Introduction to Running the WRF in LES Mode Jeff Massey April 1, 2014 University of Utah WRF Users Group.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some questions on convection that could be addressed through another UK field program centered at Chilbolton Dan Kirshbaum 1.
Advertisements

Weather Research & Forecasting: A General Overview
ATMO5332 WRF-ARW Tutorial 0.01”.
Department of Physics /Victoria Sinclair Structure and force balance of idealised cold.
UU Unitah Basin WRF Model Configuration (same as DEQ) See Alcott and Steenburgh 2013 for further details on most aspects of this numerical configuration:
Cold Fronts and their relationship to density currents: A case study and idealised modelling experiments Victoria Sinclair University of HelsinkI David.
For the Lesson: Eta Characteristics, Biases, and Usage December 1998 ETA-32 MODEL CHARACTERISTICS.
Issues in Very High Resolution Numerical Weather Prediction Over Complex Terrain in Juneau, Alaska Don Morton 1,2, Delia Arnold 3,4, Irene Schicker 3,
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System Cliff Mass, Dave Ovens, Jeff Baars, Mark Albright, Phil Regulski, Dave Carey University of Washington.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2005 RF01/RF02: LES sensitivity studies Adrian Lock and Eoin Whelan.
Diurnal circulations in Southern California Mimi Hughes and Alex Hall.
This is the footer WRF Basics Weather Research and Forecasting.
Fixing WRF’s High Speed Wind Bias: A New Subgrid Scale Drag Parameterization and the Role of Detailed Verification Cliff Mass and Dave Ovens University.
1 NGGPS Dynamic Core Requirements Workshop NCEP Future Global Model Requirements and Discussion Mark Iredell, Global Modeling and EMC August 4, 2014.
This is the footer Running WRF on HECToR Ralph Burton, NCAS (Leeds) Alan Gadian, NCAS (Leeds) With thanks to Paul Connolly, Hector.
Length Scale analysis of the transition from shallow to deep convection João Paulo A. Martins (1) Pedro M. A. Miranda (1) Pedro M. M. Soares (1) João Teixeira.
WRF namelist.input Dr Meral Demirtaş
Mesoscale & Microscale Meteorological Division / NCAR How to Set Up and Run WRF (real.exe & wrf.exe)? Wei Wang June 29, 2004.
Introduction to the WRF Modeling System Wei Wang NCAR/MMM.
Scalable Algorithms for Structured Adaptive Mesh Refinement Akhil Langer, Jonathan Lifflander, Phil Miller, Laxmikant Kale Parallel Programming Laboratory.
The National Environmental Agency of Georgia L. Megrelidze, N. Kutaladze, Kh. Kokosadze NWP Local Area Models’ Failure in Simulation of Eastern Invasion.
November 1, 2013 Bart Brashers, ENVIRON Jared Heath Bowden, UNC 3SAQS WRF Modeling Recommendations.
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service Jan-Peter Schulz Deutscher Wetterdienst 27 th EWGLAM and 12 th SRNWP Meeting 2005.
Russ Bullock 11 th Annual CMAS Conference October 17, 2012 Development of Methodology to Downscale Global Climate Fields to 12km Resolution.
Improvements of WRF Simulation Skills of Southeast United States Summer Rainfall: Focus on Physical Parameterization and Horizontal Resolution Laifang.
CCAM Numerical Weather Prediction Dr Marcus Thatcher Research Scientist December 2007.
Initialization for Real Data Cases Dave Gill
How to set up and run WRF model. Outline n How to download and compile the WRF code? n Namelist n Input and output files.
Comparison of convective boundary layer velocity spectra calculated from large eddy simulation and WRF model data Jeremy A. Gibbs and Evgeni Fedorovich.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High resolution COSMO runs for dispersion applications.
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA) Jimy Dudhia.
Regional Climate Modelling over Southern Africa Mary-Jane M. Kgatuke South African Weather Service.
Use of Mesoscale and Microscale Results to Improve the Mars Climate Database Near-Surface Variability Model E. Millour, F. Forget, A. Spiga April 6, 2011.
CS 484 Load Balancing. Goal: All processors working all the time Efficiency of 1 Distribute the load (work) to meet the goal Two types of load balancing.
Progress Update of Numerical Simulation for OSSE Project Yongzuo Li 11/18/2008.
Introduction to the WRF Modeling System
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
A Thermal Plume Model for the Boundary Layer Convection: Representation of Cumulus Clouds C. RIO, F. HOURDIN Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, CNRS,
WRF Modelling Aim:  18 th -19 th April Cyclone taking dust SW as opposed to SE  15 th – 16 th North Scotland hit  Cyclone has moved north dragging.
Page 1© Crown copyright Modelling the stable boundary layer and the role of land surface heterogeneity Anne McCabe, Bob Beare, Andy Brown EMS 2005.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Component testing of the COSMO model’s turbulent diffusion.
Mesoscale Modeling with a 3D Turbulence Scheme Jocelyn Mailhot and Yufei Zhu (Claude Pelletier) Environment Canada MSC / MRB 3 rd Annual Meeting on CRTI.
Computational Modeling of 3D Turbulent Flows With MC2 Claude Pelletier Environment Canada MSC / MRB.
Parameterization of the Planetary Boundary Layer -NWP guidance Thor Erik Nordeng and Morten Køltzow NOMEK 2010 Oslo 19. – 23. April 2010.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Status of the COSMO-1 configuration at MeteoSwiss Guy.
The effect of tides on the hydrophysical fields in the NEMO-shelf Arctic Ocean model. Maria Luneva National Oceanography Centre, Liverpool 2011 AOMIP meeting.
Real-data WRF: Setup and run ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.
California Central Valley (Experiment 6) ATM 419 Spring 2016 Fovell 1.
Matt Vaughan Class Project ATM 621
Characteristics of precipitating convection in the UM at Δx≈200m-2km
Northwest Modeling Consortium
Introducing the Lokal-Modell LME at the German Weather Service
Numerical Weather Forecast Model (governing equations)
Operational COSMO of MeteoSwiss
WRF Four-Dimensional Data Assimilation (FDDA)
“Storm of the Century”: grid nudging and stochastic perturbatons
Grid Point Models Surface Data.
Ben Green Group meeting, 9/13/2013
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
IMPROVING HURRICANE INTENSITY FORECASTS IN A MESOSCALE MODEL VIA MICROPHYSICAL PARAMETERIZATION METHODS By Cerese Albers & Dr. TN Krishnamurti- FSU Dept.
Changing WRF input files (met_em…) with MATLAB
Update on the Northwest Regional Modeling System 2017
Outlines of NICAM NICAM (Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model)
Tucson, AZ Initial Results 8/10/2011 – 8/15/2011
Cliff Mass University of Washington
Subgrid-Scale Model Tests Using Petascale Computers
Model Vertical Coordinates and Levels and Nesting
Vertical Coordinates and Nesting
Polar WRF (Ohio State Modifications)
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Running the WRF in LES Mode Jeff Massey April 1, 2014 University of Utah WRF Users Group

