1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 PROJECT MONITORING PLAN AND TOOLS First transnational workshop Manchester,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 THE COURSEWARE Focus Group Manchester, 14 th – 16 th February 2008 Venue:
Advertisements

1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 DISSEMINATION AND VALORISATION PLAN First transnational workshop Manchester,
HOW TO EVALUATE A MOBILITY PROJECT Training Unit 11.1 Procedures, tools and roles for the evaluation of a mobility project.
BUDGETING Training Unit 13.2 Principles and financial rules of mobility.
BUDGETING Training Unit 13.1 Principles for budgeting construction and implementation.
SHOW ME THE MONEY BUDGETING 101.
2 Session Objectives Increase participant understanding of effective financial monitoring based upon risk assessments of sub-grantees Increase participant.
Orientation Session on International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS) September 1, 2009.
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
“Train the trainers” seminar
European Union Cohesion Policy
Project design, preparation and approval Basel Convention Resource Mobilization Workshop Nairobi, 3 – 7 December 2006 Andreas Arlt Secretariat of the Basel.
A Roadmap to Successful Implementation Management Plans.
SECTOR SKILLS ALLIANCES TOURISM AND CATERING GRANT AGREEMENT NO. EAC PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Using EU-fin Interactive user manual for coordinators (Using EU-fin to the fullest)
E-Nomination – Electronic procedure for the nomination of exchange students.
1 The Data Protection Officer at work Experience, good practices and lessons learnt Pierre Vernhes – former DPO at the Council of the EU Workshop on Data.
1 MW - Sonet Partners virtual session 12 th of October, 2009 Financial Issues.
Progress and Financial Reporting Geoff Butters, MDR Partners 05 March 2012, KB, The Hague.
LP Seminar – Madrid – 20 October 2008 EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND REPORTING & MONITORING PROCEDURES Lead Partner Seminar Madrid, 20 October 2008.
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 PRESENTS Payment Functionality.
Contractors’ Day, June 2008 to the Framework Partnership Agreement & the Specific Grant Agreement Financial Guidelines for co-ordinators and co-partners.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 8 September 2010 How to apply – Budget and Reporting.
1 Project “EGO - ENTERPRISE GENDER ORIENTED” LLP-LDV-TOI-09-IT-0496 Management of the project: aspects of its contents Porto, January 2010 EGO, Kick-off.
Financial Management and Auditing Reporting by the Lead Partner 3 rd round operations Rostock, Elise Oukka.
CONTACT SEMINAR November 2008 Project management tools.
EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE STRATEGY PRESENTED BY DR SHYAM PATIAR.
Implementation of Leader Axis measures by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
How to make a Progress Report Activity Reporting Lead partner and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi Nachtigall.
TIPEIL Transfer of an Innovative Portfolio to Evaluate Informal Learning LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/019 Dissemination Seminar Venue: Bidart, 20 March 2009.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
LINKED Administrative & Finance overview18/03/2010 LINKED Leveraging Innovation for a Network of Knowledge on Education LIFE LONG LEARNING PROGRAMME LLP.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions 1st Reporting /Presage Other administrative issues Portugal, 8-10 July 2013.
Final meeting Palermo, July 4 – 5 th 2012 NO PROFIT EUROPE GRUNDTVIG PARTNERSHIPS.
Agence Education Formation-Europe Tips for a good application.
Quality Management (WP5) Roman CHIRCA Agency for Innovation and Technological Transfer TecTNet ………... This project has been funded with support from the.
JCint - JobCreator International Network and Web Services n. LLP-LDV-TOI-09-IT-0502 This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Leonardo da Vinci Partnerships: an opportunity to work together Italian National Agency for LLP - Leonardo da Vinci Sectoral Programme.
Financial Management MW-Sonet 16 th – 19 th of March 2011, Turkey.
TIPEIL LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/019 First Transnational Workshop Athens, 7-8 February 2008 Venue: IEKEP - 34A Averof str. in Nea Ionia 1 st floor DISSEMINATION/VALORISATION.
1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 THE IDENTIFICATION OF COMPETENCIES THE PROCESS Focus Group Manchester, 14.
LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/016. F-MU.S.EU.M. PROJECT: STATE OF THE ART AND INTERMEDIATE REPORT TO SUBMIT AT 15 DECEMBER Marco Merlini F-M U.S.EU.M. (Form Multimedia.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions Study visit and 3 rd Steering Committee meeting Freiburg, 14 – 18 October 2013.
Narrative reporting: good practices. Joint Technical Secretariat Seminar for Beneficiaries February 2012 Narva, Estonia.
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Financial reporting Linda Wormö, MA Per Dahlström, MA 1st October,2015 Kuopio, Finland.
2nd Transnational Workshop 11th December Thessaloniki 1.
ACP S&T Programme - Stakeholder conference October Implemented by the ACP Secretariat Funded by the European Union EDULINK - ACP Science and.
Antonio Mocci Mestre, January 17, 2011 Lead partner: Governance of the project monitoring, evaluation and dissemination systems.
Project Management Birutė Markevičiūtė Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 13 October 2008, Riga.
TIPEIL LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/019 First Transnational Workshop Athens, 7-8 February 2008 Venue: IEKEP - 34A Averof str. in Nea Ionia 1 st floor PROJECT MONITORING.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
Reporting and payment claims Black Sea Basin ENPI CBC Programme Training for Grant Beneficiaries and Partners Bucharest 18 June 2014 Financial Unit.
Technical Assistance Office 1 Contract, Reports and errors to avoid! GRANT AGREEMENT 2005 Comenius coordinators’ meeting, 17/10/2005 Maryline Fiaschi,
Technical Assistance Office TCP Projects 2005 Contractual and Financial Management Administrative and Financial Handbook Prepared by IA, 14/12/2001 SOCRATES.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME PROJECT DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL ISSUES Project development seminar Prague, 1 st February 2010 Luca FERRARESE JTS CENTRAL.
DG Justice and Consumers Project Modifications DG Justice and Consumers.
Welcome. Contents: 1.Organization’s Policies & Procedure 2.Internal Controls 3.Manager’s Financial Role 4.Procurement Process 5.Monthly Financial Report.
- Special Education Needs (SEN) Network Administrative and Financial Aspects.
1 FP6 – Financial Management and Reporting 1 April 2006 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Establishing good working relations
Chisinau, Republic of Moldova 2017
SOUTH BALTIC CROSS-BORDER CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME
Information session SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-two-stage "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 22/05/2013 José M. Jiménez.
Information session SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL NEGOTIATIONS Call FP7-ENV-2013-WATER-INNO-DEMO "Environment (including climate change)" Brussels 24/06/2013.
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
Presentation transcript:

1 OUT-IN: Organising, Using and Transferring INnovation LLP-LDV/TOI/07/IT/017 PROJECT MONITORING PLAN AND TOOLS First transnational workshop Manchester, 12 th -13 th February 2008 Venue: Manchester Digital Development Agency (MDDA)

2 The monitoring plan is a tool applied within working teams and partnerships with the aim of creating the conditions to continuously verify the project work in progress and the achievement of expected interim and final outcomes, so as: to highlight the possible divergences between what has been planned and actually realised; to identify the risk areas; to adopt the proper measure apt to ensure the achievement of goals defined. General provisions

3 The monitoring activities are included among ones foreseen in the implementation of a Quality Management System that each project should work out during the planning phase. The Quality management, in fact, implies the adoption of a range of solutions aimed at ensuring: Process transparency Sharing of general and specific goals among the actors involved and definition of specific roles and tasks Outcomes measurability Prevention of non-conformity risks Management of variables. General provisions

4 The monitoring plan must be structured so as to implement the regular check of the activities planned – at least the most important ones – and related expenses implied. The macroareas that is advisable to control are: Actions and products realised with respect to the ones planned Actual implementation timings, with respect to the ones expected Financial resources actually spent, with respect to the ones available (budget) or foreseen Real and foreseen cash flows Goals and outcomes actually achieved General provisions

5...to sum up.... The Monitoring is an action that follows and supports the operative and strategic management of the project, allowing: the quality evaluation of outcomes achieved; the decisions on eventual changes or adjustments; the financial accounting; the reporting to the National Agency (contents and financial issues). General provisions

