Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Exam Review 1 1.
Advertisements

Site Calibration for 3D GPS Operations
Near real time assessment of the Space Weather effect on navigation based on the DGPS technique S.Lejeune, R.Warnant, A. Barré, M. Bavier Royal Observatory.
T GPS Fundamentals Your location is: 37 o ’ N 122 o ’ W.
ADJUSTMENT COMPUTATIONS
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
GNSS DERIVED HEIGHTS- PART 2 NOS/NGS - 59
LINDA MORGAN PRINCIPAL CONSULTANT – SPATIAL POSITIONING WESTERN AUSTRALIA SURVEYING CONFERENCE 2013 Geodetic Stuff You Need to Know: Datums, Standards.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GEODETIC CONTROL SURVEYS
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Setup “Do’s & Don’ts Presented By:
Introduction.
Setting Up a New Site for GPS Operations
Differential and precision GPS surveying for sub-meter and centimeter accuracy Feb 2007 Dr. Gary Oppliger.
GPS Accuracy Testing Using: “RTK” (Real Time Kinematic) & “One Step Transformations” (Site Calibrations)
Precision Farming Creating A RTK Network - Overview.
GNSS Verification Derrin Lee Registered Mining Surveyor Xstrata Glendell Mine AIMS Mudgee Seminar February 2008.
GPS & Total Station Basics
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Planning for airborne LIDAR survey Dr.Lamyaa Gamal El-deen.
OPUS Projects (beta) status and plans Improved solutions for simultaneous or repeated observations harvest data from multiple observers share upload &
Hong Kong Satellite Positioning Reference Station Network (SatRef) Presented by : Ben LI, LS/G(HK&Is.)
OPUS : Online Positioning User Service
1 SVY207: Lecture 18 Network Solutions Given many GPS solutions for vectors between pairs of observed stations Compute a unique network solution (for many.
SU 4100 GEODETIC POSITIONING Instructor: Indra Wijayratne.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Transition of the ORGN from NAD 83(CORS96) epoch to NAD 83(2011) epoch Ken Bays, PLS Lead Geodetic Surveyor Oregon DOT March 2013 ODOT.
Effects of ionospheric small- scale structures on GNSS G. WAUTELET Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium Ionospheric Radio Systems & Techniques (IRST)
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
Part Va Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
Part V Centimeter-Level Instantaneous Long-Range RTK: Methodology, Algorithms and Application GS894G.
Lecturer: Jinglin Wang Student name: Hao Li Student ID:
Geocentric Datum of Australia Geocentric Datum of Australia (GDA) Peter Todd Project Manager GDA Implementation ICSM Matt Higgins Technical Manager GDA.
SVY 207: Lecture 13 Ambiguity Resolution
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Phase Observable.
P. Wielgosz and A. Krankowski IGS AC Workshop Miami Beach, June 2-6, 2008 University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland
A Geodesist’s View of the Ionosphere Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD.
PRS92 Bonifacia Daet Sylvia Esperanza
Calibration of geodetic (dual frequency) GPS receivers Implications for TAI and for the IGS G. Petit.
Airborne GPS Positioning with cm-Level Precisions at Hundreds of km Ranges Gerald L. Mader National Geodetic Survey Silver Spring, MD National Geodetic.
GSI Japan - 21st of June 1999 GPS-Positioning using Virtual Reference Stations - Theory, Analysis and Applications Herbert Landau Spectra Precision Terrasat.
APPLICATION OF GPS TECHNOLOGY TO ARCHAEOLOGY GROUP PROJECT.
Introduction to GPS/GNSS Introduction to Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums Corbin Training Center January 7, 2009 Jeff Little Guest Speaker ,
GALOCAD GAlileo LOcal Component for nowcasting and forecasting Atmospheric Disturbances R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*, J. Spits*,
SVY207: Lecture 17 Third party products and GPS processing procedures
MISSISSIPPI HEIGHT MODERNIZATION PROJECT JUNE 11, 2009 By Ronnie L. Taylor Chief, Geodetic Advisor Branch NOAA, National Geodetic Survey.
Global Positioning System Overview
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
Towards optimizing the determination of accurate heights with GNSS APRIL 14, 2015 Dan Gillins, Ph.D., P.L.S. and Michael Eddy, Ph.D. student.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science This file can be found on the course web page:
ST236 Site Calibrations with Trimble GNSS
Relative Positional Precision. 3.E.i. - Relative Positional Precision We know that every point located on a survey has an uncertainty in its location.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
GPS Site Calibration Objectives  Explain the Co-ordinate systems used in GPS Surveying.  Explain what a calibration is.  Explain the 5 main process.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
SVY207: Lecture 16 GPS Field Procedures and Computations
R. Warnant*, G. Wautelet*, S. Lejeune*, H. Brenot*,
KINEMATIC GPS AND AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION PROBLEM
Suggested Guidance for OPUS Projects Processing
Survey Networks Theory, Design and Testing
Online Positioning User Service Review and new developments
Presentation transcript:

Mission Planning and SP1

Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment

ICSM Standards and Practices for Control Surveys ‘SP1’

Positional Uncertainty n 95% circle of uncertainty (metres) n Independent of the nearby network n SP1 ‘the uncertainty, in metres, at the 95% confidence level, with respect to the defined reference frame (in our case GDA94)’ n Order is relative – PU is absolute n From 2005, PU replaces Order

