Policy Academy-Action Network Initiative: Overview of State Proposal and Goals April 17, 2015 Tom Andriola: Chief of Policy and Implementation, DCJS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of State Health Services (DSHS) House Human Services Committee August 8, 2006.
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Reclaiming Futures as part of the OJJDP required Three-Year State Plan A Presentation to State SAGs Tom Begich.
A Plan for Improving the Behavioral Health of New Hampshire’s Children TRANSFORMING CHILDREN’S BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE Regional Presentations April-May.
Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
JUVENILE JUSTICE TREATMENT CONTINUUM Joining with Youth and Families in Equality, Respect, and Belief in the Potential to Change.
Eliminating Disparities In Children’s Mental Health: Improving Access in Rural Nebraska Beth Baxter, M..S. Regional Administrator Region 3 Behavioral Health.
Center for Innovative the Begun Center for Violence Prevention Research and Education 1.
Criminal Justice, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Reinvestment Grant
Youth Mental Health April 9, Overview History Current Youth Mental Health Resources – Wraparound Orange Youth Mental Health Proposal Action item.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
An Introduction to Project NO REST February 11, 2015
State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.
Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide coordinated community-based services and supports to families of youth with complex emotional, behavioral.
ANGELA BELL, ESQUIRE RJIP TASK FORCE FACILITATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY CONTACT COORDINATOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY DISPROPORTIONATE MINORITY.
SAFE SCHOOLS. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION DECK  This slide deck has been created by the U.S. Department of Education as a resource tool for the public.
National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. BACKGROUND New category of funding in the FY13 Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Official title is “Category 3:
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
SHARE: Safe Healthy Attitudes Require Education Investing in Our Children Today for Our Community Tomorrow Presented to: SHARE Advisory Committee October.
State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota Youth that Crossover between Child Welfare & Juvenile Justice.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
1 Worcester Public Schools A Collaborative-Proactive Approach to provide a Safe Teaching and Learning Environment.
“Wraparound Orange”- Addressing the Children’s Mental Health System of Care December 1, 2009.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
The Role of Community Resource Mapping in the Mental Health and Schools Together-NH Initiative New Hampshire Center for Effective Behavioral Interventions.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
Reflecting on 20 Years of Advocacy. The Parent Support Network Is Formed In 1989, both the federal and state government put their money on the table and.
Improving Outcomes for Minnesota’s Crossover Youth Implementation of the CYPM April 18, 2012.
Onondaga County DMC Final Report December 13, 2011 Center for Community Alternatives Emily NaPier Juanita Gamble Co-Coordinators.
Bay Area Consortium RBS Stakeholders Communication Plan.
Front End Juvenile Justice System Reform Population of Focus Offenders ages 7 through 15 who come into contact with the juvenile justice system through.
Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services Joe Vesowate Assistant Commissioner.
1 Joyce James, LMSW-AP Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner Overview of the Texas Model for Eliminating Disproportionality and Disparities Center for.
Criminal Justice, Mental Health Substance Abuse & Reinvestment Act Charlotte County Implementation Grant Presented by: Charlotte County.
Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.
Population Parameters  Youth in Contact with the Juvenile Justice System About 2.1 million youth under 18 were arrested in 2008 Over 600,000 youth a year.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Changing the Status Quo for Status Offenders: New York State’s Efforts to Help Troubled Teens Michael Lens, Vera Institute of Justice Annie Salsich, Vera.
Maine DHHS: Putting Children First
Alaska’s Behavioral Health System Presentation to the Idaho Behavioral Health Transformation Workgroup March 24 th 2010 Bill Hogan Commissioner Commissioner.
Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Quarterly Meeting – October 21, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
Background Wraparound Milwaukee was created in 1994 to provide a coordinated and comprehensive array of community-based services and supports to families.
Innovation in Monroe County Jody Levison-Johnson Director Child & Family Service Quality & System Development Coordinated Care Services, Inc. Technical.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 30 – October 1, 2014 Twin Falls,
1 Sandy Keenan TA Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health(SOC) National Center for Mental Health Promotion and Youth Violence Prevention(SSHS/PL)
Skills for Success Program Savenia Falquist Youth Development Coordinator Jefferson County Juvenile Officer July 14, 2005.
Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &
Criminal Justice, Mental Health Substance Abuse & Reinvestment Act Charlotte County Planning Grant Presented by: Pamela Baker, MA Grant Management Analyst/Behavioral.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives September 22 – 23, 2014 Idaho Falls, Idaho.
State Of Idaho Juvenile Justice Commission District Strategic Plan Strategic Areas, Goals, and Objectives October 23-24, 2014 Pocatello, Idaho.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
New Hampshire Mental Health TA Project IDEA Partnership National Community of Practice on Collaborative School Behavioral Health Share Fair Presentation.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Behavioral Health Initiatives $17,000,000 seems like a large amount, however due to a lack of Medicaid funding, this money will be spent quickly. In order.
Full community collaboration in support of system- involved youth
Care Coordination for Children, Young Adults, and Their Families
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
School Justice Partnership Project
AspireMN Member Meeting
NAMI California Conference Presentation on June 1, 2018 Monterey, CA
Senate Health and Human Services Committee
Presentation transcript:

Policy Academy-Action Network Initiative: Overview of State Proposal and Goals April 17, 2015 Tom Andriola: Chief of Policy and Implementation, DCJS

Framing the Project April 17,

3 Background and Decision Point New York State has undertaken significant juvenile justice reform efforts in the past few years Engaging schools has been challenging, but we have been moving in the right direction We have also taken on some projects designed to help justice involved youth who have behavioral health needs Bridging these efforts and a desire to build upon them led our team to choose school-based diversion for our decision point

