October 18, 2011.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Insufficient resources  Claimant Causes  Unreported/Under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Compliance with Federal Trade Commission’s “Red Flag Rule”
Advertisements

State Presentation: MARYLAND October 14, 2011 UI Integrity/ Improper Payments Joint Federal/State Taskforce The UI Integrity Taskforce is committed to.
NEW JERSEY’S PERSPECTIVE ON REDUCING IMPROPER BENEFIT PAYMENTS.
1 Leaves and Loads – York’s Pension Plan Winter 2013.
1 Winter 2014 Leaves and Loads York University Pension Plan.
Tutorial Introduction Fidelity NTSConnect is an innovative Web-based software solution designed for use by customers of Fidelity National Title Insurance.
NASFAA 2003: Reconnecting With Students! 2 FSA Assessments: A Key to Compliance & Improvement Session #: S106.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes’  System deficiencies  Insufficient BPC staff  Oversight of issues.
UI Integrity/ Improper Payments Joint Federal/ State Task Force October 14, 2011.
Classroom User Training June 29, 2005 Presented by:
October 14, 2011 State Presentation:.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Inadequately educating claimants on reporting.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Auto cancel of some ES issues  Agency currently cross matches.
October 14, Areas of focus: Benefit Year Earnings Separation Issues The State of Delaware’s “Action Plan” to reduce the incidence of improper UI.
Introducing Connect!. Connect! Tools for Students Page 2 Interactive Planning Tools Course Planner & Credit Checker Test Prep Information & Test Dates.
Claimant Messaging Marcus Dodd, CPA, CFE Chief Internal Auditor
EPlan for Advanced Users 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 27, 2015.
October 13, W E WILL IDENTIFY, ANALYZE, AND ACT ON THE ROOT CAUSES OF IMPROPER PAYMENTS BY BUILDING UPON AND IMPROVING PRACTICES ALREADY IN PLACE.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Delays in processing cross match data.  Delays in stopping.
Louisiana UI Integrity Task Force October 24, 2011.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Auto cancel of some types of ES issues  Agency currently cross.
RemoteNet Presented By The Systems House Inc.. Enhancements Order by multiple selling units of measure Updated the webpage’s look and feel –Style sheets.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Internet certification process  Insufficient Staff for Benefit.
Interstate Work Registration Verification. Clay Cole – Texas Director of UI Support Services.
State Presentation:VIRGINIA October 14,  Separations (SEPs): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Communication Deficiencies / Internal and.
Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Absence of Red Flags/stop payments for NDNH hits  Failure to promptly investigate.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): 2008 – 2011 Root Causes : BYE - 12% of total overpayments  Claimant Causes:  Unreported Earnings 68%,
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
UI Integrity/Improper Payments Federal/State Task Force State Presentation: South Dakota October 11, 2011.
October 21, 2011  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Incomplete explanation of issues.
October 14, 2011 South Carolina Integrity Strategic Plan.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to follow-up with employers for earnings information.
October 28, 2011  KILLER APP #1:    . 2   Killer App #1: Virtual Online Interactive Claim Examiner (V.O.I.C.E)   Description of Issue  
October 28, 2011 Final Colorado.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Too few BPC staff to adequately investigate.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: Vermont.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Manual Processes  Delinquent Wage.
Dakota State University.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Automating Project Data Submittals Setting Expectations FAA Airports (AEA) Conference Cameron Bryan,
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
1 UI INTEGRITY/IMPROPER PAYMENTS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR/CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF LABOR TASK FORCE October 28, 2011.
October XX,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  XXX  YYY  ZZZ  Claimant Causes  AAA  BBB.  Employer Causes.
Electronic Case Reviews and Consumer Surveys September 16, 2013 Soon to be known as: Opportunities for Ohioans with Disabilities Presented by: Janet Cool,
State Presentation: OCTOBER 24,2011. Overpayments by Cause* 2010 Review Description$ AmountPercentage of Total Unreported Earnings $ 27,104, %
November 14, 2011 Rhode Island.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Poorly worded messaging  Staff do not “Own Integrity”
UI OPERATIONS IN SOUTH DAKOTA THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT BTQ STANDARDS.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Wage crossmatch delays  Frequency of state new hire crossmatch.
October 14, 2011 New Hampshire. Areas of National Focus: Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes: Agency –Manual processes to manage, investigate and.
October 14, 2011 DRAFT.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) 20% of BAM Improper Payments in 2010: Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Too few BPC staff.
Collaboration in CDR Erik Brown Unisys Corporation September 19, 2006.
October 25,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Staff fails to follow-up with claimant at the time continued.
October 14, 2011 State Presentation: Massachusetts.
October 14,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Late posting of wages to Tax System  Wrong Last Employer 
October 14, 2011 UT.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Communication  Claimant Causes  Lack of UI Rules Knowledge.
October 28, 2011  KILLER APP #2:    . 2  Killer App #2: Partners in Success: “Integrity Matters”  Description of Issue  Developing, building.
Fresno County Department of Child Support Services Employer Workshop Welcome.
June 23,  Introduction:  We list the strategies New York has identified for each major area in order of priority.  To meet the proposed USDOL.
October 28,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Failure to properly investigate earnings in a timely manner.
Ticket Operations for Workforce Employment Networks Wednesday, July 23, 2014 Alternate format available upon request for individuals with a disability.
June 23,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Errors caused by a misunderstanding of what to report and when Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes Failure.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: July 30, 2015 Presented by: Office of Unemployment.
October 14, 2011 MAINE.  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) 5.3% for Maine: Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Lack of adequate messaging to claimants.
June 23, Strategies to address areas of national focus:  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) Root Causes Identified 1. Fraud 2. Failure to report and/or.
June 23, Presidential mandate for all states to take immediate actions to begin reducing UI improper payment rates through improved prevention,
October 24,  Benefit Year Earnings (BYE):  Agency Causes  Inadequate claimant and employer education  Lack of some system edits on continued.
June 23,  Strategies to Address areas of national focus: Benefit Year Earnings (BYE) – Root Causes Identified  Claimant / Employer/Employee Integrity.
Temporary Disability & Temporary Caregiver Insurance
Small Business and Personal Credit
UI Integrity / Improper Payments Joint Federal/State Task Force
Practice Insight ERA & Denial Manager 2014
Hands-On: FSA Assessments For Foreign Schools
Presentation transcript:

October 18, 2011

 Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Insufficient resources  Claimant Causes  Unreported/Under Reported Earnings  Misunderstanding as to how and when to report  Untimely responses to inquiries  Employer Causes  Wrong period reported  Incorrect reporting of employee information  Untimely responses to inquiries 2

 Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Planned action(s) to address:  Increase education to claimants and employers  Modify existing processes to increase clarity to external customers  Rewrite Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System  Improve methods to acquire information more timely  Converse with DOL regarding increased access to NDNH data warehouse  Apply for funding to receive and create effective tools (ie: trend reports) 3

 Benefit Year Earnings (BYE): Principal milestones:  Implement Updated Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System  Create measuring and reporting tools  Analysis of data to determine patterns  Increased access to NDNH data warehouse The resulting milestones listed above will be integrated into continuous improvement plans, activities and presentations 4

 Separations (SEPs): Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Timely establishment of issues  Insufficient fact finding  Reversals / remands of initial determinations  Claimant Causes  Misrepresentation of facts  Incomplete/missing information  Untimely responses  Misunderstanding of direction  Employer Causes  Incomplete/missing information  Untimely or no responses 5

 Separations:  Planned action(s) to address:  Enhance employer web application for notice of claim response(s) as IT and agency resources allow  Increase education methods to employers/claimants  Continued training of staff  Implement system edit checks for inconsistency in reporting  Implement SIDES 6

 Separations:  Principal milestones:  Implementation of IVR updates  Implementation of SIDES  Implementation of internal & external reporting tools  Sufficiently informed external customers 7