Assigning Positional Uncertainty n Formula in SP1 by Leenhouts, 1985 n C = b/a n K = q0 + q1C + q2C2 + q3C3 n Radius = aK n Where: a = semi-major axis of the standard error ellipse b = semi-minor axis of the standard error ellipse. q0 = q1 = q2 = q3 =

Local Uncertainty n 95% confidence level n Average relative uncertainty with respect to adjacent points Similar to Order which refers to 1  Similar to Order which refers to 1  n Same formula as PU but error ellipse refers to ‘relative’ average between adjacent points

Class and Order n Quality Indicators n Determined by u The field and reduction procedures of the survey. u The quality of the origin data n Adjustments are an important element of verifying Class and Order

Class “CLASS is a function of the precision of a survey network, reflecting the precision of observations as well as suitability of network design, survey methods, instruments and reduction techniques used in that survey. Preferably the CLASS is verified by an analysis of the minimally constrained least squares adjustment of the network.”

Class is determined by n The network design. n Observing procedures and practices. n Reduction of observations. n The results of a minimally constrained adjustment.

Testing Class n The semi major axis of each relative error ellipse is tested against:- r = c(d + 0.2) r = Maximum allowable semi-major axis in mm c = Factor to relate Distance to Error d = Distance between stations in km

C Values for Each Class Class C Value (for 1 sigma) Typical Applications 3A 1 Special high precision projects 2A 3High precision National Geodetic Surveys A 7.5National and State geodetic surveys B 15Densification of geodetic surveys E 100Lower class surveys r = c (d + 0.2) e.g. Class A 1km GPS Line ~ r = 9mm

Relative Error Ellipse < r

Order “ORDER is a function of the class of a survey, the conformity of the new data set AND the precision of any transformation process required to convert the results from one datum to another”

Order n Order is determined in the same way as class but AFTER a fully constrained adjustment n The same formula for ‘r’ is used

Some Order and C values

Class A Significance of Class and Order Class A 4th Order 1st Order 4th Order 1st Order

GPS Surveying Observations in SP1 n n Static Surveying n n Quick Static Surveying n n Pseudo-kinematic Surveying n n Kinematic Surveying u u Real Time Kinematic Surveying (RTK)

General Requirements n Use of Manufacturer’s Instructions n Ancillary Equipment n Geodetic Receivers and Software n Satellite Geometry, Number and Elevation n Need for closure in work and connection to existing geodetic network n Connection to GDA and AHD as appropriate n Warning on site Dependent Errors

GPS Calibration SP1 now deals with GPS calibration before starting GPS campaigns!

GPS Field Techniques Vs Class

Independent Occupations n Occupy the mark another time and gather another data set n Ideally separated in time with observations to different set of satellites n Ideally occupied from different base station in the case of RTK n Back to back but with a new set up of the antenna is the minimum n Enables detection of Errors

Errors in GPS Surveying

Avoiding Errors n n Specifications and Recommended Practices have been designed to minimize errors n n GPS Errors can be put in 2 groups... u Factors which affect Phase data and thus the GPS Processing u Factors external to Processing which can affect the final result

Factors Affecting Processing n n Observation Time n n Number and Geometry of Satellites n n Quality of Starting Coordinates n n Broadcast vs Precise Ephemeris n n Ionospheric and Tropospheric delay n n Site Specific Errors such as Multipath n n All affect ability to correctly solve for ambiguities and / or resulting precision

SP1 Covers Processing S = Single Frequency. D = Dual Frequency. DD = Double difference. FX = Fixed Ambiguity solution. FT = Fixed ambiguity with repaired cycle slips. T = Triple Difference. NCP = Narrow correlation ie DGPS NCP = Narrow correlation ie DGPS.

Factors External to Processing n n Centring Error n n Antenna Height Error n n Number of repeat occupations of sites n n Quality of existing control to which GPS survey is being fitted n n Datum Transformation n n For Heights - quality of Geoid Ellipsoid Separation

GPS Survey Planning

Survey Planning n Station Marking n Station Naming n Manpower n Funding n GPS Equipment Available n Other Resources u key maps, access information, program sheets, booking forms, ancillary equipment

Reconnaissance n Office Preparation n Site Selection u Visibility u Accessibility u Multipath u Permanency u Future Use

Reconnaissance n Station Documentation u Speedo Traverse u Travel Times u Special Requirements u Field Records n Logistics u Travel time u Setup u Observation time u Optimum Times

Observation and Network Design

Networked Observation PSMs to be Coordinated Existing Control

Networked Observation PSMs to be Coordinated Existing Control

Direct Measurement - extra check - little extra time with GPS - or - Traversed during Cadastral Survey Second Set - Checks Control and New Marks Radiations are not closed - no check Observation Design PSMs to be Coordinated Existing Control

Connections to Control Network Mode

Connections to Control Base Station Mode Base 1 Base 3 2 Used for RTK and covered in SP1

Adjustment

Minimally Constrained Adjustment n Only sufficient constraints in order to achieve a solution. n Confirms internal accuracy of data. n Computed on ellipsoid of GPS computation. n No “N” values are included. n Used to assign CLASS to coordinates.

Fully Constrained Adjustment n All constraints are included. n GPS baselines may have to be transformed (say to AGD) as part of the adjustment process. n Include ‘N’ Values in this adjustment. n Used to assign ORDER to coordinates.

Adjustment Analysis n Essential to verify Class and Order n Variance factor should pass Chi - Square test n Standardized residuals inspected

RTK

Questions?Questions?