Update On The Development Of Sulfuryl Fluoride As An Alternative To Methyl Bromide Suresh Prabhakaran, Ph.D. Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A5 Countries Readiness for Methyl Bromide Phase-out by 1st January 2015: Addressing the Challenges of Sustainability Methyl Bromide Phase- out in the Postharvest.
Advertisements

MB Alternatives in dried fig sector1 DO VACUUM CHAMBERS HAVE A FUTURE AFTER THE LOSS OF METHYL BROMIDE? Patrick DUCOM National Stored Products Laboratory.
Detail actions necessary to implement the interim housing mission in the post-disaster environment Identify command and control structures at all levels.
Tuesday, 7 May 2013 Prof. Mohamed Besri
M o n t r e a l P r o t o c o l O E W G - 32, July 2012, Bangkok (Thailand) Response to Decision XXIII/5: Quarantine and Pre-shipment uses of Methyl.
MBTOC Cochairs :  Mohammed Besri  Marta Pizano  Ian Porter Methyl Bromide CUE: Final Recommendations M o n t r e a l P r o t o c o l 26 th MOP,
M o n t r e a l P r o t o c o l O E W G - 30, J u ne 2010, Geneva Teung Chin, Ph.D USDA ARS, Office of Pest Management Policy National Plant Board.
Methyl Bromide Alternatives in US/ California Dried Fruit and Nut Industries Gary Obenauf Agricultural Research Consulting Fresno, CA.
Maintenance Aerosols & Liquids Manufactured by Amrep, Inc.
1 Heat Treatment Considerations Before – After Ole Dosland Director of Technical Training & E-Learning.
30th OEWG, Geneva Critical Use Nomination: Interim Recommendations MBTOC Cochairs :  Ian Porter  Mohamed Besri  Michelle Marcotte  Marta Pizano June.
TEAP Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee TEAP Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee 1 Montreal Protocol, MOP 25, Bangkok, October 2013.
Integrated Crop Pest Management Montana Small Grain Guide.
Postharvest Handling of Tree Nuts and Dried Products
Critical Use Nomination: Interim Recommendations MBTOC Cochairs :  Mohamed Besri  Michelle Marcotte  Marta Pizano  Ian Porter Montreal Protocol, OEWG-32,
Integrated Pest Management. What pests are we talking about? ▸ Weeds ▸ Insects ▸ Disease ▸ Rodents ▸ Birds ▸ Many others.
F-solvents What do you expect from a new cleaning technology? What do you expect from a new cleaning technology? l Cleaning / Drying Performance l Material.
Dow AgroSciences New Product Developments Rod Nothwehr Dow AgroSciences/Mycogen Seeds October 29, 2009.
Pioneer Hybrids Lonnie Smith
Finance 454: Real Estate Market Analysis A Short Course in the Analysis of Residential and Commercial Real Estate Markets Wayne Foss, MBA, MAI, CRE Foss.
Life Cycle Analysis and Resource Management Dr. Forbes McDougall Procter & Gamble UK.
Good Hygiene Practices along the coffee chain The Codex General Principles of Food Hygiene Module 2.3.
ICA TriNova, LLC A marketing and development company seeking to commercialize new technologies Founded in 1999 and headquartered in Atlanta GA Privately.
1 Alternatives…. arol Jones, PhD, PE, Oklahoma State University Stored Products Research and Education Center Carol Jones, PhD, PE, Oklahoma State University.
AFLATOXIN REGULATORY ISSUES Garnett E. Wood, Ph.D. Food and Drug Administration Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Center for Food Safety and.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
Sulfuryl Fluoride ProFume* Gas Fumigant
Organophosphate Transition: Challenges to Stored Products Frank ArthurTed Rogers USDA-ARS-GMPRCUSDA-OPMP Manhattan, KSWash. DC.
2 Jacques CAZOR General Directorate for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control Noix du Périgord Noix de Grenoble.
Heat Treatments-Past, Present and Future Jerry W. Heaps General Mills.