Why Run in LES mode? 1.Capture a very turbulent or small scale phenomena 2.Capture all scales of turbulence >= model grid and their effects implicitly instead of parameterizing them with a PBL scheme 3.Run a high resolution run (<500m) 4.Loss of faith in the current WRF PBL parameterizations What is LES mode? Running the WRF at high resolutions with the PBL scheme turned off and full diffusion turned on. The effects of sub-grid scale turbulence on the state variables is no longer parameterized.

1.Run the outer domains as a regular WRF simulation. The innermost domain (1-2 km) will be the parent domain for the LES domain 2.Make met_em files for parent WRF domain and LES domain. 3.Run real.exe for parent and LES domains. 4.Rename the LES wrfinput_d02 file wrfndi_d02 and wrfout_d03 to wrfout_d01 in the run directory 5.Run ndown.exe to create new wrfbdy and wrfinput files 6.Run v_interp if you want to adjust the vertical levels 7.Run wrf with the PBL scheme turned off and diff_opt =2 Process

Need 4 namelists: 1.Namelist describing the parent domains and LES domain. 2.Namelist describing the innermost parent domain and the LES domain 3.Namelist listing the new vertical levels for v_interp 4.Namelist describing the LES domain with appropriate physics. Note: the first 2 namelists must have the same vertical levels Process

Important considerations 1.Vertical levels must match between parent WRF run and LES domain for the real.exe and ndown.exe namelists. 2.Vertical levels can be changed after ndown.exe, but the lowest half-eta level must be higher than the parent domain and the highest half-eta level must be lower than the parent domain. &newlevels nvert = 54, nlevels = ,0.9876,0.9815,0.9631,0.9450,0.9272,0.9097, ,0.8754,0.8586,0.8421,0.8258,0.8098,0.7940, ,0.7479,0.7231,0.6990,0.6755,0.6526,0.6302, ,0.5873,0.5667,0.5466,0.5270,0.5080,0.4895, ,0.4539,0.4368,0.4036,0.3722,0.3425,0.3145, ,0.2631,0.2396,0.2175,0.1967,0.1772,0.1588, ,0.1254,0.1103,0.0961,0.0829,0.0706,0.0590, ,0.0383,0.0290,0.0204,0.0000, e_vert = 37, eta_levels = , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Namelist.input for real and ndown Namelist.v_interp for v_interp

Important considerations 1.There is a fine balance between the lowest sigma level and the resolution of the terrain. For my domain ~100m vertical resolution and 5min terrain resolution worked. 2.The closer the parent WRF terrain and the LES terrain the better. I run the parent domain with 5 min terrain so they match perfectly. Ndown.exe will do a terrain mesh on the edges of the LES domain if the terrain does not match 30 sec terrain5 min terrain

Important considerations 1.Initialize the LES run after the parent WRF run is fully spun up. I allowed 6 hours. If you don’t do this the boundary conditions will get shocked and cause the run to crash Bad wrfbdy file since bounday layer is getting shocked from model spinup A good looking wrfbdy file

Important considerations 1.There are some namelist.input variables that will help and/or are necessary &domains time_step = 2 &physics sf_sfclay_physics = 11, sf_surface_physics = 2, bl_pbl_physics = 0, &dynamics w_damping = 1, diff_opt = 2, km_opt = 2, diff_6th_opt = 2, diff_6th_factor = 0.3, mix_isotropic = 1, mix_upper_bound = 0.1, time_step_sound = 8, mix_full_fields =.true.,

22 sec in 24 sec in 26 sec in LES crash over terrain My runs would crash within the first minute of the model run. Errors would start on steep slopes and then propagate throughout the whole domain Typical reasons for the errors: 1.Terrain resolution was too high 2.Low level vertical resolution was too high 3.Boundary condition forcing was too strong

WRF-PBL LES

WRF-PBL runLES run