Session 1 Study Expectations Please share the three or four items of interest that you found in the informational websites.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inquiry-Based Instruction
Advertisements

Understanding Depth of Knowledge
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Depth of Knowledge. Why Depth of Knowledge? Mechanism to ensure that the intent of the standard and the level of student demonstration required by that.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Science Break Out Session New Math and Science Teacher Dec 2008 Becky Smith.
Standards Scaling– Teacher Leaders LMS Team
An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Tammy Seneca, Ph.D.
An Overview of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
COABE 2014 Forging the Future Implementing Webb’s DOK in the Active Learning Classroom Sara Z. Gutting Education Consultant (317)
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge in Math K-5 Math Back to School Conference
DOK and GRASPS, an Introduction for new staff
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Categorizing Classroom Experiences
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Introduction to Depth of Knowledge
Common Core State Standards Video-Common Core Overview.
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
PSLA 39 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 14, Carolyn Van Etten Beth Sahd Vickie Saltzer – LibGuide Developer.
DOK Depth of Knowledge An Introduction.
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Quick Glance At ACTASPIRE Math
Webb’s Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Aligning Assessment Questions to DOK Levels Assessing Higher-Order Thinking.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
NEW REALITY STUDENTS MUST HAVE HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS 1.
ACADEMIC CONVERSATIONS
Modified from Depth of Knowledge presentation by Dr. Robin Smith at 2009 PRESA Leadership Conference… Adapted from Kentucky Department of Education, Mississippi.
A scale of cognitive demand.  Code with a ? to indicate that you have never heard of this,  Code with a + to indicate that you know something about.
DEPTH OF KNOWLEDGE (DOK)
Chapter 4: Planning Educational Outcomes Presented by: April Gannon & Lizzy Allen.
Depth of Knowledge and Cognitive Demand QualityCore Professional Development Day 1, 2–1.
Depth of Knowledge Assessments (D.O.K.) Roseville City School District Leadership Team.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) An Overview. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Depth of Knowledge and the Cognitive Rigor Matrix 1.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
By Benjamin Newman.  Define “Cognitive Rigor” or “Cognitive Demand”  Understand the role (DOK) Depth of Knowledge plays with regards to teaching with.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK) SUN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL. 2 Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norman Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align.
Tuesday 08/12 Grab DOK handouts and put them in your “Units” tab. Warm-up: Look over the Academic Integrity Policy that you researched for homework. Respond.
Thornton Elementary Third Quarter Data rd Grade ELA Which standard did the students perform the best on in reading? Which standard did students.
Getting to Know Webb’s. Webb’s Depth of Knowledge Level One (recall) requires simple recall of such information as fact, definition, term, or simple procedure.
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge.
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
Write your personal definition of “cognitive rigor” What do rigorous academic environments look and sound like?
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Understanding Depth of Knowledge. Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Adapted from the model used by Norm Webb, University of Wisconsin, to align standards with.
1 Cognitive Demand in Problems  Cognitive demand is a measure of what the instructional question (a question posed during class) or test item requires.
Day Two: February 25, :30-3:00. Series Goals Participants will have the opportunity to:  Work collaboratively to:  Deepen their knowledge of the.
Depth Of Knowledge Basics © 2010 Measured Progress. All rights reserved. He who learns but does not think is lost. He who thinks but does not learn is.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
Teaching with Depth An Understanding of Webb’s Depth of Knowledge
Definitions & Examples
March 22, 2017 Bringing Reading Anchor Standard One to Life in Your School: Text-Dependent Questions 1.
Assessment Information
Debate Unit 1 Standards Comprehension and Collaboration
Preparation for the American Literature Eoc
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Preplanning Presentation
Understanding Depth of Knowledge
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Norman L Webb.
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Presentation transcript:

Session 1 Study Expectations Please share the three or four items of interest that you found in the informational websites.

Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Promoting Rigor and Relevance in Learning

What is Depth of Knowledge? Recall and Reproduction: Level 1 Skills & Concepts: Level 2 Strategic Thinking: Level 3 Extended Thinking: Level 4 Webb’s DOK Levels

DOK: Depth of Knowledge Most state/national tests have DOK 1,2,3; however, the test in will have DOK 4. DOK is not an exact science. DOK can help you determine the “steps” your students must take to get the right answer. DOK is not about difficulty but more about the thinking process.

Recall and Reproduction DOK Level 1 DOK 1 requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or performance of a simple process or procedure. ELA Example: What is the metaphor in the first paragraph of the novel? Math Example: Name all the parts of the circle shown. As a group, create two other Level 1 questions.

Skills/Concepts DOK Level 2 DOK 2 includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem. These actions imply more than one mental or cognitive process/step. ELA Example: Identify and summarize the major conflicts in the literary text. Math Example: Determine a strategy for estimating the number of pennies in a jar. As a group, create two other Level 2 questions.

Strategic Thinking DOK Level 3 DOK 3 requires deep understanding as exhibited through planning, using evidence, and more demanding cognitive reasoning. The cognitive demands at Level 3 are complex and abstract. An assessment item that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3.

Strategic Thinking DOK Level 3 ELA Example: Analyze or evaluate the effectiveness of literary elements (e.g., characterization, setting, point of view, conflict and resolution, plot structures). Math Example: Create a unit of formal geometric constructions. As a group, create two other Level 3 questions.

