DIFFERENT FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL DIFFERENT FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PhD Research proposal Presentation
Advertisements

Political Culture and Political Socialization
SOCIAL CAPITAL THE AIMS OF THESE NOTES – Social capital: a controversial concept THREE KEY WORDS – Networks – Trust – Institutions.
Interest Groups Chapter 16.
Tekora L. Scruggs Ronda M. Bryant NC College Access Conference February 22, 2012.
Moving From Durkheim to Putnam Durkheim Putnam Preindustrial Industrial Mechanical Solidarity Organic Solidarity HomogeneousHeterogeneous CollectiveIndividualistic.

DIFFERENT FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL. 1 SOCIAL CAPITAL One of the most popular definitions of social capital refers to the set of «features of social life.
Social Capital,Civic Society & Democracy Making Democracies Work.
Differences in Culture Two themes: 1. International business success requires cross-cultural literacy 2. Culture affects the cost of doing business, both.
CLASS, SOCIAL CAPITAL AND COLLECTIVE ACTION IN EUROPE
Social networks: what makes them work? April 28, 2004 IS 208B.
Political Culture in Canada Douglas Brown Pols 220 / St Francis Xavier Fall term, 2008.
Division for Freedom of Expression, Democracy and Peace A presentation by Mogens Schmidt DADG for Communication & Information Sector.
OECD – The organisation for Economic cooperation and development Aims: supporting sustainable economic growth Boost employment Raise living standards Maintain.
NGO Management Lesson 3 NGO Strategy
Government investing in social capital: Some dilemmas in The Netherlands Tenth Anniversary Forum of the CIIF Hong Kong, 23 November 2012 Paul Dekker Tilburg.
Moving from the Margins: Women’s Activism and Social Capital The University of Alabama Women’s Resource Center Elle Shaaban-Magaña Sharmeka Lewis Jessi.
Weber’s ideal type of bureaucracy has all of the following features except? Hierarchical structure Task specialization Freedom of action Political neutrality.
People and Government. Principles of Government  Population, the most obvious essential feature of a state. ◦ State: a political community that occupies.
Health of Canadians 2017 Indicators for belonging and engagement Sandra Zagon.
Gábor Dániel Nagy Research fellow University of Szeged Brno,
Part Four: Citizens, Society & the State
Part Two: Sovereignty, Authority & Power
Introducing Government Chapter 1 Young People and Politics  Young people have a low sense of political efficacy—the belief that political participation.
Introducing Government in America. The Scope of Government Fundamental Question: Is the government responsible for ensuring important societal goals (such.
IDARI Dissemination Event 1 Social Capital and Leadership: Rural Cooperation in Central and Eastern Europe Annette Hurrelmann, Catherine Murray and Volker.
1 General Social Survey (GSS) Cycle Content 1 st series2 nd 3 rd Health1985 (1)1991 (6) Time Use1986 (2)1992 (7)1998 (12) Victimization 1988 (3)1993.
Culture & Political Culture Culture = society’s broad sense of shared values, beliefs, norms, and orientations toward the world Political Culture = (more.
Dr. Afxendiou A.P. Comparative Government and Politics Sachem Norht High School CITIZENS, SOCIETY AND THE STATE.
Areas of Study in Sociology. Family Primary function is to reproduce society, either biologically, socially, or both. Primary function is to reproduce.
Civil Society in Greece: Traditionally Weak, Abruptly Powerful ? Asteris Huliaras Professor Department of Political Science and International Relations.
Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America Robert Putnam PS: Political Science and Politics 1995.
International Co-operative Alliance1 ICA AMERICAS REGIONAL CONFERENCE Costa Rica, July 2008 Convenience and Scope of Social Responsibility as Public Policy.
Analyzing Community-Based Services & Social Capital General Approaches.
Chapter 1 The Comparative Study of Politics Comparative Politics: Structures and Choices 2e By Lowell Barrington.
Unless otherwise noted, the content of this course material is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – Non-commercial – Share Alike 3.0 License.
How can lifelong learning contribute to poverty reduction? Dr. Jittie Brandsma Brandsma Training & Learning Research, the Netherlands.
Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America Robert Putnam PS: Political Science and Politics 1995.
University of Limerick Ollscoil Luimnigh 25 th September 2007Eileen Humphreys, HSyRC, Dept. Sociology, UL Social capital and community: Findings and conclusions.
Dr Veronique Siegler and Rachel O’Brien
Building Resilience– How can a village rise a child ? Ted Smeaton.
Public Opinion and Democracy A key goal of the Framers was to give people an active voice in government. Another goal of the Framers was to protect government.
Chapter 15 Political Culture Lecturer: Tong Dezhi Tianjin Normal University College of Politics and Public Administration.
Final Report Group A. Contents 1. Welfare regimes and poverty dynamics 2. Children’s well – being 3. Connection between poverty and health 4. Immigration.
Resources for (successful) active citizenship The starting points The successfulness of citizens’ activities depends on individual, i.e. personal, capacities,
Social Capital & Sustainable Development
Forms of participation Social Capital and Patron-client relations: What difference do they make?
DEMOCRATIC BELIEFS AND VALUES
Economic, social, human, cultural.
Participation (continued). What is social capital? The norms and trust that develop from interpersonal social relationships A byproduct of other activities,
Major Types of Government All governments belong to one of four major groups.
Family Ties and Underground Economy Mauro Marè Antonello Motroni Francesco Porcelli 69 th Congress of The International Institute of Public Finance Taormina.
Building Community-Based Services & Social Capital.
Ch : 9 Interest Groups. ANSWER: C 1. What is the main purpose of a political action committee?  A: education interest groups  B: writing and passing.
 Unit III Socratic Seminar. Democracy in America.
Citizen engagement to build community resilience to disasters Dr Judith Burnside-Lawry
Dr Anita Frayman Monash University 13 June
Chapter 23: Building Community
1.
How does civil society contribute to democracy
How does civil society contribute to democracy
Chinese Social Organizations
Political Participation -- II
Robert Putnam PS: Political Science and Politics 1995
Nonprofits Rolling Together Conference August 23rd, 2018
Towards a Social Economy Programme for Africa
Comparative Analysis of Democratization prof. Fulvio Venturino
Norwegian Civil Society Sector and the Active Citizens Fund
Community Mobilization: Garnering public support for your housing plan
Presentation transcript:

DIFFERENT FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL DIFFERENT FORMS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL

1 Pierre Bourdieu 1986 The Forms of Capital Economic Capital Cultural Capital Social Capital The Relations?

2 Putnam 1995 SOCIAL CAPITAL One of the most popular definitions of social capital refers to the set of “features of social life - networks, norms, and trust - that enable participants to act together more effectively to pursue shared objectives”(Putnam, 1995) Cases: networks norms trust

3 Four T ypes of Social C apital 1.Bonding social capital 结合型社会 资本 strong ties 2.Bridging social capital 桥接型社会 资本 weak ties 3.Linking social capital 连结型社会 资本 4.Corporate social capital 社团型社 会资本

4 BONDING SOCIAL CAPITAL The term “bonding” (Putnam 1993) holds a negative connotation and generally refers to small circles of homogeneous people that do not cooperate with others outside the boundaries of the group. Ex: Banfield (1958) partly attributed the backwardness of Southern Italy to the inability of citizens “to act together for their common good or, indeed, for any end transcending the immediate, material interest of the nuclear family” Max Weber, the Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Family business contributes to economic development in East Asia.

5 BRIDGING SOCIAL CAPITAL Bridging social capital (Putnam 1993) is given by horizontal ties shaping heterogeneous groups of people with different backgrounds. The term bridging refers to the ability of such networks to create “bridges” connecting sectors of society that, otherwise, would have never come into contact. The common claim is that such relationships have positive effects on the diffusion of information and trust, thus fostering transactions and economic growth. Mark Grannovette: Weak ties are more useful for job searches. Ex: Alumni Association

6 Question 1 Through some cases to show the bonding and bridging social capital in your life. How do they work?

7 LINKING SOCIAL CAPITAL The term linking social capital (Knack and Keefer,1997) describes ties connecting individuals, or the groups they belong to, to people or groups in position of political or financial power. For example, civil society organizations allow citizens to come into contact with the institutions to carry out advocacy activities through collective action. This kind of networks is critical for leveraging resources, ideas and information beyond normal community linkages and, therefore, may play a significant role for social well-being. Ex: Environmentalists protect environment through collective action. mass disturbances

8 Collective action for protecting environment Making decision without civic participation and supervision——project implementation——public protest——project canceling April, 2012 , Tiangjin PC project July, 2012, Qidong, Jiangsu Oct. 16 th till 28 th, 2012, Ningbo, Zhejiang PX project by Sinopec

9

10 CORPORATE SOCIAL CAPITAL Professional associations, labour unions and political parties that pursue the special interests of their members organizations can behave pro-socially as well as anti- socially Ex: Democratic Parties (Revolutionary Committee of the Kuomintang) 18 th congress CPC represents common people’s interests, no special interests Falun Gong for its special interests

11 Question 2 Analyzing these 4 types of social capital through cases, and discuss their advantages and disadvantages.

12 References Banfield, E.G. (1958). The Moral Basis of a Backward Society. New York: Free Press. Olson, M. (1965), The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1997), Does Social Capital Have An Economic Payoff? A Cross Country Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112/4, Putnam, R.D. (1995), Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital, Journal of Democracy, VI: Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R. and Nanetti, R.Y. (1993), Making Democracy Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sabatini, F. (2008b), Social Capital and the Quality of Economic Development. Kyklos, Vol. 61, No. 3,