year One Wednesday, March 16 7:00-8:00 p.m. VHS Learning Commons.
Essential Skill Requirements Professional Development Tool for District/School Use Fall 2010.
Q2 Benchmark Report1 Lodi Unified School District Benchmark Assessment Results (Mid-Year Student Achievement Monitoring) Prepared by.
Use PowerPoint deck to share with your staff details about:
You Can’t Afford to be Late!
New Developments in NYS Assessments
W E L C O M Magrill Elementary STAAR Informational Night Date.
NGSS-TCT-Writing in Science
Taking the TEAM Approach: Writing with a Purpose
Accessibility Features and Accommodations
Smarter Balanced Assessments: What do families need to know?
Interim Assessment Training NEISD Testing Services
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
NEISD Testing Services
Presentation transcript:

Iowa Collaborative Assessment Modules A Brief Overview

Contents ICAM Purposes Reading and Mathematics Modules Test Characteristics/Response Formats ICAM General Structure Timeline and Costs Choosing Modules LEA Assessment Plan and Alignment Heartland AEA 11 Support

Purpose of ICAM Modules Second Assessments in reading and math Standards referenced Includes multiple choice, short answer, and constructed response items Aligned with content specifications derived from Iowa districts’ standards and benchmarks Created with an eye to complementing the ITBS/ ITED tests

Reading Modules Reading (4, 8 and 11) Comprehending Literature Comprehending Academic Texts Comprehending Functional Texts Literary Elements and Techniques (8th and 11th only)

Mathematics Modules Mathematics (4, 8 and 11) Problem Solving Process and Strategies Number Concepts and Operations Measurement Geometry Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability Patterns, Functions and Algebra Solving Work-Related Math Problems

Test Characteristics Most modules have two parallel forms (all but 2 math modules) Modules have between 17 and 20 items each Technical adequacy research has been conducted and is available ICAM modules are standards-based. Student performance is reported within established performance levels

Response Formats Reading Combination of multiple choice and constructed response Mathematics Combination of multiple choice, short answer and constructed response items

General Structure for ICAM Statewide System ICAM assessment coordinated by AEA team and carried out by LEA educators AEA team works with the printer and the scoring sites to ensure materials are prepared, scored and processed appropriately

General ICAM Timeline September/November-Review Modules for alignment with district assessment plan November - Order Modules January/February - Test materials are printed March/April - 6 Wk. Testing period May - Tests returned to AEA May/June - Training of scoring facilitators June - Constructed Response Scoring July/August -Scores to Districts

$Costs $ $0.85 per module per student ( ) Test Booklets, User’s Guide, Test Admin Guides Constructed Response Scoring* Selected Response Scoring by NCS Reports - criterion referenced - three performance levels - individual student data AEA Support - interpretation, use, decisions LEA and AEA educators together score constructed responses over a 3 day time period. Districts provide one scorer per modules purchased at local per diem.

AEA Support Heartland Team for ICAM Phil Berrie-Overall ICAM Coordination Mariann Culver-Lead Mathematics Scoring Facilitator Mike Szymczuk-Lead Reading Scoring Facilitator Janice Walter-Operations and Support Facilitator Regional Alignment Sessions Coordination of Scoring Sessions Follow-up support in using ICAM in districts as test results are returned

Choice: Which modules should be used?

Where to start? Start with the district-wide assessment plan that is part of the CSIP. What gaps exist in the assessment plan? What specific content areas should be examined?

Decisions… Are there benchmarks in the district assessment plan that are poorly covered by the current assessment plan? Which educators will review the modules for inclusion in the plan? What will be the basis for the choice of modules?

Decisions… A review of the ICAM items may assist in plugging the gaps in the district’s assessment plan for addressing local standards and benchmarks!

Levels of Alignment Curriculum expectations Reading to Reading Math to Math District Standard to the ICAM Module and content specifications District benchmarks to individual items and content specifications for the modules

What level of alignment should the district do? If ICAM is a component of a district’s assessment plan, the modules have to be closely aligned to district standards and benchmarks.

AEA 11 Website Contents services/cia/assessment/icam/ This slide presentation for you to adapt A slide presentation on the history of ICAM Content Specifications for all modules FAQs Alignment guide General scoring guides “Using Data” checklist for success Other helpful information