6 So as to verify the conformity between: What has been plannedWhat has been realised

7 To work out and implement a Monitoring plan apt to control this conformity, it is first of all necessary to identify the documents of reference that the partnership must know and consider all along the project life cycle: the proposal approved, where are indicated the general and final goals of the project, direct and indirect beneficiaries, final and interim outcomes and outputs foreseen; the project workplan approved, where are provided all detailed information related the actual execution of the project, step by step; the project total budget; the detailed budget for each partner involved; the Agreement with the authority financing the intervention (LLP National Agency) the Agreements – when requested – among the project partners; the administrative and financial procedure ruled by the Programme or Authority financing the intervention, concerning the financial accounting, the activities reporting, the in itinere monitoring and evaluation, etc. The areas/documents of reference

8 So, it is possible to say that the conformity between activities planned and activities realised is grounded on few specific Documents and tools of Reference: The Project proposal (goals, products/results, work plan) The Cahier de Bord (for financial control) The Agreement with the National Agency The areas/documents of reference

9 … and on main Areas of Reference: The Budget The Timetable The Production Process The areas/documents of reference

10 Research and analysis activities Outputs production and planning Outcomes and outputs dissemination and valorisation Timings and deadlines Human and financial resources implied External evaluation activity All these aspects must be monitored using specific tools and respecting fixed timings. Which are the main areas to be controlled through the monitoring action?

11 In general it is advisable that a member of the partnership would be in charge of implementing the monitoring action and that the other members would cooperate in providing all the necessary information. That is why each partner should identify the contact person in charge of communicating all data and information requested concerning activities realised and financial resources spent. All partners must: Use the tools and format provided; Be punctual in providing the information requested; Respect timings and deadlines. The monitoring actors

12 As far as project activities are concerned, the monitoring will be realised through a desk analysis action, using semi-structured grids that will be sent to all partners, by , around every 4 months. All partners will be requested to fill in the grid and send it back respecting the deadlines provided. In this case the grids will ask for information concerning the work in progress of: Specific research activities or actions; Outputs realisation; Dissemination outputs and outcomes; Timings foreseen. Every grid sent will refer to a specific Work package of the project work plan and the information requested would concern one or more activity included in the Work package concerned. In the same grid the partners will be also asked to provide some analytical and quality information, in order to provide a kind of self- evaluation of the work done or of the situation approached. Monitoring activities, tools and timings

13 A few examples of the question areas requested The main K-questions included in each monitoring grid, will be: Description of activities realised: information on process adopted, methodology used, subjects involved; Description of possible divergences/difficulties encountered, with respect to planned and realised activities, and reasons related; Recovery actions or solutions adopted; Outputs realised or in progress.

14 Partners Report of activities Partners Report of Dissemination Activities Partners workshop evaluation Partners Evaluation of Dissemination Seminar External evaluation of Dissemination Seminar Monitoring tools and process About 5 typologies of grids will be adopted to implement the monitoring on project and dissemination activities and outputs:

15 Monitoring tools and process MONITORING COORDINATOR Works out and send it to all partners Partners Report of activities grid ALL PARTNERS fill in MONITORING COORDINATOR Use and integrate data and information received in the Cahier de Bord and in the Reports to be submitted to the NA Partners Report of activities grid and send it back to Provides a feedback to all partners, asking for an agreement on proposed corrections – if the case Analyses the information received working out a proposal of possible adjustments required – if the case

16 MONITORING COORDINATOR Works out and send it to all partners Partners Report of Dissemination activities grid ALL PARTNERS fill in MONITORING COORDINATOR Use and integrate data and information received in the Cahier de Bord and in the Reports to be submitted to the NA Partners Report of Dissemination activities grid and send it back to Provides a feedback to all partners, asking for an agreement on proposed corrections – if the case Analyses the information received working out a proposal of possible adjustments required – if the case Monitoring tools and process

17 As already mentioned, the monitoring activity that yields the overall picture of the project progress, must consider the financial flow linked to the implementation of the activities. A control tool is necessary therefore to match the realised activities and the resources that have been spent, so that, if necessary, one can identify inconsistencies, reserve or dispersion that may negatively influence the external evaluation of the project (for example by the technical assistance agencies) and /or the compliance with what was planned. The Cahier de bord, that we will use about every 6 months, will, therefore, include a section dedicated to the monitoring of the financial resources used for each WP of the work plan, comparing the estimated financial commitment during advance planning, with was actually used during project implementation. The Cahier de bord will be so articulated in two main tools: 1.An excel file – where each partner will record the financial flow per WP; 2.A word file – where each partner will record the activities progress per WP. Monitoring the projects financial flow in relation to the work programme