April 17, Core Team Members State Tom Andriola*Division of Criminal Justice Services Jack CarterJuvenile Justice Advisory Group Meredith Ray-LaBattOffice of Mental Health Steve HansonOffice of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services Local Joe ManciniSchenectady County Probation Larry SpringSchenectady City School District Darin SamahaSchenectady County Office of Community Services Dekida HamlerSchenectady City Mission *Core Team Leader

April 17, Home Team Additional Representative Organizations DCJS, Office of Justice Research and Performance DCJS, Office of Probation and Correctional Alternatives DCJS, Office of Public Safety State Education Department Office of Children and Family Services Office of Court Administration Families Together in New York State Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children Schenectady City Police Department Schenectady County Department of Family Assistance Schenectady County Family Court

New York State Juvenile Justice System Overview April 17,

7 New York State Juvenile Justice System

New York State Behavioral Health System and Juvenile Justice April 17,

9 Behavioral Health in the Juvenile Justice Context Research across the country has shown that juvenile justice involved youth experience high rates of mental health disorders In New York, between 50 and 60 percent of delinquent youth admitted to state custody present a mental health need at intake Additionally, between 54 and 63 percent present a substance abuse need at intake

Collaboration with the Schenectady City School District April 17,

April 17, Schenectady City School District Referral Process Several steps are taken before filing a PINS petition: 1.Collaborative Action Team (CAT) meets monthly to review individual students’ behavioral issues and possible solutions 2.The youth and the youth’s family is contacted for pre-PINS diversion so they can be referred to community based agencies 3.PINS application is sent to the Center for Juvenile Justice, which schedules a Preliminary Intake Review Committee (PIRC) meeting 4.If there are suspected substance abuse or mental health issues, a MAYSI screening will be done and a specific referral may be made 5.If all diversion efforts are exhausted and the behavior does not improve, further PINS processing may be used as a last resort

April 17, Schenectady City School-Based Incidents School Year (VADIR data) Violent IncidentsNon-Violent Incidents 1043,974 Schenectady City School District Totals Violent IncidentsNon-Violent Incidents Schenectady High School Violent IncidentsNon-Violent Incidents 331,847 Mont Pleasant Middle School

April 17, Schenectady City School District – School Based Incidents School Year (VADIR data) Sex Offenses RobberyAssault Reckless Endangerment Minor Altercations Harassment, Bullying, etc. Criminal Mischief Larceny/Theft Bomb Threat False Alarm Riot Weapon Possession Drug/Alcohol Possession Other Disruptive Incidents ,766 Schenectady City School District

Current Efforts April 17,

April 17, Current Efforts: School Based Partnered with the Permanent Judicial Commission on Justice for Children Statewide summit Six regional summits Intensive school arrest diversion and school climate workshops Upcoming restorative justice workshop Involvement in NYS Safe Schools Task Force JJAG focus on school justice issues

April 17, Current Efforts: Behavioral Health Needs Monroe County diversion project to match evidence-based treatment services to the probation intake population Award received from the BJA Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Grant Program to support expansion to Schenectady, Onondaga and Westchester counties Three counties (Madison, Ontario and Ulster) were also awarded funds for innovative diversion strategies that include implementation of behavioral health assessments at probation intake and provide an array of restorative interventions

Diversion Goals April 17,

April 17, Broad Objectives Divert non-violent youth with behavioral health needs and co-occurring disorders from juvenile justice system court involvement Identify, assess, and service youth with behavioral health needs prior to justice-system involvement Create a robust diversion program for non-violent youth with behavioral health needs Expand the capacity for evidence-based mental health services Reduce disproportionate minority contact Scale this model across the state to other counties

April 17, Goal 1: Identify youth with behavioral health needs at the front-end within the school system Implement a school-based identification strategy guided by best practices to identify youth with potential behavioral health needs Flag youth before a PINS or JD referral becomes necessary

April 17, Goal 2: Assess youth by expanding the use of MAYSI assessments for all probation intakes and other identified youth as appropriate through diversion protocols developed with the school system The expanded use of the MAYSI will enable an effective evaluation and treatment of youth with behavioral health needs This initiative will be helpful in helping us to foster enhanced cross- system coordination protocols

April 17, Goal 3: Divert school-based incidents to a newly developed system of care Use MAYSI assessments to guide diversion efforts Provide appropriate services for youth with behavioral health needs, which may include the use of evidence-based treatment services Develop MOU’s with service provider to ensure that youth are engaged in appropriate services in a timely manner

April 17, Goal 4: Expand capacity for services for youth Outline currently available/utilized services for youth with behavioral health needs Identify where gaps in services exist and incorporate evidence-based services focused on treating behavioral health needs to fill gaps Expand System of Care to include wraparound services In-home therapy Respite care Parent-to-parent support Mentoring In-home crisis intervention Ensure System of Care is appropriately structured, applied with fidelity and rooted in best practices

April 17, Goal 5: Reduce racial and ethnic disparities that may be found in school-based referrals and arrests Analyze available data to identify disproportionate minority contact within the school disciplinary system, probation, and other points in the system Target specific areas/youth for MAYSI administration and early diversion Employ robust racial and ethnic disparity trainings for school personnel focused on needs areas Apply assessment tools with fidelity

April 17, Goal 6: Measure outcomes Perform systematic evaluations of individual sites Ensure efforts are effective Monitor program fidelity Evaluate project performance Coordinate with technical assistance services provided by the initiative to determine outcome metrics

April 17, Goal 7: Expand efforts statewide Use Schenectady as the example Develop a strategy for scaling up the effort with the cooperation of state agencies, counties and school districts across New York State