NOPEER Route Attribute Propose a well-known transitive advisory scope attribute Applied by originating AS to route prefixes Interpretable as advice to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to IP Routing Geoff Huston. Routing How do packets get from A to B in the Internet? A B Internet.
Advertisements

BGP01 An Examination of the Internets BGP Table Behaviour in 2001 Geoff Huston Telstra.
Allocation vs Announcement A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston February 2004 (Supported by APNIC)
The Changing Structure of the Internet Geoff Huston Telstra June 2001.
BGP Table Analysis (even more!) Geoff Huston. Interpretation There is no synchronized overview of the entire connectivity and policy state of all parts.
RPKI Standards Activity Geoff Huston APNIC February 2010.
Tracking the Internets BGP Table Geoff Huston Telstra January 2001.
Architectural Approaches to Multi-Homing for IPv6 A Walk-Through of draft-huston-multi6-architectures-00 Geoff Huston June 2004.
1 An Update on Multihoming in IPv6 Report on IETF Activity IPv6 Technical SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston February 2005 APNIC.
Routing Items from IAB Utrecht Workshop Geoff Huston IAB.
Routing Table Status Report November 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Number of ASs Observations ASs grew by 25% over the year Note span of visible ASs (11,200 – 12,500) Not every AS is visible to all other ASs But there.
BGP01 An Examination of the Internets BGP Table Behaviour in 2001 Geoff Huston Telstra.
4-Byte AS Numbers The view from the old BGP world Geoff Huston October 2006 APNIC.
BGP Status Update Geoff Huston September What Happening (AS4637) Date.
Comparing IPv4 and IPv6 from the perspective of BGP dynamic activity Geoff Huston APNIC February 2012.
A Study of BGP Origin AS Changes and Partial Connectivity Ratul Mahajan David Wetherall Tom Anderson University of Washington Asta Networks † † ‡ † ‡ ‡
ROAs and Detecting “Bad” Originations Geoff Huston SIDR WG IETF 74.
© J. Liebeherr, All rights reserved 1 Border Gateway Protocol This lecture is largely based on a BGP tutorial by T. Griffin from AT&T Research.
Dongkee LEE 1 Understanding BGP Misconfiguration Ratul Mahajan, David Wetherall, Tom Anderson.
2006 – (Almost another) BGP Year in Review A BRIEF update to the 2005 report 18 October 2006 IAB Routing Workshop Geoff Huston APNIC.
1 Interdomain Routing Protocols. 2 Autonomous Systems An autonomous system (AS) is a region of the Internet that is administered by a single entity and.
Best Practices for ISPs
Distributed Route Aggregation on the Global Network (DRAGON) João Luís Sobrinho 1 Laurent Vanbever 2, Franck Le 3, Jennifer Rexford 2 1 Instituto Telecomunicações,
CDNI Footprint Advertisement draft-previdi-cdni-footprint-advertisement-00 Stefano Previdi Francois Le Faucheur Allan Guillou Jan Medved IETF-82 Taipei,
BGP update profiles and the implications for secure BGP update validation processing Geoff Huston Swinburne University of Technology PAM April 2007.
Changed made by MF on 29/10/04 Delete Change Add –All slides Obtained Geoff Huston’s review – done on 26/10/2004 Obtained Doc Team’s proof read - done.
CS Summer 2003 Quiz 1 A1) IGP (IS-IS, OSPF) BGP A2) Stub Transit. because it is adverting AS2’s routes to AS1 and vice versa. A3) Traffic discarded.
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP4) Rizwan Rehman, CCS, DU.
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
Interconnectivity Density Compare number of AS’s to average AS path length A uniform density model would predict an increasing AS Path length (“Radius”)
Jennifer Rexford Fall 2014 (TTh 3:00-4:20 in CS 105) COS 561: Advanced Computer Networks BGP.
Inter-Domain Routing Trends Geoff Huston APNIC March 2007.
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) W.lilakiatsakun. BGP Basics (1) BGP is the protocol which is used to make core routing decisions on the Internet It involves.
Secure Origin BGP: What is (and isn't) in a name? Dan Wendlandt Princeton Routing Security Reading Group.
1 To Insert AS Origin field into APNIC IP address database Xing Li Shuang Zhu CERNET
IPv6 Site-Local Discussion Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman IETF 56 San Francisco March 2003.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston November 2004 APNIC.
Information-Centric Networks04b-1 Week 4 / Paper 2 Understanding BGP Misconfiguration –Rahil Mahajan, David Wetherall, Tom Anderson –ACM SIGCOMM 2002 Main.
4 Byte AS Number Update Geoff Huston August 2008.
Information-Centric Networks Section # 4.2: Routing Issues Instructor: George Xylomenos Department: Informatics.
© 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. BGP v3.2—1-1 BGP Overview Understanding BGP Path Attributes.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston August 2004 APNIC.
Routing Table Status Report August 2005 Geoff Huston.
Tracking the Internet’s BGP Table Geoff Huston Telstra December 2000.
Text BGP Basics. Document Name CONFIDENTIAL Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Introduction to BGP BGP Neighbor Establishment Process BGP Message Types BGP.
Border Gateway Protocol. Intra-AS v.s. Inter-AS Intra-AS Inter-AS.
AS Numbers - Again Geoff Huston APNIC October 2009
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Inter-domain SLA Exchange
draft-patel-raszuk-bgp-vector-routing-01
LISP BOF, IETF 72 Dublin, July, 2008 Darrel Lewis (for the LISP crew)
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
More Specific Announcements in BGP
Border Gateway Protocol
Network Router Configuration: From Data Mining to Policy Management
Goals of soBGP Verify the origin of advertisements
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Jessica Yu ANS Communication Inc. Feb. 9th, 1998
Geoff Huston APNIC August 2009
Geoff Huston APNIC 7th caida/wide measurement workshop Nov
Routing Table Status Report
Geoff Huston September 2002
An Update on Multihoming in IPv6 Report on IETF Activity
RIPE October 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC
Routing Table Status Report
2005 – A BGP Year in Review February 2006 Geoff Huston
Routing Table Status Report
Routing Table Status Report
Geoff Huston APNIC 7th caida/wide measurement workshop Nov
Presentation transcript:

NOPEER Route Attribute Propose a well-known transitive advisory scope attribute Applied by originating AS to route prefixes Interpretable as advice to limit the scope of propagation of the prefix so that the prefix is not advertised across bilateral SKA peer inter-AS connections Documented in draft-huston-nopeer-00.txt Geoff Huston Telstra August 2001

Intended Usage Address the TE usage of BGP where specific routes are selectively advertised and a covering aggregate is more generally announced NOPEER would be applied to the more specific advertisements The more specifics would be propagated to the extent that the originating AS has direct and indirect upstream service relationships

Potential Benefits Reduce the unbounded propagation of more specific entries to a scope limited to: –the originating AS funding –the effective TE scope where the originators policy has some leverage Quantification: –Some 53% of table entries are more specific prefixes of enclosing aggregates –Of these: 36% share a common origin AS with the immediately enclosing aggregate 21% share a common AS path with the immediately enclosing aggregate NOPEER could reduce the unbounded propagation of TE-based more specifics to a logical boundary of funded agent ASs