State Level Achievement Survey “A Study on learning levels of children in class III &VIII in Andhra Pradesh” During 2014-15.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Advertisements

October 7, 2013 Sarah Schumacher, Manager of Secondary Education COMMON CORE STANDARDS AND THE EDMONDS SCHOOL DISTRICT.
1 Alternative Language Services (ALS) November 10, 2008.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Irv Richardson Coordinator for Public Education and School Support NEA-NH Workshop for Candidates.
Identification, Assessment and Re-classification of English Learners Initial Identification  Complete within 30 school days of enrollment Administer Home.
Needs Analysis Instructor: Dr. Mavis Shang
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
English as a Second Language Parent Orientation Lackawanna City School District Martin Road Elementary School.
1.Study design  Cross sectional study. METHODOLOGY.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
GRAPHING CALCULATORS AND STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT BY RAED DANDAN.
From June 2011 to Dec Obejectives:  Present Status of Pre Primary Education  Teaching Methodology  Carry out the Data Collection from Government.
Universal Education Foundation. Methodology For Conducting The Voice of Children Survey By Chief Executive Officer Alpha International For Research Polling.
Welcome to 3rd Grade Mrs. Fitzgibbon. Background Information This is my 10 th year teaching at Hannum. I have taught 3 rd, 4 th, and 5 th grades. This.
National Seminar on “Addressing Equity Issues in Educat ion” Community Involvement Towards Greater Equity - Andhra Pradesh Experience Rajiv Vidya Mission.
ANNUAL STATUS OF EDUCATION REPORT ASER 2014: HARYANA.
A STUDY ON DIFFICULT ON MATHEMATICS SUBJECT AMONG THE STUDENTS OF ENGINEERING COLLEGE IN DINDIGUL DISTRICT Presented by G. UMA Assistant Professor Department.
8.Implications for Analysis: School Survey, Student Assessment, and Transcript Data.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015 EL SEGUNDO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT.
PROGRAMS AND SERVICES TO ELL Students District One Schools Special Services Department.
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students Elementary
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students School
Introduction: Philosophy:NaturalismDesign:Core designAssessment Policy:Formative + Summative Curriculum Studied:Oxford Curriculum, Text book board Peshawar,
Blue Springs Elementary School Standards Based Report Card Parent Meeting.
Hope is a waking dream. - Aristotle.
1 Rajiv Vidya Mission (SSA) Andhra Pradesh Welcomes the Participants 1 st National Workshop cum Review Meeting of Urban Planning on October 2008.
Centre for Development and Research Hyderabad Andhra Pradesh.
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
By Cao Hao Thi - Fredric W. Swierczek
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL BIOLOGY TEACHER’S PERCEPTION OF THEIR NEEDS IN KWARA STATE, NIGERIA. M.Ed. Research Proposal Seminar By MORADEYO, Ismaila (12/68ON007)
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Adams 12 GT Universal Screener Casting a wide net to find hidden talent.
An Overview of 5% Sample Post Enumeration Survey of DISE Data Anugula N. Reddy Assistant Professor
South Africa Presentation Dakar 2008, APEIE Jennifer Joshua Faith Kumalo Morongwa Masemula Justice Libago.
End-of –year Assessments MAP and DRA Testing Workshop for Parents
Darla Stynen. The subject matter I am teaching in my classroom, as prescribed by the school district.
Dear Parents and Guardians: Soon you will be receiving a Score Report from the California Assessment of Performance and Progress (CAASPP) that will provide.
Assessments used in teaching English as a foreign language at elementary schools in Asia: Cases from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan Yuko Goto Butler (University.
Assessment Procedures for Counselors and Helping Professionals, 7e © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. English Language Learners Assessing.
Assessment Driven Learning. Some Issues No state/central examinations upto grade 12 Children promoted to next grade irrespective of examination performance.
DEVELOPING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY LITERACY AMONG TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN PARAGUAY Hong Kong, January 2006 Aichi University of Education.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
AUTHOR: NADIRAN TANYELI PRESENTER: SAMANTHA INSTRUCTOR: KATE CHEN DATE: MARCH 10, 2010 The Efficiency of Online English Language Instruction on Students’
THE CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT TEST (CELDT) Poway Unified School District.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
© 2010 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium District Understandings of Academic Language.
Gretchen McAllister Hoda Harati Claudia R. Rodas Northern Arizona University Presentation at the Annual AACTE conference Las Vegas, 2016 Examining long.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
AWARDED to those who are in the field of special education 27 Students from the field of special education. Experienced in the field of special education.
The Results of Using Educational Games on Math Score for Preschool Children Pavinee Komanasin.
TRANSLATING RESEARCH INTO ACTION Randomized Evaluation Start-to-finish Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab povertyactionlab.org.
MORGAN HILL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Understanding CELDT scores.
Charlton Kings Junior School INFORMATION EVENING FOR YEAR 6 PARENTS.
RVM (SSA) Ranga Reddy,AP. “Quality Education for all”
TCAI: Lessons from first Endline TCAI Development Partners Feb 27, 2013.
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Charlton Kings Junior School
2nd International Conference of the Linguistic Association of Pakistan
Statutory Assessment at SPRINGFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL
MAHARAJA SAWAI MAN SINGH VIDYALAYA
Survey What? It's a way of asking group or community members what they see as the most important needs of that group or community is. The results of the.
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
English Learner Advisory Committee
KS2 SATS 2018.
Presentation transcript:

State Level Achievement Survey “A Study on learning levels of children in class III &VIII in Andhra Pradesh” During

 Assessment of children learning is indispensable in the School Education System.  It helps to assess the children achievement levels in the curricular areas, to explore areas for further academic inputs needed for better learning of the children.  Assessment of children at regular intervals entails tracking the changes visible in learners from time to time.

 To study the achievement levels in terms of prescribed academic standards in curricular subjects among the children of classes III & VIII in PS,UPS&HSs.  To study the effect of background variables such as Home, Teacher and School on the achievement levels.  To study the achievement levels with reference to medium of instruction; location of schools; school management; different social groups; gender;

 There is no significant difference in the achievement levels of the students across the districts in different subjects.  There is no effect of background variables such as Teacher, School and Home on the achievement level of students.  There is significant difference in the achievement levels of the students with regard to Gender, location, Management, Medium of Instruction and Social Groups (SC,ST, OBC and Minorites).

RESEARCH DESIGN & METHODOLOGY  The methodology employed in this study is of normative study using survey method.  Schools are selected in the district through Stratified Proportionate Random Sampling. (As it was done in the previous year )  No. of Districts considered for the Study: All 13 Districts  All Revenue divisions is selected from 13 Districts  Two are three mandals is selected from each Revenue Division  Further care is taken that the sample well representative of a wide range of students, belonging to different locations, school managements, Area (Rural,Urban &Tribal and social groups and schools enrolments.

From each Identified Mandal – Primary Schools : 1 – Upper Primary Schools : 1 – High School : 1 Total Sample of Schools in the State: - Primary Schools : 418 (68%) Class III - Upper Primary Schools : 126 (19%) Class III&VIII - High School : 78 (13%) - Urdu Schools from 5 districts : 25 (2- P.S, 2-UPS, 1- HS from each district :5) - Total Schools: On an average each district (40 to 60) Schools including PS,UPS&HS will be Selected Proportionately Stratified Random Sampling.

 The children’s sample is 25 will be selected from each selected class (Class III&VIII)  Minimum sample children in each class is not less than 10  If more than 25 students in the class, only 25 students will be selected randomly.  For Class III(PS&UPS): 8010, for Class VIII(upper primary section &HS; 2759, Total children’s are to be selected approximately. Curricular Subjects considered for the Study:  PS (Class III) & UPS(Classes III): Telugu, English, Maths and EVS  UPS & HS (Class VIII): Telugu, English, Maths, Science and Social studies

