LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines1 Ballooning Unit, Lecture 4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Engineering Graphics IV
Advertisements

Engineering Design GE121 Isometric and Orthographic Sketching
Solidworks Lesson 6 - Assembly & Part Drawings
Chapter 12 Working Drawing
Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
UP, UP, AND AWAY! CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW Ty Bailey, Soo Park, Cameron Coupe, Trevor Arrasmith, Carolyn Mason, Sam Frakes, Brandon Harris, Peter VanderKley.
Good Morning 5/5/2015 Due today: The Chapter 10 Packet and the Liquid Nitrogen Worksheet. I’ll be coming around to check your packet with the clip board.
Technological Systems Unit 1 ~ How They Work Lesson 1 ~ Exploring Technological Systems Technical Sketching.
MP Prototype 2 1IWF-EXP/ÖAW GRAZ  Smaller Size  Outcome of the test results with MP-P1 was the need for a reduced cross section  Rectangular Shaped.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Chapter 20 Working Drawings
SDC PUBLICATIONS © 2011 Chapter 11 Assembly Drawings and Blocks Learning Objectives:  Create an Assembly Drawing from Part files.  Using AutoCAD with.
TEAM kkkkk Conceptual Design Review Saad Alqahtani, Charles MacCraiger, Alexa Warly, Connor Jacobson, Kyle Skjerven, Matt Busby 09/19/11 Fall 2011 Rev.
Orthogonal Projection and Multiview Representation
1 Student Hands On Training I (2009) Construction, Integration, and Test Construction, Integration, and Test.
Colorado Space Grant Consortium Foam Core Class #05 Foam Core Class #05.
Working Drawings Chapter 12.
Design Review Corinne Desroches Saad Alqahtani Charles MacCraiger Alexa Warly Connor Jacobson Kyle Skjerven Matt Busby.
Space Debris Launch Readiness Review Seanna Renworth, Emily Logan, Corey Godwin, Sean Murphy, Cole Bostrom, Jonathan Kirchmaier November 11 th, 2008.
QA during Stave Core Assembly Stephanie Qing Yang (Oxford) 25 th Sept 2014 WP4 f2f meeting at RAL.
LSU 10/09/2007Drawing a System Diagram1 How to draw a system diagram Project Management Unit #2a.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
4 Unit Title Blocks and Notes. 4 Unit Title Blocks and Notes.
CHAPTER 16 Engineering Drawings and Symbols
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
PHAT-TACO Experiment Pressure Humidity And Temperature Tests And Camera Observations Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring.
LSU 06/23/04COSPAR 2004, HASP Presentation1 The High Altitude Student Platform (HASP) for Student-Built Payloads T.G. Guzik and J.P. Wefel Dept. of Physics.
TECH 104 – Technical Graphics Communication
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
SPANDEX FRR. Mission Goal We aim to measure solar panel efficiency as a function of altitude. We would like to determine if the lower temperature and.
1 Technical Communications. 2 Objectives Understanding graphics as a communication tool Technical sketching Projections –Orthographic –Pictorial Sketching.
Dr. Catherine Turner Assembly drawings.
ENTC 1110 OBLIQUE PICTORIALS.
Parachute Design Unit. Design a parachute that will safely deliver its cargo to the ground according to the following constraints: * The parachute must.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
PHAT-TACO Experiment On board ACES-23 Hannah Gardiner, Bill Freeman, Randy Dupuis, Corey Myers, Andrea Spring Science Presentation Team Philosohook.
1 SheetCourse: Engineering Graphics 1504Memorial University of Newfoundland Engineering Graphics 1504 Lecture 2 – Orthographic Sketches Objectives l Recap.
Working Drawings (Production Drawings)
Team Magnaritaville Conceptual Design Review Zachary Cuseo, Andrew Fruge, Shweta Maurya, Sydni Smith, Christopher Nie, Tyler Knappe 9/22/09 Fall 2009 Rev.
DRAFTING REVIEW ELEMENTS OF A DRAWING TYPES OF VIEWS PART DRAWINGS
Documentation.
1 MEMB113: ENGINEERING GRAPHICS & CAE 13 ASSEMBLY AND DETAIL DRAWING.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Cloudland Instruments Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot Compiled April 8th, 2016.
Extracting Information
LSU v09/08/05SBC Overview1 Introduction to the LA ACES Student Ballooning Course A summary of the motivation, contents and status of the materials available.
ADVANCED MECHANICAL DRAFTING
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Orthographic Writing.
Documentation.
Architectural Drafting
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
Lecture 16 SolidWorks Toolbox; Drawings
Building a Nightstand Woods 1 Final Project Step #1
Working Drawings (Production Drawings)
Dimensioning & Projections
Orthographic Projection
Detail Drawings and Assembly Drawings
Engineering Drawings ME 161
Technical Drafting –p401 Before a technical object can be manufactured, its shape and dimensions must be determined. A technical drawing must be created.
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
How to draw a system diagram
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
Working Drawings Chapter 12.
ORTHOGRAPHIC PROJECTION
Working Drawings (Production Drawings)
Project Management Unit #2
What We Do Hillphoenix, a leading industry innovator has dedicated the necessary resources to develop a new Walk-Ins Division. The result, Hillphoenix.
Presentation transcript:

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines1 Ballooning Unit, Lecture 4

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines2 Mechanical Design Topics How to produce mechanical drawings What mechanical interfaces do you need to specify How do material choices affect your payload What are the steps for producing a sound mechanical design What should your testing procedure be Handy, pocket size reference book is “Pocket Ref” by Thomas J. Glover available at ACE Hardware stores.“Pocket Ref” by Thomas J. Glover

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines3 Reasons for Producing Drawings Aide to configuration planning –Help determine what components are needed –Determine how components will go together –Check that dimensions & locations are consistent Specify what is to be built –Proper drawings are needed by shop personnel –Communicate with management & reviewers Document what has been built –Track changes in the configuration –Provide record of experiment configuration

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines4 Sample Drawing

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines5 Basic Views in a Drawing Most drawings provide Top, Front and Side views What the component would look like if viewed from that direction Views arranged usually as if object were unfolded Sometimes an isometric (3D) view is provided

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines6 Drawing Label The label provides all of the information necessary to interpret the drawing and track revisions Included in the label should be a drawing number, title, author, date, revision number, sheet number, scale, units, tolerance, material and a description of any other relevant information

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines7 Representing Hidden Surfaces Surfaces that can be seen in a particular view are indicated by a solid line Surfaces that are “hidden” are indicated by a dashed line Through holes are solid circles face on and dashed for side view Threaded holes have perpendicular dashing to indicate screw threads

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines8 Putting Dimensions on the Drawing All surfaces, holes & cuts should be dimensioned to specify location, width, length & depth Consistent with units and tolerance specified in label Reference to common surface or point Holes are specified with a radius for clearance Threaded holes are specified with a screw size & depth Callout boxes provide addition information

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines9 Mechanical Interfaces There are multiple interfaces that you will need to identify, specify and control Component to component interfaces –Where and how does each part of your experiment contact another part? –Electrical connectors, motors, actuators, hinges Component to payload structure interfaces –Where and how do you secure your experiment components within the payload box? Payload to balloon vehicle interface –Interface already specified in Lecture 2 –How will you implement this interface? Your documentation should list all your interfaces and specify how they will be implemented and controlled

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines10 Material Considerations When you choose materials for your payload you need to consider how they will affect your payload How will a material affect your sensors? –Iron / steel will distort the readings of a magnetic sensor –Will your observation port window transmit the desired frequencies? –Will the material outgas and affect the sensor readings? How will a material be affected by the environment? –The intense cold can embrittle many plastics and glues –Non-rigid, closed cell foam will expand dramatically in vacuum How much does a material weigh? Is there a lighter material that will do the same job? When in doubt obtain a material sample and test it.

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines11 Weight Budget Early on in your project establish a weight budget List of ALL payload parts, their weight, a weight uncertainty, the weight total and the uncertainty in this total Weights can be estimated, calculated or measured –Large uncertainty for estimated, smaller uncertainty for measured Initially keep a contingency of ~20% to cover missing items and weight uncertainty –The more complete (number of items, measurements instead of estimates) your weight budget is, the lower the contingency needed As your design matures your weight budget should include more details, more measured components, lower uncertainty and lower contingency

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines12 Payload Design Questions 1 Component Layout: –How many components does your experiment have? –Where do these components need to be located? Component Access: –What components need to be frequently accessed (e.g. on/off switch)? –What components need to be infrequently accessed (e.g. configuration DIP switches)? –If a component needs to be replaced how will this be done? Component Mounting: –Are there any critical alignment issues with sensors? –How will components be secured to not come loose during flight?

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines13 Payload Design Questions 2 Payload Integration: –In what order are components assembled to produce the completed payload? Thermal Control: –What payload surface treatments are necessary to control thermal properties? –How much insulation of what type located where is necessary to protect critical components? –Are any heaters needed? Strength: –How will you determine that your structure is strong enough to survive the balloon flight without falling apart?

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines14 Develop a Testing Plan Many design issues can be quantified by testing under controlled conditions Such a Test Plan needs to address the following issues: –What components or systems need to be tested? –What test data needs to be collected? –What tests need to be performed? –What is the test procedure? –How will the data be recorded, analyzed and documented? Need to assure payload will survive the flight environment –Thermal testing for the extremes of hot and cold –Vacuum testing for the low pressure at high altitude –Shock testing for when balloon bursts and payload lands

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines15 Major Tests Develop prototypes or mock-ups –Test component layout and mounting –Develop specifications for mechanical interfaces –Thermal, vacuum and shock testing for strength Thermal testing using dry ice –Tropopause temperature get down to ~-60 o C and dry ice surface temperature is –78.5 o C –Test glues and other materials for embrittlement –Test thermal insulation properties A small vacuum bell jar can simulate the pressure environment –Material outgassing, expansion, high voltage corona / arcing, etc. Major shock is on landing –Nominal decent rate is 20 fps, so drop test article about 10 feet

LSU 05/13/2004Mechanical Design Guidelines16 References “Pocket Ref” by Thomas J. Glover, 3 rd Edition, 2003, Sequoia Publishing, Inc. P.O. Box , Dept. 101, Littleton, CO , also available in ACE hardware stores“Pocket Ref” by Thomas J. Glover