WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Govt. of India WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By R.Bhattacharya Assistant Controller of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Intellectual Property Rights Regime in India & US: The Evolving Landscape February 15, 2014, The Hyatt Regency Hotel, New Delhi D. CALAB GABRIEL.
Advertisements

WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES N.Ramchander, EXAMINER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS Patent Office, Mumbai Govt. of India WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By N.Ramchander,
10 April Probiotics are Live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host. Probiotics have been.
6 August 2005 © MarkPatent.Org 1 IP - Fostering the Globalization potential By Dr. Rajeshkumar H. Acharya.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Consultant F. Hoffmann La Roche
Drugs which are not patentable
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
Building a Competitive Edge: Protecting Inventions by Utility Models and / or Patents : Case Studies By P. Kandiah KASS International Sdn.Bhd. KASS.
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
1 Intellectual Property Patents, Trademarks and Copyrights.
Chapter 6 – Legal Issues for the Entrepreneurs Vishnu Parmar, IBA University of Sindh, Jamshoro.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THAILAND Present by Phanit Ratasuk, AIT Marketing group.
1 Presented By: MP Bhatnagar New Delhi, India. 2 TRIPS Obligation and India (1) TRIPS Obligations & India’s Response Copyright: Article – 9,10,11,12,13,14.
1.  Creation of Human Mind  Scientific, industrial, Literary, artistic domains  In the form of invention, Manuscript, software, a business name Intellectual.
Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido
Intellectual Property – The Basics Christine Helliwell, PhD Scottish Health Innovations Ltd 25 th October 2012.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA AN OVERVIEW OF PATENT PROTECTION IN ZAMBIA.
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
W HAT CAN BE PATENTED – AND WHAT DOES THAT MEAN ? András Jókúti Hungarian Intellectual Property Office Ankara, 25 January 2011.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Intellectual Property. Edwin Land Harvard dropout used to sneak into Columbia U. to conduct research 22 years old, obtained $375,000 from investors to.
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
Intellectual property Week 19 Tom Underhill. Intellectual property Patents Registered designs/design rights Case study/Questions/update (DA). Details:
“Inventing the Future” – The Role of Utility Models and Patents in Leveraging Technical Innovation in the Market Place Kingston, Jamaica Jun 4 - 6, 2012.
Page 1 IOP Genomics Workshop Patents and Patenting Biotech Inventions Annemieke Breukink, Ph.D. September 8th, 2009.
Preparing a Provisional Patent Application Hay Yeung Cheung, Ph.D. Myers Wolin, LLC March 16, 2013 Trenton Computer Festival 1.
Patent System In India. Legislative Framework of IP Administration Department of IP &P covers The Patents Act, 1970 (as amended in 2005) The Patents Rules,
A Report on Patent Agent Examination By- Asif Razzaq
Introduction to Patents Anatomy of a Patent & Procedures for Getting a Patent Margaret Hartnett Commercialisation & IP Manager University.
(c) 2002 Sandeep K. Rathod Patents: An Introduction A Presentation at Zydus Research Centre Oct. 19, 2002 by Sandeep K. Rathod B. Com, L.L.B. Sr. Exe.
Presentation By Dr.S.N.Maity Controller General of Patents,Designs and TradeMarks.
W.T.O TRIPs AND WIPO. Intellectual Property Imagination is more important than knowledge Albert Einstein.
ADAMS & ADAMS Intellectual Property within the Pharmaceutical Industry Presentation to SAPRAA. 04 September 2009 By : Alexis Apostolidis B.Sc (Chem, Law);
DOMESTICATION OF TRIPS FLEXIBILITIES IN NATIONAL IP LEGISLATION FOR STRENGTHENING ACCESS TO MEDICINES IN ZAMBIA PROPOSED PATENT BILL AND ITS RELEVANCY.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
No Incentive To Innovator Prior To 1st January 2005 Prior to 1st January 2005, the Indian Patent Act (1970) allowed only for process patents in all areas.
Intellectual Property Legal Implications. What is Intellectual Property? The product of creativity and intellectual endeavour Intellectual Property Rights.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 16, 2009 Class 2 Introduction to Patents.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
Patents. WHAT IS A PATENT- Patent, under the Act, is a grant from the Government to the inventor for a limited period of time, the exclusive right to.
Patent System In India K.S.Kardam
HARVARD UNIVERSITY Office of Technology Development
Fundamentals of Intellectual Property
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Intellectual Property Legislation The patents Act 1970.
Intellectual property (IP) - What is it?. Intellectual property (IP) Refers to creations of the mind, such as inventions; literary and artistic works;
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
Patent Review Overview Summary of different types of Intellectual Property What is a patent? Why would you want one? What are the requirements for patentability?
Patents in Russia Vladimir Biriulin, Partner Gorodissky and Partners Law Firm, Moscow, Russia.
Patent filing and tips on patent drafting Makerere University – July 7, 2016 Kagwa John Marius – Examiner Patents.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
An introduction to Intellectual property protection TG © Copyright by Stevens Institute of Technology.
IP experiences and challenges of SMEs of the Republic of Tajikistan
Overview of presentation
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
Chapter 06: LEGAL ISSUES FOR THE ENTREPRENEUR
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By R
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
Intellectual Property Rights: Practice and Process
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
The IP International framework Seminar on the Role of IP for SMEs Damascus, November 17 and 18, 2008 Marco Marzano de Marinis, Program Officer.
Intellectual Property Law
Jonathan D’Silva MMI Intellectual Property 900 State Street, Suite 301
Presentation transcript:

WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Govt. of India WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By R.Bhattacharya Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs Patent Office, Mumbai Govt. of India

Organizational Chart CONTROLLER GENERAL Organizational Chart CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS,DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION GRANT OF PATENTS UNDER THE PATENTS ACT, 1970 AND REGISTRATIONOF DESIGNS UNDER THE DESIGNS ACT,1911 DOCUMENTATION INCLUDING RERIEVAL AND TDISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION CONTAINED IN PATENT DOCUMENTS REGISTRATION OF TRADE MARKS UNDER THE TRADE AND MERCHANDISE MARKS ACT, 1958 PATENT OFFICE PATENT INFORMATION SYSTEM TRADE MARKS REGISTRY CALCUTTA NEW DELHI MADRAS MUMBAI NAGPUR AHMEDABAD CALCUTTA MADRAS MUMBAI

The Patent Office, Todi Estate, 3rd Floor, Sun Mill Compound, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai – , Ph. No , Fax No Web site:

Knowledge Own Apply Create Protect Generate Access Trade IPR

Type of Intellectual Property Rights Patents Industrial Designs Trademarks Geographical Indications Copyright and Related Rights Layout-Designs (Topographies) of Integrated Circuits Protection of undisclosed Information Control of Anti-Competitive Practices in Contractual Licenses

What rights a Patent confers on the patentee If the patent is for a product :- - the right to prevent others from - making - using - offering for sale - selling - importing the patented product

If the patent is for a process :- - the right to prevent others from the act of - using the process - using the product directly obtained by the process - offering for sale the product directly obtained by the process - selling the product directly obtained by the process - importing the product directly obtained by the process What rights a Patent confers on the patentee

Type of Patent Applications 1.Ordinary application(sec. 9 & 10) (i) application with provisional specification (ii) application with complete specification 2. Convention application (sec. 10 & 135) 3. PCT National Phase Application (Rule 20)

What is Invention Under Section 2(1)(j) “Invention” means a new product or process involving an inventive step and capable of industrial application; “inventive step” means a feature that makes the invention not obvious to a person skilled in the art; “capable of industrial application”, in relation to an invention, means that the invention is capable of being made or used in an industry.

Non Patentable Inventions [Under Section 3] a)An invention which is frivolous or which claims anything obvious contrary to well established natural laws; b)an invention the primary or intended use or commercial exploitation of which could be contrary to public order or morality or which causes serious prejudice to human, animal or plant life or health or to the environment; c)the mere discovery of a scientific principle or the formulation of an abstract theory or discovery of any living things or non-living substance occurring in nature;

d)the mere discovery of any new property or new use for a known substance or of the mere use of a known process, machine or apparatus unless such known process results in a new product or employs at least one new reactant; e)a substance obtained by a mere admixture resulting only in the aggregation of the properties of the components thereof or a process for producing such substance; f)the mere arrangement or re-arrangement or duplication of known devices each functioning independently of one another in a known way; Non Patentable Inventions [Under Section 3]

g) Section 3(g) of the Patents Act,1970 has been omitted; h)a method of agriculture or horticulture; i)any process for the medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic, diagnostic, therapeutic or other treatment of human being or any process for a similar treatment of animals to render them free of disease or to increase their economic value or that of their products; Non Patentable Invention [Under Section 3]

m)a mere scheme or rule or method of performing mental act or method of playing game; n)a presentation of information; o)topography of integrated circuits; p)an invention which, in effect, is traditional knowledge or which is an aggregation or duplication of known properties of traditionally known component or components’. Non Patentable Inventions [Under Section 3]

Atomic Energy Related Inventions Not Patentable ( Under Section 4) No patent shall be granted in respect of an invention relating to Atomic energy falling within sub section (1) of section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, e.g. Inventions relating to compounds of Uranium, Beryllium, Thorium, Plutonium, Radium, Graphite, Lithium and more as notified by Central Government from time to time.

