SLOs for School Librarians August 20, 2012. “There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
The 21st Century Context for
 Teacher Evaluation and Effectiveness laws are now in place  Legislature has passed a law that student performance can now be a part of teacher evaluation.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR.
It defines acceptable evidence of student’s attainment of desired results. It determines authentic performance tasks that the student is expected to do.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 2 (REVISED FEBRUARY 2012)
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Student Learning Objectives It’s Been a SLO Summer.
Aligning Priorities, Goals and Initiatives for School and Student Success Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
2012 Secondary Curriculum Teacher In-Service
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives & the Assessments needed Mary Ann Luciano, Director.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
* Provide clarity in the purpose and function of the Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) as a part of the APPR system * Describe procedures for using.
Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR). What are the components of APPR? Teacher Evaluation –60 points (observation*/goal setting) –20 points (State.
Your Name Grading and Reporting on Student Learning What is it? A system of assessing and reporting that describes student progress in relation to standards.
Unit 1 – Preparation for Assessment LO 1.1&1.2&1.3.
Assessing Student Learning Lynn Merklin Assistant Provost Office of Institutional Effectiveness August, 2014.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
Teaching Today: An Introduction to Education 8th edition
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.
OCM BOCES SLOs Workshop. Race To The Top: Standards Data Professional Practice Culture APPR.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
FEH BOCES Student Learning Objectives 3012-c.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Winter, 2012 Teacher Effectivensss Day 5. To download powerpoint:
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
HOME High Quality Assessments in Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (PEPG) Systems.
Race to the Top (RTTT) and the New York State Regents Reform Agenda Dr. Timothy T. Eagen Assistant Superintendent for Instruction & Curriculum South Huntington.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Creating a Student Learning Objective (SLO). Training Objectives Understand how Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) fit into the APPR System Understand.
Student Learning Objectives NYS District-Wide Growth Goal Setting Process December 1, 2011 EVOLVING.
What does it mean to be a RETA Instructor this project? Consortium for 21 st Century Learning C21CL
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center *Please see caveat © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Student Learning Objectives OCM.
 Teaching: Chapter 14. Assessments provide feedback about students’ learning as it is occurring and evaluates students’ learning after instruction has.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
The Role of the School Librarian & Media Specialist In the Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Process South Carolina Department of Education Steve Driscoll,
1 Overview of Teacher Evaluation 60% Multiple Measures of Teacher Performance At least 31 points based on “at least 2” observations At least one observation.
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Assessing the Common Core Standards
Exploring Assessment Options NC Teaching Standard 4
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
Developing Quality Assessments
Presentation transcript:

SLOs for School Librarians August 20, 2012

“There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know.” ~Donald Rumsfeld

What do you know?

Chance to review what we currently do! Let’s show our school community how School Library Media Specialists make a difference to student learning!

Goals of SLOs  What students need to know and be able to do at the end of the year  SLOs place student learning at the center of the conversation  SLOs are critical part of all great educator’s practice  SLOs are an opportunity to document the impact educators make with students  SLOs provide principals with critical information that can be used to manage performance, differentiate and target professional development, and focus supports for teachers  The SLO process encourages collaboration within school buildings

“SLO process drives collaboration which drives better practices.” ~Mary Ratzer

Getting to 100 Points

Who Does What? STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES From NYSED SLO GUIDANCE MAY 2012 WHAT IS DECIDED BY THE STATE VERSUS DISTRICT LEVEL AND/OR SCHOOL/TEACHER LEVELS FOR COMPARABLE GROWTH MEASURES?

I apologize…very wordy slides coming up!

The State determines the following for comparable growth measures:  The overall SLO framework, including required elements.  Requirements in the context of Regulations:  Requirements for which teachers must set SLOs and which teachers must have State-provided growth measures.  Requirements for which assessments must be used, and which are allowable options, under the Regulations.  Requirements around scoring:  The scoring ranges and categories for the measures of student growth subcomponent.  Rules for scoring SLOs that include a State-provided growth measure.  Rules for scoring multiple SLOs.  Provides training to Network Teams and Network Team Equivalents on SLOs prior to school year.

Districts (in the context of State Regulations and frameworks) determine the following:  Assess and identify their unique priorities and needs.  Identify who in the District will have State-provided growth measures and who must have SLOs as “comparable growth measures” as per the State’s rules.  District-wide rules for how specific SLOs will get set.  Expectations for scoring SLOs and for determining teacher ratings for the growth component, within State rules.  District-wide processes for setting, reviewing, and assessing SLOs in schools.  Create processes to ensure that any assessments are not scored by teachers and principals with a vested interest in the outcome of the assessment they score, and address assessment security issues.  Establish which decisions are made at the District level versus in schools by principals, and/or principals with teachers.  Provide or arrange for training to lead evaluators.

