NEES Equipment Site University of Minnesota Multi-Axial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) 6 Degree-of-Freedom (DOF) Control Technology Ability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structural Dynamics Laboratory Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology,
Advertisements

Design of Seismic-Resistant Steel Building Structures
Shake Tables Derek Jacobs & Julia Johnson. What is a shake table? Used to replicate earthquakes Can also used for noise & vibration tests Their most basic.
Experimental Testing of Drift- Sensitive Nonstructural Systems – Year 4 The Pathways Project San Jose State University Equip Site:
Seismic Performance Evaluation of Energy Efficient Structural Insulated Panels (SIPs) Using Hybrid Simulation and Cyclic Testing SELIM GÜNAY, POSTDOCTORAL.
Current NEESR Projects and Potential Applications at MUST-SIM Jerry Hajjar University of Illinois.
Steven Chase 1, Yaw Adu-Gyamfi 2 and Paul Fuchs 3 1&2 Department of Civil Engineering, University of Virginia 3 Fuchs Consulting Inc.
Impacts of Seismic Stress on Pore Water Pressure in Clayey Soil By: Qazi Umar Farooq Lecturer Civil Engineering Dept Univ of Engg & Tech Taxila.
OBJECTIVE To present a MTLAB program for conducting three dimensional dynamic analysis of multistory building by utilizing a simple and ‘easy to understand’
Modeling for Analysis CE Design of Multi-Story Structures
Beams and Frames.
1 Windows CIS*2450 Advancing Computing Techniques.
UNBONDED POST-TENSIONED HYBRID COUPLED WALLS Yahya C. KURAMA University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana Qiang SHEN, Michael MAY (graduate students) Cooperative.
Yahya C. Kurama University of Notre Dame Notre Dame, Indiana, U.S.A
ISEE: Internet-based Simulation for Earthquake Engineering Part (I): The Database Approach Yuan-Sen YANG, Shiang-Jung WANG, Kung-Juin WANG, Keh-Chyuan.
Clemson University Department of Civil Engineering 110 Lowry Hall Clemson, SC Patrick J. Fortney Clemson University Civil engineering Telepresence.
A Versatile Depalletizer of Boxes Based on Range Imagery Dimitrios Katsoulas*, Lothar Bergen*, Lambis Tassakos** *University of Freiburg **Inos Automation-software.
1 LEHIGH MODEL ATLSS Engineering Research Center Lehigh University Version 1.2.
Level (m-1 ) Level m h (1-c)h ch Rigid Beam x1x1 x k1k1 k2k2 knkn kHkH RC AND SRC SHEAR WALL MACRO-MODELING l Multiple Vertical Line.
UB Node Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES)
The soild mechanics experimental facilities include a wide range of tools for the investigation of the mechanical response of material. In particular,
9/28/01Colorado-NEES1 Fast Hybrid Test Platform for Seismic Performance Evaluation of Structural Systems P.I.s: P. Benson Shing Enrico Spacone University.
Monitoring Structural Response to Earthquakes using Wireless Sensor Networks Judith Mitrani June 18, 2002.
Multiaxial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) System C. French, A. Schultz, J. Hajjar, C. Shield, R. Dexter Department of Civil Engineering D. Ernie Department.
Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop 1 Distributed Testing at CU-NEES Using OpenFresco and SIMCOR Gary Haussmann.
NEESGrid - A Collaborative Portal Study Charles Severance University of Michigan NEESGrid SI Team
Field Testing & Monitoring of Structural Performance University of California, Los Angeles 7 NCEEJuly 21-24, 2002 George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake.
Feb. 19, 2008 CU-NEES 2008 FHT Workshop Simulation and Control Aspects of FHT M. V. Sivaselvan CO-PI CU-NEES Assistant Professor Dept. of Civil, Environmental.
Abstract In this project we expand our previous work entitled "Design of a Robotic Platform and Algorithms for Adaptive Control of Sensing Parameters".
Colorado State University
for Earthquake Resistance
High Rise Structural Systems
ITW Structural and Strength of Materials Teaching Laboratory Civil & Materials Engineering UIC November 2009.
Shearing Stresses in Beams and Thin-Walled Members
Virtual Experiments for Teaching Hysteretic Structural Behavior Shirley J. Dyke, Nestor Castaneda, and Zach Feinstein Washington University in St. Louis.
Fire Testing of an Earthquake Damaged R.C. Frame Presented by: U.K. Sharma/Pradeep Bhargava Under UKIERI Project being Jointly Investigated by: Indian.