18 The excel file will be: 1.divided by the number of WPs that structure the executive work programme; 2.organised according to the voice of cost included in the overall project budget. As a general rule, each worksheet of the excel file will correspond to a WP and each WP will call for the registration of financial data that will allow the comparing between: Estimated budget to realise the WP activities Budget actually spent to realise the WP activities. That means necessary that each partner should: 1.Analyse the project work plan; 2.Focus on its own roles, tasks and responsibilities for WP; 3.Estimate the financial flow for WP referring to its own budget. Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file)

19 The heading of each worksheet will include standard information as: WP n_ and title; Length of the WP from ____to_____, the items that will be checked will be placed on the left side of the sheet, in column, following the structure of the project budget, while on the right there will be another two columns, one to indicate the estimated budget, the other to indicate actual expenditure. In that regard, it must also be considered that financial monitoring can include also committed sums, that is the budget shares that have not been spent yet but, for example are already committed with estimates or contracts. The column regarding the actual expenditure will have shares regarding the committed sums, given that the aim of the tool is to register the budget used for specific actions, in order to exactly know the available reserve for future interventions. Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file)

20 Assuming that the project budget is organised according to specific macro-items and relative sub-items, the worksheet may appear as follows: WP n_ TITLE LengthFrom: dd/mm/yyTo: dd/mm/yy Responsible : Expenditures Items of the BudgetPlanned expenditureActually spent Macro-item A - Staff Sub-item 1a (by category) Sub-item 2a (by category) …… Subtotal A Macro-item B – Direct costs Sub-item 1b (travels) Sub-item 2b (subcontracting) Sub-item 2c (other) Subtotal B Macro-item C - Indirect costs Indirect costs Subtotal C Total (A+B+C) Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file)

21 As mentioned, the Cahier de Bord, or Log book, is a tool that allows checking and comparing in itinere the progress of the planned activities to those that have been implemented, referring to the financial resources used and /or spent. It means that another section of the Cahier de bord will be structured so as to record: the activities realised, to which are related the expenses declared in the excel file; The work in progress of the project, comparing what was planned to what has been actually done. It is obvious that also in this case the word file will be articulated with respect to the WP included in the executive workplan. Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file) and implied activities (word file)

22 Let us use, to have an actual example, a work programme on a phased basis. The type of information (items) that will make up the cahier de bord will be, in general: planned activities (from the work programme) realised activities (according to project progress) planned products (from the work programme) realised products (according to the project progress ) partners involved and role (by type of activity/product) possible outside subjects and role (from the work programme) Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file) and implied activities (word file)

23 Also in this case, each page of the cahier should be organised in order to correspond to a WP of the work programme. As a result, the heading of each page should have the following general background information: WP n_ and title (from the work programme) WP length from ____to_____ (write dates in mm/dd/yy) Phase manager (if the case - can be one or more bodies involved in the partnership, as in the work programme) WP goals (as in the work programme) Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file) and implied activities (word file)

24 WP n_ TITLE Lengthfrom dd/mm/yyto dd/mm/yy Responsible: Planned Activities Realised Activities Planned products Realised products Partners involved and roles Possible external subjects and roles So, using a simple table in word file as the one following: Will be possible for all partnership to check the actual overall progress of the project in terms of both activities and products, and the compliance with the maximum length planned for the completion of the specific actions for each single phase. Cahier de bord: Monitoring the projects financial flow (excel file) and implied activities (word file)

25 The monitoring and evaluation action that will be implemented during the whole project life cycle (24 months), will be articulated as follows: Every 4 months: Desk analysis - all partners will receive two grids: One for research activities reporting (including outcomes and outputs); One for dissemination activities reporting (including outcomes and outputs) Every 6 months: Financial flow check – all partners will receive two files: Cahier de bord excel file (record of financial data) Cahier de bord word file (synthesis of activities realised) To sum up

26 Thank you for your attention