George Jugovic, Jr. Chief Counsel, PennFuture.  Air Quality  Shallow Groundwater  Special Protection Watersheds  Public Lands  Transparency  Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Natural Gas Drilling Activities - A State Perspective Ryan Benefield, P.E. Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
Advertisements

Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
INTRODUCTION TO THE USE OF CERCLA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROJECTS USDA FOREST SERVICE Grants and Agreements Workshop February 28, 2002 Great Falls,
Community Impacts of Mariner East Pipelines Prepared for West Cornwall Public Meeting November 21, 2014 Presented by Sam Koplinka-Loehr, Clean Air Council.
1 Public Lands Advocacy HOW TO REVIEW A FEDERAL PLANNING DOCUMENT.
SHALE PLAYS IN THE INTERMOUNTAIN WEST: LEGAL AND POLICY ISSUES Development of Shale: Water Resource Concerns & Policy Considerations Katy Dunlap, Esq.
Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP DGSLAW.COM Dave Neslin Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Former Director of the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission Environmental.
Marcellus Shale: the mother of all gas deposits Largest in North America Close to lucrative northeastern markets First Pennsylvania Marcellus well drilled.
Chapter 18: Part #1 Oil Fossil Fuels and the Environment.
Michael A. Skiffington Program Support Manager Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy W&M ELPR Spring Symposium Williamsburg, VA – March 28,
 The Mining Law governs access to federal lands for locatable hardrock mineral activities ◦ It is not an environmental statute and doesn’t need to be.
GUEST EXPERTS: DAVE YOXTHEIMER & JOHN HANGER APRIL 7, 2011 American Association of Blacks in Energy (AABE) Webinar on Natural Gas Development.
U.S. Energy Information Administration Independent Statistics & Analysis US Extractive Industry Overview: Oil, Gas, and Coal United States.
Office of Natural Resources Revenue U.S. Department of the Interior Industry ComplianceAccurate Revenues & DataProfessionalism & Integrity Federal and.
Broadening the Marcellus Discussion – Issues and Economics of the Resource Thomas Murphy Penn State Cooperative Extension October 2009.
Is Natural Gas the Answer for Electricity Generation? Issues and Considerations October 14, 2011 Bruce Baizel Staff Attorney Earthworks Durango, Colorado.
E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy May 10, 2005.
Health and Environmental Impacts of Transmission Pipeline Infrastructure Prepared for Citizens Meeting Dallas, PA September 17, 2014 Sam Koplinka-Loehr.
BLM-Alaska Overview Bud C. Cribley BLM-Alaska State Director Western Interstate Region Board of Directors Meeting Board of Directors Meeting May 21, 2014.
Who will pay for plugging and abandonment of PA’s shale gas wells? Austin Mitchell 2 August
Fracking 101. Fracking is a debated environmental and political issue. Industry’s insist it is a safe and economical source of clean energy; critics,
BELL WORK Pg. 224 Q.# 5. Human Impact on Land Lesson 2.
Environmental Issues Associated with Oil and Natural Gas Extraction, Transport and Processing in the Marcellus and Utica Shale Region of Ohio Joe Bonnell,
Jeopardy $100 Land + SeaTrash/MinesPollutionWater Miscellaneous $200 $300 $400 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
What landowners should consider if offered a gas well for “free” William Ziegler, Field Supervisor ODNR – Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management.
Fossil Fuels  Fossil fuels are energy sources that formed over geologic time as a result of compression and decomposition of plant and animal material.
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
AIM: What is fracking? Why is fracking such a controversial topic? DN: What do you know about fracking?
Recent PSD Experiences in SWRO Regulatory & Statutory Requirements Relationship with EPA Federal Land Managers - FLAG Appeals.
Ch WAC Geologic Sequestration of Carbon dioxide John Stormon Hydrogeologist Washington Department of Ecology Seattle, WA October.
Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone.
W w w. j a c k s o n k e l l y. c o m Kathy G. Beckett, Esquire 500 Lee Street East, Suite 1600, Charleston, WV Phone: Fax:
With information from Jacob Friedman.  Hydraulic Fracturing AKA Hydrofracking  High-pressure water mixed with chemicals and sand are injected into wells.
Impacts of Mining, Mining Regulations & Mine Reclamation.
Outdoor Heritage Fund. Established on August 1, 2013 by the Legislature. Continuing Appropriation of $20,000,000 annually from oil and gas taxes. Outdoor.
Coal.  Carboniferous Period~ million years ago  Dead plants-> sunk to bottom of swamps- >formed peat->covered by sand and clay- >sedimentary.
Hydraulic Fracturing Tom Carr, Lauren Dynes, and Pete Strader.
LOGGING FORESTS. Logging Forests Forests regulate climate by recycling water and carbon dioxide. transpirationOn hot days a large tree may absorb 5.5.
Source: Energy Information Administration
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Founded by U.S. government (under Richard Nixon) in 1970  William Ruckleshaus was first EPA administrator  a.
V.Sedyakin A. Nakhutin Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE) Institute of Global Climate and Ecology (IGCE)
Watersheds and Wetlands CHAPTER 1. Lesson 1.5 Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds Human Activities Watershed Quality Health of U.S. Watersheds.
Water Quality Rulemaking in Response to S.L
16.3. Bellringer The Environmental Impacts of Mining Because of the potential environmental impact of mining on a large scale, mining is one of the most.
1. 2 Jonah Field, Wyo. 40 acre spacing JonahBasinphoto03lrg.jpg 550×367 pixels.
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
Let your voice be heard! Presentation by Sean Mullin Legislative Aide Delegate Shane Robinson District 39.
Bureau of Land Management Federal Coal Leasing Program Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Scoping Meeting Supporting Text.
Using cleaned up mine water for fracking
To the: Waterway Commission
Hydraulic Fracturing in Virginia
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
4.1 Energy & Mineral Resources
“There’s a problem? Says who?”
Addressing Costs of Methane Waste and Future Policy Actions
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Gas companies recently have turned their sights on the Marcellus shale, shown in grey here, a vast natural gas reserve 6,000 to 8,000 feet below the Earth’s.
Human impact: extraction of energy resources
Human impact: extraction of energy resources
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Chapter 16 Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS AND CODES
Section 3: Mining Regulations and Mine Reclamation
With information from Jacob Friedman
Objectives Describe seven important potential environmental consequences of mining. Name four federal laws that relate to mining and reclaiming mined land.
Pros of Fracking Access to natural gas or oil Natural gas in “cleaner”
Old v. New Congress Old Congress: Few environmental hearings, dominated by industry lawyers and lobbyists New Congress: 19 environmental hearings so far,
Presentation transcript:

George Jugovic, Jr. Chief Counsel, PennFuture

 Air Quality  Shallow Groundwater  Special Protection Watersheds  Public Lands  Transparency  Data Collection

Flaring Study by Ceres group of investors using figures from North Dakota Industrial Commission indicates that 29% of gas produced in May 2013 was flared, down from high of 36% in September In 2012 equivalent of 1 billion gas burned and GHG emissions of putting 1 million cars on the road

NOx Emissions  1 hour NAAQS ppb short term exposure to avoid adverse health effects (Jan 2010)  Evidence of degraded air quality in other gas fields across the country  DEP SWRO has permitted equivalent of two coal fired power plants in the past eight years  Lack of modeling because considered minor source  Lack of monitoring in most active areas

Fracking  NETL study preliminary results being evaluated  Single well in one geologic location  Pennsylvania geology variable across the shale play  More studies needed to assure public

Pipeline Crossings  High Quality and Exceptional Value streams  2 Million persons fish annually; 1.6 Billion pumped into economy yearly (PAFBC)  Renewable resource  Anti-degredation policy  Cumulative impacts

Methane Leakage  Estimated 300,000 abandoned wells  Complex geology complicated by underground coal mines, abandoned wells, and shallow gas  Lack of construction standards for drinking water wells

On-site Disposal Practices  RCRA exemption for oil and gas wastes  PA Residual waste  No permit required for disposal  DEP authorized on-site disposal; 200 feet from stream; 20 inches above groundwater; remove liquid; wrap in liner; no long-term monitoring

 1895 – Dr. Joseph Rothrock became the first commissioner  1897 – General Assembly passed law authorizing the purchase of “unseated lands for forest reservations”  1930s – Department of Forest and Waters began purchasing what would become the Loyalsock State Forest from Pennsylvania Lumber Company

 60% forested  Pennsylvania state forests one of largest in east million acres.  About 2/3 or 1.5 million sits on the Marcellus shale  The state owns about 70% of mineral rights beneath state forests; only 30% state parks  385,400 acres of state forest land has been leased for drilling; DCNR informal policy seeks to prevent drilling in State Parks

 2010 DCNR Park Study  33.6 million people visited State Parks; spent $738 million direct payments  $463 million sales  8,439 jobs  2006 Outdoor Wildlife Survey  87.5 million hunted, fished or recreated  $122.3 billion dollars

 Forest fragmentation  Erosion and sedimentation  Loss of habitat

Case 1: Loyalsock State Forest  114,494 acres  Clarence Moore tracts consists of 25,000 that contains some of the most ecologically sensitive areas in PA  Clarence Moore purchased the mineral rights from Pennsylvania Lumber Company  Anadarko Petroleum own the rights

 DCNR asserts it must allow access because of implied right of easement  Conservationists assert an unusual lease provision terminated surface access on 18,000 acres  The remaining 7,000 not accessible without an easement  DCNR budget already accounted for the amount of money that Anadarko offered to resolve surface access dispute

 Anadarko submitted development plan in March 2012  Still has not been released to public for comment  DCNR refused to hold any public hearings for over one year  April 2013, DCNR offered a meeting to hand-selected groups and individuals  May 22, 2013, DCNR finally agreed to an open public meeting, held on June 4

 No public planning process  No comprehensive environmental impact statement (mini-NEPA)  No obligation to hold public hearings  No plain right to administrative hearing from DCNR actions

 Case 2: waste management records  Act 13 requires maintenance of detailed records for waste management  No obligation to submit records to DEP unless requested  Public has no access under RTKL unless submitted to agency

 Serious lack of data on important issues affecting the environment  Public policy decisions should be based on scientific facts  No long-term air monitoring plan in areas with most drilling  No comprehensive shallow aquifer data  No reporting of methane releases  No data on frack fluid migration  NETL study on frack fluid migration  PSU study on forest fragmentation