HEAT TREATMENT Perspectives from the Pest Management Industry Anil Menon, PhD. BCE Director of Technical Training Wil-Kil Pest Control Sun Prairie, WI.
STORED - PRODUCT INSECTS: “INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT – A RESEARCHER’S VIEW” David Weaver DEPARTMENT OF ENTOMOLOGY MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY BOZEMAN, MT.
Fourth Stored Product Pest Management & Heat Treatment Workshop Bh. Subramanyam (Subi) Department of Grain Science and Industry Kansas State University.
Fluoride Exposure from Pesticides: The Case Against SULFURYL FLUORIDE Michael Connett, FAN 2nd Citizens’ Conference on Fluoride July 30, 2006.
Temperature Treatments for Postharvest Dried Fruits and Nuts
Heat Treatment of Empty Steel Bins Mark Casada, Dennis Tilley, & Frank Arthur USDA-ARS Grain Marketing and Production Research Center Manhattan, Kans.
Challenges to Sustainability in Florida Dr. Norm Leppla UF/IFAS - IPM Florida SYSCO 2008 Sustainable Ag/IPM Conference & Farm Tour.
Biotechnology Objectives for October 21, 2010  We will consider the nature and issues of food biotechnology  We will answer some questions about food.
IPM for Commercial Grain Storage: Industry Perspective Paul W. Flinn USDA, ARS, Grain Marketing & Production Research Center Manhattan, Kansas With a.
Bhadriraju Subramanyam Department of Grain Science and Industry Kansas State University Manhattan, KS Entomology Research and Extension Update November.
Efficacy of Flameless Catalytic Infrared Radiation Energy Against Different Life Stages of Insects Khamis Moses, Bhadriraju Subramanyam, Dogan Hulya and.
Methyl Bromide Update: Reregistration and Montreal Protocol April 23, 2009 Reddick Fumigants.
Development and Use of a Thermal Chamber Brian C. Zeichner Alfred Lynn Hoch, Zia Mehr, Daniel Topp, Donald Wood,
NEW PHOSTOXIN LABELING
IPM Integrated Pest Management John Royals Instructor Turfgrass Management Technology Central Piedmont Community College.
National Program 308 Assessment and Customer Workshop Feb 28 - Mar 2, 2006 Jim Bair, vice president North American Millers’ Association Washington, DC.
Is Pest Management Possible in the Post-FQPA Era ? Jerry Heaps THE PILLSBURY COMPANY MINNEAPOLIS, MN Food Processing Industry’s Perspectives.
Effectiveness of a Dry Formulation of Spinosad Against Stored-Grain Insects Anna Getchell and Bhadriraju Subramanyam Department of Grain Science and Industry.
HEAT TREATMENT PERSPECTIVE / EXPERIENCES August 7, 2001 Kansas State University Department of Grain Sciences HEAT TREATMENT WORKSHOP NAPERVILLE, IL Post.
Lecture 6 – Moisture Relationships
2/6/ Moisture Relationships. – Amount of moisture affects the following: Density: particle density decreases with increasing moisture content Force-deformation.
Michael Toews Dept. of Grain Science and Industry
2009 PROGRAM COMPONENTS AND INITIATIVES. MISSION – AND WORK 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS 2009 PLANS.
Insect Numbers in Traps and Product Samples Before and After Heat Treatment Andy Allen Graduate Research Assistant Department of Grain Science and Industry.
Principles behind treatments recommended in ISPM No. 15 Dr. Eric Allen Canadian Forest Service Natural Resources Canada.
AFLATOXIN REGULATORY ISSUES
Flexible Air Permitting
Significance of ISO to the Food Industry
GENE EDITING: Regulatory & IP Considerations
Ministry of agriculture, forestry and food
CAN IT BE DONE? IPM re-evaluation possible new products/ use of old
Lecture 5 – Moisture Relationships Announcements
Maintenance Aerosols & Liquids
Lecture 6 – Moisture Relationships
Critical Use Nominations: Final Recommendations
Regulatory Sciences and Government Affairs
Lecture 5 Announcements
Heat Treatments-Past, Present and Future
Air Transportation List Contact us
Presentation transcript:

Update On The Development Of Sulfuryl Fluoride As An Alternative To Methyl Bromide Suresh Prabhakaran, Ph.D. Dow AgroSciences LLC, Indianapolis, IN

Sulfuryl Fluoride (SO 2 F 2 ) Early 1950’s - Research initiated by Dow to develop an alternative structural fumigant without the mercaptan odors associated with methyl bromide First field tests with sulfuryl fluoride for control of DWT Patent received for fumigation with sulfuryl fluoride (#2,875,127) First marketed in US under trade name Vikane* gas fumigant Sulfuryl Fluoride production initiated at Dow Chemical facility at Pittsburgh, CA. * Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC.

Sulfuryl Fluoride (SO 2 F 2 ) Currently sold under global trade name Vikane* gas fumigant Primary use: Structural Fumigation to control Drywood Termites Secondary uses: Railcars, Shipping Containers, Artifacts, Beetles Currently registered in:  USA  Caribbean  Sweden  Germany (use permit) * Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC.

More Similarities Between SF & MeBr than Differences Both are excellent fumigants that: l have wide pest spectrums l are non-flammable and odorless l have similar vapor density and molecular weights l are non-corrosive in vapor phase l utilize CT dosage relationship Dosage = Concentration X Time

Key Differences: Physical/Chemical Properties Factor SFMeBr Formula SO 2 F 2 CH 3 Br Nature InorganicOrganic B.P. (°C) V.P. (kPa) Solubility Water (ppm) ,500 Solubility Organics(ppm) Low High

Key Differences: Fumigant Properties Factor SFMeBr Effect on Ozone No Yes (?) Penetration Rapid Slow Sorption LowHigh Desorption Rapid Slow Aeration Rapid Slow Odor Potential NoneSulfurous

Key Differences: Biological Activity Relative Insect Control Stage SFMeBr Adult X X Pupal X X * Larval X X Egg X * X * May Require Higher Dosages

Key Differences: Packaging and Use Factor SFMeBr Cylinder wt90 kg kg Pressure(kPa) Heat Exchanger No* Depends Vol. Contrl. Hose len/dia. None Shooting Outside Depends * Shooting fans necessary as internal heat exchanger and for improved fumigant equilibrium

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Biology efforts to define effective dosages –Laboratory efficacy trails ( ) –Target six key SPIP (IMM, MFM, CFB, RFB, WB, STGB) CSL in UK DFA in CA BBA in Germany USDA-ARS in CA –Validate CT concept for SPIP –Field validation of laboratory results Germany UK US –Translation of data into label rates based on targeted level of control –Development of ProFume* Fumiguide Calculator *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Development of “Best Practices” to optimize efficient use of sulfuryl fluoride –Improved structure sealing techniques –Optimizing gas retention –Increased HLT –Shorter time to reach equilibrium –Maintenance of fumigant equilibrium –Improved monitoring techniques Goal: Use of less fumigant to reach desired level of insect control –Minimize downtime –Ensure safety –Avoid damage *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Taste and Quality Effects –Validate that fumigation of DF & TN and Cereal Grains does not affect taste and quality Completed two DF & TN trails –9 commodities –In cooperation with DFA and USDA-ARS Coordinating taste and quality tests on wheat, rice and corn with: –Kansas State University –HGCA / CSL Fumigating kernels, processed products (flour) and finished products *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Population Modeling –Better understanding of economic thresholds and action levels –Population rebound rates –Potential for development of resistance –Determination of economical dosages –Help determine success of pervious fumigations –Predict when future fumigations will be required *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Residue Research –DF & TN Commodity Fumigation / Analysis - Completed 1999 –Cereal Grains (Wheat, Rice, Corn) Fumigation of grain and process functions currently underway Residue analysis/risk assessment *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

ProFume* Gas Fumigant Development Regulatory Timeline *2001 –Dried Fruit and Tree Nut EUP (Walnuts, Raisins) *2002 –Section 3 Registration Approval DF&TN –Product Launch DF&TN *2003 –Section 3 Registration Approval Cereal Grains (US) –Product Launch Cereal Grains (US) *2004 –Product Launch Cereal Grains (Europe) –Section 3 Approval Food Processing (US) –Product Launch Food Processing (US) *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

Product Stewardship It is a Dow AgroSciences expectation that an effective Product Stewardship Program will be a primary requirement in any area where sulfuryl fluoride business currently exists or where new uses are being developed.

Conclusions Dow AgroSciences is committed to supporting sulfuryl fluoride in the existing Vikane* markets as well as new use patterns Sulfuryl fluoride (ProFume*) will be a viable alternative for methyl bromide in many commodity fumigation markets Dow AgroSciences is demonstrating confidence and commitment in ProFume* through our investments in product development Developing technical foundation for long term use of sulfuryl fluoride Cooperating with researchers, fumigators and the food industry to development practical sulfuryl fluoride fumigation options *Trademark of Dow AgroSciences LLC ProFume is not available for sale. EPA registration pending.

Thank You Questions?