Extended Thinking DOK Level 4 DOK 4 requires high cognitive demand and is very complex. Students are expected to make connections—relate ideas within the content or among content areas—and have to select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Due to the complexity of cognitive demand, DOK 4 often requires an extended period of time.

Extended Thinking DOK Level 4 ELA Example: Write and produce an original play. Math Example: Develop a rule for a complex pattern and locate a phenomenon that exhibits this behavior. As a group, create two other Level 4 questions.

The Depth of Knowledge is NOT determined by the verb but the context in which the verb is used and the depth of thinking required.

DOK 3- Describe how the author of a short story must be cognizant of how much space he actually has to develop the elements of the story because he is confined by that space. (Requires deep understanding of the elements of a short story and the definition of the short story genre) DOK 2- Describe the difference between a short story and a novel. (Requires cognitive processing to determine the differences in the two genres) DOK 1- Describe the characteristics of a short story. (Simple recall) Examine the DOK

DOK 4- Students will graph a variety of two-dimensional figures and analyze them to determine classification. (Requires deep understanding of the characteristics of various two-dimensional figures and the ability to draw conclusions.) DOK 3- Students will graph the vertices of a quadrilateral and determine its classification. (Requires a deep understanding of the characteristics of quadrilaterals.) DOK 2- Students will graph the vertices of a rectangle and compare the diagonals. (Requires cognitive processing to make a comparison.) DOK 1- Students will graph the point (2/3, -4 3/8). (Requires only simple recall.) Examine the DOK

Remember... Depth of Knowledge (DOK) is a scale of cognitive demand. DOK requires looking at the assessment item/standard-not student work-in order to determine the level. DOK is about the item/standard-not the student. The context of the assessment item/standard must be considered to determine the DOK-not just a look at what verb was chosen.

The task: The teacher and students will brainstorm a list of very specific capitalization rules (at least one rule per child). Examples: Names of rivers, names of oceans, names of pets, etc. Each student will choose or be assigned a rule for which he/she will make a poster with the rule itself, pictures, and examples. (For motivation, the teacher could make this assignment into a contest with prizes for winners.) Each student will present his or her poster to the class and have the class give additional examples of the given rule. These posters may be displayed and reviewed each day for a period of time before a final assessment. Differentiation: Students may be given a choice of doing a poster, a power point, a web page, an illustration, etc. Evaluate the DOK: Elementary Task

The task: Every day this week two students will stand outside the classroom for five minutes after the tardy bell rings and collect data concerning tardy students. Each day these students will determine how many students arrive to their classes late. Tardy students will be classified as male or female, and as 6 th grade student, 7 th grade student, or 8 th grade student. The data collectors will also record the classroom (101, 102, 103, 104, 105) each tardy student enters. At the end of the week, the data collectors will tabulate their results for each classification of student and for each classroom. Then, they will create a graph to display their results for the class. Underneath the graph, the data collectors will type a paragraph analysis of their results. Students will synthesize their results in a brief class discussion on tardiness. Some questions to consider: ◦What type of graph will be the most effective? ◦Are more males or females tardy to class? What might this indicate? ◦Which grade level has the most number of tardy students? What might this indicate? ◦Which classroom has the least number of tardy students? What might be the reason? ◦What percentage of students in our school habitually arrive late? ◦What does this percentage indicate about the tardy policy at our school? Evaluate the DOK: Middle School Task

The task: The student focuses on one American poet and creates a project board or a multimedia presentation that illustrates understanding of the poet’s subject matter and use of diction, syntax, sound, form, figurative language, and structure; the characteristics of the poet’s particular style; the poet’s life and times and the effect of these factors on the poet’s work; and the ways in which the poet’s work furthers and/or breaks from prior literary traditions and informs or affects the traditions and literary works that follow. Evaluate the DOK: High School Task

As a team, take 10 – 15 minutes and assign a DOK level to each of the ELA and math standards on the sample CCGPS sheet. Please be prepared to defend your choice(s)! Your Turn!

GradeStandard DOK Level/Comments CC.6.NS.2.Fluently divide multi-digit numbers using the standard algorithm. CC.3. RL.1 Ask and answer questions to demonstrate understanding of a text, referring explicitly to the text as the basis for the answers. CC L.1 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. a. Use parallel structure.* b. Use various types of phrases (noun, verb, adjectival, adverbial, participial, prepositional, absolute) and clauses (independent, dependent; noun, relative, adverbial) to convey specific meanings and add variety and interest to writing or presentations CCGPS.3.OA.1. Interpret products of whole numbers, e.g., interpret 5 × 7 as the total number of objects in 5 groups of 7 objects each. For example, describe a context in which a total number of objects can be expressed as 5 × 7. CC.9-12.N.CN.7Solve quadratic equations with real coefficients that have complex solutions. CC.7. SL.1Engage effectively in a range of collaborative discussions (one-on-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 7 topics, texts, and issues, building on others’ ideas and expressing their own clearly. a. Come to discussions prepared, having read or researched material under study; explicitly draw on that preparation by referring to evidence on the topic, text, or issue to probe and reflect on ideas under discussion. b. Follow rules for collegial discussions, track progress toward specific goals and deadlines, and define individual roles as needed. c. Pose questions that elicit elaboration and respond to others’ questions and comments with relevant observations and ideas that bring the discussion back on topic as needed. d. Acknowledge new information expressed by others and, when warranted, modify their own views.

Participants should identify the DOK for each standard listed on one of the handouts provided and briefly justify the level chosen. Study Expectation