Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leveraging inter-sectoral action to address the social determinants of health: view from the health system Lucy Gilson University of Cape Town; London.
Advertisements

From QA to QI: The Kentucky Journey. In the beginning, we were alone and compliance reigned.
Team Readiness: Probing questions for coaches to ask before an Open Standards process begins Are the minimum capacities in place to engage in a planning.
© 2005 The Finance Project Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Oregon 21 st Century Community Learning Center Programs October 2011.
Sustainability Planning Pat Simmons Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
SILC-NET, a project of ILRU – Independent Living Research Utilization Developing an Outcomes-Focused SPIL: Three Easy Steps Module 2 A series of online.
This project is financed, in part, by a DHHS grant from the Office of Community Services. © Community Action Association of Pennsylvania Introduction.
1 Theory of Change Chesapeake Bay Funders Network Program Evaluation Training Workshop OMG Center for Collaborative Learning January 9-10, 2008.
Healthy Child Development Suggestions for Submitting a Strong Proposal.
Logic Models. A logic model is your program ROAD MAP. Where are you trying to go? How are you trying to get there? What will tell you that you’ve arrived?
ROMA Next Generation Results-Oriented Management and Accountability
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Helping Families Receive the Best Start in Life.  Check In  AOK History  AOK Communities  Conceptual Framework  Advancing Collaborative Leadership.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
Funding Opportunity: Supporting Local Community Health Improvement Sylvia Pirani Director, Office of Public Health Practice New York State Department of.
D OCUMENT O UR W ORK (DOW) VDSS O UTCOME R EPORT VAdata: Virginia’s Sexual and Domestic Violence Data Collection System.
Building a Brighter Future for Our Kids and Families Multnomah County Department of School and Community Partnerships.
Non-Profit and Public Housing Partnerships National Association of Latino Community Asset Builders Presented by Lourdes Castro Ramirez, President/CEO San.
RUSS SPAIN, CCAP NICK BURROWS, CCAP SHERYL BAILEY, CCAP Strategic Planning The Award-Winning Way! THIS PRESENTATION CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
Creating a New Vision for Kentucky’s Youth Kentucky Youth Policy Assessment How can we Improve Services for Kentucky’s Youth? September 2005.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Training of Process Facilitators Training of Process Facilitators.
The Evaluation Plan.
Using Information for Community Action Kathryn Pettit, The Urban Institute National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership.
Overview of Performance Review Process
Capability Cliff Notes Series PHEP Capability 3—Emergency Operations Coordination What Is It And How Will We Measure It? For sound, click on the megaphone.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Coordination and Net Working on DRR Rapid Emergency Assessment and Coordination Team (REACT) Bishkek November, 2009.
Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior The Center for Youth and Communities The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Your Program.
Getting Started Conservation Coaches Network New Coach Training.
Module 2 Stakeholder analysis. What’s in Module 2  Why do stakeholder analysis ?  Identifying the stakeholders  Assessing stakeholders importance and.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
ROMA In a Nutshell Oklahoma department of Commerce.
National ROMA Peer to Peer Trainers Developing an Individual Strategic Action Plan for
Program Evaluation for Nonprofit Professionals Unit 1 Part 2: Evaluation and The Logic Model.
CONDUCTING A PUBLIC OUTREACH CAMPAIGN IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Conducting a Public Outreach Campaign.
General Grant Writing Tips. Research the problem/need and the program before beginning the grant proposal Review research on similar problems/needs and.
Module III: Creating a Strategic Financing Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
Planning for Results National Peer to Peer (NPtP) ROMA Training Project Goal 5 – Agencies improve capacity to Achieve Results.
Module II: Developing a Vision and Results Orientation Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24,
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
AESuniversity NPI Reporting.  Session Overview  Terms and Definitions  Where It Fits Within MIS  Setup Process  User Process  Questions & Answers.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW Steven Preister,
Our mission: to build vibrant and diverse neighborhoods with homes that are affordable to families with a mix of incomes, where people choose to invest.
Sustainability Planning Framework and Process Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 ©
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Innovations in Research Rosalyn McKeown University of Tennessee.
Prepared by: Forging a Comprehensive Initiative to Improve Birth Outcomes and Reduce Infant Mortality in [State] Adapted from AMCHP Birth Outcomes Compendium.
TCRF Strategic Planning Process A Stakeholders’ Consultative Retreat- Morogoro 26 th -27 April 2013.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
CSBG ROMA NEXT GENERATION
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.
Student Affairs Division Meeting September 19, 2012.
An Introduction to the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) DALLAS, TX OCTOBER 21, 2015.
Assessment/Evaluation Make evaluation a central part of planning – not an afterthought 1) Determine Needs 2) Determine Desired Outcomes 3) Determine Activities.
MCCORMACK BARON MANAGEMENT Lisa Beffa, Senior Vice President.
Agenda for Change Creating Stable Families Basic Needs Strategies and Guidelines.
An Introduction to the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) SAN ANTONIO, TX APRIL 6, 2016.
Performance Management
Opportunities for Growth
Logic Models and Theory of Change Models: Defining and Telling Apart
Results of the Organizational Performance
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
Key Stakeholders are aware of the Coalitions activities
A Focus on Strategic vs. Tactical Action for Boards
Changing the Game The Logic Model
Presentation transcript:

Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!

Local Theory of Change  The process of creating a local TOC provides a chance for the agency to “think through” where they are going and what road they will take.  It makes connections among needs, population, outcomes and services.  What are the agency’s proposed outcomes? Are they consistent with the network outcomes?

Steps in Creating a Local TOC From draft NASCSP workbook to be used prior to the Strategic Planning process 4

Assumptions about poverty in our community: What does your agency assume about poverty in your community? (e.g. identify causes and conditions of poverty, how the conditions impact the people with low-income and the community at large)

Identified Needs Identifying the individual, family, community and agency needs Please state the top three to five needs identified in your community assessment and analysis process:  Identify if these are family, agency or community level needs. Enter “f,” “a,” or “c” in the column to the right.  Of the needs above, which are integral to your agency mission?  Are you already addressing these? (In the column to the right, indicate yes or no)  Of those needs that are integral to the agency mission, identify those that require community level strategies and/or partnerships to address.  Of those that are outside the immediate focus of your agency mission, are there things you can do to contribute to community wide or other effort to address them?

Identifying outcomes:  Identify your agency Overall Outcomes (These are the outcomes that are based on the community needs and resources, the agency’s priorities and the agency planning process. They may be achieved by multiple agency strategies, which you will be asked to identify below.)  Next identify the Program Outcomes (These may be identified by program funding source or by the specific focus of the individual program. You will be asked to state how these Program Outcomes contribute to the Overall Outcomes of the agency. Note: you may have “divisions” or “departments” or other ways that you organize your programs – if so you may have outcomes associated with a set of programs that are so grouped.)

Identifying customers:  There are two kinds of customers that most agencies serve: the Service Population (those who are served, but for which no outcomes are expected) and the Target Population (for which the organization holds itself accountable for the achievement of specified outcomes).  Who are your customers?  Do you document outcomes or count outputs?

Target Population or Service Population  Target population members are those that will achieve the outcomes the agency identified in its Theory of Change.  Service population members are those who receive emergency assistance or single or short term services for which little follow up is done, and little “change” in status is expected.

Service Population “Organizations generally find it almost impossible to serve target population members only. There are numerous reasons, including the presence of legacy programs; funder requirements; the need to maintain credibility and promote ease of access in local neighborhoods; and the desirability of having a broad base of support when engaging in advocacy. Examples of a Service Population—youth attending a drop-in center, school-based or community-based informative workshops, a job “fair” or other collection of resources for a given topic such as health, or senior citizen services, a soup kitchen or food distribution where no follow up will be done.” David Hunter “Working Hard and Working Well”

Identifying services and strategies:  List the services you provide or strategies in which your agency participates.  Connect the service to one or more of the outcomes you identified.  Of the customers you identified in the previous activity, indicate if they receive single or multiple services in the last column.

Service Outcome One Service -> One Outcome.

Service Outcome Multiple Services -> One Outcome.

Service Outcome One Service -> Multiple Outcomes

Service Outcome Multiple Services -> Multiple Outcomes.