1.1. School Questionnaire a) School Infrastructure Facilities (Variables) School Enrolment Variables Teacher Perfection Variables 2 Teacher Questionnaire Teacher background Variables Teacher –TLM (Variables) Absenteeism 3.3. Student Questionnaire Student Background variables Student parent’s Educational Background Students Parent’s Occupational Background 4 Class III (Telugu, English, Maths &EVS Each Subject Two Test forms (Test Form-1 &Test Form-2) is to be selected) Each test form 40 items (20 Anchor items +20 new items) Total test items for class III in each subject: 60 (20 Anchor items and 40 New items are) Class VIII (Telugu, English, Maths, Science Social Each Subject Two Test forms (Test Form-1 &Test Form-2) is to be selected Each test form 50 items (30 Anchor items +20 new items) Total test items for class VIII in each subject: 70( 30 Anchor items and 40 New items)

 Pedagogy of SSA in coordination with SCERT is developed Subject wise Test items for Learning Assessment Tools of class III &VIII.  Test items developed based on the IRT (multiple test forms)  SCERT moderated Tools by the concerned subject Lecturers/ Professors  Urdu Co-ordinator is translated Tools into Urdu medium

 A Pilot study is conducted in Krishna district for 3 primary schools and 3 UPs and 3 HS. Around 120 children is tested in each class for class III&VIII.  Tools are standardized through pilot study, and doing necessary modifications by adopting Item Response Theory (IRT) or Classical Theory. And use of SPSS software.

After completion of the administering the tools the DPOs/AMOs will be collected the tools from all MEOs for scrutinized the Data. The testing tools are to be scrutinized and analyzed with the help of DIET faculty and DRPs at the District as per instruction given in the training. State level Data Entry Valuation of test items is to be done at the Krishna district through offline application

Orientation of field Functionaries S.N TrainingNo.of DaysParticipants 01State level One Day AMOs,Asst.AMOs, DRPs, one from DIET in each Dist. 02District level One Days MEOs, DIET Faculty Members, Concern school HMs,. DLMTs and Identified CRPs. 3Administering the test each class two days 30 th and 31 st Each class one CRP for class III&VIII in PS,UPS&HS

Academic Standard wise Children’s Achievement Class III

StandardsA+AB+BC Reading Writing Vocabulary & Grammar Listening and speaking (Oral) Overall Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: %; C : 40% and below. ( Oral 63.5%are NA)

StandardsA+AB+BC Reading Writing Vocabulary Grammar Listening and speaking (Oral) Overall Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: %; C : 40% and below.( Oral NA 63.0)

standardsA+AB+BC Problem solving Reasoning & proof Communica tion Connection Representati on Overall Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

Academic Standards A+AB+BC Conceptual Understanding Hypothesis and Experimental skills Drawing and Mapping skills values, Daily life application overall subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

StandardsA+AB+BC Telugu English Maths EVS Overall Class III Subject wise children secured grades in terms of % – Class- III –all subjects Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

Classes – VIII For the Year

standards A+AB+BC Fluent Reading and Understanding Vocabulary & Grammar Writing Over all Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

Standard wise Achievement levels in terms of Mean – Class –VIII- English

StandardsA+AB+BC Reading Comprehens ion Vocabulary Grammar Writing over all Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

Standard wise Achievement levels in terms of Mean – Class -VIII -Maths

Standard wise children secured grades in terms of % – Class –VIII- Maths Standards A+AB+BC Problem solving Reasoning & proof Communication Connection Representation Over all Subject Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

StandardsA+AB+BC Conceptual understanding Experiments – Projects Drawing and models Application in daily life and concern towards Bio- Diversity Over all Subjects Standard wise children secured grades in terms of % – Class- VIII - Science Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

Standard wise Achievement levels in terms of Mean – Class -VIII- Social

StandardsA+AB+BC Conceptual understanding Responding on Social /Current Issues Mapping Skills Application in daily life and concern towards Bio- Diversity Over all Subjects Standard wise children secured grades in terms of % – Class- VIII -Social Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

StandardsA+AB+BC Telugu English Maths Science Social Overall Class VIII Subject wise children secured grades in terms of % – Class- VIII –all subjects Grades: A+- Above 90%; A: 71-90%; B+: 51-70%; B: 41-50%; C : 40% and below.

THANK YOU