DPE Property Project Presentation to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises 21 June 2006

Overview of Presentation Background Process Non-core Property breakdown by SOE Geographical spread of SOE non-core properties Properties for Sale: B-BBEE Guidelines –Promoting B-BBEE –Promoting Local Benefit Properties for Development –Property Development Process –Property Development Vehicle

Background DPE sole shareholder for 7 SOE. SOE are in a process of focusing on core business, divesting themselves of assets and enterprises that are non-core. Property project identifies optimal ways to dispose of non-core property. Non-core property holdings have been classified as either commercial or non-commercial properties. Properties for development can optimise value for SOE and promote socio-economic development impact. Property Portfolio Core Non-core Disposal to Government Housing Sale Non- Commercial Commercial Development

Process Cabinet Memo on the framework for the disposal of non- core property has been approved. Submission of Cab Memo on B-BBEE guidelines for consideration. PFMA –Approval granted for Transnet’s non-core list. –Partial PFMA approval granted to Denel. –Transactions will be subject to approval by the Minister in terms of S54(2). Properties for Sale –Competitive process with a set of clearly defined steps in the transaction process. –B-BBEE Guidelines apply. –Local benefits.

Process Disposal to government and consultation with government departments: –Bilateral with Department of Housing is underway. –Bilateral with Department of Education is imminent. –Discussions with Land Affairs have started. Once disposals to government departments have been finalised, SOE packaging will proceed followed by disposal to the public. Provincial roadshows and communication strategy to raise awareness of the disposals process to alert people to potential purchasing opportunities at a local level. Properties for development to be developed under auspices of SPV.

Non-Core Property Share by SOE

Spread of SOE Non-Core Properties

Properties for Sale: B-BBEE Guidelines Originally, collaborated with DPW on a Joint Disposal Strategy and B-BBEE Guidelines, but resubmission of latest Cab Memo focuses on B-BBEE Guidelines which are applicable to SOE only. B-BBEE guidelines are based on the dti Codes of Good Practice and the Property Sector Charter. Applicable to properties for sale. Replicability of these guidelines for properties for development yet to be determined.

Promoting B-BBEE through Disposals BEE StatusQualificationRecognition Level Level One Contributor≥100 points on the Generic Scorecard135% Level Two Contributor≥85 but <100 points on the Generic Scorecard 125% Level Three Contributor≥75 but <85 on the Generic Scorecard110% Level Four Contributor≥65 but <75 on the Generic Scorecard100% Level Five Contributor≥55 but <65 on the Generic Scorecard80% Level Six Contributor≥45 but <55 on the Generic Scorecard60% Level Seven Contributor≥40 but <45 on the Generic Scorecard50% Level Eight Contributor≥30 but <40 on the Generic Scorecard10% Non-Compliant Contributor<30 on the Generic Scorecard0% Where any enterprise is in excess of 50% owned by black people and has achieved the full 7 points under net equity interest, the BEE Status of that Enterprise will be at the level immediately above the level at which its actual score is evaluated.

Promoting B-BBEE Overall target: –A minimum of 70% of all asset disposals by value (other than those for transfer or housing) by each SOE must be to entities with a BBBEE status of at least Level 4, i.e. entities with scorecard points equal to and above 65%. BEE thresholds have been set for different property values. DPE considers that local benefit and economic development are functional criteria against which bids should be measured - these have been built into the adjudication criteria. Each SOE should report quarterly to the DPE on performance against the targets, based on the BBBEE status table.

Properties for Development JOHANNESBURG: Newtown North Precinct Spatial development framework and business case complete, possible JV JOHANNESBURG: International Airport Property strategy complete, land transactions with ACSA in process JOHANNESBURG: Kaserne / City-Deep Inland Port Scoping study completed DURBAN: Non-port related sites Victoria Embankment and NMR development projects underway EAST LONDON CBD Development framework completed, land transfer to District council and Buffalo City Development Agency under consideration PORT ELIZABETH: Harbour Business case for relocation and harbour development completed, Transnet capital projects reviewing decision by end July 06. CAPE TOWN: Culemborg Black-River Properties for development identified, negotiations on development framework and bulk infrastructure underway.

