Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs State Coordinators Meeting February 2009 Arlington, Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Arizona Department of Homeland Security SAA Site Monitoring 6 th Annual Homeland Security UASI Conference May 2012 May 2012 Governor Janice K. BrewerDirector.
PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.
Title I LEA and Peer Review Process of School Improvement Plans Kokomo Center Schools Kokomo, IN.
THE ROAD LESS TRAVELED…. HOPEFULLY!! Dispute Resolution.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Alabama State Department of Education Federal Programs FY 2011 FY 2011 SIG Application Technical Assistance Session.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration May 21, 2012 through May 29, 2012 Title I Technical Assistance Session School Level Parental.
Application Amendments and Budget Transfers (Part 2) Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University,
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
The mission of the Office of Migrant Education is to provide excellent leadership, technical assistance, and financial support to improve the educational.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
Big Strides for Small Patients: Developmental Screening in Pediatric Primary Care Department of Pediatrics Jerold Stirling, MD Rebecca Turk, MD Melanie.
Update: Web Data Collection System (WDCS) Title I Administrative Meeting—September 30, 2010 Kristi Peters, Research and Evaluation Coordinator 1.
Erica Cummings Grant Coordinator 1.  The New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (DHSEM) is responsible for:  Monitoring.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
SASA WEBGRAM State Title I Directors July 27, 2011 Topic: 2011 Grantee Satisfaction Survey Patricia A. McKee Acting Director Student Achievement and School.
Who Are We? Marianna GoheenDeifi Stolz Health ScienceMethods of AdministrationProgram Supervisor.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Federal Programs Fall Conference Title I and the ACIP Logan Searcy and Beth Joseph.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick McMenamin, Administrator Categorical Program Monitoring.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
Implementing School Plans in ePlan
Coordinators’ Academy Friday, July 24, :15-10:30 a.m. & 10:45-12 p.m. Shared Responsibilities for Title I, Part A, Grant Management at the School.
Compliance Training for School Board Members Kids Without Homes: A School District Responds.
NYGEAR UP State Evaluation State Technical Workshop February 23, 2015.
Continuous Improvement and Focused Monitoring System US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Overview of the OSEP Continuous Improvement.
Florida’s Charter Schools Program Grant Award Information Session August 2011.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Office.
Miami-Dade County Public Schools Title I Administration School-level Parental Involvement Plan (PIP)
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Office of Federal Programs December 10, 2013.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 1 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.
1 REGION 3 Planning Workshop for the School Year Office of Field Services.
Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Association.
Jaimie Lewis Omnitrans San Bernardino, California SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
CHARTER SCHOOLS PROGRAM MONITORING AND DATA COLLECTION CONTRACT SOLICITATION NO.: ED-OII-15-R-0014.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
First Things First Grantee Overview.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Add your school name and the date and time of the meeting
A Multi-tiered Framework for Monitoring ESEA & IDEA Programs
Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs
Equitable Services Under ESSA
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
ESSA Monitoring: Existing Resources
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 2
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
APR Informational Webinar
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring LEA McKinney-Vento Programs State Coordinators Meeting February 2009 Arlington, Virginia

Find a partner. Answer the following questions: What is monitoring? Why monitor?

What is monitoring? Monitor: to watch, keep track of, or check usually for a special purpose (Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary)

Why monitor? Because we have to: (statutory requirements): ◦ Section 722(g)(2) of the ESEA State plans for the education of homeless children and youth requires the State to ensure that LEAs comply with the requirements of the McKinney-Vento ESEA. Section of the EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative Regs) further requires that the State, as the grantee, is responsible for monitoring grant and subgrant-supported activities to assure compliance with applicable Federal requirements. Because it improves programs

Who gets monitored in your state? Part of all title programs – on site, desktop, self evaluation based on criteria (flag concerns), 5 year cycle (FL) McKinney and nonsubgrantee – included in Title I monitoring, extra detail for grantees (cross train monitors) (KY) Network with other title specialists Every grantee every year (GA) WA – reminder of monitoring and requirements each year

When does monitoring occur? (frequency) Annually – small # LEAs Subgrants yearly; nongrantees 3 year (SC) Three year cycle; nongrantees as possible MT Many grantees annually 5 year cycle with other federal programs

How is monitoring implemented? Structure/system? MD – advance notice, complete template and return to SC; explore any questions at visit; complete report and submit VT; consol applic; pre- site submission; on site (reduces time on site; KY: grantee meetings TA to ease monitoring; FL – on line system LEA selection? See who is monitored (WA – “big 4 annually” + indicators) Follow up actions? FL – system improvement plan

Vermont’s Monitoring Targeting: ◦ Liaisons ◦ Subgrants ◦ Embedded in Other Monitoring ◦ Ongoing Monitoring of Performance Purposes ◦ To meet federal requirements ◦ To educate liaisons and subgrants ◦ To gather feedback on TA and PD needs

VT: Homeless Education Liaisons Survey Monkey Format Includes overview of liaison responsibilities in McKinney-Vento Solicits feedback on TA and PD needs of individual liaisons Guides work of the Vermont Homeless Children and Youth Project staff

VT: Subgrants On-site monitoring Monitoring tool incorporates federal monitoring content Survey monkey end-of-year data gathering

VT: Embedded Monitoring Title I on-site monitoring tool Feedback from Title I staff to Homeless Coordinator Coordinated compliance follow-up

VT: Ongoing Monitoring Funding to purchase time from Surrogate Parent Program staff Creation of Vermont Homeless Children and Youth Project On-site orientation and technical assistance On-going monitoring of quality of services in schools

Rejoin your partner. Brainstorm components to include in LEA monitoring Which are most critical? How did you decide?

Review your state’s monitoring protocol (or one being shared) Be ready to report out observations/comments

Special issues Number of LEAs/large area to cover Balancing findings and technical assistance “Buy-in” from other SEA departments

Top Ten Reasons to Monitor: 10. You love to drive 200 miles or more in a day. 9. Your state’s travel regulations are a breeze to follow. 8. Hotels that meet your state rate are so luxurious. 7. Visiting the Bates Motel brings back fond memories. 6. Ah, such fine dining options are available.

Top Ten Reasons to Monitor: (continued) 5. You need a break from your significant other. 4. You need a break from your kids. 3. On the road, somebody else makes the bed. 2. Talking face-to-face beats and phone calls. 1. Bottom line: you have an opportunity to improve programs and, therefore, the lives of our children