 Work Search Issues: Root Causes Identified:  Agency Causes  Work search indicator improperly set  Lack of valid work search verification (Resolved)  Claimant Causes  Misunderstanding of a valid work search  Improperly reporting work searches  Inadequate work search information 8

 Work Search Issues :  Planned action(s) to address:  Implement timely work search verification process (Completed)  Increase communication to claimant on the definition of a valid work search 9

 Work Search Issues :  Principal milestones:  Implementation of IVR updates  Decrease in work search issues 10

 Strategies to Support Owning UI Integrity:  Encourage every staff member  Create integrity task force  Invite communication between departments and units  Encourage staff to provide feedback 11

 Strategies to Support Owning UI Integrity:  Develop processes  Increase tracking systems  Increase analysis of data  Prioritize IT resources 12

 Strategies to Support Owning UI Integrity:  Maintain management oversight  Provide progress reports  Enhance partnerships with Workforce Administration, local offices, and external agencies  Continuous Improvement philosophy and planning 13

 Communications Strategies:  To claimants and employers  Increase electronic media communication methods  Improve existing communication methods  Provide frequent reminders  Clarify verbal and written direction self-help tools  Educate and remind employers of cost control benefits associated with accurate and timely reporting / responses 14

 Communications Strategies, Continued:  To state UI staff  Provide periodic feedback meetings  Provide progress reports  Training of UI staff  Integrate integrity initiative with staff performance measures  To the public  Newsletters  Claimant Guide / Employer Guide updates and website updates  Self help tutorials  Public forums  Provide periodic updates to JSND Advisory Council 15

 Killer App: Separation Category  Description of Issue – Increase the quality and timeliness of communication between the agency and our employers while streamlining the process to reduce costs  Add the following functionality to JSND employer internet application  Employers can elect to receive electronic notification / reminders of items that need their attention  Separation information – fact finding letters  Cross match inquires  Work search verifications  Quarterly wage / payment reporting  Tax due notification  Delinquent report / credit / debit notifications  Employers not utilizing SIDES can respond online to fact finding letters  Provide online “to do” calendar of task due dates  Provide hyperlinks to documents or reporting tools requiring action 16

 Description of Solution:  Enhance our current employer internet application to incorporate items listed on the previous slide.  Anticipated Results:  Electronic notification / reminders are expected to reduce the rate of appeal reversals by increasing the quality of responses as well as the rate of response  Reminders can be sent to an address or as text to a cell phone.  A reduction in employer and agency cost through reduced postage, consumables, and staff time  Bonus - Additional costs reductions for employer and JSND as any correspondence can be sent electronically. 17

 Anticipated Results Cont’d  Online responses will improve the timeliness and quality of information received  Questions can be marked as mandatory, with edits requiring completion  Responses would be sent real time to the issue management system used by adjudication staff  Visual “to do” list provides a monthly view by day listing all tasks (with links) that an employer needs to complete  The “to do” view is expected to increase employer understanding of requirements as well as provide for better response rates and timeliness 18

 Anticipated Results Cont’d  Allowing employers to respond to cross match and work search verification inquiries online is expected to:  Result in a higher response rate  Better quality response  More timely response  Future ability to integrate the response with our benefits system  Automatically set issues and send appropriate fact finding inquiries 19

 Killer App:  Cost / Benefit explanation:  Many of these enhancements would result in an increase in the timeliness of issue detection with enhanced quality responses  Real time online response capability coupled with electronic notification is expected to result in:  Increased response rates  More timely issue detection  Improved quality responses  Less manual intervention by staff  Online responses do not require staff intervention  Response is sent directly to the issue management system and EDMS system  Result is a decrease in administrative time / costs due to the streamlining  All of these enhancements work together to improve the integrity of the UI program, both by minimizing overpayments and by lowering administration costs 20

“Integrity: Own It!”  Questions?  State Contact for follow-up: Patrick Brown: Phone: 701/