Product per se Claims - Not Patentable [Under Section 5(1)] (a)claiming substances intended for use or capable of being used as food or as medicine or drug or (b)relating to substances prepared or produced by chemical processes (including alloys, optical glass, semiconductors and intermetallic compounds), Only process of manufacture of above substances is patentable ‘Explanation – For the purpose of this section “chemical processes” include biochemical, biotechnological and microbiological processes’.

Product per se Claim Under Section 5(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Sub Section (I), a claim for patent of an invention for a substance itself intended for use, or capable of being used, as medicine or drug, except the medicine or drug, specified under sub-clause (v) of clause (l) of sub section (I) of section 2, may be made and shall be dealt, without prejudice to the other provision of this Act, in the manner provided in Chapter IVA. (i.e. grant of Exclusive Marketing Right).

Patent Grant Procedure Filing of patent application Publication after 18 months Request for examination Examination: Acceptance or Refusal Notification of acceptance in the Gazette of India GRANT OF A PATENT Opposition to grant of patent

Grant of patents of be subject to certain conditions The grant of a patent under this Act shall be subject to the condition that - 1.any machine, apparatus or other article in respect of which the patent is granted or any article made by using a process in respect of which the patent is granted, may be imported or made by or on behalf of the Government for the purpose merely of its own use; 2.any process in respect of which the patent is granted may be used by or on behalf of the Government for the purpose merely of its own use;

4.in the case of a patent in respect of any medicine or drug, the medicine or drug may be imported by the Government for the purpose merely of its own use or for distribution in any dispensary, hospital or other medical institution maintained by or on behalf of the Government or any other dispensary, hospital or other medical institution which the Central Government may, having regard to the public service that such dispensary, hospital or medical institution renders, specify in this behalf by notification in the Official Gazette. 3. any machine, apparatus or other article in respect of which the patent is granted or any article made by the use of the process in respect of which the patent is granted, may be made or used, and any process in respect of which the patent is granted may be used, by any person, for the purpose merely of experiment or research including the imparting of instructions to pupils; and

Sr. No. On what payableFrom No. Natural Person(s) Fees for other than natural Person(s) 1Application for Patent1Rs. 750/-Rs. 3000/- 2Examination19Rs. 1000/-Rs. 3000/- 3Sealing9Rs. 1500/-Rs. 5000/- Indian Patent Applications Fees

Sr. No. On what payableFor Natural Person(s) (In rupees) For other than Natural Person(s) (In rupees) 1Renewal fee for 3 rd year Renewal fee for 4th year Renewal fee for 5th year Renewal fee for 6th year Renewal fee for 7th year Renewal fee for 8th year Renewal fee for 9th year Renewal fee for 10 th year Renewal fee for 11th year Renewal fee for 12th year Renewal fee for 1 3th year Renewal fee for 14th year Renewal fee for 15th year Renewal fee for 16th year Renewal fee for 17th year Renewal fee for 18th year Renewal fee for 19th year Renewal fee for 20th year Indian Patent Renewal Fees

Sr. No. CountryLocal FilingForeign Filing 1Australia Austria Brazil Canada China Finland Germany India Japan Korea Mexico United Kingdom United states of America Worldwide Filing

Case study (i) Honeywell in 1993 won $96 million damages from Minolta for infringement of Honeywell's auto-focus technology for cameras. This judgement was effectively used by Honeywell to make several licensing deals with other camera manufacturers which brought in an additional $400 million. This demonstrates the spillover effects of confirmed and established knowledge ownership. (ii) Polaroid vs Eastman Kodak continues to be a historic judgement in 1990 when Polaroid won over $900 million as compensation from Kodak for infringement of its patents related to instant cameras. $454 million was awarded as compensation and $455 million was added as interest. Kodak is also known to have moved out of the instant camera market after the case. This illustrates the potentially disastrous impact on a Corporate for infringing someone else's IPR. (iii) Fonar vs General Electric is an example demonstrating that size of a firm does not necessarily matter while enforcing IPR. Fonar had filed several patents in 1970s related to magnetic resonance imaging techniques and machines for in situ and non-evasive detection of cancer and diseases in living bodies. Subsequently General Electric and Hitachi entered this market. Fonar filed infringement suits against these companies. Hitachi settled out of court. As the end of the suit, GE was ordered to pay $128.7 million to Fonar. Interestingly Fonar's annual revenue is only $17 million. Fonar claimed it lost profits corresponding to 600 MRI machines it could have sold if GE had not infringed its patents. The Jury concluded that, inter alia, Fonar could have sold 75 machines and therefore awarded them lost profits for 75 $371,000 per machine and royalty for 575 $65,000 per machine.