Geoff Huston, APNIC March 2006 APRICOT 2006 IPv4 Numerology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal (LAC ) Toshiyuki Hosaka Working Group on the policy for IPv4 address.
Advertisements

IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited Geoff Huston March 2004 Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Paul Wilson, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Axel Pawlik. LACNIC VI, March 2004, Montevideo. An RIR in 2010 History, Continuity and Future presented by: Axel Pawlik.
Allocation vs Announcement A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston February 2004 (Supported by APNIC)
Policy Aspects of the Transition to IPv6 Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited Geoff Huston September 2003 Presentation to the RIPE 46 Plenary Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional.
ARIN Public Policy Meeting
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston.
BGP AS Number Exhaustion Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC March 2003.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC APNIC 24, September 2007.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston February 2005 APNIC.
Routing Items from IAB Utrecht Workshop Geoff Huston IAB.
Routing Table Status Report November 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC.
End of the Internet Predicted! Torrent at 11. The Oracle Bones of IPv4 Some personal divination by Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv4 Consumption Update
End of the Internet Predicted! Torrent at 11. The Oracle Bones of IPv4 Some personal divination by Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC APNIC 24, September 2007.
Where are we with IPv6? Geoff Huston APNIC. The minister for communications and information technology does not believe that regulatory intervention is.
Analysis of the impact of IPv4 transfer policies; Issues and solutions Dawit Bekele & John Schnizlein Internet Society AfriNIC-9 Mauritius.
Running Out of Space: IPv4 Exhaustion Brian Nisbet Network Operations, HEAnet.
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
BGP in 2009 Geoff Huston APNIC May Conventional BGP Wisdom IAB Workshop on Inter-Domain routing in October 2006 – RFC 4984: “routing scalability.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 31 October 2005 Australian IPv6 Summit.
IPv4 Consumption Status Geoff Huston. Status of IPv4 today.
APNIC Update The state of IP address distribution and its impact to business operations 1 Elly Tawhai Senior Internet Resource Analyst/Liaison Officer,
Allocations vs Announcements A comparison of RIR IPv4 Allocation Records with Global Routing Announcements Geoff Huston May 2004 (Activity supported by.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG 27 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei.
IPv4 Addresses. Internet Protocol: Which version? There are currently two versions of the Internet Protocol in use for the Internet IPv4 (IP Version 4)
IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
Measuring IPv6 Deployment Geoff Huston George Michaelson
Internet Addressing and the RIR system (part 2) 12 February 2004 Phnom Penh, Cambodia Paul Wilson, APNIC.
APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC November 2007.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited - Revisited Geoff Huston November 2003 Presentation to the IEPG Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional.
BGP in 2011 Geoff Huston APNIC. Conventional (Historical) BGP Wisdom IAB Workshop on Inter-Domain routing in October 2006 – RFC 4984: “routing scalability.
Religion. I comman d you: Deploy IPv6 NOW ! Religion, Technology,
IPv4. The End of the (IPv4) World is Nigh(er) ! Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
1 AS Consumption Patterns Geoff Huston APNIC May 2005.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston November 2004 APNIC.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston, APNIC 26 October 2005 ARIN XVI.
Prop-097: Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA Alejandro Acosta, Nicolas Antoniello, S. Moonesamy, Douglas Onyango,
1 IPv4 Address Lifetime Presented by Paul Wilson, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
AS Numbers NANOG 35 Geoff Huston APNIC. Current AS Number Status.
IPv4 Address Lifetime SANOG IV Presented by Nurani Nimpuno, APNIC Research activity conducted by Geoff Huston and supported by APNIC.
The Internet will switch versions of IP. Projection based on 3 years.
IPv4. The End of the World is nigh (er) ! Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC.
Routing Table Status Report Geoff Huston August 2004 APNIC.
Routing Table Status Report August 2005 Geoff Huston.
Tracking the Internet’s BGP Table Geoff Huston Telstra December 2000.
IP Address Management The RIR System Nurani Nimpuno APNIC.
Routing 2015 Scaling BGP Geoff Huston APNIC May 2016.
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Religion.
IPv4.
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Routing and Addressing in 2017
The IPv4 Consumption Model
Routing Table Status Report
Geoff Huston September 2002
RIPE October 2005 Geoff Huston APNIC
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
Routing Table Status Report
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Revisited
End of the Internet Predicted!
Routing Table Status Report
Routing Table Status Report
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
Presentation transcript:

Geoff Huston, APNIC March 2006 APRICOT 2006 IPv4 Numerology

If 42 is the answer …

Then what was the question? –Part of the reason for differences in outcomes in this area lies in the difference of the question being posed So - to be clear – the question posed in this study is: When can we expect that the current address allocation policies for IPv4 will no longer apply?

