Convergence ? Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Convergence ? Keynote Presentation Interop Japan 2007 Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
Advertisements

The Internet Market. ISP Economics The ISP business is a repackaging of carriage offerings, combining IT capabilities with data transmission services.
Internet Futures. Here I am channelling Anders Rockstrom of Telia Sonera, whose presentation at the.se event in October 2006 had a profound impact on.
Views of Technology Futures An Internet Perspective Geoff Huston Internet Society October 2000.
Internet Futures. Acknowledgement to Anders Rockstrom of Telia Sonera, whose presentation on this topic had a profound impact on me – he presented his.
Internet Futures. My Aim: share some thoughts about the Internet and its future think about some of the major factors that will shape our future +
End-to-End and Innovation Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC.
Nortel Proprietary Information 2 The Impact of the World Wide Web on Carrier Networks – an Historic Opportunity Geoff Hall Chief Technology Officer, EMEA.
ETSI Grid Starter Group BT Perspective on Grid and Standardisation Mike Fisher BT Group 24 May 2006.
All rights reserved © 2006, Alcatel Grid Standardization & ETSI (May 2006) B. Berde, Alcatel R & I.
Saif Bin Ghelaita Director of Technologies & Standards TRA UAE
M A Wajid Tanveer Infrastructure M A Wajid Tanveer
0 0 0 BBWF Madrid October 2005 Access-independent Core Networks: Converging towards all-IP Andy Jones Head of Transmission & Interconnectivity Vodafone.
Strategies to Ensure ROI From Ipv6 Transition and Deployments Alpna Doshi Asst. Vice President – Telecom Business Unit Satyam Computer Services Ltd.
1 Internet Evolution and IPv6 Paul Wilson APNIC. 2 Overview Where is IPv6 today? –In deployment –In the industry Do we actually need it? –If so, why and.
ONE PLANET ONE NETWORK A MILLION POSSIBILITIES Barry Joseph Director, Offer and Product Management.
TEL 355: Communication and Information Systems in Organizations Digital Loop Carrier (DLC) Professor John F. Clark.
VoipNow Core Solution capabilities and business value.
Wireless & VoIP Christian Huitema February 26, 2000.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web Services in the environment of Next Generation Network.
October 4-7, 2004 Los Angeles, CA Changing the VoIP Paradigm: Delivering Value over IP John Meyer President, Lucent Worldwide Services.
VoIP Voice Transmission Over Data Network. What is VoIP?  A method for Taking analog audio signals Turning audio signals into digital data Digital data.
Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009 Multimedia Service Delivery on Next Generation Networks Pradeep De Almeida, Group Chief Technology Officer Dialog Telekom.
Silviu Stanescu Siemens Information and Communication Carrier Next Generation Networks Convergent alternatives.
© 2007 AT&T Knowledge Ventures. All rights reserved. AT&T and the AT&T logo are trademarks of AT&T Knowledge Ventures. Subsidiaries and affiliates of AT&T.
6. Next Generation Networks A. Transition to NGN B
The Internet Geoff Huston Telstra Internet. What can I say about the Internet..... that hasn’t been said already!
Peering, network sharing, interconnects Eckart Zollner September 2014.
EVOLVING TRENDS IN HIGH PERFORMANCE INFRASTRUCTURE Andrew F. Bach Chief Architect FSI – Juniper Networks.
10/09/2015 NGN related Standardization Issues (Architecture and Protocol) Chae-Sub, LEE TTA 1GSC-9, Seoul SOURCE:TTA TITLE:NGN for Global Generation (Architecture.
Business Data Communications, Stallings 1 Chapter 1: Introduction William Stallings Business Data Communications 6 th Edition.
1 Convergence ? Geoff Huston Research Scientist APNIC.
Net Neutrality ? Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC CAIA, Swinburne University of Technology.
Hosted Communications and Services David Byrd Chief Marketing Officer.
National Institute of Science & Technology Voice Over Digital Subscriber Line (VoDSL) Vinay TibrewalEE [1] VoDSL: Next Generation Voice Solution.
1© Nokia Siemens Networks 2011 To change the document information in the footer, press [Alt + F8] and use the „Nokia_Siemens_Networks_–_Change_Document_Information“
MATERI KULIAH 6 SP 2005 PENJASTEL. Next Generation Networks ( NGN ) Adapted from PT. INTI internal documents for teaching purposes.
Applied Communications Technology Voice Over IP (VOIP) nas1, April 2012 How does VOIP work? Why are we interested? What components does it have? What standards.
Networks and Protocols CE Week 5b. WAN’s, Frame Relay, DSL, Cable.
Huda AL-Omair_ networks61 Wide Area Network. Huda AL-Omair_ networks62 What is a WAN? Wide area network or WAN is a computer network covering a wide geographical.
1 FMC: Driving the Transition to IMS Ken Kuenzel VP and Founder Covergence Inc.
Voice Over Internet Protocol (VoIP). Basic Components of a Telephony Network.
IP Network Clearinghouse Solutions ENUM IP-Enabling The Global Telephone Directory Frank Estes Vice President , ext 224
SANOG-7 Internet Evolution and IPv6 Paul Wilson Geoff Huston APNIC.
Greg Pisano Director, Market Development Brooktrout Technology.
Evolution towards the Next Generation Network
S4-Chapter 3 WAN Design Requirements. WAN Technologies Leased Line –PPP networks –Hub and Spoke Topologies –Backup for other links ISDN –Cost-effective.
ﺑﺴﻢﺍﷲﺍﻠﺭﺣﻣﻥﺍﻠﺭﺣﻳﻡ. Group Members Nadia Malik01 Malik Fawad03.
October 10-13, 2006 San Diego Convention Center, San Diego California SIP Trunking… Why is it so important?
Telecom in Transition Global Telecommunications is in a time of dramatic transition –Traditional telephone service was just about voice –We now live in.
Adoption of IP in the Next Generation Contact Center Rupesh ChokshiGautham NatarajanDirector, AT&T.
Internet Protocol TeleVision
Softswitch SIP Proxy Server Call Manager IP Telephony Router Tablet PC IP PBX Class 5 Switch Class 4 Switch PBX Access Gateway Broadband Router Voice Gateway.
International Telecommunication Union Workshop on Next Generation Networks: What, When & How? Geneva, 9-10 July 2003 NGN Research in China Jiang lin-tao.
1 © 2006 Nokia Fixed Mobile Convergence The future of communication networks János Kurtz 11/05/2006.
- D1 - FT/Networks and Carriers Division ITU-T WORKSHOP on NGN (Geneva 9-10 July 2003) NGN an architecture for 21st century networks? ITU-T NGN Workshop.
“End to End VoIP“ The Challenges of VoIP Access to the Enterprise Charles Rutledge VP Marketing Quintum Technologies
HP Network and Service Provider Business Unit Sebastiano Tevarotto February 2003.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEVISION (IP-TV)
Chapter 1: Explore the Network
NET 3710 WAN Data Networks.
Internet Evolution and IPv6
Geoff Huston Research Scientist APNIC
Introduction to Networking
Introduces New Mobile Backhaul Initiative to Resolve 4G/LTE Backhaul’s Most Costly Challenge Nan Chen, President, MEF.
INTERNET PROTOCOL TELEVISION (IP-TV)
Geoff Huston Research Scientist APNIC
CAIA, Swinburne University of Technology
IMS & Wireline to Wireless Convergence
Presentation transcript:

Convergence ? Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC

Networking 101 Communications networks were traditionally constructed to meet the requirements of the intended service For example: The dynamics of the human voice and the PSTN Voice range covers 300 Hz to 3500 Hz Poor high frequency response reduces intelligibility Dynamic range of 70db Delay within 400 ms Limited Total Harmonic Distortion Digitally, voice can be mapped with with 8000 samples per second, with each sample quantized to 256 discrete levels: 8KHz of 8 bit samples The PSTN is a time switched network with a base 125usec clock pulse Digital Circuits are derived from these time-switched 64K synchronized bit streams, using multiples of this basic service atom Voice networks are highly constrained systems that operate to a HCF service model

Architecting Networks for Data Data networks are different…. There is no fixed speed unit There is no fixed minimum bit error rate Loss, jitter and latency variance tolerance There is no particular service model: Variable speed, bandwidth, times, reliability,… Data networks have variable control models, with a strong pressure to operate a lowest common denominator service model with edge-based control imposition

The Full Service Provider Operates a variety of different networks, each attuned to differing service requirements PSTN Video reticulation Data circuit services (DSN,Frame, ATM) Data cloud / VPN services (EtherSwitching) Access networks (DSL, Cable) IP MPLS Lambda services OOB, Command and Control networks

Whats wrong with this? Proliferation of special purpose networks within each full service providers infrastructure – high operating costs, low revenue yields But all these little networks are just shovelling digital packets around Why does the communications service operator need to construct and operate many distinct networks? If all these networks are just moving packets around, why cant this be achieved within a single packet-switching plane? Higher volume lowers unit cost, doesnt it?

Welcome to Convergence!

The Converged Utopia A small number of vertically integrated full service providers leveraging their underlying infrastructure investment into a high yield, high margin service delivery retail system using a single network platform for comprehensive service delivery Low cost, high value, strong service control, fantastic margins!