Service Single Service.

Making Connections  The “thinking” that happens between the gathering and analysis of community assessment data (including agency data) and the creation of a new year’s agency wide strategic plan is the creation of the local agency Theory of Change. It is when you actually identify all the elements just mentioned, and can see how they all connect. 17

The network’s long term goals: Low-income people become more self- sufficient. Communities are revitalized or thriving. 19

The Six National Goals Goal 1. Low-income people become more self-sufficient. (Family) Goal 2. The conditions in which low-income people live are improved. (Community) Goal 3. Low-income people own a stake in their community. (Community) Goal 4. Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved. (Agency) Goal 5. Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results. (Agency) Goal 6. Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential by strengthening family and other supportive systems. (Family) 20

These are actually pre-conditions  The conditions in which low-income people live are improved producing a revitalized or thriving community.  Agencies increase their capacity to achieve results – and be better able to document and analyze the changes they have supported.  Low-income people own a stake in their community – to improve their own social capital and take action for community issues.  Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people are achieved – to achieve a specific purpose.  Low-income people, especially vulnerable populations, achieve their potential – to maintain or achieve stability. 21

How to Improve the National Performance Indicators  Make explicit the connections between the indicators and goals. Why do we think these indicate success in the Six National Goals?  Identify the numbers of individuals, families, communities that achieved the GOALs. Have they achieved multiple indicators?  Connect the services provided with the indicators reported Is it one service for one outcome? Many services for one outcome? Many outcomes from one service?  Clarify the population that is achieving the indicators Target population and service population Unduplicated count?  Identify the results of partnerships (don’t just count them).

Goal Four Partnerships as a means for both agency level goal and also as community level goal 23

Suggested revision to Goal Four statement: Partnerships among supporters and providers of services to low-income people achieve a specific purpose. Alternate suggestion:  Community Action works through partnerships and other collective community efforts to achieve results.

Purpose could be  To improve the agency functioning  Agency customers have access to other services,  Partners provide resources for agency activities  To improve community conditions  Agency participates in “Collective Impact” projects  joins with others to increase access in low income communities 25

Outcomes of partnerships?  Sharing service  Expanding services  Increasing access  Sharing information  Create Single record system  Improved outcomes  Reduce costs  Expand capacity of staff  Reduce paperwork  Reduce duplication of service  Reduce gaps  Tracking of referral systems (service received? Outcome achieved?)

Indicators  Current NPIs only ask for counts  Looking for support/ideas for collecting data on indicators (might be related to the outcomes just mentioned on the prior slide)

Family Level NPIs 28

Target Population and National Goals GOAL ONE: People with low incomes become more self- sufficient. GOAL THREE: People with low incomes who own a stake in their community increase social capital. GOAL SIX: People with low incomes, especially vulnerable populations, achieve stability. 29

Family Indicators for Target Population  Net family household income is increased.  Families reduce reliance on public benefits.  Families improve status in multiple life domains.  Children meet developmentally appropriate milestones.  Vulnerable populations achieve/maintain stability. 30

Community Level NPIs 31

Planning for Change “Real, lasting community change is built around knowing where you are, where you want to be, and whether your efforts are making a difference. Indicators are a necessary ingredient for sustainable change. And the process of selecting community indicators -- who chooses, how they choose, what they choose -- is as important as the data you select.” Central Massachusetts Regional Planning Commission, 2011, Data That Tells A Story

Community Indicators 33 Community Action addresses complex issues that relate to creating thriving communities. Community Action joins with stakeholders (partners) to improve conditions in low income communities. Communities are improved by people with low incomes having network connections, and these community networks help improve the social capital of people with low incomes.

Reporting Community Work  The agency can clearly articulate the purpose of each partnership and the expected changes that will be produced.  The agency can identify the number of partnerships that both support the agency’s activities (agency outcome) and support community change.  The agency can track its involvement in and value to community changes.  The agency records involvement of their customers (individuals with low-income) in community projects. 34

Suggested revision to goal statement GOAL TWO: Community Action joins with other community stakeholders to improve the conditions in which people with low incomes live. Should mention of thriving or revitalized community be included?

36

For more information 37