APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. One Way Delay Measurement in KOREN MPLS Networks Sok-Hyun Jung Broadband Telecommunication.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MPLS and GMPLS Li Yin CS294 presentation.
Advertisements

QoS Strategy in DiffServ aware MPLS environment Teerapat Sanguankotchakorn, D.Eng. Telecommunications Program, School of Advanced Technologies Asian Institute.
Object-Oriented Design and Implementation of Fault Management Function for MPLS network Sung-Jin Lim, Ryung-Min Kim, and Young-Tak Kim Advanced Networking.
APNOMS03 1 A Resilient Path Management for BGP/MPLS VPN Jong T. Park School of Electrical Eng. And Computer Science Kyungpook National University
Design and Implementation of Performance Management for the DiffServ-aware-MPLS Network Dong-Jin Shin, Young-Tak Kim Advanced Networking Technology Lab.(ANT.
Q5/13: Network Interworking Including, IP Multiservices Networks
Japan Telecom Information & Communication Labs
MPLS VPN.
MPLS: The Magic Behind the Myths Grenville Armitage (author) Scott Crosby (presenter)
Traffic Engineering over MPLS
Identifying MPLS Applications
Setting the MPLS EXP bits
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v Frame-Mode MPLS Implementation on Cisco IOS Platforms Troubleshooting Frame-Mode MPLS on Cisco.
1 Routing Protocols I. 2 Routing Recall: There are two parts to routing IP packets: 1. How to pass a packet from an input interface to the output interface.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v MPLS VPN Technology Introducing the MPLS VPN Routing Model.
Application of GMPLS technology to traffic engineering Shinya Tanaka, Hirokazu Ishimatsu, Takeshi Hashimoto, Shiro Ryu (1), and Shoichiro Asano (2) 1:
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—2-1 Label Assignment and Distribution Introducing Convergence in Frame-Mode MPLS.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—2-1 Label Assignment and Distribution Introducing Typical Label Distribution in Frame-Mode MPLS.
MPLS: The Magic Behind the Myths Grenville Armitage Lucent Technologies.
© 2001, Cisco Systems, Inc. Ethernet over Multiprotocol Label Switching.
Introducing MPLS Labels and Label Stacks
5: DataLink Layer5-1 Cerf & Kahn’s Internetwork Architecture What is virtualized? r two layers of addressing: internetwork and local network r new layer.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
MPLS Multiple Protocol Label Switching 2003/2/19.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
UCB MPLS An Overview Jean Walrand EECS. UCB Outline Objectives Label Switching LSP setup.
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
Building a Simple Network
Computer Networks ATM and MPLS Professor Hui Zhang
MPLS Evan Roggenkamp. Introduction Multiprotocol Label Switching High-performance Found in telecommunications networks Directs data from one network node.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
MPLS networking at PSP Co Multi-Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Hamid Sheikhghanbari 1.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
1 Fabio Mustacchio - IPS-MOME 2005 – Warsaw, March 15th 2005 Overview of RSVP-TE Network Simulator: Design and Implementation D.Adami, C.Callegari, S.Giordano,
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
M P L S. MPLS Overview MPLS or Multiprotocol label switching is a new network protocol that defined a mechanism for packet forwarding in network router.
Broadband Communication Lab. Asymmetric Path Detection in BGP Routing 29 January, 2004 Eun Mi, Park Korea Univ. Dept. of Electronics and Computer Engineering.
MPLS MultiProtocol Label Switching.
IP/MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
PRESENTED BY:- VIVEK SINGH THAKUR VIVEK MISHRA HEMANT GUPTA TARANMEET SINGH KAKKAR VIVEK GUPTA.
MultiProtocol Label Switching (MPLS) July 29, 2000TECON 2000 Pramoda Nallur Alcatel Internetworking Division.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) References: Juniper white papers on MPLS and DiffServ at: white_papers/
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS Introduction Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
Multi-protocol Label Switching Jiang Wu Computer Science Seminar 5400.
Multi-Protocol Label Switching University of Southern Queensland.
MPLS and Traffic Engineering Ji-Hoon Yun Computer Communications and Switching Systems Lab.
MPLS Forwarder Preliminary 1 Outline MPLS Overview MPLS Overview MPLS MRD MPLS Data Path HLD 48K MPLS Fwder HLD IPE MPLS Fwder HLD Issues Summary.
Lab MPLS Basic Configuration Last Update Copyright 2011 Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D. 1.
Case Study: ATM (+ MPLS)
CCUG Meeting MPLS/L3VPN LAB. wikipedia.org What is MPLS? MPLS is a highly scalable, protocol agnostic, data-carrying mechanism. In an MPLS network, data.
MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts. Outline Overview What Are the Foundations of Traditional IP Routing? Basic MPLS Features Benefits of MPLS.
An Application of VoIP and MPLS Advisor: Dr. Kevin Ryan
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING Brandon Wagner. Lecture Outline  Precursor to MPLS  MPLS Definitions  The Forwarding Process  MPLS VPN  MPLS Traffic.
June 4, 2003Carleton University & EIONGMPLS - 1 GMPLS Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching Vijay Mahendran Sumita Ponnuchamy Christy Gnanapragasam.
Section #7: Getting Data from Point A to Point B.
Broadband Communications 광대역통신연구실 APAN-KR Korea University Traffic Analysis with Cflowd Sungkwan Youm Korea Univ. Broadband Telecommunication Laboratory.
MULTI-PROTOCOL LABEL SWITCHING By: By: YASHWANT.V YASHWANT.V ROLL NO:20 ROLL NO:20.
Chabot College ELEC Managing Network Traffic by Design.
Multi-protocol Label Switching
Jia Uddin Embedded System Lab.  MPLS  IMANET  IMANET network model  Proposed model of IMANET with MPLS  Conclusion.
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Routing algorithms provide support for performance goals – Distributed and dynamic React to congestion Load balance.
MPLS Introduction Computer Networks 2007 Week 9 Lecture 1 by Donald Neal.
Advanced Computer Networks
Multiprotocol Label Switching
Requirements for LER Forwarding of IPv4 Option Packets
B-TECH PROJECT MID-SEM PRESENTATION 2011
3. Internetworking (part 1)
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Presentation transcript:

APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. One Way Delay Measurement in KOREN MPLS Networks Sok-Hyun Jung Broadband Telecommunication Lab. Dep. of Electronics Engineering, Korea University

2 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Experiment Description Objectives of Experiment To measure End-to-End One way Delay through various Transit networks such as Conventional IP and MPLS networks To evaluate MPLS performance Related project We had a grant of foundation of Korean National Computerization Agency Experiment organization Korea University (KU), Chonnam University (CHNU)

3 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Overall Experiment Environment One way delay measurement GPS satellites Transit Networks KU KU connects with CHNU through various transit networks Such as Conventional IP and KOREN MPLS networks In case of KOREN MPLS networks, LSP is set up between KU and CHNU KOREN MPLS network Conventional IP network Korea Univ. (KU) Chonna mUniv. (CHNU) Label Switched Path (LSP)

4 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. KOREN networks Korea Univ. (KU) Chonna mUniv. (CHNU) Constitutions of KOREN ATM switches added MPLS function LER & LSR Functions of KOREN Currently, provides only basic functions such as LSP setup using the LDP (Label Distribution Protocol) and so on. In the future, provides TE, VPN, QoS and so on.

5 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Transit Network 1 – Conventional IP network One way delay measurement Conventional IP network CHNU KU This network is compared with other transit networks such as Packet based MPLS and ATM based MPLS

6 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Transit Network 2 - Packet based MPLS CISCO 7204 Packet based MPLS network CHNU KU CISCO 7505 GSR Router Daejon GSR Router Seoul GSR Router Kwanju Swap Table XY YZ ZX MPLS runs over the Ethernet as link layer protocol LSP is set up between CHNU and KU Label Switched Path (LSP)

7 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Transit Network 3 - ATM based MPLS CHNU KU ATM based MPLS network CISCO 7204 CISCO 7505 (Nortel ) Seoul (Nortel ) Daejon (Nortel 15000) Kwangju (Fore ASX200BX) (RealCell) Allocating New VP Unlike Packet based MPLS, ATM based MPLS makes use of ATM as link layer protocol New VP is allocated from CHNU to KU and similar to LSP

8 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. How to measure ? 1. To Synchronize between two end systems using GPS 2. Host1 sends one way traffics to host2 through various Transit networks 3. Host2 receives traffics, and measures delay 4. To compare measured results for each Transit networks GPS satellites Transit Networks Host1 SenderReceiver AMS: Active Measurement System AMS CHNU KU Host2 AMS

9 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Result 1 : Conventional IP network Table1: One-way Delay Measurement for conventional IP at KU Table2: Ping test for conventional IP at KU One way delay is about 10 msec

10 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Result 2 : packet based MPLS Packet based MPLS network CHNUKU ATM Table3: One-way Delay measurement for packet based MPLS at KU Table4: Ping test for packet based MPLS at KU Host1Host2 CISCO Router (LER) CISCO Router (LSR) CISCO Router (LSR) CISCO Router (LER) One way delay is about 5 msec It is smaller than that of the conventional IP network

11 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Result 3 : ATM based MPLS ATM based MPLS network Host1Host2 CHNUKU ATM CISCO Router (LER) CISCO Router (LER) ATM Table5: One-way Delay Measurement for ATM based MPLS at KU Table6: ping test for ATM based MPLS at KU One way delay is about 3.6 msec It is smaller than that of the Packet based MPLS

12 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Conclusion Delay in ATM based MPLS is the smallest value ATM based MPLS can reduce one way delay, as compared the Packet based MPLS and Conventional IP network Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Conventional IP Packet based MPLS ATM based MPLS msec msec msec Types of Transit NetworksE2E One Way Delay Bad Good

13 APAN 2003 Meeting Broadband Communication Lab. Thank you for your attention !! Thank you for your attention !!