A look at the IPv4 data Use the fundamental assumption that the driver for address consumption is the Public Internet, and that the growth of the Internet itself is reflected in address consumption demands This is based on the growth of advertised address span in the public Internet Adjust the model to include each individual RIRs allocation behaviour over time Set the exhaustion date at the point when any RIR cannot honor an address request

Current Status of IPv4

Advertised and Unadvertised Addresses

This Approach to Modelling IPv4 The post-2000 data indicates that more than 95% of all allocated address space is advertised in BGP on the public IPv4 Internet This implies that the drivers for address consumption can be found in the advertised address pool behaviour From the advertised data time series, first remove the high frequency noise components, generate a best fit trend, then model interactions with unadvertised and RIR address pools Perform forward extrapolation from this model

Advertised Address Space

Advertised Address Growth First Order Differential

Advertised Address Growth First Order Differential of Log

Advertised Address Growth Exponential growth model provides a best fit to the 3 year data series of advertised address span Now find a reasonable correlation between advertised and unadvertised address space Then project RIR allocation demands

Unadvertised Address Space

Unadvertised / Advertised Ratio

Modelling Advertised Growth Best fit to previous 3.5 years data appears to be a compound rather than constant growth rate –Use an exponential growth model in underlying address demand function ( adv = e a* x + b ) Average network growth of some 7 /8s per year – accelerating at a rate of 0.3 /8s per year To reach an exhaustion point the model uses: –an exponential growth trend model based on previous 1,200 days (~ 3.5 years) advertised address data –a decreasing linear trend model of the ratio of unadvertised to advertised addresses

The Address Consumption Model Advertised Address span grows at an exponential rate

Unadvertised Addresses Unadvertised address pool continues to grow (at a slower rate than advertised) This implies that reuse, reclamation and return rates for addresses have had no significant impact on overall address consumption. This model assumes no change in address return and reuse rates

The Address Consumption Model Advertised and Unadvertised Addresses

The Address Consumption Model Total address demand projection

RIR Allocation Model Assumes that the relative rate of RIR allocation across the RIRs varies according to relative allocation trend rates in previous 3.5 years Absolute rate of RIR allocation is driven by the total address consumption growth The point of address exhaustion occurs when any single RIRs address pool drops to zero

The Address Consumption Model Combined RIR Model

The Address Consumption Model IANA Pool Consumption

The Address Consumption Model

Projections from this Model IANA Pool exhaustion –04 January 2012 RIR Pool exhaustion –08 January 2013

Comments This model assumes an orderly procession right up to the point of effective exhaustion of the unallocated address pool –This is highly unlikely to eventuate A more likely industry response will be accelerating demands as imminent address exhaustion becomes more visible –A last chance rush on remaining resources It is not possible to model such industry rush behaviours using the historical address allocation and BGP data –Some other form of modelling of social and market behaviour would be better positioned to make some guesstimates here

Comments Exhaustion of the IPv4 unallocated address pool does not imply complete unavailability of IPv4 address resources to industry players The exhaustion of the unallocated IPv4 address pool does not appear to imply a forced IPv6 conversion onto the industry at that point in time There is reason to believe that the Internet industry will continue to use IPv4 as a base protocol well after this IPv4 unallocated address pool exhaustion date comes and goes

Some Speculation on Address Policies and an IPv4 Address Market In the absence of the imposition of specific external control functions, a conventional economic response would be the emergence of various forms of trading markets in address resources In conventional markets scarcity tends to operate as a pricing premium factor Market behaviours would then imply an entirely different behaviour in terms of IPv4 address distribution functions

More Speculation Unadvertised address pools, and release of current address holdings based on conversion to address compression technologies could come into play within a market-based pricing dynamic What form of market regulation would be appropriate? How would it be applied? Who would apply it? Why would it be useful to have? How can we preserve address utility (the integrity of address uniqueness) in an environment of market-based trading?

Food for Thought RIR Allocation Policies: –What is the threshold point where the application of different IPv4 address allocation policies may be appropriate? –Or is no change a wiser course of action? –Or should the RIRs establish strategic reserve address pools? Why?

Food for Thought Emergence of IP Address Markets: –Is the emergence of such markets Good or Bad? Avoidable or Inevitable? Appropriate or Inappropriate? Fair or Unfair? –Are there any practical alternatives for the industry? –How would address trading markets be best supported? –Would such markets be regulated? How? –What is the RIR role in such an environment?

Food for Thought Global Implications: –What about Equity, Affordability, Fairness of access to address resources at a global level? –And in what venue are such concerns best expressed? –And how would they be expressed within the overall model?

Address Policy Questions What are most appropriate address management policy measures that will support the continued well-being of the global Internet and its users? And when will they be needed?

The Daily Report

Thank You