Provision of infrastructure services Construction of improvements Property Development Process PROFESSION FEES PROJECT MANAGE LAND ENABLE COSTS Property in current transport use zoning, improvements & infrastructure to support historic use DEVELOPED PROPERTY TO END USER Acquisition of alternative land use rights development rights to support mixed alternative land use Market research Viability study Context Precinct Plan Town Planning Develop framework Rezone Survey PROPERTY HOLDING COST MANAGE FEE ELECTRIC SEWERAGE WATER ROADS STORM TELECOM BRICKS MORTOR CONSTRUCTION MARKETING SALES LEASING ADVERTISING

Newtown North Precinct PMG note: map not included, please

ACSA JOHANNESBURG AIRPORT LAND HOLDINGS PMG note: map not included, please

JOHANNESBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PMG note: map not included, please

JOHANNESBURG INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PMG note: map not included, please

Johannesburg Kaserne / City Deep PMG note: map not included, please

2608 Container Data.doc PMG note: map not included, please

CSIR for City of Johannesburg Economic Development Unit, June 2004 Container throughput to double in 10 years Container Growth Demand

CSIR for City of Johannesburg Economic Development Unit, June 2004 Projected Demand for Land

DURBAN GAUTENG PRETCON SENTRARAND CITY DEEP DURBAN PORT BAYHEAD KZN Inland Terminal – e.g. Cato Ridge ERMELO WITBANK KOMATIPOORT MAPUTO RICHARDS BAY Coal-link export line, dual electrified 25KVA AC, also carries general freight Electrified 3KV DC Non- Electrified Non Electrified Durban Gauteng Spoornet mainline service Dual Electrified 3 KV DC Current - Approx 25 to 30 trains per day in each direction. 5 to 7 Container trains per day in each direction.Operating at less than 40% of theoretical capacity IMEX Intermodal service, 1100 wagons, teu’s pa = average 6,4 day wagon turnaround, 5 to 8 day container transit time Proposed- long trains to Sentra rand then short block train diesel loco shuttle to Kaserne and city deep – direct to terminals Durban Gauteng Road Freight Service Congestion, road safety and environmental issues Door to door transit time 2 days Proposal: Sentra Rand Marshalling yard, Future Inter-modal Terminal Proposal: Diesel shuttle rail service, Sentra Rand - City Deep Proposed -Block train Spoornet service to inland port, shuttle diesel rail service to Durban Port. Decreased Spoornet wagon turnaround, decreased costs Future Road freight terminal Proposal: City Deep Inter-modal upgrade and re-planning. Schematic of Corridor

KC-D Action Plan Improve operational efficiencies by reduce wagon turnaround time from 6 to 2 days. Design rail operating system and layout of KC-D block train marshalling and dispatch yard to service container terminals and warehousing facilities. Identify container terminals for possible concession, development and service provision. Undertake internal high level layout design and establish potential viability and industrial land value. Identify town planning, infrastructure and service requirement to maximise land values and operational efficiencies. Programme phasing of rail service improvement, system upgrading, marketing and development.

PMG note: map not included, please

Durban Joint NPA-eThekwini call for proposals on Victoria Embankment. Project preparation and excision of NMR site from Spoornet as part of City Sports Precinct for 2010.

East London CBD PMG note: map not included, please

East London CBD PMG note: map not included, please

Port of Port Elizabeth PMG note: map not included, please

Port Elizabeth: Manganese Ore & Fuel Reservoir PMG note: map not included, please

Port Elizabeth PMG note: map not included, please

Port Elizabeth Development Site PMG note: map not included, please

Transport Corridor approaching Cape Town PMG note: map not included, please CAPE TOWN Transnet property

Transport Corridor approaching Cape Town PMG note: map not included, please

Transport Corridor leaving Cape Town PMG note: map not included, please

Culemborg Development Proposal PMG note: map not included, please

Transport Infrastructure Requirements PMG note: map not included, please

Property Development Vehicle The coordinated development of the key property projects needs overall coordination under a single property development vehicle. A model has been designed and is under consideration. Key functions to be performed: –Asset management –Development management –Property management –Compliance management

Property Development Vehicle Guiding principles that have informed the proposed institutional arrangements: Decision making must be fair, transparent and certain The proposed institutional arrangements must: –Set out defined reporting lines and governance structure. –Be commercially viable and sustainable. –Ensure public sector oversight, participation and representation. –Avoid duplication of capacity by utilising existing public sector SOE capacities. –Contribute to transformation of the property sector.