Dr. Thomas Hacker Co-Leader for Information Technology George E. Brown Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Assistant Professor, Computer & Information.
Seismic Design of Concrete Structure.
Digital Image Correlation
A Dual-Actuator Load Frame for Mixed-mode Fracture Testing of Laminated or Adhesively Bonded Specimens David A. Dillard and Donatus Ohanehi Engineering.
NEESR: Near-Collapse Performance of Existing Reinforced Concrete Structures Presented by Justin Murray Graduate Student Department of Civil and Environmental.
Static Pushover Analysis
Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory Experimental and Micromechanical Computational Study of Pile Foundations Subjected to Liquefaction-Induced.
NEES Facilities Used: University of Nevada, Reno University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana INTRODUCTION Bridge columns are subjected to combinations of.
TOPICS COVERED Building Configuration Response of Concrete Buildings
Current Activities at the MUST-SIM Facility NEEShub Site Visit to UIUC July 23, 2010 Dan Kuchma, Greg Pluta, Thomas Frankie, and Aditya Bhagath Illinois.
Site Operations Manager’s Workshop – September 26 th -28 th, 2006 Data Curation at NEES Claude Trottier Data Curator Site Operations Managers Workshop.
Techniques used for Functional and Multi-segmental Spinal Unit Functional Spinal Unit (Motion Segment) –the smallest segment of the spine that exhibits.
July 21, 2005AESE Fast Hybrid Simulation with Geographically Distributed Substructures Gilberto Mosqueda Boza Stojadinovic Jason P. Hanley (Presenter)
The Academic Impact of NEES Ian Buckle University of Nevada Reno.
Hybrid Simulation of Structural Collapse
Dr. Wang Xingbo Fall , 2005 Mathematical & Mechanical Method in Mechanical Engineering.
Building Fun You will have 30 minutes to build the strongest structures you can with only the materials you are provided with. Explain to the class the.
Grid Based Distributed Hybrid Testing Mobin Ojaghi, Javier Parra-Fuente, Kashif Saleem, Anthony Blakeborough, Martin S. Williams. Department of Engineering.
A Software Solution for the Control, Acquisition, and Storage of CAPTAN Network Topologies Ryan Rivera, Marcos Turqueti, Alan Prosser, Simon Kwan Electronic.
Multi-Site Soil-Structure-Foundation Interaction Test (MISST) PI: Bill Spencer, Illinois Co-PIs: Amr Elnashai, Dan Kuchma, Illinois Jim Ricles, Richard.
NEES Cyberinfrastructure Center at the San Diego Supercomputer Center, UCSD George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation Enabling.
Written by Changhyun, SON Chapter 5. Introduction to Design Optimization - 1 PART II Design Optimization.
Strength of Materials Malayer University Department of Civil Engineering Taught by: Dr. Ali Reza Bagherieh In The Name of God.
CABER Project Update February 22, 2008
Presentation by ANAS AHMAD ME1 B1 batch Submited to
University of Illinois Contribution Amr S. Elnashai Sung Jig Kim Curtis Holub Narutoshi Nakata Oh Sung Kwon Seismic Simulation and Design of Bridge Columns.
DESIGN OF AIRPORT TERMINAL AND CONTROL TOWER
RP-16, Verification of Laboratory Environments Presented by: Doug Cooper TAC.