Wouldnt it be good if… You could operate all forms of real time and data services within a single network and a single switching plane Your carriage plane could be triggered to support graded service responses for each class of service usage You could support both high resilience high quality real time and various profiles of data services, and all points in between within a common switched network platform You only needed a single protocol, a single carriage architecture and a single OSS (and a single operator!) to drive the entire network operation

And wouldnt it be even better if… You could account for, and tariff, the end user value of delivered services rather than just switched packets Customers paid you for value-added service solutions, rather than the marginal cost of packet delivery

So is IP the Holy Grail of Convergence? Does IP offer the industry the reality of convergence? Can we load up the totality of all kinds of service profiles upon a single IP substrate? Can we run all service profiles, all security domains, all network models, upon a single IP switching plane and a single network operational platform from core through to edge? Will this offer the service provider enterprise more efficient cost structures with higher revenue leverage? Can we really reconstruct massive vertically integrated communications service providers using IP as the convergence lever?

Or is this Hopelessly Unrealistic? The drive for convergence of services in a single delivery system is a persistent theme in this industry: Mixing Data and Voice streams with ATM Mixing circuits and packets with MPLS Mixing Video, Voice and Data with Triple Play Each new generation of carriage technology is heralded as the harbinger of a wonderous new converged era of communications service provision

What if… Deregulation was more than industry lip service to a vague political premise? We experience intense competition at every level of the service delivery enterprise? In other words: What if we acknowledge todays reality? Is convergence still a valid concept?

The Unconverged Reality Deregulation, intense competition, branching role specialization at every level Resulting in many parallel service delivery networks, many network operators, industry-wide duplication of activities, continual exposure to inefficient resource use, exposure of niche markets, limited planning capability, high investment risks, high costs, low operating margins, continual restatement of investor expectations, negative returns on equity investments, continual recycling of management and staff

The Unconverged Reality Deregulation, intense competition, branching role specialization at every level Resulting in competitive discipline placed on service providers market forces match supply to demand pricing based on cost of supply, not value of service service delivery skill specialization service innovation continuous industry response to meet current user needs

Convergence vs Reality Voice is no longer the emperor of communications – its reign is over Voice is becoming just another UDP application (and a low volume one at that) Voice signalling is just a SIP rendezvous question VOIP + ENUM is inevitable Sooner or later Somehow or other

Convergence vs Reality Triple Play time is over – BitTorrent won! Its a service network, not a forcing function - support the user to run what ever services they want rather than force feeding the user with a limited set of services that the service provider finds easy to deliver News Clip: October 24 BitTorrent is collaborating with a number of global hardware manufacturers to embed its peer-assisted digital content delivery technology into consumer electronics. ASUS, Planex and QNAP are among the first CE manufacturers to implement the BitTorrent download manager into their digital home devices. Products include wireless routers, media servers and network attached storage (NAS) devices.

Convergence vs Reality Value-Added service networks are causing value added service network providers to go value-added negative earnings per share Overlay-based services now own the user

Convergence vs Reality The Internets major leverage was always cheaper price and lowest common denominator service profiles in the network Arming networks with complex quality and service manipulation capabilities is a business lose arming networks with adequate bandwidth is a superior strategy – QoS, NGNs and their converged friends have completely lost the plot

Convergence vs Reality IP Transit is a volume-based low-value commodity activity IP Access is a volume-based low-value commodity activity Adding value to packet pushing happens as an end device to end device transaction

Convergence vs Reality There is no next vertical killer app Overlays have already claimed the user! Think XML, Ajax, RSS, Rendezvous, Torrents, Podcasts

Todays Carrier Squeeze Play Service Application Platform Network User Infrastructure Service Application Platform Network User Nostalgia Reality

Todays Operating Principles Stick to the basics - keep the overheads low and keep the network offering simple, stable, fast and cheap User value construction is happening over the top of the network through overlay structures Open the network edge up for innovation Stop playing pointless cat and mouse games with selective service interception! Really Useful Networking is a lowest common denominator packet carriage utility

What have we learned? Vertically integrated service providers are fading away into history - the deregulated competitive service industry continues to specialize rather than generalize at every level Convergence is now obsolete

End-to-End really IS important! Valued service delivery is changing – we are now seeing user value based on interactions across overlay systems that treat the network as a simple transmission service As it should be!

The Converged Utopia of the old world carrier industry remains only as a piece of dull, unimaginative, nostalgic monopolistic mythology within todays communications industry

The Unconverged Internet world is diverse, vibrant, innovative, exciting and very much alive

And maybe thats a Very Good Thing!