Schools (in the context of State Regulations and frameworks, and District decisions) determine the following:  Implement State and District-determined processes.  Make choices as needed when District leaves flexibility to schools.  Ensure that lead evaluator approves each teacher’s goals and monitors/assesses results.  Ensure all assessments are secure and that any assessments, including those used as evidence for SLOs, are not scored by teachers and principals with a vested interest in the outcome of the assessment they score.

Teachers (in the context of State Regulations and framework, District decisions, and school decisions) determine the following:  Propose, in consultation with lead evaluator, SLOs and targets based on District and school requirements.  Obtain all possible data on students to best inform baseline, starting level of student learning.  Reflect on student learning results and consider implications for future practice.

August 13 Guidance B12. When must school librarians be evaluated under Education Law § 3012-c? Only classroom teachers and building principals must be evaluated under Education Law § 3012-c. "Classroom teacher" is defined as a teacher in the classroom teaching service who is a teacher of record. Librarians who are certified as a library media specialist or school media specialist (library) are teachers in the classroom teaching service. For the school year, teacher of record is defined as a teacher who is primarily and directly responsible for a student’s learning activities that are aligned to the performance measures of a course, consistent with guidance. Therefore, a certified librarian who is not a teacher of record is not a "classroom teacher" and therefore would not need to be evaluated under Education Law § 3012-c. However, if a certified librarian is a teacher of record, he/she would be considered a "classroom teacher" and therefore must be evaluated under Education Law § 3012-c.

In English:  Only a “teacher of record” needs an SLO  District defines what a teacher of record is…on the safe side, anyone with regularly scheduled classes!  The Guidance says only for school year, will probably come next year  So, why should we do one…

Baseline can be scored by YOU! Summative must be scored by SOMEONE ELSE! Oct 3 is BEDS DAY

Dissecting the SLO Template

Let’s look at Examples ages/SLS/common.cfm?subpage= Shortcut: Click on Common Core Central Click on APPR

Parking Lot important yes, but they can bog us down!  Student population  Length of an instructional unit  Teacher of record  Who will grade assessments  Librarians do not have an approved state wide curriculum for standards

Things to Consider  Using last year’s test as this year’s baseline assessment.  Multiple SLOs provide you with more opportunities to show growth in student learning.  Consider exceeding the minimum population requirements.  Cannot fill in target(s) until baseline assessment is complete.

"Assessment should be deliberately designed to improve and educate student performance, not merely to audit as most school tests currently do." - Grant Wiggins, EdD., president and director of programs, Relearning by Design, Ewing, New Jersey

What IS Assessment?  Table top twitter  In table groups, one person at a time writes one word on the chart in response to the question: “What is assessment?”  No one talks  You can write as many times as you want  3 minutes  Be ready to share

So…what IS assessment???  Educational assessment is the process of documenting, usually in measurable terms, knowledge, skills, attitudes and beliefs. Assessment can focus on the individual learner, the learning community (class, workshop, or other organized group of learners), the institution, or the educational system as a whole. documentingknowledgeskillsattitudes beliefs 

Effective assessment will…  Provide diagnostic feedback  Evaluate progress  Relate to a student’s progress

Types of assessment: Formative  Used to gather student feedback  Used to improve instruction  Done during instruction Summative  Reflect student learning  Given at the end of a unit of study

Think, pair, share…  What are some assessments you currently use?  Are they formative or summative?

Authentic assessment could be… Observation Essays Interviews Performance tasks Exhibitions and demonstrations Portfolios Journals Teacher-created tests Rubrics Self- and peer- evaluation

High & Low-Inference Constructed Response Questions Key Components of CR Items: Task: a specific item, problem, question, prompt, or assignment Response: Any kind of performance to be evaluated, including short/extended answer, essay, presentation, & demonstration Rubric: scoring criteria used to evaluate responses Scorers: people who evaluate responses (ETS, 2005)

 For Short Response Questions:  Measures targeted reasoning skill  Task is clearly specified  Question can be answered in allotted time  Avoid choices among several questions  Measures higher order thinking skills (Upper Levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy) Steps to Writing Constructed Response Questions

Bloom’s Taxonomy

Item Review Guidelines Requires Content Experts Item Coding: Content (Aligned to correct Learning Standard-See Common Core Exemplars) & Cognition (e.g. Bloom Taxonomy; Webb’s Depth of Knowledge)

Webb’s Depth of Knowledge LevelDescription Level 1Recall: recall of a fact, information, or procedure Level 2Skill/Concept: use of information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level 3Strategic Thinking: requires reasoning, developing plan or a sequence of steps, some complexity, more than one possible answer. Level 4Extended Thinking: requires an investigation, time to think and process multiple conditions of the problem (

Flying the plane while we’re building it… ..\Common Core\Regional CCS Unit Writing for 10711\EDS_Airplane.wmv..\Common Core\Regional CCS Unit Writing for 10711\EDS_Airplane.wmv

Let’s break for lunch!!!! Enjoy!!!

Now What…  We will spend the remainder of our time working on assessments  The assessments will be regional: Monroe 2 Orleans, Monroe 1, RCSD, and WFL  We will be using the Information Fluency Continuum for our standards