QUAKE SUMMIT 2012, Boston, July 12, 2012
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Structural aspects related to the vacuum vessel of the SHIP Project
Dr-Ing Asrat Worku, AAIT
NEESGrid - A Collaborative Portal Study
Shearing Stresses in Beams and Thin-Walled Members
Presentation transcript:

NEES Equipment Site University of Minnesota Multi-Axial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) 6 Degree-of-Freedom (DOF) Control Technology Ability to test large-scale structural subassemblages Teleoperation of hydraulic equipment Real-time data and visual information sharing via telepresence The University of Minnesota Multi-Axial Subassemblage Testing (MAST) system enables multi-axial quasi-static cyclic tests of large-scale structural subassemblages, including portions of beam-column frame systems, walls, and bridge piers. Six-degree-of-freedom control technology, employed by the MAST system, advances the current state of technology in which boundary effects are often reduced to simple uniaxial loading configurations because of difficulties encountered in imposing multiple-degree-of-freedom states of deformation and load using conventional structural testing means. The system is unique in size and scope and greatly expands the large-scale earthquake experimentation capabilities both nationally and internationally. As shown in the photograph above, the MAST system employs a stiff steel crosshead in the shape of a cruciform, which is controlled with six-degree-of-freedom control technology. Four ± 1470 kN (± 330 kip) vertical actuators, capable of applying a total force of ± 5870 kN (± 1320 kips) with strokes of ± 510 mm (± 20 in.) mount between the crosshead and the strong floor. Two sets of actuator pairs with strokes of ± 400 mm (± 16 in.), provide lateral loads up to ± 3910 kN (± 880 kips) in the horizontal orthogonal directions. The actuator pairs are secured to an L-shaped strong wall with universal type swivels. The vertical clear distance permits specimens up to 8.8 m (28 ft. 9 in) in height to be tested. The horizontal clear distance between the vertical actuators can accommodate specimens up to 6.1 m (20 ft.) in length in the two primary orthogonal directions. Larger specimens may be oriented along the diagonal directions. The stiff steel crosshead and six-degree-of-freedom control technology enable control of the position of a plane in space. This feature makes it possible to apply pure planar translations, as well as the possibility of applying gradients to simulate overturning (e.g., axial load gradient in the columns of a multi-bay frame, or wall rocking). Any degree-of- freedom may be programmed in either displacement control or load control, and degrees- of-freedom may be constrained in a master-slave relation to be a linear combination of the values of other degrees-of-freedom. As an example, using the mixed-mode control capabilities of the MAST system, it is possible to program any lateral displacement history, and at the same time specify overturning moment as a constant times the lateral force, while simultaneously maintaining an independent history of axial load on the test specimen. The system is also equipped with four ± 980 kN (± 220 kip) ancillary actuators with strokes of ± 250 mm (± 10 in.), which can be used to apply lateral loads at intermediate story levels, gravity loads, or simulated specimen boundary conditions. An example of a test incorporating the ancillary actuators to simulate a simple boundary condition for a slab-column connection test is shown in the figure to the right. In addition to quasi-static ramp and hold testing protocols, the MAST laboratory also supports hybrid testing using either a local or remote (user provided) computation engine for local or distributed testing. The equipment is capable of supporting Simcor and OpenFresco protocols. The MAST laboratory has a wide array of instruments including LVDTs, string potentiometers, tiltmeters, and load cells. These instruments are seamlessly integrated into MAST’s data acquisition system with a variety of custom designed quick connect boxes. The data acquisition system allows for any combination up to 248 ¼-bridge strain sensors and 172 voltage channels to be sampled simultaneously at a rate of up to 10Hz. MAST also offers the use of a Metris (formerly Krypton) K600 optical dynamic measuring machine. The K600 system is a CCD camera-based system that is used to monitor the position of infrared LEDs in 3D space. Where traditional instruments are typically limited to one or two measurable degrees of freedom, the advantage of the K600 system is the ability to measure 3D positions of single points on a specimen and rotations of planes on a specimen. MAST has 41 LEDs which can be run 100Hz. In conjunction with the contributions of NEESit Cyberinfrastructure software, the teleobservation/teleoperation infrastructure provides relevant information needed for both monitoring and interpretation of experiments. As such, this facility incorporates real-time teleobservation of all visual monitoring information (video feeds) during an experimental run and real-time transmittal of all acquired sensor data. Full real-time teleoperation of 10 video cameras and 8 still image cameras, and limited real-time teleoperation of hydraulic equipment is available. The MAST facility fits into an integrated data-centric approach for experimentation, computation, theory, databases, and model-based simulation facilitated through the NEEScentral collaboratory. One of the most powerful features of this integrated approach to model-based simulation is an accumulated database of experimental results, which features the ability to “replay” tests and to couple experimental responses with computer simulations. The project team for the operational phase of the facility includes Carol Shield (PI), Catherine French, Paul Bergson, Drew Daugherty, Angela Kingsley, Jon Messier, and Jane Zirbes, (Dept. of Civil Eng.), and Douglas Ernie (Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng.) Carol Shield Principal Investigator This equipment site receives operational support from the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement No. CMS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the view of the National Science Foundation. Researchers examined the damage of a 8.3m (27'-3") tall tee-shaped concrete wall that was subjected to a series of multidirectional deformations at the MAST facility. MAST 6 Degree-of-Freedom Testing Machine Testing of a Slab-Column Connection MAST Control Room – supports teleparticipation