IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LACNIC Policy Update Roque Gagliano LACNIC. Current Policies Proposals - LACNIC As a result of the Open Policy Forum at LACNIC XI four policy proposals.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2007 JPNIC All Rights Reserved. IPv4 Countdown Policy Proposal (LAC ) Toshiyuki Hosaka Working Group on the policy for IPv4 address.
Axel Pawlik. LACNIC VI, March 2004, Montevideo. An RIR in 2010 History, Continuity and Future presented by: Axel Pawlik.
Policy Aspects of the Transition to IPv6 Geoff Huston Chief Scientist, APNIC.
ARIN Public Policy Meeting
End of the Internet Predicted! Torrent at 11. The Oracle Bones of IPv4 Some personal divination by Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv4 Consumption Update
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations Philip Smith, Geoff Huston September 2002.
End of the Internet Predicted! Torrent at 11. The Oracle Bones of IPv4 Some personal divination by Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC APNIC 24, September 2007.
Where are we with IPv6? Geoff Huston APNIC. The minister for communications and information technology does not believe that regulatory intervention is.
Proposal-062: Use of Final /8 Jonny Martin, Philip Smith & Randy Bush Policy APNIC 26 28th August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand.
Policy SIG report 29 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei Toshiyuki Hosaka Randy Bush Jian Zhang.
ARIN IP Address Stewardship 3 February About ARIN Regional Internet Registry (RIR) – Established December 1997 by Internet community 100% community.
Analysis of the impact of IPv4 transfer policies; Issues and solutions Dawit Bekele & John Schnizlein Internet Society AfriNIC-9 Mauritius.
1 News from APNIC AfriNIC 9 27 November Coming up Some numbers Some service updates Some policy news 2.
IPv4 Run Out and Transitioning to IPv6 Marco Hogewoning Trainer, RIPE NCC.
1 Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG Wednesday 26 August 2009 Beijing, China.
IPv6 Addressing – Status and Policy Report Paul Wilson Director General, APNIC.
Update on RIPE NCC Inter- RIR Transfer proposal Adam Gosling APNIC 38 Policy SIG Meeting 18 September 2014.
Global policy proposal for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries prop-069-v002.
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy Geoff Huston Research activity supported by APNIC The Regional Internet Registries s do not make forecasts or predictions.
2009-3: Allocation of IPv4 Blocks to Regional Internet Registries.
Overview of policy proposals Policy SIG 27 February 2008 APNIC 25, Taipei.
Copyright © 2008 Japan Network Information Center JPNIC's review of IPv4 address transfer  Izumi Okutani  Japan Network Information.
1 IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji Geoff Huston.
Open Policy Hour Einar Bohlin, Policy Analyst. OPH Overview Draft Policy Preview Policy Experience Report Policy BoF.
POLICY EXPERIENCE REPORT Leslie Nobile. Review existing policies – Ambiguous text/Inconsistencies/Gaps/Effectiveness Identify areas where new or modified.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 29, Kuala Lumpur Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v002.
CONFIDENTIAL IPv4 Current Market Conditions and Information Matt Talarico October,
APNIC Depletion of the IPv4 free address pool – IPv6 deployment The day after!! 8 August 2008 Queenstown, New Zealand In conjunction with APAN Cecil Goldstein,
IPv4 Unallocated Address Space Exhaustion Geoff Huston Chief Scientist APNIC November 2007.
A proposal to lower the IPv4 minimum allocation size and initial criteria in the AP region prop-014-v001 Policy SIG APNIC17/APRICOT 2004 Feb
Life After IPv4 Depletion Leslie Nobile. Overview ARIN’s current IPv4 inventory Trends and observations Ways to obtain IP addresses post IPv4 depletion.
Prop-080: Removal of IPv4 Prefix Exchange Policy Guangliang Pan Resource Services Manager, APNIC.
ARIN Section 4.10 Austerity Policy Update.
PROP Leif Sawyer. Draft Policy ARIN Eliminating Needs-based Evaluation for Section 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 transfers of IPv4 Netblocks Author:
Erik Bais, May 13 th 2015 PP – unassigned yet General Transfer Policy Presenter : Erik Bais –
Draft Policy Preview ARIN XXVII. Draft Policies Draft Policies on the agenda: – ARIN : Globally Coordinated Transfer Policy – ARIN : Protecting.
1 AS Consumption Patterns Geoff Huston APNIC May 2005.
Skeeve Stevens APNIC 31, Hong Kong Alternative criteria for subsequent IPv6 allocations Prop-083v003.
1 Life After IPv4 Depletion Jon Worley –Analyst Leslie Nobile Senior Director Global Registry Knowledge.
A S I A P A C I F I C N E T W O R K I N F O R M A T I O N C E N T R E Emerging Registry Criteria ASO General Assembly Budapest, 19 May 2000.
Current Policy Topics Emilio Madaio RIPE NCC RIPE November 2010, Rome.
News from APNIC German Valdez Communications Area Manager RIPE October 2008.
Registration Services Feedback Andrea Cima RIPE NCC RIPE 67 - Athens.
1 IANA global IPv6 allocation policy [prop-005-v002] Policy SIG 1 Sept 2004 APNIC18, Nadi, Fiji.
IPv4 Transfer Proposal. What does a transfer proposal do? Transfer Proposal allows APNIC to reflect records of transfers undertaken by APNIC account holders.
Prop-077: Proposal to supplement transfer policy of historical IPv4 addresses Wendy Zhao Wei, Jane Zhang & Terence Zhang Yinghao.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
Policy SIG Report APNIC AGM Friday 29 August 2008 Christchurch, New Zealand 1.
Whois & Data Accuracy Across the RIRs. Terms ISP – An Internet Service Provider is allocated address space by an RIR for the purpose of providing connectivity.
Policy SIG report AMM, APNIC 27 Manila, Philippines.
The Status of APNIC’s IPv4 Resources: Exhaustion & Transfers
Addressing 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
Draft Policy ARIN Amy Potter
Regional Internet Registries
IP Addresses in 2016 Geoff Huston APNIC.
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
Downstream Allocations by LIRs A Proposal
IPv6 Address Space Management Report of IPv6 Registry Simulation
Recommended Draft Policy Section 8
News from APNIC ARIN XXII 16 October 2008.
End of the Internet Predicted!
Randy Bush & Philip Smith
Overview of policy proposals
Experimental Internet Resource Allocations
Overview of policy proposals
IPv4 Address Lifetime Expectancy
Supporting Historical Resource Transfers
Presentation transcript:

IPv4 Address Transfer proposal APNIC prop-050-v002 Geoff Huston

IPv4, IPv6, and Transition: As planned IPv4 IPv6 Dual Stack now later

IPv4, IPv6, and Transition: As being implemented IPv4 IPv6 Dual Stack ? now later not later enough IPv4 Pool Exhaustion

Motivation If the demand for IPv4 addresses extends beyond the likely pool exhaustion date … How will IPv4 addresses be distributed to meet this ongoing demand? Will industry be forced into a mode of IPv4 address transfers to support dual stack deployments? Should we look at this option now, or wait until its time to really panic?

Address Transfer Proposal APNIC to recognise the transfer of IPv4 addresses between current APNIC account holders Record these IPv4 address transfers in the APNIC IPv4 address registry

Constraints – Address Block Address block: /24 or larger administered by APNIC status is current subject to all current APNIC policies

Constraints – Source The disposer is: a current APNIC account holder registered holder of the address block in APNIC registry ineligible for any further APNIC IPv4 address allocations for 24 months must document the reasons for any future IPv4 address requests following this 24 month period

Constraints – Recipient The recipient is: current APNIC account holder subject to all APNIC policies liable for APNIC fees associated with current resource holdings

Details Transfer procedure requires notification to APNIC by both parties Details of the transfer to be published by APNIC in a transfer log APNIC may levy a transfer registration fee

Advantages Maintain a consistent and accurate public registry of address holdings Mitigate risks associated with potential black / grey market formation Provide indirect incentives for address holders to recirculate unused / unneeded IPv4 address space to support the dual stack transition phase

Disadvantages Market formation and risks of various forms of market distortions emerging This would be beyond the direct control or purview of APNIC Potential for process abuse Potential for further routing table growth

Comparison: RIPE Policy Proposal RIPE Proposal Parties are RIPE LIRs Respect minimum allocation size of block Allow permanent and non-permanent transfers Address blocks must be certified

Comparison: ARIN Policy Proposal IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal ARIN Advisory Council proposal Disposer has not received any resources for previous 24 months, nor able to receive resources from ARIN or from transfer for 24 months Acquirer may only make 1 transaction each 6 months and cannot dispose for 24 months. Must be qualified under ARIN policies as requiring addresses IP block meets minimum size constraint

Further Considerations Constraint Setting: Application of constraints on transfers to prevent hoarding, fragmentation and speculation vs excessive constraints potentially motivating the emergence of alternative constraint- free transfer systems outside of the the RIR framework

Considerations Side Effects: Just how fragile is todays routing environment? What distinguishes transfer any different from current routing fragmentation practices?

Considerations Clarity of intended outcome: temporary measure to mitigate some risks in the IPv6 transition and facilitate a path to an IPv6 outcome vs the construction of a long term viable market in IPv4 addresses

Considerations Clarity of role: Registration of outcome vs facilitation of the redistribution of addresses

Considerations Scope: Regional or Global? Should this encompass a cross-RIR framework for transfers?

Questions?